{"id":252221,"date":"2009-09-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-12T21:34:36","modified_gmt":"2015-05-12T16:04:36","slug":"the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOI?i3\"\u00bbR.\n\nDATED THIS THE 7\"' DAY 01\u00bb? SEPTEMBER 2039.'   ' \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE s. 433%\/'YrL::,Nf1&gt;ZEE1j? \"   'V  R: J T\n\nREGULAR FIRST APREALAz0.1093\/2307 (R135;  1  u\n\nBetween:\n\n(O&amp;MI)ivis4i:3t1)_, V _ _   .\nKarnaiaka PoW?\u00a7.7I\"ran\u00e9c\u00ab.mi\u00e9?Si6n 4'   \nCorporatioxzLirfxi_t.e':\u00a3,\"    ~\nMandya 9-\".VS7-:'1R4'01.  '  4,  V'\n\n2 The':Chai1'mah';    ..\nKPTCL, Cauvery'  ~ \u00ab. \nKempego\u00e9wda Ribadj. \" _ \nBangalore'? 5V60.0\u00a3)9.\". \"\n\n   Secretary, ...... ..\n\n' . VKPTCL.,Cai'1\u00abvery Bhavan,\n'   _Kem1\u00a7cgowuda.R.oad,\n2 Bangai015e..~Y\u00a760 009.  Appellants.\n\n * 'R  Sri B. Rl\ufb01ragowda, Adv.)\n\n\n\n,1 UDGMEN T\n\nThough this appeal is posted for admission, by consent_:_of'  \n\nthe learned Counsel for the parties, it is taken up for. .fin_'avI_vhea:rin_g, i\n\nheard and disposed of by this judgment. 1\n\n2. The first respondent is theiiiiiplsailltiff. The A_appieIIants are<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">defendant Nos.l to 3 and second &#8220;defendant No.4 in<br \/>\nthe suit. For the sake of convenience,itheipairties&#8217;are &#8216;referred to by<br \/>\ntheir respective  before the&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">3. :&#8217;7i_&#8217;he._ piaintiff-.. aforesaid suit for award of<\/p>\n<p>compensation &#8220;on accountiof deiath of her son Boregowda. It is the<\/p>\n<p>_ case of the p1.aintiff.&#8217;that: her son Boregowda was doing agriculture.<\/p>\n<p>i7.It :1&#8217;s*fty1i&#8217;ther contended that the joint family of Boregowda was<\/p>\n<p>owi;jng9.__s1 &#8216;iin&#8217;iii9y.No.79\/2, 8 guntas in Sy.No.79\/4 and 33<\/p>\n<p>V V guntas in Siy&#8217;-..:I\\.Io;7i9\/11 situated at S.I.Kodiha11i. The said lands are<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;i.&#8217;AuadJiace;1t4_to the lands of one Bullaiah. Buiiaiah had raised paddy<\/p>\n<p> lands and the Boregowda had raised sugarcane crop in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">5<\/span><br \/>\nE<br \/>\n233%<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The suit of the plaintiff is hereby decreed with&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>COSIS.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">The plaintiff is entitled for a Mcornpen_=satioii\u00abiiof <\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,91,000\/&#8211;. Out of which, the plaintiffisentitledpfor\u00e9i &#8211;  f<\/p>\n<p>half share along with 4&#8243;&#8216; defendant. i4&#8217;l&#8217;he&#8221;de.fenda1i.;ts:l \u00b0<\/p>\n<p>to 3 are jointly and several.ly._liable&#8221; to<br \/>\ncompensation amount within <\/p>\n<p>the amount will carry iateiest 4?)  date of<\/p>\n<p>realisation.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">5. Sri Rudr&#8217;a.go&#8217;5y_d_a,  Cioainsel appearing for the<br \/>\nappellants w&#8217;oucldihatVth&#8217;e appelian\u00e9ts do not dispute the<br \/>\ncause for thvegacicyident  vtothe death of Boregowda and their<\/p>\n<p>liability to pay the compcnsatioirl His only submission is that the<\/p>\n<p>:.\u00ab-&#8216;co.mpens_atio;niV awarded&#8221;b&#8211;y~&#8211;\u00ab&#8217;the court below is excessive and<\/p>\n<p>exorbita;at._  i,argned that the deceased was doing agriculture<\/p>\n<p>  duriagie  relevianttciipoint of time. The accident took place on<\/p>\n<p>  plaintiff has not produced any material evidencing<\/p>\n<p>  of the deceased at the time of accident. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p> coixrtiiiaelow could have taken at best his income at Rs.lOO\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>r.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\n<p>day. The Court below should have followed the method adopte&#8217;ds._V_<\/p>\n<p>while awarding Compensation under the Motor Vehicles  &#8216;  ;. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>said method is applied, the compensation payable !;rideri:tl3e&#8221;&#8216;h,ead<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;loss of dependency&#8217; comes to Rs.3,84,(l{l0\/&#8211;::&#8217;tald&#8217;n\u00a7intoVlaclcount  &#8216;A<\/p>\n<p>the multiplier at 16 since the deceased was aged about\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">6. On the other hand, learned=.Co11nseE appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>respondents have sought to &#8220;j&#8217;a.stify_.&#8221;hthe&#8221;impugned judgment and<br \/>\ndecree. Learned Counsel for the &#8216;plainti&#8217;1;ffrespohd,ent&#8217;No.1 submits<\/p>\n<p>that the first respon~deiiatVp:E~eing:=the rnoth&#8217;er:of:_the_deceased is entitled<\/p>\n<p>for 50% oifthe the &#8220;other hand, learned Counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the second&#8221;respond&#8217;ent that the second respondent was<\/p>\n<p>._aged a.b\u00a7out &#8220;27 yea&#8217;r&#8217;s&#8211;..at_ the time of the death of her husband.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;_&#8221;i&#8217;heref0_re, ..she,1s.,e&#8221;nti_tled for atleast 75% of the compensation.<\/p>\n<p>   the learned Counsel for the parties, the<\/p>\n<p> question for&#8217; -consideration in this appeal is whether the<\/p>\n<p>C   ,&#8221;&#8216;compensatio&#8211;n awarded by the court below is excessive?<\/p>\n<p>l<br \/>\nll:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">Y.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p id=\"p_8\">8. There is no dispute as to the occurrence of the\u00a7i_:accid_e&#8217;n.t_f  _<\/p>\n<p>and the liability of the appellants to pay theycompensati&#8217;o11-it is&#8221;als0_<\/p>\n<p>not in dispute that the deceased Boregow&#8217;da,*i was   <\/p>\n<p>years at the time of the accideni;_&#8217;v&#8217;Adn2ittediy,<br \/>\nagriculture. The respondents herein  mother&#8217;  who<br \/>\nwere depending on him for  have been<br \/>\nproduced by the firstresporidetlthinicome of the<br \/>\ndeceased during\u00ab&#8211;tEie.4_re:iey&#8217;ant  V&#8221;l&#8217;heiiideceased was an<br \/>\nagriculturists. ,_it   take his income as<br \/>\nRs.l00\/&#8211; per   and reasonable to award<\/p>\n<p>compensation&#8217; accoiidaiicetyiith the method adopted while<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">-v.aWardiiig. cvornpensationvnnder the <a href=\"\/doc\/785258\/\" id=\"a_1\">Motor Vehicles Act<\/a>. Since the<\/p>\n<p>ideceased v.zas&#8217;.ageyd&#8221;33 years at the time of his death, it is proper to<\/p>\n<p>adoptthe properipittinltiplier 16. 1\/3&#8243;&#8216; of his income has to be<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; deducted .to&#8221;wjardis his persona} expenses. Therefore, applying 16<\/p>\n<p>  multiplier and taking his income at RS100\/&#8211; per day, and after<\/p>\n<p> ___&#8221;&#8216;dedacting 1\/3&#8243;&#8216; of the income towards his personal expenses, the<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appellants on 28.8.2007 pursuant to an interim order passed in this<\/p>\n<p>appeal. The appellants are directed to deposit balance of the<\/p>\n<p>amount before the trial court within a period of eight weeksTtronj&#8217;.s&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The couiitibelow <\/p>\n<p>directed to apportion the award amountfn&#8217; the&#8217; ratio;oif&#8221;l30;70:l\u00ab&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>between the mother and the wife of the dec\ufb01\ufb01sdilil I f11l\ufb01l&#8217;1e1*\u00bb.di~relU[\u00a2l&#8217;l&#8217;.. V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>that 50% of the amount awarded to eac&#8217;h:o&#8221;f the respondents shallllhe<br \/>\nkept in a Fixed Deposit in a nationalised  a period of three<br \/>\nyears and the balance of the aniountv &#8216;sh&#8217;a11&#8217;&#8230;l;5etijvsbilrsed to the<\/p>\n<p>respondents herein, The &#8216;:1&lt;espo_nden.ts&#039; are i&#039;eii_tit1Ved:fto draw interest<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOI?i3&#8243;\u00bbR. DATED THIS THE 7&#8243;&#8216; DAY 01\u00bb? SEPTEMBER 2039.&#8217; &#8216; BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE s. 433%\/&#8217;YrL::,Nf1&gt;ZEE1j? &#8221; &#8216;V R: J T REGULAR FIRST APREALAz0.1093\/2307 (R135; 1 u Between: (O&amp;MI)ivis4i:3t1)_, V _ _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":776,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\",\"name\":\"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009"},"wordCount":776,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009","name":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-12T16:04:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-executive-engineer-elecl-vs-kempamma-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Executive Engineer (Elecl) vs Kempamma on 7 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}