{"id":252248,"date":"2010-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-10T21:17:50","modified_gmt":"2016-06-10T15:47:50","slug":"dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  _\n\nDATED THIS THE 20*\" DAY OF SEPT_E~9---'1SEjR\u20ac ':iO1.Q V4' -. \n\nBEFORE   V &\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUST-ICE='A,__l\\!. \\\/ENOGOR,\u00a2.EA_OOV\\(rrj>;r\u00a7i%\nWRIT PETITION NO;1i\"i.;\u00e9Vs9.[20iO-- \nBETWEEN:   K     W\n\nDr. George V  '\n\nS\/0.Late C.V.Fran_cis V ..    :\nAged 71 years V      \" \nR\/at Chettupu_zh.a!%gkaraVn__ H~~oVu'se'a_'  '\nAvenue RQac!i,._ !\u00a74undupVaOi~tam\"'\" V\nChee,y~a--ra.m*ViIl\u00e9ige. \" \n\nThrisstar T\u00e9n'iuk_; _T hriss4ur~\u00abl'}istrict\nKerafa 5680   \"\n\n PETITIONER\n\n(eysr; Asjiosk, Bv.*Pa tsr, TAdv.)\n\n   1;.- V  - . i'Vi\u00abr%,C F.-Jiose\n\nS\/c';C.$;I.Francis\n Agedrr 70 veers\n\n.. 'R\/at Chettupuzhakkaran House\nAizenue Road, Mundupalfam\nCheeyaram Village\nThrissur Tatuk, Thrissur District\nKerafa - 680 005.\n\n 2. Mrs.Valsa Chacko\n\nW\/0.Late C.F.Chacko\nAged 66 years\nR\/at Chettupuzhakkaran House\n\n\n\nFatima Nagar, Chembukavu Viilage\nThrissur Taluk, Th rissur District\nKerala --~ 680 005.\n\nSaju Chacko\n\nS\/o.Late C.F,Chacko\n\nAged 43 years   \nR\/at Chettupuzhakkaran\"House  '\n\nFatima Nagar, Chembukayu Village  'D\n\nTh rissur Talu k, Thrissu'r\"Di'strict_\nKerala -- 680 OO..5}\" -_   \n\nMs.Seena Jojy  '--\n\nD\/o.Late:\u00e9C;..F.Cl;jacko'V:::  _ _ :\nAged 45 yeagrsg   V \" \n\nR\/ a:t\"C'.h_eVttu ;S*_uzh-aj!<_|V'<a.ra'n'i_ Ho use\nFatinja'i..Nagar; 'ChevrritJu'kiavi;g Village\n\n.ThAri.ss*:;.=r Tai2_uk, "T.hrissur"'D~is'trict\n\nKeraiavyi+..V5V3'oV%oo5:~\u00bbg_g   _'\n\n \nD\/o\u00ab.-Late C.-F.C.hacE<o\n\n* \u00bb Aged 4-2 years '\n R\/at Chet'tu_o.uzvhakkaran House\n"Fatima Nagar, Chembukavu Village\n'  --vTh~ri'ssu'r..Ta|uk, Thrissur District\n' vvKe.raiaF:--v68O 005.\n\nvfvvirs-.,AAP,_ju.dge._ Cat \"\u00ab...Bangaiore in O.S.No.5896\/2006\n(Ann-exure'-\u00bb.B)'.\"\" \"\n\n \ufb02hisupetitionmeoming on for preliminary hearing in 'B'\n\n' V.Vg'roVup.,V<\/a>''t~hi's.V day the Court made the foliowingz\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 ..V”Pet.iVt’ioner instituted 05.5896\/2006 against the<\/p>\n
2 xrespondents. Written statement was filed by the 15*<\/p>\n
“”.de1″Aendant on 30.9.2006. Appiication seeking amendment<\/p>\n
of the piaint was filed on 13.3.2007. The Triai Court, suo<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
r”\n<\/p>\n
\n
motu passed an order under Order 2 and  of<\/p>\n
CPC.\n<\/p>\n
2. According to the Trial  <\/p>\n
sought three different reliefs in respect <\/p>\n
land in different survey  and tl:.er’efore.’,’:,thVere is no
\ncommon question ovr’:fact   the case and
\naccording to it, there’VV_is:”jAo_indefv  of action in one
\nsuit which  trial and hence, it<\/p>\n
has direc.t_ed.;.4th.e’.p’l’aintiff\u00ab.to”~o:r;o’o’se”any one of the reliefs in<\/p>\n
the :7{._)|ai_ii’t   “separate suits for remaining<\/p>\n
reliefs.’ “Aggrvieved’,rV.’the”‘plaintiff has filed this writ petition.<\/p>\n
  =lileard”th’e’V learned counsel on both sides and<\/p>\n
f  per u ‘thee. writ papers.\n<\/p>\n
 The Trial Court has not noticed the decision of the<\/p>\n
 rrApex'””C.ourt in the case of PREM LALA NAHATA AND<\/p>\n
“”~.V\\\/al’I!\\f:OTHER VS. CHANDI PRASAD SIKARIA (2007) 2 SCC<\/p>\n
“551), wherein, almost in an identical circumstances, it has<\/p>\n
been held as under: \\\u00a7
\n\/7′<\/p>\n
-.\n<\/p>\n
\n
“10. Based on this understanding, we the<\/p>\n
respective positions of Order 1 and Order   a<\/p>\n
of things. Order 1 deals with parti_es’~vtof.all”Vsuit <\/p>\n
provides who may be joined as.l’the:lp’laintiffsand ‘<\/p>\n
be joined as the defendants. ltlalso ideals’  <\/p>\n
of the court to direct thle”-plaintiffs either to~eleclt with’<\/p>\n
reference to a particular plvaiintiff _ or at particular defendant
\nor to order separate trials’  respect’ of “the parties
\nmisjoined as the p1’a:\u00a3mffst_ olrltheldefendants. It also gives
\npower to thecourtto.ipi*onouncel.juVd’gmlent for or against
\none of the plarties frorri  pa.rties who have joined<\/p>\n
together  “‘~suledl”v.:together. The order also<\/p>\n
spe’cifies;that suitvshall n_ot”‘be defeated by reason of the
\nmisjoinderllo\ufb01.nona–jcirider of parties, so along as in the
\ncase oflncon–join’der,”‘the’ non–joinder is not of a necessary<\/p>\n
party.  Code”. also gives power to the court to<\/p>\n
V_”‘*\u00e9-ubstitute the-cori*ect person as a plaintiff or add parties<\/p>\n
A  or _vfstril<:.e*~0ut parties as plaintiffs or defendants, at any<\/p>\n
V  stagetifit"is~found necessary.\n<\/p>\n
 2 deals with frame of suits. It provides that<\/p>\n
every_ suit shall be framed as far as practicable so as to<\/p>\n
” *=.afford grounds for final decision upon the subjects in<\/p>\n
if  dispute and to prevent further litigation concerning them.<\/p>\n
It is also insisted that every suit shall include the whole of<\/p>\n
the claim that a plaintiff is entitled to make in respect of<\/p>\n
its subject–matter. There is a further provision that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff may unite in the same suit several causes of
\n\/<\/p>\n
.\/<\/p>\n
action against the same defendant and tlief:l”p21aintiffs<\/p>\n
having causes of action in which  aie’fjoi7ntlyp<\/p>\n
interested against the same defendant,-rnayunite <\/p>\n
causes of action in the samefflsuit; It  that T.<\/p>\n
objection on the ground of misjoiinder of ‘-causves action<\/p>\n
should be taken at the\u00ab.___earlies.t’ opportuciiityiy it also”<\/p>\n
enables the court, where i”t..Valppears”to the court that the
\njoinder of causes action m’ayV””embarrass “or delay the
\ntrial or otherwise  to order separate
\ntrials or to make su.ch’_o.th’er o_rde’1′. a’s–.1rn’ay be expedient in<\/p>\n
the interestsjustice. -V\n<\/p>\n
12. ‘:1’  fplainft suffers from the defect
\no;fVp_arti_es or.rnisjoinder of causes of action
\neithei’4in’termjse.of\u00bb Rule 1 and Order 1 Rule 3 on<\/p>\n
the o~haelrh_ehd,   2 Rule 3 on the other, the Code<\/p>\n
iitself indi-cates that the perceived defect does not make<\/p>\n
 one ‘barred by law or liable to rejection. This is
\n ._clea1″afrorn Rules 3–A, 4 and 5 of Order 1 of the Code, and
\n pth’is.”is,_err’;phasised by Rule 9 of Order 1 of the Code which<\/p>\n
A  pro’vid\u00a7s that no suit shall be defeated by reason of non–<\/p>\n
joinder or misjoinder of parties and the court may in<\/p>\n
A’ ‘ either case deal with the matter in controversy so far as it<\/p>\n
 -regards the rights and interests of the parties actually<\/p>\n
before it. This is further ernphasisgd by Rule 10 of Order
\n1 which enables the court in appropriate circumstances
\nto substitute or add any person as a plaintiff in a suit.<\/p>\n
Order 2 deals with the framing of a suit and Rule 3<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
\/v<\/p>\n
provides that save as otherwise provided. <\/p>\n
unite in the same suit several causes ofactivons”against <\/p>\n
the same defendant and any__p\u00bb1a.i1f1tiffslhaving .Vca_use’&’:_V  T <\/p>\n
actions in which they are jdiuntlyiivinterested”  .<\/p>\n
same defendant may unite such csiusesef. action’: in the<\/p>\n
same suit. Rule 6 enabies”*~.i;he court–.to:*_:order”separate
\ntrials even in a case of mi_s__io:inderV of cause_s  action in a
\nplaint \ufb01led. _ V 1 ‘\n<\/p>\n
13. After the amendmesnthvof  ‘1~T6_-Rule 1 in England,
\nit was he1d’\u00abIoy.the;_Court of, Afip.ea1  England in Thomas
\nv. Moqrerz_9i\u00a7,_8;’._1 K..e_1555:s’7 Lice 577{CA} thus:<\/p>\n
 been at the time when
\nsirnuy-tt::1:;:%a:te__v*.4eHarmqy11894 AC 494.-1891-41Au ER Rep
\n8635 (HL) was goinder of parties and joinder of<\/p>\n
causesof. act.ion._ are-7discretionary in this sense, that if<\/p>\n
_{they are tldere is no absolute right to have them<\/p>\n
– lstruck’ out,  is discretionary in the Court to do so if<\/p>\n
it ” ‘it”thi11ks.VTright.”\n<\/p>\n
l”dl4.A Privy Council in Mahant Ramdhan Pun’ v.
\n chgqudhury Lachmi Narain{AIR 1937 PC 42.-1937 All LJ
\n _  555} pointed out: [AIR p.45)<\/p>\n
“It is desirable to point out that under the rules as
\nthey now stand the mere fact of misjoinder is not by itself
\nsufficient to entitle the defendant to have the proceedings<\/p>\n
set aside or action dismissed.” \\<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
,4-v<\/p>\n
Of course, their Lordships were speaking in<\/p>\n
Section 99 of the Code. Their Lordships’_”1’eferred”_ to  <\/p>\n
abovequoted observation of the . Court. . oi”; >’ Appeal {in b T<\/p>\n
Thomas V. Moore<\/a> in that decision. {It is thereforepcliearxthat<\/p>\n
a suit that may be bad Vfozjmisjoinder ofcauses ofigactionz<\/p>\n
is not one that could be’g.o.t’~istruck*– oiutor rzcjeclted by a
\ndefendant as a matter of..–right and the’di.scr\u00a7etion vests
\nwith the court eith–e_rfto  the suit or to direct
\nthe plaintiff to take steps  defect. in fact, the
\nPrivy Couvnfiil in   that the suit was bad
\nfor  causes of further noticed that
\nthe triialpdiudge   the complications created
\nth.ereby..itried::f:A\u00a7V of the suit satisfactorily.
\nThereforeil  occasion for the court to dismiss
\nthe suit onthe  misjoinder of causes of action at<\/p>\n
the appellate stage-.\n<\/p>\n
 isxwellllunderstood that procedure is the handmaid<\/p>\n
V’ ” ..ofjus’ti:ce:an,_d not its mistress. The scheme of Order 1 and<\/p>\n
clearly shows that the prescriptions therein are in<\/p>\n
A=-.._thev_>reVaJm of procedure and not in the realm of<\/p>\n
substantive law or rights. That the Code considers<\/p>\n
A’ ‘ objections regarding the frame of suit or joinder of parties<\/p>\n
it  only as procedural, is further clear from Section 99 of the<\/p>\n
Code which speci\ufb01cally provides that no decree shall be
\nreversed in appeal on account of any rnisjoinder of parties
\nor causes of action or nonjoinder of parties unless a
\ncourt finds that the nonjoin\ufb02er is of a necessary party.<\/p>\n
\/”\n<\/p>\n
‘\/6′<\/p>\n
This is on the same principle as of Section__2″1″oft;-hefijode<\/p>\n
which shows that even an objection\ufb01to::_”territori.al’<\/p>\n
jurisdiction of the court in wl’1ichi the  instituted,’ j i<\/p>\n
could not be raised successfVully::’for:’theiirslt <\/p>\n
appeal against the decree unless the appellant:  alsotvabjlee,<\/p>\n
to show consequent failure.:ofi_iustice..The:.’Suitsl”Va1uation
\nAct similarly indicatesp_….th’at’–.absence-_of’\u00a7 pecuniary
\njurisdiction in the,._\ufb02cour_t the cause without
\nobjection also stands  isfsanie footing. The
\namendmentjto  v’C”odVe in the year 1976
\nconfers4..pQwer:onthe ieozurt  towtransfer a suit \ufb01led in
\na cofuj: 1:jii;;\u00a7i\ufb01’g ‘ nlobjurisdiction, to a court having
\nJuviris’d1’cat;1ic:n  In context of these provisions\n<\/p>\n
 –.particu’lar:”re\u00e9fereiice “to the rules in Order 1 and
\nOrde.1j’2,  is clear that an objection of
\nVrn_isjoin’de_r:l of..plai’ntlift”.s or misjoinder of causes of action,<\/p>\n
 p”roceAd’ura.1…\u00abobjection and it is not a bar to the<\/p>\n
”  enteliftaining of the suit or the trial and \ufb01nal disposal of<\/p>\n
. ltizefsuitl  court has the liberty even to treat the plaint
\n bin suel1_.a case as relating to two suits and try and<\/p>\n
2\u00b0dis’pose”:them of on that basis.”\n<\/p>\n
5. In view of the declaration of iaw made by the<\/p>\n
  Supreme Court and in view of the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
of the case, there is neither joinder of causes of action nor<\/p>\n
misjoinder of unnecessary parties. There is misdirection<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
on the part of the Trial Court in passing <\/p>\n
order, without correctly noticing the re_c’o’rd’1ja.nd’\u00bb:al~so <\/p>\n
relevant provisions applicable to:=,.the.-Arn\u00e9.tter..’   l V<\/p>\n
In the result, writ peVtitvior.\u00bb.stanV.as.
\norder stands quashgedi The” broug’ht”torward, is
\nrequired to be tried Trial Court is
\ndirected to.” the pending I.As.\n<\/p>\n
within a   date a copy of this
\norder.\n<\/p>\n
 instituted in the year 2006,
\nthe Trial Courtis-v__diire”cte’d to expedite the trial and dispose<\/p>\n
ofthe  as e’ar!y.._a\u00abs practicable and at any event within a<\/p>\n
‘ ,period.__o~f  year from today.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/#13″\n<\/p>\n
I\ufb01dge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT _ DATED THIS THE 20*” DAY OF SEPT_E~9—‘1SEjR\u20ac ‘:iO1.Q V4’ -. BEFORE V & THE HON’BLE MR. JUST-ICE=’A,__l\\!. \\\/ENOGOR,\u00a2.EA_OOV\\(rrj>;r\u00a7i% WRIT PETITION NO;1i”i.;\u00e9Vs9.[20iO– BETWEEN: K W Dr. George V ‘ S\/0.Late C.V.Fran_cis V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1554,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010"},"wordCount":1554,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010","name":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-10T15:47:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-george-vs-mr-c-f-jose-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr. George vs Mr. C.F. Jose on 20 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252248\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}