{"id":252359,"date":"2010-02-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-01T02:53:03","modified_gmt":"2018-08-31T21:23:03","slug":"m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
IN\"UH3HHH\u20acCOURT{H7KARNATAKA(HRCUTTBENCH\n\nATDHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 08\"' DAY OF FEBRUARY...24f0:1tG\u00ab',\"are. V,\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE \n\nCRL.R.P. Noe;k2r9,,41\/2o,1ko\nCRL.R.P__.. NO.VA2.25'6\/20,09\n\nIN CRL.R.P. NO. 2041\/2o%:0,,%%,  'V\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nM.A.Ganishab\u20ac   ' \u00bb g \nS\/0.M.A.V2.--h--id_s'a.b_3' =:_;;,, 'V 'V ._\nAge<\/a>: 43 years,  _BVusine\"s~\u00abs_,_ _\nR\/0. Tavarger\u00e9, Tq_:V'K,\"u.sh\u00bbt,ag_i,,\" \nDist: K0ppa1}._ ' . '  \"  \n\n(By SriJ5},D;Gu\ufb01de'A,..V_}\u00a7Ldvecate.)\n\n Me]lafj\ufb01a\u00bb-Sr\u00a75;'Malakajeppa Balutagi\nAge:  years, Occ: Agriculture,\n\n.  ,gMgane1p.\u00a7'a S\/0. Ramappa Maddin\n  39 years, Occ: Agriculture,\n\nShararzappa S\/0.G0s0mappa Aryar\n\" \"Age: 38 years, Occ: Agricuiture,\n\nw4\"w\"\n\n  \n\n...Petiti0ner.\n\n\n\nl\\)\n\nVeerbhadrappa S\/o.Andaneppa Dandin\nAge: 41 years, Occ: Agriculture,\n\nNingappa S\/o.h\/Ialakajeppa Pundagoudar\nAge: 41 years, Occ: Agriculture,\n\nSidappa S\/o. Karadeppa Dandingp\nAge: 49 years, Occ: Agriculture,   \n\nRespondents 1 to 6 are _ V<\/pre>\n
R\/o. Tavargera, Tq: Kushtag-i,,
\nDist: Koppal.\n<\/p>\n
State of Karnataka v  _<\/p>\n
by Tavargera Police,” ‘  ‘-\n<\/p>\n
represented by  _  2
\nState PublicF\u00a3’ovs_ec1;ltor, ” .4
\nHigh Court      <\/p>\n
Dharwadrz:-‘ ll.  ” ”\n<\/p>\n
…Respondent.\n<\/p>\n
This cpimmaislghgzistaisiriggciseaaon is filed U\/s\/397 r\/w.<\/p>\n
 l\u00a7o’ppal, thereby allowing the<\/p>\n
 theease to the Sessions Judge, Koppal.<\/p>\n
g..,_.t\u00a3””~”‘”””-‘<\/p>\n
401 Cr.P._C.  .aVC!_Vo-oblate’ for the petitioner praying that
\nvthis  Court””m_a__y.\u00bbbe pleased to set aside the order<\/p>\n
.date’d:V4.,\/lb:’2S?()’lQ9,pa.s_sed in Crl.R.P.No.l 1\/2009<\/p>\n
by the learned<\/p>\n
revision filed<\/p>\n
 the 1’\u00bb’,’,Sp_’C)’f1{lVSi\u00e9~l1A’i[ Nos} to 6 against the order of committal<\/p>\n
 5\/3i’.’Z,V(S)’1{)9 passed by the learned JMFC<\/p>\n
, Kushtagi, in<\/p>\n
_V K  and consequently allow the application
\n_fil5ed”,byl the petitioner U\/Sec.323 Cr.P.C<\/a>. for committing<\/p>\n
IN CRL.R.P. NO. 2256\/2009<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
The State of Karnataka,
\nRepresented by Tawaragera<\/p>\n
Police Station, Tawearagera.\n<\/p>\n
(By Sri.P.H.G0tkhindi, HCGP.)
\nAND:\n<\/p>\n
1 .\n<\/p>\n
Mailappa S\/o.Ma1a1<ajappa A _
\nAge: 37 years, Occ: B.1,:sin.e3sis," 3:';
\nR\/o.Tawaragera, Tq:"*K{us,h-tag.i,:,  " A
\nDist: Koppal.  _  :\n<\/p>\n
Manappa S\/0.4 a\ufb01pai  = <\/p>\n
Age: 38 ye’afs_, :”A_g_fi’e_u1-tu’i*,e, <\/p>\n
R\/o.Tawai1’gg*e,r;ag, Tq’: 4K’t.:i_sht’a’gi,
\nDist:\n<\/p>\n
Sharana1i5p_,ai S\/e”.(iie.soriie}3ipa Areara
\nAge: yeiar.sA,’0’ee:*Agricu1ture,
\nR\/_u’~i.,Ta_waragef’a,..T.q.: Kushtagi,<\/p>\n
 Dist:\n<\/p>\n
I   S\/o.Andaneppa Dandin<\/p>\n
Age: 39_.ye_aa”s, Oce: Agriculture,
\nR\/6-.Ta..war’\u00e9:gera, Tq: Kushtagi,<\/p>\n
 Dist:”K(‘:ppal.\n<\/p>\n
. Niiiigappa S\/0.Malakajap_pa Pundagoudar
\nAge: 37 years, Oee: Business,<\/p>\n
“F7;\/o.Tawaragera, Tq: Kushtagi,<\/p>\n
 W’Dist: Koppal.\n<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
6. Siddappa S\/o. Karadeppa Dandin
\nAge: 48 years, Occ: Agriculture,
\nR\/ofllawaragera, Tq: Kushtagi,
\nDist: Koppal.\n<\/p>\n
. . . Res _<\/p>\n
This Criminal Revision Petitio_yn….ips filedll’U;l’S.397’_’er\/w.”. <\/p>\n
401 Cr.P.C<\/a>. by the advocate for the petit’ion\u00aber’i’p–r.ayiun,g”that
\nthis Hon’ble Court may be pleased-to?__set aiS’id”e..pthe”_i(3\u00a3T_.Ci’e1′.<\/p>\n
passed by the learned Sessions ‘._Ju’dge,,7l{oppal:];
\nCrl.R.P.No.l1\/2009 dated 4\/6\/2.Ql’;~.9 and.__restto’:fe7,th’e” order”<\/p>\n
passed by the learned JMFC, Kush-saga? in c.sc.No.342\/2007
\ndated 5\/3\/2009.  –\n<\/p>\n
These petitions eorningj” hearing on<\/p>\n
interlocutory applie-aVtion,”t’l1is”ptlie.V_”Court made the
\nfollowing:  h’  *’    i<\/p>\n
 _ C” ORDER
\n(3ls~1~.l\u00a7.Pvv.lN–o:.”2s2So:’f”\u00a7i9itis filed by the complainant
\n  yyyy “the file of the learned JMFC,<\/p>\n
K’u_sht;a7gi,p e_haa1:lelrig_ing the legality” and correctness of the<\/p>\n
ii”e\u00bb..p___ivmpugn_ie’dl aaaeeaeaaaa 4\/6\/2009 passed in Crl.R.P.1 1\/2009<\/p>\n
.:ipipi’_:\u00ab:byl’t_he learrie:d Sessions Judge, Koppal. Crl.R.P.No.2041\/l0<\/p>\n
  the PW.l complainant i.n the said Criminal Case<\/p>\n
l’a.lic’halpleahging the correctness of the very same impugned<\/p>\n
f <\/p>\n
order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, in
\nCrl.R.P.No.l1\/2009. Therefore, both these reyision<\/p>\n
petitions are disposed of by this common order.  4′<\/p>\n
2) The facts leading to the <\/p>\n
petitions are as under:\n<\/p>\n
a) Crime No.43fl)_V”f’~….V
\nP.S., ifaluka Kushtagi, was:fe.gis,tered’
\naccused Nos. 1 to
\nU\/Secs.l43, 147, 447,30_7,’,’3i:;3,,.,,32′;;\u00e9i;md 504
\nr\/W.Sec.l49:..  IPEC.  of<\/p>\n
inves’tiigat~i.o}v1′ in:f:’\u00a7t’he:li’sa’id  the accusation<\/p>\n
against the  ,f0t::it’h_ie.offence U\/Sec.307<\/p>\n
of IPC<\/a>   d.r:(7’piped and charge sheet<\/p>\n
came” to ib’eA.._i_Viisubn1itted against all these
\n  forppall thewsaid other offences.<\/p>\n
H A  (ihiarges were framed by the Trial
\n_ Clo4urt,.__”aga”inst all the accused Nos.l to 6
\nVA  Aptlgiereivnffor the offences U\/Secs.143, 147, 447,
\n 324 and 504 r\/w.Sec.149 of IPC<\/a>. While
\nrec-ording of evidence of PW.l, before his<\/p>\n
4 if”examination–in-chief could be completed, the<\/p>\n
r**–(“\\’W\\”‘\/W<\/p>\n
learned Assistant Public Prosecutor (APP)<\/p>\n
made a request to the Trial Court that he was <\/p>\n
desirous of filing an application U\/Sec.323 <\/p>\n
Cr.P.C<\/a>. seeking an order committing the_.”‘s;aid:”*.if-it  A<\/p>\n
case to the Sessions Court andmtherefore—ithell *<\/p>\n
examination in chief be deferred…rlgiclcse\ufb01tliiig~..v,,.W<\/p>\n
the said request, the Trial Coulrit defe-\u00a7*rle’dl’<\/p>\n
exarnination-in-chief of PWT”‘1:iV:..l”.<\/p>\n
\n
c) Then  :”vv=.f.iled  his
\napplication U\/Sec.323   by
\nthe affidavtvitljof    order
\ncommitting   Sessions<\/p>\n
Courts””ons:l”j;the’7\u00a7:.; that”: the material
\ncollected ‘by \u00abthis\u00bb_i11.vlesitiga’ting officer was not
\ncorrectlandi the c”o:rnp.’l’a.inant did not give his<\/p>\n
furtiherli. staterne’nt l\u00e9-efore the 1.0. based on<\/p>\n
 wii..ileh1,”athe ..offenclellllJ\/Sec.307 of IPC<\/a> came to<\/p>\n
 _ 1.2- “dro*p_ped  ”\n<\/p>\n
  learned JMFC, by his order<\/p>\n
 dated.V:_S1~\/3\/2009 allowed the said application<\/p>\n
A  and~\u00ab_.comrnitted the said case to the Sessions<\/p>\n
  Aggrieved by the said order, the
\n“”accused therein filed Crl.R.P.No.l’l\/2009<\/p>\n
before the learned Session Judge, Koppal. By<\/p>\n
 \u00bbw<\/p>\n
his order dated 4\/6\/2009, the learned Sessions<\/p>\n
Judge, allowed the said Revision Petition and
\nset aside the order of the Trial
\ncommitting the said case to the
\nCourt and remanded the  4′
\nCourt. Correctness of this order <\/p>\n
in these revisions.\n<\/p>\n
3) There has  caused
\nin filing the  the cause
\nshown in the  thereof,
\nMisc.Crl. No.   condonation of<\/p>\n
delay is he’r_eb._y- allowejdandi”tvhe– said delay is condoned.<\/p>\n
4) Ha”V.i_’ng_ nature of the order passed<\/p>\n
U.\/.Svec.3\u00bb2i3i:o”fxCriP’;-Ci. …. ..b’.>’ the Trial Court and the order<\/p>\n
pa’sse.d’*iIi_’vrenfisiion by the learned Sessions Judge, this<\/p>\n
1iiexwmatterthis _tal{V_eri for final disposal by consent of<\/p>\n
..i.3}-S.ri;-N.D.G’un\u00e9le, the learned counsel for the revision<\/p>\n
petityiom in Crl.R.P.No.2041\/2010 and Sri.P.H.Gotkhindi,<\/p>\n
 .tjiie…l.earned High Court Government Pleader, representing<\/p>\n
 revision petitioner State in Crl.R.P.No.2256\/2009<\/p>\n
 x<\/p>\n
before issuing notice to the respondents therein (accused<\/p>\n
before Trial Court). Perused the order of Triai Cour:t”‘\u00bband<\/p>\n
aiso the impugned order of the learned Sessions   <\/p>\n
5) Sec.323 of Cr.P.C<\/a>. prO\u00a7*’iidV\u20acS4ihi_hlt,_”iilf._ tin-i.i’at?iy 2<\/p>\n
inquiry into an offence or a trial biefoire a M’_–agfstra;te’,–~,pit~.VV<\/p>\n
appears to him at any stage iof:’z”he pr’o_\u00a2ee;;;’ng\u00a2; “before<\/p>\n
signing judgment that the_””casei i,9iVi’o::\u00bb;eiVC’14?hich ought to be
\ntried by the Courtptof Sesstofz-,t  i_sh’a!li”ejorhmit it to that
\nCourt under ihetfeirtibie\ufb01’)7*e contained and
\nthereupon 0″f,C-hapt’er’XVI’1I shall apply to the
\ncommitmentso\u00ab.miade”;’:’e<.V"C'V. <\/p>\n
6)  iVst..c1e’ari”‘f;rorn the provisions of Sec.323<\/p>\n
 t–.h=at”i..t is oinilyhafter commencement of the inquiry<\/p>\n
into o;1*.tt’riai, if it appears to the Magistrate that<\/p>\n
the ease— is.–__”one’ which ought to be tried by the Court of<\/p>\n
_i”Eiest,sio:1,4 heihas to commit the case to the Court of Session.<\/p>\n
 instant case examination of PW.1 was commenced<\/p>\n
 exan1ination\u00bbi.n-chief itseif was deferred at the<\/p>\n
r\u00bb..J”‘”””*”‘<\/p>\n
request of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Thus it<\/p>\n
is clear that PW.1 was not subjected to cross examinaitigon.<\/p>\n
At that stage the learned JMFC entertained _<\/p>\n
filed U\/Sec.323 of Cr.P.C<\/a>. and accepptingp.”t’i1’ei:’_aiiieirrnAe12.stis”= <\/p>\n
made by the injured complainant   ai9rIid;;vit<\/p>\n
sworn to in support of the staid’-v.._appl’iQa’t~ion~,_tii.e””ii1.earned’iii<\/p>\n
JMFC by his order, aV1iowed&..i-‘t’ii.e_:’-said app}-ichaiion and
\ncommitted the case to the Court~’o’f  The learned<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge h\u00a7as”\u00abr_ightiiy  impugned order<\/p>\n
passed in revisionifthat’t\u00bbh4e”ii:if}’.r.ial..i’Court committed error in<\/p>\n
ailowing the  ‘eiren before PW.1 could be<\/p>\n
fully ex.amineid\u00ab,_Vii V<\/p>\n
  ii5\u00a7.Vj\u00a7’}.g_.hasstated in his affidavit sworn to in<\/p>\n
suppor*ti___of’i\u20aci:,e  application that he did not give any<\/p>\n
 ifurtheri”stat.emciit before the 1.0. and therefore dropping of<\/p>\n
accusation against accused therein for the offence<\/p>\n
 of _IPC<\/a> was not justified and hence the accused<\/p>\n
 to be tried for the said offence also. This was accepted<\/p>\n
\u20ac~ <\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
by the Trial Court. The learned Sessions Judge has rightly<\/p>\n
observed in his impugned order in revision that the coinitents<\/p>\n
of the said affidavit to that effect ought notyhattea heeh\u00ab_<\/p>\n
accepted by the iearned Magistrate before   = <\/p>\n
examined as to recording of furitherf”s’tate.rnen’tio’f..gfh_e<\/p>\n
complainant.\n<\/p>\n
8) I do not findvanxy reasons ito_inter’fere”iwith the
\nimpugned order passed by  Judge in the<\/p>\n
Said Cr1.R.P.N0;.”1ii?t'{g2’009i=t_ these revisions<\/p>\n
deserve tofbe”da.ig:simiss?e’d iaspi”bein”g”‘devoid of merits. Hence<\/p>\n
the fo11owiiri–g:ii \u00ab. V V v   <\/p>\n
  it”Crl.,.R.-P.No.2256\/2009 filed by the<\/p>\n
cio’rn_p1airitaiit4State’ and Cr1.R.P.No.2041\/2010 filed by PW.i<\/p>\n
 the__satidv_i.Ci\u00a7ijti:No.342\/2007 On the rite of the learned<\/p>\n
 Klishitagi, are hereby dismissed as being devoid of<\/p>\n
jiiihe impugned order dated 4\/6\/2009 passed in<\/p>\n
\u00a2-~–t\u00ab=.$””””‘”””‘\u00b0”‘~”*-“””‘<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
Crl.R.P. No.11\/2009 by the learned Sessions Judge, Koppal,<\/p>\n
is hereby confirmed. No order as to costs.<\/p>\n
\u00a7u@\u00a7%eTp*e7<\/p>\n
Vmb\/Mrk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN”UH3HHH\u20acCOURT{H7KARNATAKA(HRCUTTBENCH ATDHARWAD DATED THIS THE 08″‘ DAY OF FEBRUARY…24f0:1tG\u00ab’,”are. V, BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CRL.R.P. Noe;k2r9,,41\/2o,1ko CRL.R.P__.. NO.VA2.25’6\/20,09 IN CRL.R.P. NO. 2041\/2o%:0,,%%, ‘V BETWEEN: M.A.Ganishab\u20ac ‘ \u00bb g S\/0.M.A.V2.–h–id_s’a.b_3’ =:_;;,, ‘V ‘V ._ Age: 43 years, _BVusine”s~\u00abs_,_ _ R\/0. Tavarger\u00e9, Tq_:V’K,”u.sh\u00bbt,ag_i,,” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1546,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\",\"name\":\"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010"},"wordCount":1546,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010","name":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-31T21:23:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-a-ganishab-vs-mallappa-on-8-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.A.Ganishab vs Mallappa on 8 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252359"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252359\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}