{"id":25245,"date":"2008-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-09-30T17:15:08","modified_gmt":"2017-09-30T11:45:08","slug":"thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 199 of 2008()\n\n\n1. THIRUMANGALATH MADHAVAN NAMBOODIRI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KOLORATH K.SURESH, S\/O.KRISHNAN NAIR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :25\/07\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                    M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n\n                       -------------------------------\n\n                      C.R.P.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008\n\n                       -------------------------------\n\n                     Dated this the 25th July, 2008.\n\n                                O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
                 Petitioner in CRP.No.l99\/2008 is the defendant in<\/p>\n
O.S.No.18 of 2005 and plaintiff in O.S.No.36 of 2005 on the file of<\/p>\n
Munsiff Court, Koyilandy. O.S.No.36\/2005 was filed by the petitioner<\/p>\n
for realisation of Rs.66,000\/=.      O.S.No.18\/2005 is a suit instituted<\/p>\n
by the respondent for realisation of Rs.85,000\/=. Both the suits were<\/p>\n
jointly tried. Petitioner remained absent on 5.2.2007 and the suits<\/p>\n
adjourned to 9.2.2007. On that day, O.S.No.36\/2005 was dismissed<\/p>\n
for default and a decree as prayed for by the respondent was granted<\/p>\n
in O.S.No.18\/2005. Petitioner filed I.A.No.440 of 2005, an application<\/p>\n
filed under Rule 13 of Order IX of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside<\/p>\n
ex parte decree in O.S.No.18\/2005. He also filed I.A.No.441 of 2007 to<\/p>\n
restore O.S.No.36\/2005, under Rule 9 of Order IX of Code of Civil<\/p>\n
Procedure. In both the petitions, petitioner contended that he was<\/p>\n
hospitalised on 3.2.2007 and was discharged only on 8.2.2007, his<\/p>\n
absence was not wilful and, therefore, ex parte decree is to be set<\/p>\n
aside and the suit dismissed for default is to be restored.<\/p>\n
\n\nCRP.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008\n\n\n                                   2<\/span>\n\n                2.     Respondent opposed       both the applications\n\n<\/pre>\n
contending that there is no sufficient cause to set aside ex parte<\/p>\n
decree or to restore the suit. It was contended that      attempt of the<\/p>\n
petitioner is only to protract the trial of the suits and he was not<\/p>\n
hospitalised as claimed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                3. The learned Munsiff disposed the applications<\/p>\n
separately by separate orders. No oral evidence was adduced, apart<\/p>\n
from producing the medical certificate to prove sufficient cause for the<\/p>\n
absence of the petitioner, when one suit was decreed ex parte and the<\/p>\n
other suit was dismissed for default. Learned Munsiff dismissed both<\/p>\n
the petitions.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                4. Petitioner challenged dismissal of I.A.No.440 of 2005<\/p>\n
before the Sub Court, Koyilandy, in C.M.A.No.12 of 2007 and<\/p>\n
I.A.No.441 of 2007 in C.M.A.No.13 of 2007. Learned Sub Judge, as<\/p>\n
per separate orders, confirmed the order of the learned Munsiff and<\/p>\n
dismissed the appeals. C.R.P.No.199 of 2008 is filed challenging the<\/p>\n
dismissal of I.A.No.440 of 2007 as confirmed in C.M.A.No.12 of 2007<\/p>\n
and CRP.No.207 of 2008 is filed challenging the      order in I.A.No.441<\/p>\n
of 2007 as confirmed in C.M.A.No.13 of 2007.\n<\/p>\n
CRP.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008<\/p>\n
                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
                5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and<\/p>\n
the learned counsel appearing for the respondents were heard.<\/p>\n
                6.   The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
pointed out that though no oral evidence was adduced, petitioner has<\/p>\n
produced medical certificate to establish that he was being treated as<\/p>\n
an inpatient from 3.2.2007 till 8.2.2007, and the petitions were filed<\/p>\n
within a period of 30 days from the date of dismissal of O.S.No.36 of<\/p>\n
2005, and the ex parte decree passed in O.S.No.18 of 2005, and the<\/p>\n
courts below should have taken a lenient view and               granted<\/p>\n
opportunity to the petitioner to have a decision on merits, and in such<\/p>\n
circumstances, the orders are to be set aside. The learned counsel<\/p>\n
submitted that petitioner is prepared to get ready in the suit and<\/p>\n
learned Munsiff may be directed to dispose the suit within a time<\/p>\n
frame.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                7. The learned counsel appearing for        respondent<\/p>\n
argued that there is no bona fides in the petitions and the petitions<\/p>\n
were rightly dismissed by the courts below. It was argued that suits<\/p>\n
were originally disposed ex parte and subsequently opportunity was<\/p>\n
granted to the petitioner, and even thereafter he was not willing to<\/p>\n
CRP.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008<\/p>\n
                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n
proceed with the suit, and that is the reason why suit filed by the<\/p>\n
petitioner was dismissed and suit filed against respondent         was<\/p>\n
decreed. The learned counsel argued that when the petitions were<\/p>\n
taken up by learned Munsiff, there was no request for adducing<\/p>\n
evidence and no oral evidence was adduced, and in such<\/p>\n
circumstances, courts below were justified in dismissing the<\/p>\n
application. It was also submitted that petitioner was not serious in<\/p>\n
prosecuting the petitions and even appeals were filed after inordinate<\/p>\n
delay and the conduct of the petitioner shows that attempt is only to<\/p>\n
protract the trial of the suits, and in such circumstances, as there is<\/p>\n
no illegality or irregularity or jurisdictional error in the impugned<\/p>\n
orders, the revision petitions are to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
                8. The fact that petitioner was earlier remained absent<\/p>\n
and an ex parte decree was passed or suit was dismissed for default,<\/p>\n
are not relevant facts, when the suits were subsequently restored<\/p>\n
after setting aside the ex parte decree, by the court on satisfying<\/p>\n
sufficient grounds for the absence.      Hence, it is  not a ground to<\/p>\n
dismiss subsequent applications filed under Rule 13 of Order IX or<\/p>\n
Rule 9 of Order IX of Code of Civil Procedure. The question to be<\/p>\n
decided is when the petitioner remained absent on 5.2.2007 and the<\/p>\n
CRP.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008<\/p>\n
                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n
ex parte decree was passed on 9.2.2007, was there any         sufficient<\/p>\n
cause for his absence, and if so, whether ex parte decree is to be set<\/p>\n
aside and suit is to be restored granting opportunity to the petitioner.<\/p>\n
                9.   There is force in the submission of the learned<\/p>\n
counsel appearing for the respondent that petitioner was not diligent<\/p>\n
enough in prosecuting his suit or defending the suit instituted by the<\/p>\n
respondent. That could only be the reason why the petitioner did not<\/p>\n
adduce evidence in support of his contentions in the applications.    In<\/p>\n
the petition, the reason alleged for the absence was that he was being<\/p>\n
treated as an inpatient in the hospital. Though the doctor who issued<\/p>\n
the certificate was not examined, medical certificate was produced. It<\/p>\n
shows that petitioner was being treated as an inpatient from 3.2.2007<\/p>\n
to 8.2.2007. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that there is no<\/p>\n
sufficient cause for the absence of the petitioner on 5.2.2007. Viewed<\/p>\n
from that angle courts below should have taken a lenient view and<\/p>\n
should have granted an opportunity to the petitioner to have a decision<\/p>\n
on merits, but on terms.     It is more so because the petitions to set<\/p>\n
aside the decree and to restore the other suit were filed within the<\/p>\n
period of limitation.\n<\/p>\n
CRP.Nos.199 & 207 of 2008<\/p>\n
                                   6<\/span><\/p>\n
                 10. In such circumstances, the revision petitions are<\/p>\n
allowed on terms. I.A.No.440 of 2005 and I.A.No.441 of 2005 will<\/p>\n
stand allowed on the petitioner paying or depositing a cost of<\/p>\n
Rs.2000\/= to the respondent within two weeks from today, failing<\/p>\n
which dismissal of the petitions as confirmed in C.M.A.Nos. 12 and 13<\/p>\n
of 2007 will stand and the revisions will stand dismissed. If the cost is<\/p>\n
paid, ex parte decree in O.S.No.18 of 2005 will stand set aside and<\/p>\n
O.S.No.36 of 2005 will stand restored.     In that event, petitioner shall<\/p>\n
get ready for the trial of the suit and shall not seek any adjournment.<\/p>\n
If the ex parte decree       in O.S.No.18 of 2005 is set aside and<\/p>\n
O.S.No.36 of 2005 is restored, learned Munsiff to dispose both the<\/p>\n
suits within four months from the date of restoration.<\/p>\n
                Post on 13.8.2008 for reporting compliance.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                        M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
\n                                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n
nj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 199 of 2008() 1. THIRUMANGALATH MADHAVAN NAMBOODIRI, … Petitioner Vs 1. KOLORATH K.SURESH, S\/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN For Respondent :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR The Hon’ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR Dated :25\/07\/2008 O R […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1180,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Thirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008"},"wordCount":1180,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008","name":"Thirumangalath Madhavan ... vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-30T11:45:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thirumangalath-madhavan-vs-kolorath-k-suresh-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thirumangalath Madhavan … vs Kolorath K.Suresh on 25 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25245"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25245\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}