{"id":252563,"date":"2011-02-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-18T03:28:10","modified_gmt":"2016-01-17T21:58:10","slug":"matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Rajasthan High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR<\/p>\n<p>Matadeen V\/s. State of Rajathan <\/p>\n<p>S.B. Criminal Appeal No.892\/2004<\/p>\n<p>S.B. Criminal Appeal under <a href=\"\/doc\/1903086\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 374<\/a> of Code of Criminal Procedure<\/p>\n<p>Date of Order \t      \t\t::          February 15, 2011<\/p>\n<p>\t\t  HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.CHAUHAN<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Shrikant Meena for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Mr. Javed Chaudhary PP for the State.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">Mr. Ashish Sharma for<br \/>\nMr. Pankaj Gupta for the complainant.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">REPORTABLE<\/p>\n<p>\t\tBoth the complainant, Smt. Bina Devi and accused-appellant, Matadeen, are present before this court. They have been identified by their respective counsel before this Court. Smt. Bina Devi states that she does not wish to pursue the criminal appeal which has been filed by the accused-appellant against the judgment dated 11.08.2004. According to her, both the accused-appellant and she are close relatives. She further states that with the help of elderly members of the village, both the parties have come to an understanding that she should not prosecute the appeal and, in fact, she should help the accused appellant in getting the appeal decided.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\t\tThe alleged incident had occurred on 01.07.2003. Although, initially the case was registered under <a href=\"\/doc\/1279834\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 376<\/a> IPC, but vide judgment dated 11.08.2004, the appellant was convicted for offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/203036\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 354<\/a> IPC. Both, when the alleged incident had taken place and when the impugned judgment was passed, the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/203036\/\" id=\"a_3\">Section 354<\/a> IPC was compoundable under <a href=\"\/doc\/91933\/\" id=\"a_4\">Section 320<\/a> Cr.P.C. However, after the amendment made in<a href=\"\/doc\/1569253\/\" id=\"a_5\"> the Code<\/a> of Criminal Procedure, in 2005, the said offence is no longer compoundable. Therefore, an issue was raised by this Court whether after the amendment, the offence continues to be compoundable or not under <a href=\"\/doc\/91933\/\" id=\"a_6\">Section 320<\/a> Cr.P.C?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\t\tMr. Shrikant Meena, the learned counsel for the appellant, has relied upon the case of Mohd. Abdul Sufan Laskar &amp; Ors. V\/s. State of Assam [(2008) 9 SCC 333], in order to argue that in case the offence were compoundable on the date of the incident, then the subsequent amendment made in<a href=\"\/doc\/445276\/\" id=\"a_7\"> the Code<\/a> of Criminal Procedure would not debar the court from compounding the offence. Therefore, he has pleaded that since the complainant and the accused-appellant have entered into a compromise &#8211; a copy of the compromise is available in the Court file &#8211; the offence should be compounded and the appellant should be acquitted for offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/203036\/\" id=\"a_8\">Section 354<\/a> IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">\t\tMr. Ashish Sharma appearing on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for the complainant, has neither challenged the compromise entered into between the parties, nor has challenged the position taken by the learned counsel for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\t\tIn case of Mohd. Abdul Sufan Laskar (supra), the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court dealt with a case wherein the appellant was convicted for offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/724142\/\" id=\"a_9\">Section 324<\/a> IPC. The said offence was committed on 15.06.1995 and the appellant was convicted both by the learned trial Court and his conviction was upheld by the Hon&#8217;ble High Court of  Assam. A question arose before the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court, when the complainant and the appellant have entered into a compromise during the pendency of the appeal before the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court, whether the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/724142\/\" id=\"a_10\">Section 324<\/a> IPC could be compounded or not considering the fact that after the amendment of 2005, the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/724142\/\" id=\"a_11\">Section 324<\/a> IPC was no longer compoundable? In the aforementioned case, the Apex Court clearly held that notwithstanding the amendment made in 2005, but considering the fact that the offence had occurred prior to the said amendment, the amendment does not debar the Court from compounding the offence, and from acquitting the accused. The present case is squarely covered by the  judgment in the case of Mohd. Abdul Sufan Laskar (supra). In the present case, as noted above, the alleged incident had occurred on 01.07.2003 i.e., prior to the amendment of 2005. However, the parties have entered into a compromise after the amendment of 2005. But, considering the principle, as enunciated by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court, this Court has no hesitation in compounding the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/203036\/\" id=\"a_12\">Section 354<\/a> IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\t\tTherefore, the impugned judgment dated 11.08.2004 is, hereby, quashed and set aside and the appellant is acquitted of the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/203036\/\" id=\"a_13\">Section 354<\/a> IPC. Hence, the appeal is, hereby, allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">  (R.S.CHAUHAN)J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">A.Asopa\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR Matadeen V\/s. State of Rajathan S.B. Criminal Appeal No.892\/2004 S.B. Criminal Appeal under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure Date of Order :: February 15, 2011 HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.CHAUHAN Mr. Shrikant [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":705,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011"},"wordCount":705,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011","name":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T21:58:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/matadeen-vs-state-of-raj-on-15-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Matadeen vs State Of Raj on 15 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}