{"id":252651,"date":"1918-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1918-04-15T18:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918"},"modified":"2014-12-06T00:11:34","modified_gmt":"2014-12-05T18:41:34","slug":"maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","title":{"rendered":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 46 Ind Cas 98<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Roe<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Chapman, Roe<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Roe, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1. The question in issue in this appeal is one of some importance and has been the subject of an abortive reference to a Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court, The facts are briefly that the appellants have contracted with Government to maintain the rights of all tenure holders entered in the Record of Rights prepared prior to the giving of a kabuliyat by the appellants. They nevertheless bring this action for a declaration that one of the tenure-holders covered by this Record of Rights has obtained a fraudulent entry therein and has no such rights as those recorded. The learned Judge has decided as a question of law that having regard to the terms of this kabuliyat the appellant cannot maintain this action. On this ground the appellant appeals to this Court and quotes in the first instance the reference to the Full Bench of the Calcutta High Court made by Coxe, J., and Imam, J., [Manmatha Nath Mitter v. Rai Kishore Mahanti 7 C.L.J. 70 (Notes) ]. The cases relied on in support of the contention of the respondents are those of Gour Chandra Saha v. Mani Mohan Sen 32 C. 463 and <a href=\"\/doc\/444169\/\" id=\"a_1\">Jahandar Baksh Mallick v. Ram Lal Hazra<\/a> 5 Ind. Cas. 565 : 11 C.L.J. 364;14 C.W.N. 470 : 37 C. 449. But in relying upon the latter case, it seems to me, the learned Vakil has lost sight of the distinction which Mookerjee, J., drew between the Gour Chandra&#8217;s case 32 C. 463 and the cases of Tapanidhi Raghunath Puri v. Pitambar Gajendra Mahapati 5 C.L.J. 67 and <a href=\"\/doc\/1498097\/\" id=\"a_1\">Chandramoni Mohanti v. Manmatha Nath Mitter<\/a> 5 Ind. Cas. 301 : 11 C.L.J. 68. The reference to the Fall Bench seems to be based chiefly upon the decision in Tweddle v. Atkinson (1861) I B.&amp; S. 393 : 30 L.J.Q.B. 265 : 4 L.T. 468 : 9 W.R. 781 : 8 Jur. (N.S.) 332 : 121 E.R. 762;124 R.R. 610 and the decision of the Judicial Committee in <a href=\"\/doc\/1129356\/\" id=\"a_2\">Jamni Das v. Ram Autar Pande<\/a> 13 Ind. Cas. 304 : 39 I.A.7;16 C.W.N. 97 : 11 M.L.T. 6 : 9. A.L.J. 37 : (1912) M.W.N. 32 : 15 C.L.J. 68 : 14. Bom. L.R. 1 : 21 M.L.J. 1158 : 34 A. 63 (P.C.). That the rule in these cases is not of universal application is clear from the decision in Rogers v. Hosegood (1900) 2 Ch. 388 : 69. L.J. Ch. 652 : 83 L.T. 186 : 48 W.R. 659 : 16 T.L. 489, which is clear authority for the proposition that in contracts relating to land a third party may take the benefit of the contract if they have a beneficiary interest in its purpose. <a href=\"\/doc\/1020411\/\" id=\"a_3\">In Nawab Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Nawab Husaini Begum<\/a> 7 Ind. Cas. 237 : 37 I.A. 152 : 14 C.W.N. 865 : 7A.L.J. 871 : (1910) M.W.N. 3(SIC)3 : 8 M.L.T. 147 : 12 C.L.J. 205 : 12 Bom. L.R. 638 : 20M.L.J. 614 : 32 A. 410 (P.C.) the principle of Tweddle v. Atkinson (1861) I B.&amp; S. 393 : 30 L.J.Q.B. 265 : 4 L.T. 468 : 9 W.R. 781 : 8 Jur. (N.S.) 332 : 121 E.R. 762;124 R.R. 610 was held to be inapplicable to a case in which, though the respondent was no party to the original agreement, she was clearly entitled to proceed in equity to enforce her claim. The cases of Gour Chandra Saha v. Mani Mohan Sen 32 C. 463 and <a href=\"\/doc\/444169\/\" id=\"a_4\">Jahandar Baksh Mallick v. Ram Lal Hazra<\/a> 5 Ind. Cas. 565 : 11 C.L.J. 364;14 C.W.N. 470 : 37 C. 449, as Mookerjee, J., explains, were based on the principle that the tenants themselves had waived the conditions imposed upon the landlord by the Government and could not now resile from their waiver. There has in the case before as been no waiver of the conditions imposed by the Government. I am of opinion that these conditions prevail and that advantage may be taken of them by the tenant and that the cases before us are not maintainable until the condition has been removed by waiver on the part of the tenants on the estate or by the Government who were parties to the original contract. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed with costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">Chapman, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">2. I agree.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 Equivalent citations: 46 Ind Cas 98 Author: Roe Bench: Chapman, Roe JUDGMENT Roe, J. 1. The question in issue in this appeal is one of some importance and has been the subject of an abortive reference to a Full [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918\",\"datePublished\":\"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\"},\"wordCount\":683,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\",\"name\":\"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918","datePublished":"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918"},"wordCount":683,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918","name":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1918-04-15T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-05T18:41:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maharaja-kunwar-manmath-nath-roy-vs-seikh-ameer-khan-on-16-april-1918#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maharaja Kunwar Manmath Nath Roy vs Seikh Ameer Khan on 16 April, 1918"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}