{"id":252892,"date":"2008-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-11T14:46:47","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T09:16:47","slug":"sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
 \" :1:v1$I.:_}N.A;,_L(:<3;~1T12<5LLERT \u00bb\n\n..I.\n\n1:: THE HIGH coum or KARNATAI-EA, BANGALORE"-V   ~..\n\nDATED Tms THE 2m DAY OF' SEPTEMBER, 205$\nBEFORE   ._ H  V\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE RAM Morzjgi-Tikmbv \n\nWEE'? PETITION No. 44:23'\/52997V(L:KsRTc3' '  .\n\nBETWEEN 1\n\nB A RAVINDRA ' ._  f\nS\/O ASHWATHANARAYANAPPAVT  '\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS - V g\nR\/AT POST BYRAHA1.:;r'   \nTALUK MALUR, KOLz'-'\u00a33. '  \n\n    PETITIONER\n\n{BY SR1] sis\/\u00a7T;--~v..\u00e9 'issjiliii iE;s.\u00bbMB\u00abTi\u00a7lJi}L\u00a7\u00a7'?\u20ac--v .\u00a5:\\ns1o1s:.., KOLAR  * ~'\n\nREPBY 1T8 _  '\" '\n\n RESPONDEWF\n\n    \"\u00a7EiTiTION ES FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND\n227~O}?--.'fi'HE} \u00a31ON\u00a71fI\"i'I'UT1ON OF' INDIA PRAYENG TO QUASH THE\n\n'   AWARD DTD, ':2r3;04.20o5 PASSED BY THE 11 ABDL. LABOUR\n\nCOURT'; B\u00a3\u00a2.NCi1'!\u00a3LORE, IN i.I3.NO.99\/' 1998, THE CERTIFIED COPY\n\n C11?' w1-:m1~1g_ IS PROIDUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS\n\" ~ .  '\u00a3'sN1\\lEXURE~E, BY WHTCH THE LABOUR COURT HAS REJECTED\n\n'1'fI7\u00a5E'L\u20ac1LAIM OF THE PETITIONER' WHICH IS ILLEGAL,\n\n -  AF1E\ufb02TRARY AND AGAINST THE PRGVISIONS 012' THE I.D.AC'I'\n --..\u00a3uNL} ETC.\n\nTHIS WRIT PETETION COMENG ON FOR FRELEMINARY\n\n  ;T~1EARIN'<:; THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWENG:\nMK\n\n\n\n-2-\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner While working as a conductor  V K<\/p>\n
xesyondent-Road ‘Franspo\ufb01; Corporation,   K<\/p>\n
‘Management’, disciplinary proceec1ih\u00bb%g”‘ was inii_{i afe_d: “ihr<\/p>\n
misconduct of unauthorised loog abasexieez  VV ”<\/p>\n
petitioner was governed by  ‘–\u00a71n;91e\u00a7yeeeV”‘Le’eve
\nRules 1964, for short Rules.  ‘\ufb01hdingt petifrioner
\ng”u11′ ty and being of the   sezvice was<\/p>\n
proper punishx;1e:1\u00e9t,v.. _the;_’ imposed. the<\/p>\n
puniehx\ufb01e\ufb01t   by onzier (it. 5.3. x993.
\nThe petiuitiohherh  10(4-A) of the indusma’ 1<\/p>\n
Disputes ..1947,-%_&x\u00ab,~_’%s1\u00a7on Act, \ufb01ied a claim statement<\/p>\n
 =  as   before the Ii Acidl. Labour Court,<\/p>\n
  ;’vt”\u00ab:\\rrsz_}1ox’t Labour Court, raising an Industrial<\/p>\n
iI)i~:3phuhte,v  question the order of the management,<\/p>\n
 which \ufb01es hvresisted by filing statement of objections of the<\/p>\n
 V.x’ee’pc.r;\u00ab1dent. in the premise of the pleadings of parties, the<\/p>\n
*   Court framed three iesues, recorded the evidence of<\/p>\n
” Wthe enquiry o\ufb01icer as MW4 and marked six documents as<\/p>\n
Exs.M1 to M6, While the petitioner examined himself as WW-<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-3…\n<\/p>\n
1. The Labour court by order dt. 6.1.2003 if _<\/p>\n
preiiminary issue in the ai\ufb01rmative holding. .1:  ”<\/p>\n
enquiry as fair and proper. ‘Thereaftenxz-e,Itivs,u’~sthe.’m\u00e9titiottezfis <\/p>\n
examined Dr.K.SriI1ivasaiah  ae  , w\ufb01enee\u00e9t <\/p>\n
respondent-Management too
\nas MW-1. The Labour   Vtheuxmatexial
\non record, the evidence   held. that
\nthe petitioner ;;ii(1\u00ab:\u00e9\u00a7;o\u00a7  ettiih-‘:?\u00e9Ive.___V:zV3.?pt];)1icatioI1 before
\nproceeding  V.  aocept the plea of the
\npe\ufb01tionfiru  was sent through his
\nbmther-‘terietv  ha\ufb02irmed the finding of the<\/p>\n
Enquiry officer’  petitioner remained absent<\/p>\n
   …. 1997 to 17.10.1997 Without a<\/p>\n
ve1td~ee1z.se. Labour court further held that the Enquiry<\/p>\n
of\ufb01eertwats \ufb01gstitied in recording a \ufb01nding that the petitioner<\/p>\n
[did t1ottproctuce the prescription slip or the receipts for<\/p>\n
x V’ “..fhA\u00a3a\\?io_g ghuehased medicines for treatment of the alleged<\/p>\n
–   As regents the justi\ufb01cation for the management to<\/p>\n
” htittzpose the punishment of dismissal from service, the Labour<\/p>\n
Court held that the past service record of the petitioner<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
disclosed unautlio\ufb01sed absence \ufb01ozze service ieadVinVg_1 ‘io<\/p>\n
imposition of minor punishment on 1 1 occasions  .\u00ab\u00e9;’:s–. <\/p>\n
petitioner had made vaciilatoxy statements t11a_t..b,e V’ ”<\/p>\n
treatxnent from an Ayurvedic oc{\u00a2m:f b;ut\u00ab i\u00a3evej:I*t}1ev1ese_ T <\/p>\n
adduced the evidence of Dr.\u00bbK._S1’iniv=ase;ia}1,,  VV Wee’: e.”<\/p>\n
Homeo’path, heid that the ease”Vp;:;t—forth   Ia}; Iietitioner
\nwas falee. The obse1″va1iox_1e ofe-I\ufb01ieision  of this
\nCourt in the case of 1i)1\\nsio: uAL ;'(Z3iZ)I$$T:I_’R\u00a5’;.\u00a71;’n1.’r_E2R, NWKRTC,<\/p>\n
BAGALKCYI’ -rv- ‘R\u00a3’\u00a7\u00a7\ufb013}%AV;;AF}N1;\u00a7’_R:i;*\\  KATTI, reported<\/p>\n
i13.ILR 290 4i\u00a7\u00e93’–a:1dAV’e;at}}f’ei\u00a2 Apex com in mm-u
\n‘rRA.NsPo1_?1* \u00a7_:c)R_r5e’\u00a7e.\u00a7T1.c\u00a7N.. SARDAR SINGH zeporied in<\/p>\n
2004 S\u20ac1CVVV'(}i;\u00ab\u00ab?eS)   in the circumstances being<\/p>\n
.\u00abvV.eppoei\u00a7\u00a7e,:  i,e’oo’o2f…..Cx;urt declined to interfere with the<\/p>\n
 t _q1:ae3iztumv 91″. pmiiahment.\n<\/p>\n
” ._    couznsei for the petitioner contends<\/p>\n
ethat the “‘o;’eiriou$ sewice rendered by the petitioner from<\/p>\n
H ”   \u00a7.;98i:V’.”‘to 1995 was blemishless and that it was: only from<\/p>\n
  1995 on account of illness that the petitioner had to<\/p>\n
 “abstain from work, I am not impressed. by that submission.<\/p>\n
”  The faei that the petitioner in order to obtain leave on<\/p>\n
,>\u00ab~\\<\/p>\n
‘ti<\/p>\n
..5..\n<\/p>\n
medical gmuncis was required. to produce medical.  _<\/p>\n
as prescribed in Appendix–[) to Ru1emS4\u00bb of _the:\u00bb anti”<\/p>\n
having not done so, it cannot but   V .’<\/p>\n
was unauthorised. Having  to   <\/p>\n
the petitioner remained unautiicx\ufb01ae\ufb01ly   was
\nvisited with minor   omeeioes it is
\npossible to conclude neg1i;\u00a3.\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00a2   on the
\npart of the  Tihe  petitioner who
\nclaims that   .01″ lack of knowledge
\nto estatj\u00ab1iS}Vi   mate\ufb01ais. The
\nLabour   hez-xtegorical \ufb01nding that the<\/p>\n
petitioner  piacecl 1A1Q\u00bb1i3-a\u00e9;te1*i,s:1 in support of his case but<\/p>\n
 * had *.taciBetOs3r–…\u00abstatements, I am of the considered<\/p>\n
Ogi\ufb01ian mat reasons, \ufb01ndings and conclusioxzgs arrivecl at<\/p>\n
by   are just and pmper, not calling far<\/p>\n
‘ . Vinterfer.ei1ce.V<\/p>\n
H V. _  “}’he writ petition is without merit and is, accordingly<\/p>\n
‘  … ‘ ” rejgected.\n<\/p>\n
Ln.\n<\/p>\n
‘\\<\/p>\n
Sd\/’E.\n<\/p>\n
Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy ” :1:v1$I.:_}N.A;,_L(:<3;~1T12<5LLERT \u00bb ..I. 1:: THE HIGH coum or KARNATAI-EA, BANGALORE"-V ~.. DATED Tms THE 2m DAY OF' SEPTEMBER, 205$ BEFORE ._ H V THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE RAM Morzjgi-Tikmbv WEE'? PETITION No. 44:23'\/52997V(L:KsRTc3' ' . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":715,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008"},"wordCount":715,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008","name":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T09:16:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-a-ravindra-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-2-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B A Ravindra vs The Management Of Kstrc on 2 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}