{"id":253072,"date":"2008-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-12T11:05:33","modified_gmt":"2015-06-12T05:35:33","slug":"sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
 \n\n   .... \n<\/pre>\n
  V T. sT1m—:\u00e9 <\/p>\n
 V VV A1} ar\u00e9”son–;=\u00a7 bf  B N Rudmgorwda
\n_   All are agzfictllturist and residing at
\n” ‘V V. ‘Beunzlr V\ufb02iagc<\/p>\n
 Hasgsa-z<\/a>:~D3.strict W 573 115  Pcamanms<\/p>\n
%_ .\n<\/p>\n
L;\n<\/p>\n
xx THE men noun’: 0? mnxnruu A1′ 1 * . <\/p>\n
Dated this the 9*’-1 day of
\nBamxga 4  %     \u00ab
\nma HOBPBLE am. Ju\u00e9ffzcg rt
\nWrit Petition No.  {:%\u00ab%\u00a7:};g%?;gR\/sun;\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1 Sri B Re.1;mj\u00e9\u00a7ath 1;    ii;\n<\/p>\n
Aged -=11?’ye\u00a71″1′:3 ”   *<\/p>\n
2 s;i*’B*’%R’pzg;bh\u00a7i;\u00e9;~
\nAga\ufb01 39   V <\/p>\n
3 551i 3′ 13 yve;ay%
\nAged 3′?Vycar.3  A <\/p>\n
 – A ” ‘Agei:1″ 35″yg:ars<\/p>\n
B\u00e9lur ‘i”Es1uk<\/p>\n
(By Sn’ K G Sadashivaiah, Advocate)<\/p>\n
ksm)    %
\nV’  V _Wf[o.,Ra\u00a2he:”gmvda\n<\/p>\n
– Aiiged 70<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
The Deputy Commissioner
\nHa.-man District
\nHassan –5′?3 207,<\/p>\n
The Assistant Commissioner and { ..
\nSpecial Land Aoquisi\ufb01on O\ufb01ocrK_ ”
\nHemava\ufb02zy Reservoir  ‘
\nHassan Distxict v <\/p>\n
Hassan — 573 201<\/p>\n
The Tahsilsdar<\/p>\n
Beiur Taluk T _ V<\/p>\n
Beiur — V f<\/p>\n
Hassan District -~ 5′?-3 “I 15<\/p>\n
Sri M&B.s’\u20acgW”\u00e9\ufb01.’;’– %     A
\nS\/o latr\u00e9 Mazigowda \u00e9  A<\/p>\n
Aged  gbout’;’381.:y_cars ”  ‘ ‘
\nResiding [atif,Go1vL\u00a7r’  .\n<\/p>\n
Maciih.-2:11 Ho-i;:;a._V  >   %
\nHassan Diatxiet -‘%”S’?3V “115
\nSn’ Raje Gowda” V<\/p>\n
   L.Rs.,<\/p>\n
Smt.\n<\/p>\n
rm  @
\nH R”R11;drappa<\/p>\n
 * 0 Riachcgcmda
\n ”  55 years<\/p>\n
 Sr; Digambarappa
\n S\/o Rajegowda
\nAgcad about 35 yams<\/p>\n
_     ;’}Iti\u20acX’ passed by the Deputy Commissioner
\n  144′  at Am1exu1e–H setting aside: the order of the
\n  Commissiaoncr and the Tahsikiar and mmanding the<\/p>\n
K  _ i:t\u00a7at’t;a;r for fresh considcratian.\n<\/p>\n
7 Sri Gangadhamppa
\nSic) Rajegowda
\nAged about 32 years   <\/p>\n
Respondents 5 to 7 are<\/p>\n
Residing at Haarohalli<\/p>\n
Madihaili Hcbli V
\nHassan District:–571 135 ____”‘-…v.’.R\u00a2;:spo11\u00a2ie1;ta <\/p>\n
(By Sri R  1305?;  to 3;\n<\/p>\n
Smt. Namitha Mahesh, Advgx.-ate. fbi R_s+_;-5\u00a7a),’_5{b). and 96-7)<\/p>\n
This W1it:_}3e’\u00a3i\u00a7ti:jz2 i\u00e9s  undm*”Art\u00a7cIcs 226 and 227 of
\nthe Cons\ufb01tulicxanf  praying’–\u00a3o”qua$h the order passed by
\n1:11;: Deputy C’;oxx1:1’1L\u00a7sai{\u00a7ne4_ ;’*.’:E-Eqgisrzin  Hmsaan District
\n(mspondcnt\ufb01l ‘h::zi:i\ufb01):_’RA -\u00bbN0.__117i-BQGQ-2003 dated 14-11-2006<\/p>\n
vide.\n<\/p>\n
Thi$-Wrutit  for prehm’ inary hca1′.u1′ g this
\nday, the C\u00bbot1rt_ mad\u00e9’t&>}1\u00a3:i\u00a7;vin,g:\n<\/p>\n
 ….. *3 B E E B<\/p>\n
  have pxcfcxtrcd this Writ Pe\ufb01ticm<\/p>\n
2. The material on record discloses land bearing Sy. 0.\n<\/p>\n
ROM _ .7 . –  ..  .5′ ,. . I.’
\n17 nwasuzres 72 acres in all. which is 31 test} a <\/p>\n
A'”  “I7axgacefi’p1’uject wen: granted 4 acres of land in Sy.
\n ‘rehabilitation. The said order ef grant was\n<\/p>\n
  111.”‘\u00a21\u00a7:i’e.”\u00e9:at1  However, the same came to be caneeiieti
\n \u00e9  t11e4 ‘!%..ssf i:-?.\u00a7te1;’;t Commissioner on 11.2.2001? which order was
\n by the Deputy Commissioner on 2.1.2001.
\n   by the same respondents 4 to 7′ pxefermd an appeal
\nT  Kamataka Appellate Tribune} whieh ailowed the appeal<\/p>\n
  en 24.8.2001 setting aside the oztier of canoeliaticm and<\/p>\n
Belur Taiuk, Hassan District. In the
\nK.S.Nan.j11ndaswaIny was granted 25-macxes ‘
\nSmyanarayana Rae was ganted
\nbetween them 50 acres. The oriier 9f \ufb01e’ L’
\nm~granti:ng the hand is dated 3o.5V;%}::’\u00a77e;e.__E\u00a7\u00a2:h sold the
\nland belonging to them teene  Selvam under a
\nregistered sale deegi ‘Loopy of the
\ndeed produced  shows the extent
\nmen\ufb01oned    not 25 acres. The
\npetititanefe  each out of the 50 acres
\nunder   dated 28.4.1997. In the<\/p>\n
meanwhije 1’c;’:;\u20ac’\u00a7p(}V11\u20ac3\u00a33I.,3iSA.”.4- ‘”t..\u00a3J 7 who 1031’; their land for the<\/p>\n
rcstozrixag the grant in their favbusr. In   <\/p>\n
petitioners \ufb01led a Writ Petition bcfcrm this    —\n<\/p>\n
34651-34655\/2001 seeking a di;~eca’$a::\u00a7   the <\/p>\n
authoritiezs to measure 50  \u00a355 <\/p>\n
boundaries. Respondents 4 to   ‘tn:V thc; \u00a7said Writ
\nPetitions. This Court by oxriiejr  allowed the
\nWrit Pc\ufb01ticns dimp\ufb01ng   boundaries of
\nthe land in    ail the in\ufb01emsted
\npersons    \ufb01rwncrs on the basis of
\nthe   Ag\u00e9\ufb01l\u00e9mcnt records keeping in
\nView Secfgicm’   Land Revenue Act, 1964.\n<\/p>\n
AccordingIy,VV’th_#  ‘i$\u00e9.ucd notices ten the petitioners as<\/p>\n
\u00bb ,’S\u00a7’\u20acH 3_.&i’;:I1;O:f_{1\u00a7\ufb02 vms\ufb01indgnm 4 to 7′ and prepared a sketch as per
\n 50 acres of land puzchascd by the<\/p>\n
  sale dcreds. A  by the amine<\/p>\n
 .I1:spc>iiii:ic11v*1i.~:.\u00a2.. ‘=’.4  to 7′ pmferr\ufb01 an appeal to the Assistant<\/p>\n
H 4.44’\u20ac.3@im1t1fissidn;::r who dismissed the: same. 11: “m against these<\/p>\n
  iitspondents 4 ta 7 preferred a second appeal to the<\/p>\n
   Comzmssioncr, Hassan District. The Deputy<\/p>\n
   Commissioner set aside the azforcsa\ufb01 order of the Assistant<\/p>\n
Commissioner as wcii as the sketch prepared
\non the gmund undsr Section 14O(2)_9f_1\ufb01he \ufb01\u00e9i’ \u00bbe:i:;e;V  ‘ ~
\nwas expected to prepare a sketch
\nrespect of the entire extent of mg       >
\nsaid land belonging to the   _”\u00a7V’fhe:1;\u00a7\u00a7:forc. the
\nDeputy Commissioner   to’AAe:vsAs.*Vect1tc the
\nbmmdaxy work st;-gguy  30(2) of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
Aggricved by the:  hf-\ufb01fom this Court.\n<\/p>\n
3. Res;13bi\u00a7d\u00a2iz”t\u00e9S.V__i:1ave._  aqzpearancc. They have<\/p>\n
\ufb01led a   have 3139 produced
\ndmumcz\ufb01s   contention. The sum and
\nsubstance of  ‘in the first place the vendors of
\n _t’hc   only to an extent of 50 acres of<\/p>\n
 331: dead dated 22.10.1987 under which<\/p>\n
 that they own 54 acres af land which<\/p>\n
 is pafbntljgfi \u00e9z\ufb01ir\ufb01mus. Secondly they contend out of the 50
\nH H   owned by the vendors of the petitioners an extent
\nV. A   aegis 1′? gamma belon\ufb01ng to both Saniyappa and Scivam
\n acquired for Yagachi Canal and possession of the said land<\/p>\n
   Rivas takzm on 19.7.1991 as per AImexu1.r=:—R14. if the; afomsaid<\/p>\n
X?\u00bb\/’<\/p>\n
exizem: of land 4 acres 34 glmtas is cxcludati,
\nwith the vendors of the petitioners _is.~~e_I_1’ly    gjjnti-:5 <\/p>\n
and, th\ufb01rcfore, they could not havc:”:Qon \u00a7%ey\u00a5\u00e9:d
\npetitioners and the authorities ‘iisfutgot t he     L’
\nacres of land on the basis  the said
\nezxtcnt. It is in  the suxvcy
\nconducted by thg:    the Deputy
\nCommissioner    said ox\ufb01crs and<\/p>\n
dimcting re-s;\u00ab1;’V\u20ac;\u00a7.;\u00bb’_ H <\/p>\n
4. :*._Pe;r’  counsel for the petitioners
\ncountc\ufb01ng  an en\u00e9onscment issuw
\nby the;  O\ufb01ccr stating that in Sy. No.<\/p>\n
   extent of ? mlm 10 guntas and as<\/p>\n
M  belong to the Government no award is
\n   ‘gm-Inpcxasation is paid. Relying on that the
\n   \u00a7c:amed  for the, petitioners submit the: contcn\ufb01en that 4<\/p>\n
   guntas was acquired is without any substance.\n<\/p>\n
 S. Fmm the aiizvresaid undisputed facts what emerges is<\/p>\n
  No. ‘.72 measures 17 atmas. Out of the said 72 acres 50<\/p>\n
.9 \ufb01ver:  -3-5  only. At any rate before \ufb01xing<\/p>\n
 is for the authorities to \ufb01nd out what is the<\/p>\n
K V  qnfV’lv;.tg:)1.i1i.daI’11cs. If the extent of 4 ames 34 games ia not<\/p>\n
H  \ufb01gcontendad by the petitimzzezs than they wouki be
\nV  50 acres of land. Pcti\ufb01ouers would not be ealti\ufb02sd to
\n  of lead if there is aoquisi\ufb01on. Then their cntitbmcnt<\/p>\n
  ‘kvould be arestrictcd to 45 acres 6 guntas. It is net 2: case where<\/p>\n
acms was ganted to K. ‘. :3’ ” ” ;
\nI{.S.Smyanarayanara<:: where in turn   2 '
\nSelvam and Saniapjpa, the vendors
\nas per Annaxu1t=:~R14 an cxte:r;t "cfV..2  17_
\nacres 34 guntas was taken  0fu6Vt;;2\u00a3!.3 EV$cf\u20ac;A1ve1Avvv1}*\u00a7as.sing of
\nan award. Thus, the  c;f  the petitioners
\nvendors on the day  " 45 acms 5
\nguntas.   which reliance is
\nplasixmd shcrwsi.   It is on that basis
\npc1ition\u00a2:jb$     \ufb01acy want the boundaries
\nto be  for J  No. 17. The authorities have<\/p>\n
acqujxt-ti an 'E:-\u00a7.'-tm':t,.\u00a2V:;1V"–.  and the peti\ufb01oaars vendors<\/p>\n
actu" '  heid by the paxtlb 3 who am seckm g<\/p>\n
the petitioners are challenging the grant  <\/p>\n
respondents 4 to 7 or the respondentaate iiiie it i<\/p>\n
of the petitioners of the afo1esaid<pl\u00a3n_'id;ii The thin<\/p>\n
regarding the extent of   ed   <\/p>\n
which is the land which they     Under these
\ncircumstances, the  Com]  a'aaionr,r  ji1sti\ufb01ed' in
\nsetting aa1d' e the orders 'pass:-dd     and the
\nAssistant  i    to keep in
\nmind       thereafter in \ufb01x the<\/p>\n
which  the   is utilized' ' for Yagachi Canal<\/p>\n
" "and  the  in the petitioners vendors was
\n mentioned in Annexu1e–R14 and also to
\n   \ufb01nd' oiitas  endorsement, only the land belonging' to the<\/p>\n
 ' Govemnient;  land, was acquired and no compensation<\/p>\n
  "After ascertaining these facts \ufb01x the boundaries in<\/p>\n
 with the directions issued in the earlier Writ<\/p>\n
it  This would meet the ends of justice. In that View of
\nhi\/'<\/p>\n
the matter. I do not \ufb01nd any merit in this
\nAocoltlingly, the petition is disposed 4:-f:      't<\/p>\n
ckl<\/p>\n
Ii!-{J w. 2:. Re. 11659 '4a\u00a3'–\ufb01gs
\n3.3.2009     "\n<\/p>\n
Mm. at. 25112009  _ A _<\/p>\n
in paragraph 2 air page 3 in
\nViiiaga’ is mcnf:211ed, it is   nt
\nvtiiiag\ufb01 is ‘\ufb02anayakanahaiii  \u00a7 for VV
\n{?\u00a3}I’I’E,Cfi”j{\u00a7I1 of the afomsajei “t.’\u00abI_’\u00a7’f_}I’,’! \u00abt’1f;i:’-3 \ufb01\ufb01piimztion<\/p>\n
is \ufb02ied,<\/p>\n
2, The   ui1t::rf._4’c:2u_1::\u00a7\ufb01,’;c1V\u00a5,3t:x;’i’; H.:=:1?:r:::, o\ufb01tse: is;\n<\/p>\n
direct\u00e9td tcr      <\/p>\n
Sd\/-3
\nfudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008 Author: N.Kumar …. V T. sT1m—:\u00e9 V VV A1} ar\u00e9”son–;=\u00a7 bf B N Rudmgorwda _ All are agzfictllturist and residing at ” ‘V V. ‘Beunzlr V\ufb02iagc Hasgsa-z:~D3.strict W 573 115 Pcamanms %_ . L; xx THE men noun’: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1446,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008"},"wordCount":1446,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008","name":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan ... on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-12T05:35:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjunath-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-hassan-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B R Manjunath vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 9 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}