{"id":25335,"date":"2011-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-09-10T12:11:54","modified_gmt":"2016-09-10T06:41:54","slug":"mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/900042\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Pai\n           T\u00ad15,\u00a0Sunrise\u00a0Park\u00a0Tenements\n           P.O\u00a0Bodakdev\n           Ahmedabad\u00a0380\u00a0054\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Prasar\u00a0Bharati\n           O\/o\u00a0Chief\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(WZ)\n           AIR\u00a0&amp;\u00a0TV,\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0Bhawan\n           Worli\n           Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Kalpana\u00a0Gokhe,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Director\u00a0(Engg.)\n\n                                      \u00ad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner              :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                               Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/900042\n\n\n                                                   ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.28.11.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0O\/o\u00a0CE(WZ),\u00a0Mumbai.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       his\u00a0application\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0class\u00a0I\u00a0Engineering\u00a0Officer\u00a0was\u00a0deputed\u00a0as\u00a0an\u00a0Inquiry\u00a0Officer\u00a0to\u00a0look\u00a0into\u00a0certain\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       charges\u00a0against\u00a0staff\u00a0members,\u00a0officers\u00a0of\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0Kendra,\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0in\u00a02008.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0context,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       he\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>       i)       Copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0inquiry\u00a0report\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\n\n       ii)      Any\u00a0additional\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0details\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.     The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a07.1.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0inquiry\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       referring\u00a0 to. \u00a0 \u00a0 She\u00a0 added\u00a0 that\u00a0 \u00a0 the\u00a0 reports\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0 inquiries\u00a0conducted\u00a0 in\u00a02008\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0 then\u00a0Chief\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Engineer\u00a0which\u00a0were\u00a0confidential\u00a0in\u00a0nature\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0submitted\u00a0personally\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0enquiry\u00a0officer\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0disciplinary\u00a0authority\u00a0i.e.\u00a0DG:Doordarshan\u00a0vigilance\u00a0section,\u00a0Mandi\u00a0House,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0and\u00a0added\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       that\u00a0any\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0enquiry\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0sought\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0vigilance\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       section\u00a0of\u00a0DG:Doordarshan.\u00a0She\u00a0marked\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0letter\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Director\u00a0General\u00a0(Vigilance\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Section).\u00a0 The\u00a0 Applicant,\u00a0 however,\u00a0 on\u00a0 not\u00a0 receiving\u00a0 any\u00a0 reply\u00a0 from\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 Vigilance\u00a0 Section\u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       DG:Doordarshan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.18.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>3.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0reiterated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0Chief\u00a0\u00a0Engineer\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0V.C.Jain,\u00a0(who\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       since\u00a0retired)\u00a0\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a02008,\u00a0conducted\u00a0several\u00a0enquiries\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       enquiry\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0referring\u00a0to.\u00a0\u00a0Be\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0may,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0neither\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0enquiry\u00a0reports\u00a0not\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       copies\u00a0 are\u00a0 available\u00a0 with\u00a0 her\u00a0 since\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0reports\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0handed\u00a0over\u00a0personally\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       concerned\u00a0officer\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0DG:Doordarshan\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Jain\u00a0himself.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0<br \/>\n          also\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0unaware\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0persons\u00a0against\u00a0whom\u00a0the\u00a0enquiries\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0conducted.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellant\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0enquiry\u00a0was\u00a0against\u00a0a\u00a0stenographer\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0news\u00a0division\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Doordarshan.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0by\u00a0ordinary\u00a0post\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         violation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0orders\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting\u00a0\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0directed\u00a0\u00a0Prasar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Bharati\u00a0to\u00a0ensure\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0RTI\u00a0replies\u00a0are\u00a0dispatched\u00a0\u00a0either\u00a0by\u00a0Registered\u00a0post\u00a0or\u00a0by\u00a0speed\u00a0post.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Section,\u00a0DG:\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         Doordarshan\u00a0 \u00a0 to\u00a0 \u00a0 respond\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Ms.\u00a0Gokhe,\u00a0Dy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Director(Engg)\u00a0by\u00a010.4.11.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0 \u00a0PIO,\u00a0Vigilance,\u00a0Doordarshan,\u00a0 \u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         penalty\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.250\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0day\u00a0(Maximum\u00a0Rs.25000)\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0levied\u00a0on\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0responding\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0time\u00a0period\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0 \u00a0Act.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0may\u00a0submit\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         written\u00a0response\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a010.\u00a04.11.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0PIOs\u00a0in\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharati\u00a0make\u00a0take\u00a0note\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         letter\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0I&amp;B,\u00a0to\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharati,\u00a0 \u00a0as\u00a0mentioned\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0and\u00a0ensure\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         henceforth\u00a0all\u00a0RTI\u00a0matter\u00a0are\u00a0dispatched\u00a0either\u00a0by\u00a0Registered\u00a0post\u00a0or\u00a0by\u00a0speed\u00a0post,\u00a0in\u00a0compliance\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         with\u00a0the\u00a0Secretary&#8217;s\u00a0instructions.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         PIO,\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Section,\u00a0DG:Doordarshn,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0for\u00a0action.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>5.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Pai<br \/>\n         T\u00ad15,\u00a0Sunrise\u00a0Park\u00a0Tenements<br \/>\n         P.O\u00a0Bodakdev<br \/>\n         Ahmedabad\u00a0380\u00a0054<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n         Prasar\u00a0Bharati<br \/>\n      O\/o\u00a0Chief\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(WZ)<br \/>\n     AIR\u00a0&amp;\u00a0TV,\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n     Worli<br \/>\n     Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>3.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/900042 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a011,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Pai T\u00ad15,\u00a0Sunrise\u00a0Park\u00a0Tenements P.O\u00a0Bodakdev Ahmedabad\u00a0380\u00a0054 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Prasar\u00a0Bharati O\/o\u00a0Chief\u00a0Engineer\u00a0(WZ) AIR\u00a0&amp;\u00a0TV,\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0Bhawan Worli Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Kalpana\u00a0Gokhe,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Director\u00a0(Engg.) \u00ad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/900042 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.28.11.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0O\/o\u00a0CE(WZ),\u00a0Mumbai.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0 his\u00a0application\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0class\u00a0I\u00a0Engineering\u00a0Officer\u00a0was\u00a0deputed\u00a0as\u00a0an\u00a0Inquiry\u00a0Officer\u00a0to\u00a0look\u00a0into\u00a0certain\u00a0 charges\u00a0against\u00a0staff\u00a0members,\u00a0officers\u00a0of\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0Kendra,\u00a0Ahmedabad\u00a0in\u00a02008.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0context,\u00a0 he\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information: i) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":580,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011"},"wordCount":580,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011","name":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T06:41:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manojpai-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Manojpai vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}