{"id":253814,"date":"2009-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-04-13T20:08:23","modified_gmt":"2015-04-13T14:38:23","slug":"prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRCRev..No. 128 of 2009()\n\n\n1. PRABHAKARAN, S\/O. NANU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, S\/O. MATHEVAN PILLAI\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.SAJEEV\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :24\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n         PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                      ------------------------\n                     R.C.R.No.128 OF 2009\n                      ------------------------\n\n             Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.\n<\/p>\n
\n
      The tenant, who lost concurrently before the rent control<\/p>\n
court as well as the appellate authority, is the revision petitioner.<\/p>\n
Eviction was sought by the landlord on the grounds of arrears of<\/p>\n
rent Section 11(2)(b), reconstruction Section 11(4)(iv) and bona<\/p>\n
fide   own occupation Section 11(3) of the         Kerala Buildings<\/p>\n
(Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.       The need projected in the<\/p>\n
rent control petition was that the existing building is to be pulled<\/p>\n
down and a new building is to be constructed in its place for use<\/p>\n
as a lodging house.    The bona fides of the need and the claim<\/p>\n
was denied and the tenant claimed protection of the second<\/p>\n
proviso to    sub section (3) of Section 11.      The rent control<\/p>\n
petition was enquired into and      on appreciating the evidence<\/p>\n
before the rent control court, it was submitted on behalf of the<\/p>\n
respondent landlord that     eviction order need not be passed<\/p>\n
under Section 11(4) (iv) and it will suffice if order of eviction is<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                  2<\/span><\/p>\n
passed under sub section (3) of Section 11 and sub section (2) of<\/p>\n
that Section. The rent control court         would appreciate the<\/p>\n
evidence and conclude that the landlord’s need under Section 11<\/p>\n
(3) was a bona fide one.      It was also found in the context of<\/p>\n
second proviso to sub section (3) of Section 11 that even though<\/p>\n
the tenant was successful in establishing that he satisfied the first<\/p>\n
limb of the second proviso to sub Section (3), in view of his<\/p>\n
failure to establish that he satisfies the second limb of the<\/p>\n
second proviso to sub section 3 of Section 11, he was not eligible<\/p>\n
for the benefit of the second proviso at all. As for the ground for<\/p>\n
arrears   of rent, it was found that        rent was    in arrears.<\/p>\n
Accordingly, order of eviction was passed against the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner both on the ground of arrears of rent as well as bona<\/p>\n
fide own occupation.\n<\/p>\n
      2. The appellate authority also, after reappraisal of the<\/p>\n
entire evidence, concurred with all the conclusion of the rent<\/p>\n
control court and confirmed the order of eviction.<\/p>\n
      3.  The   learned   counsel   for  the   revision   petitioner<\/p>\n
Sri.D.Sajeev,   has    addressed    us   very    strenuously    and<\/p>\n
persuasively. He submitted that the need projected in the rent<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                 3<\/span><\/p>\n
control petition was to construct a new building and to occupy<\/p>\n
that building for the purpose of conducting a lodging business.<\/p>\n
The need to construct a new building was given up by the<\/p>\n
respondent in the    rent control court itself. According to the<\/p>\n
learned counsel, since the   projected need of putting up a new<\/p>\n
building in the place of an existing old building has been given<\/p>\n
up, the need projected under Section 11 (3) cannot survive any<\/p>\n
longer.\n<\/p>\n
      4.  As directed by us, learned counsel placed before us<\/p>\n
copies of the rent control petition as well as the memorandum<\/p>\n
of rent control appeal.      We have anxiously considered the<\/p>\n
submissions of Sri.Sajeev, learned    counsel for the petitioner.<\/p>\n
We have gone through the papers placed by him before us as<\/p>\n
well as the order of the rent control court and the judgment of<\/p>\n
the rent control appellate authority.  Having gone through the<\/p>\n
rent control petition, it is clear to our mind that though the<\/p>\n
ground of eviction under Section 11 4(iv) was also specifically<\/p>\n
invoked in the pleadings   as a ground for own occupation after<\/p>\n
reconstruction,   the ground which seriously arose was only the<\/p>\n
ground of own occupation.         The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
respondent was perfectly justified in submitting before the rent<\/p>\n
control court that    order of eviction is not necessary under<\/p>\n
Section 11 (4)(iv) in view of the need projected under Section 11<\/p>\n
(3), since an order of eviction under Section 11 (4) (iv) will be<\/p>\n
subject to proviso to that sub section including the 3rd proviso,<\/p>\n
which obliges the landlord to re induct the tenant to any portion<\/p>\n
of the newly constructed building.\n<\/p>\n
      5.    The only question,      therefore, which arises for<\/p>\n
consideration before us in this revision under Section 20 is<\/p>\n
whether the findings concurrently entered by the rent control<\/p>\n
court and the appellate authority that the respondent landlord<\/p>\n
needs to occupy the new building put up by him in the place of an<\/p>\n
existing old building for use as lodging house is a bona fide one<\/p>\n
warrants interference and whether the tenant is entitled to the<\/p>\n
protection of the second proviso to sub Section (3).    On going<\/p>\n
through the order of the rent control court and the judgment of<\/p>\n
the appellate authority, we find that the findings entered therein<\/p>\n
in favour of the respondent landlord in the context        of sub<\/p>\n
Section (3) of Section 11 are founded on evidence and are<\/p>\n
reasonable findings. Same is the position with the finding under<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                    5<\/span><\/p>\n
second proviso to sub section 3 of Section 11. Of course, the<\/p>\n
first ingredient of the second proviso has been found in favour of<\/p>\n
the tenant. But, both the ingredients are in the conjunctive and<\/p>\n
the same will not of much avail to the tenant.            we, in this<\/p>\n
jurisdiction under Section 20 of the Act, are not expected to re<\/p>\n
appreciate the entire evidence and substitute our conclusions on<\/p>\n
facts for the conclusions entered by the facts finding authority.<\/p>\n
Under the statutory scheme, the appellate authority is the final<\/p>\n
court on facts.      Our enquiry is only to consider whether the<\/p>\n
finding on facts entered by the facts finding authority is vitiated<\/p>\n
by any illegality, irregularity or impropriety warranting correction<\/p>\n
under Section 20.      Having gauged the order of the rent control<\/p>\n
court as well as the judgment of the appellate authority by those<\/p>\n
para metres, we are of the view that there is absolutely no<\/p>\n
warrant for invocation of the revisional jurisdiction of this court<\/p>\n
under Section 20 of the Act.        Same is the position as regards<\/p>\n
the order of eviction passed under section 11 (2) (b). Of course,<\/p>\n
Sri.Sajeev, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits<\/p>\n
that the entire arrears of rent is under deposit. If it is so, nothing<\/p>\n
prevents the revision petitioner to apply under Section 11 (2)(c)<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                    6<\/span><\/p>\n
and get the order of eviction formally vacated.           The revision<\/p>\n
petitioner will be entitled for 30 days time more from today for<\/p>\n
filing application under Section 11(2)(c).          Considering the<\/p>\n
apprehension of the petitioner voiced by the learned counsel<\/p>\n
Sri.Sajeev    that the respondent landlord will not        put up new<\/p>\n
building or conduct       lodging house business,         we will only<\/p>\n
observe that under such an eventuality sub section (2) of section<\/p>\n
11 will come to the rescue of the revision petitioner.<\/p>\n
      6. Result of the above discussion is that the           revision<\/p>\n
petition fails and the same will stand dismissed.<\/p>\n
      7. As his last request, Sri.Sajeev sought for         one year’s<\/p>\n
time. But we do not think we will be justified in granting so<\/p>\n
much of time.      However, on considerations of indulgence, we<\/p>\n
direct the Execution Court to defer the execution till 1st January<\/p>\n
2010 subject to the following conditions;\n<\/p>\n
                     i). The revision petitioner shall file<\/p>\n
               an affidavit before the Execution court<\/p>\n
               undertaking to peaceful surrender the<\/p>\n
               petition   schedule   building    to   the<\/p>\n
               respondent on or before 31\/12\/2009<\/p>\n
RCR.No.128\/2008                   7<\/span><\/p>\n
           and also discharge the arrears of rent<\/p>\n
           found by the rent control court under<\/p>\n
           Section 11 (2)(b) within one month and<\/p>\n
           continue to pay occupational charges at<\/p>\n
           the current      rent rate till he makes<\/p>\n
           actual surrender.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 ii). It is clarified that the revision<\/p>\n
           petitioner will get the benefit of time<\/p>\n
           granted under this judgment only if the<\/p>\n
           affidavit is filed on time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
                                    PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                       P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE
\ndpk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RCRev..No. 128 of 2009() 1. PRABHAKARAN, S\/O. NANU, … Petitioner Vs 1. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, S\/O. MATHEVAN PILLAI … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.D.SAJEEV For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon’ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE The Hon’ble MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPrabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1239,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009"},"wordCount":1239,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009","name":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-13T14:38:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakaran-vs-ramakrishna-pillai-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prabhakaran vs Ramakrishna Pillai on 24 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253814\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}