{"id":253829,"date":"2008-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-09-12T06:22:03","modified_gmt":"2014-09-12T00:52:03","slug":"smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">94 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.52321\/__\u00a72I_G\u00a7\n1\n\nIN THE men COURT or KARNATAKA AT  %\nnxmn mm was 24133 mm or      =\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUS'\u00a73;;E::-!'.!Aa.!'?(.\u00a75'A_.1:'4lA!.'.::\" %% A'  _\nwnrr PETITION nemszi' ~91?  J %\nBETWEEN:     \n\nSMTCHANNAMMA\nWIQHALAGE Gowm,\n\nAGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,\n\nR.iAT.BlLAGUNOA VILLAGE, _ .\n\nPERIYAPATNA TALUK;  - ; \u00abV \nwsoREo:s*rRec_1:--_   I     permowsn\n\n   \n\n(av sR|.B.s.MAGA\u00a7&gt;;Ag;\"Ai&gt;vo\u00a2A'1E5--   \"\nAND:  .... _  \" V '\n\n1. rnesrarsayrnaauamkaa, *   \nDEPARTMENT,OFREVENUE,_'    \nREPRESENTED BY rrs SECRETARY,--- \nM.S.BUlLDiNG,  V. -  \nDRAMBEDKAR vssm, -\n,BA~GAL,GjRE--5m om. ~ \n\n2:':VTH'EAAs\u00e9:;=3'fA\u00a7ai1'cbmMIssroNER\nHUNSUR suamvwmu, 1.\nH{3N_SL\u00a3R.   -  \n\n  SMT.fTHCTAPPA SHF\u00a7!\"TY,\n\n._ ' \" S!0.K.S.'FHOT4l_\u00a7-*PA \n\n men ABGUT so YEARS,\n\n..  . ,. .RfAI.BEf\u00a5ABAPURA VILLAGE,\n\" = V PERfv'.APATNA 'TALUK.\n wanna ezsrmcr'\n\n --  =    RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">&#8216;(ef  motea SH\u00a3VANANt}APPA, HOSP<\/p>\n<p>._ 1&#8217; V  V . ._\u00a3-fo\ufb01 R1 3. 2 Ana SR1. T.N.RAGHUPATHY, ADVOCATE FOR R3)<\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w.p.No.s232;:2oe3<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.5232 i{20\u20ac!3<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THISWRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AN!) 22&#8242;? OF<br \/>\nTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE IMPUGNED<br \/>\nORDER I-&#8220;A3SED BY THE KAT. BANGALORE IN APPEAL NO.903I2002<\/p>\n<p>D&#8217;I&#8217;.2.6,2003 VIDE ANN-A AND GRANT STAY VIDE ANNA <\/p>\n<p>FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO IT.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;n-as wan PETITION cowncs ON FOR HEARING,   <\/p>\n<p>COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Petitioner, being awrieved by <\/p>\n<p>June 2003 passed by the xgmam.IAppeqaa:eI.iaI.Ismna:, <\/p>\n<p>Bangalora made in Appg-at  .Ivii&#8217;de..ArInexure<br \/>\nA, has presented me   <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;if  &#8216;..\u00a7oner&#8217;  in the instant vwit<br \/>\npe\ufb01tion:&#8221;&#8216;IIas&#8221;tI1a&#8217;t,: :5;-:IdI \ufb01led Form No.7-A under<br \/>\nSectipn  the Iamehded Land Reforms Act for<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;v1r\u00a2-,~gi\u00a7Is*4,IIIf:ra&#8217;i:*::n  rights on the ground that, she<\/p>\n<p>  in question since severai decades.<\/p>\n<p>  _ ThIe&#8221;-I appii\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01on \ufb01led by peti\ufb01onar had come up for<\/p>\n<p>  befare the Auawized Officer. The<\/p>\n<p>  officer, in turn, after verifying the records and<\/p>\n<p>I  &#8220;other materiai available on file, without conducting proper<\/p>\n<p>IN &#8216;ms HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w.1&gt;.No.s2321:2ao3<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOQQQ &#8216;W.!&#8217;.No.5232il2G03<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>enquiry has registered me occupancy righm in favour of<\/p>\n<p>petitioner herein in respect of an extent of G1 <\/p>\n<p>guntas in Sy.No.7l1 situate at Bilgund village,  <\/p>\n<p>Taluk by his order dated 24&#8243;&#8216; July&#8230;2002.  * <\/p>\n<p>correctness of the said order  <\/p>\n<p>passed by the Authorized  tlA1&#8243;&#8216;e:_ti1ir;Ai v:gfAeeA_i;$t:s*1c:&#8217;i;=:nt A e<\/p>\n<p>herein filed an appeal_ on&#8217;..&#8217;Ve_;fiI\u00e9-\u00bbe._ef &#8216;ti&#8217;ie&#8217;v-AKer\u00a7nataka<br \/>\nAppeuate Tribunal at Behgeiemi&#8217; an<br \/>\nThe Appeilate   the said appeal<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led by&lt;%_\ufb021i__re set aside the order passw<br \/>\nby the   further issued the directim<\/p>\n<p> _ to an\u00e9gnge for eiegrdernama\ufb01on of 07 acres of Sy-No-7I1<\/p>\n<p>  guntas of sy.No.7I2 and further<\/p>\n<p> Jtthe respec\ufb01ve portions of land under<\/p>\n<p>&#039;v._\u00bbunaeti2t)}i;zec4i cultivation wimin 04 acres 04 guntas of<\/p>\n<p>&#039;    sand in Sy.No.7I2 of Bilagunda village of<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">  &#8212;. V \ufb02eranahalli Hobli, Piriyapatna Taluk, so as to avoid any<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; u further unnecessary can on regarding respective<\/p>\n<p>____M____M____.__..,,&#8230;.._.n<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAR}~}A&#8217;i&#8217;AZ\u00a3&lt;A AT BANGALORE W.PNa.523&#039;21:&#039;29D3<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT 0?&#039; KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.5232l;&#039;2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>rights and interests of the parties concerned. Being<\/p>\n<p>aggrieved by the impugned order passed by Karnafdaka<\/p>\n<p>Appeiiate Tribunal, mtitioner herein felt &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>present the instant writ petition.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3. I have heard Iearned Igou_nee| ii<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and learned     <\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">4. After carefuiiexreiajdtidn ;df&#8221;fh_eibi&#8217;eriginai records,<\/p>\n<p>made avaiiabiefby  Pieader<\/p>\n<p>appeerfingior&#8217;  threadbare and o\ufb02uer<\/p>\n<p>reievantiimiateriai. ieiieiiebiiie on \ufb01ie, and after careful<\/p>\n<p> pergzsgigeii af  order passed by the Karnataka<\/p>\n<p> and the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p> vide Annexures A and B respectiveiy,<\/p>\n<p> it asiimanarieii on the face at&#8217; both the orders that, both the<\/p>\n<p>vi  have committed a grave error and iiiegaiity in<\/p>\n<p>   proceeding to pass the impugned orders without actuaiiy<\/p>\n<p> going \ufb02irough 318 reiev\/a%&#8217;rer.:ords. it is signi\ufb01cant to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;-&#8220;__m___&#8217;___,,_._&#8230;-.-I<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.\u00a7&#8217;.Ne.52321;&#8217;20G3<\/p>\n<p>Rt&#8217; THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.52321!2003<br \/>\n:3<\/p>\n<p>note after microscopic evaiuation of me originai_,reo-orcis<\/p>\n<p>that, in the record of rights, for the 1972-73  in <\/p>\n<p>column No.12 (2), the name of\u00bb..\u00bbtt1e  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has been noti\ufb01ed and   \u00a2ui:iv?.:asr{gi _<\/p>\n<p>an extent of 01 acre 19 guntae\ufb02and  coiutnn ;(3), it<\/p>\n<p>the mode of cuitivation  iiiiihau\ufb01worized<br \/>\ncui\ufb01vation&#8217;. Further,  No.7-A \ufb01led<br \/>\nby petitioner  rights, &#8216;me<br \/>\nTaiuk    inspection and<br \/>\npreparreoiiio the report dated 18&#8243;&#8216;<br \/>\n &#8216;tiie petitioner is in possession<\/p>\n<p>of an &#8216;extentaofv 25 guntas of Sy.No.&#8217;\/&#8217;I1. This<\/p>\n<p>  iiooumentaw evidence was very much<\/p>\n<p>1ei1\u00e9&#8217;i!at\u00a7ive  the same has not been looked into<\/p>\n<p>N it \u00abV not  by both the authorities and proceeded to<\/p>\n<p>it &#8216;V V&#8217; &#8220;&#8216;..jjp\u00e9iss;..ij1eV&#8221;impugned orders contrary to the relevant record<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; a\u00a7&#8217;aiiebie on file, without verifying the mode of cultivation<\/p>\n<p> V?  the petitioner and without ascertaining as to which<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.PNo.S232l.f2DG3<\/p>\n<p>{N THE HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.52321s&#8217;2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>por\ufb01on has been granted in favour of late Sri. Thotappa<\/p>\n<p>Shetty. Further, it is seen that, bath the <\/p>\n<p>have not conducted proper enquiry as envis:r;&#8217;:g;ed&#8217;_ <\/p>\n<p>Sestion 77025: the Land Reforms   i &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>pf<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, in View of non conductiiizf  <\/p>\n<p>for not taking proper decisiofi&#8217;-E&#8221;.ac\u00a7brd$ric\u00e9= Viizi\ufb01v,<br \/>\ncontrary to the reievari:t&#8217;~~mat=i\u00e9ri\u00e91i&#8217;\u00e9g\ufb01iiabie an \ufb01i\u00e9, the<br \/>\nimpugned orders; cannQt_v\u00a7\u00a7eV  hence, they<\/p>\n<p>are iiabie  &#8216;fhi\u00a75s.b\u00a3a\u00bb&#8217;i\u00e9ground, without<\/p>\n<p>going into furihgr  of the case.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">5. Havirig&#8221;rrregarriifd..Vfh\u00e9\u00a7~~&#8217;ifacts and circumstances<\/p>\n<p>of   sfats\u00e9ri &#8216;ahsve, the writ petition filed by<br \/>\n is  &#8216;gf as foiicws:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">ii  I]   petition \ufb01led by petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216; &#8216;  I f \u00ab  V&#8217; &#8220;&#8216;aIlqwe&#8221;d  pan&#8217;;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\"> &#8220;:il_] The impugned order passed by&#8221; the<\/p>\n<p> V   &#8221; &#8220;Authorized Officer &#8212; second respondent<\/p>\n<p>herein dated 24&#8243;&#8216; July 2002 bearing<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.S232lf2(}\u00a3)3<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.5232I!2(}03<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No. 7?A\/LRF\/9299-2000 wide Annexure 3 and<\/p>\n<p>the order dated 2&#8243;&#8221; June 2003 passed <\/p>\n<p>Appeal No.903\/2002 on the \ufb01fe of A&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Kamataks Appellate Tr-ibungt, at aaagszoti\u00e9tj t _ T V     <\/p>\n<p>Vida Annexure A, are hereb3}1_1set-<br \/>\n1111 Matter s:mg%Tre;n:aea mtsg  %<\/p>\n<p>second respondgtvt &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">reconsideration  and to<\/p>\n<p>take appn .  with<\/p>\n<p> opportunity to<br \/>\npetizsoner andtm and decide the<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; _; same  r\u00a7\u00a73n;\u00a7pliance of the mandatory<\/p>\n<p>   ,  of the Kamataka Land Reforms Act<\/p>\n<p> and dispose of the same, as<\/p>\n<p> ts,-Jtfaeditiousty as possible, not later than six<\/p>\n<p>AA &#8216; m\u00e9nths from the date of receipt of a copy of<\/p>\n<p>T this order;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">,4<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT ()1: KARNATAKA. AT BANGALORE W.P.Na.5232ia&#8217;2\ufb014}3<\/p>\n<p>{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W,P.Nc.5232If2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IV] Further, petitioner and A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>respondent herein are pe\ufb01mtr&#8217; ed to    &#8221; ~<\/p>\n<p>their w\ufb01tten submission,    <\/p>\n<p>authenticated docume\ufb01fs  of <\/p>\n<p>their cfaim within a<br \/>\nfrom the date of\u00a3&#8217;eeeip(bf_ gf<br \/>\nV] the   hereby<br \/>\ndimcteti&#8217;   pmceed<br \/>\n    Vthe directions,<\/p>\n<p>iesueeby &#8216;this&#8217; % aeeei&#8217;-afed_&#8217;supra.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w.P.No.s2321:2&#8243;6\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil 94 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.52321\/__\u00a72I_G\u00a7 1 IN THE men COURT or KARNATAKA AT % nxmn mm was 24133 mm or = THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUS&#8217;\u00a73;;E::-!&#8217;.!Aa.!&#8217;?(.\u00a75&#8217;A_.1:&#8217;4lA!.&#8217;.::&#8221; %% A&#8217; _ wnrr PETITION nemszi&#8217; ~91? J % BETWEEN: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1093,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008"},"wordCount":1093,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008","name":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-12T00:52:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-channamma-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Channamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253829"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253829\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}