{"id":253912,"date":"2008-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-30T23:10:10","modified_gmt":"2017-01-30T17:40:10","slug":"the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Manjula Chellur K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\"> \n\n \n\n\u00a3s_y&lt;%s#:    * ifse\ufb01il ma:\n\n,,..:.\n\nxx rag area sonar \u00a7E~KA\ufb01NA\u00a3$Kg &#039; &#039;\n\ncxncuxm BENCH Am \ufb01aa\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01b\n\nQATED $313 gag 2?$a QAx \u00a7FA\u00a3HGUS$ 3GQ8~-.&#039;\n\n  ?RE3E:1??_\u00a7&#039;~._ \n\nasxxgzg mas Sv\u00e9wggg \ufb01A\u00a7$u\ufb02A cgELLva\n\naaiwgggg\n\nT\ufb01e 3peaig;&#039;La\ufb01\u00a7_\u00a7\u00a2qui\u00e9:t1on\nGfficer, Hi\u00e9k\u00e9l Dam Prbject,\nn:\u00a2ga1gL\ufb01ukkerz&quot;ma1uk?\n\nJ&#039;a\u00a7eA\u00a7aum,$istrictL&quot;** ****\n\n.* Appellant\n\n&#039;VA\u00a7\ufb02: \n\n};; Ex; L.B.Qesai;\n  &#039;Ag*a: &quot;rza\u00e9ori\n.1gGcci&quot;\u00a3and~lor\ufb01, by his\n-a Ea\ufb01ex of Attarney Koiarf\n, &quot;$ri,Shankariingaaaa KW@\ufb01\u00a7\nJ~&amp;g\u00e9: $5 gears,\nGas: serviceg\n\n\ufb01fa \ufb01hika\u00e9i,\nEeigaum.\u00a7istriatv\n\n \n\n\n\nthe Act befoga the Civil Judge 3_\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7;f.\n\nccpensatian. The applicat;on fiie&amp; undgr_&quot;\n\nsections 30 and 31 aame E9  bg34\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9r\u00e9\u00a2},a&amp; \n\nLA: 196!1984. on 24.7.35;.;his%\u00a7\u00a7p1ica\u00a3;\u00a7\u00a7Lc\ufb01m\ufb01&#039;\nta be diamissed ab$e\u00a7\u00a7i%\u00a7 _Vt\ufb01\u00e9t:\ufb02&#039;\u00a3h\u00a7  V%ery\napplication is not m%intai\ufb01%\u00a7#\u00a2{\ufb015 it \ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 not on\na reference fra the @a$\u00a7 $$Q\ufb01i\u00e9\ufb01t\u00a7g% officer and\nheld that a;.a\u00a7;eth\u00a7 \u00a7\u00e9\u00a2ds \u00a7\u00e9:e \u00a7a\u00a7tea with the\nQavernmentifi@$?\ufb01\u00a7g@&quot;\u00a7n%\ufb01m\u00a7@f\u00a7nae, the only right\navailable=t\u00a7 %\u00a7$\u00a7&amp;an&amp;@\u00a7\ufb01&amp;;f\u00a7:;%r sectian &amp;4{?) of\nthe Kaggatgkg :\u00a7g\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7iy\u00a7 Act, 1951 and not for\n\nany&#039; 0th\u00e9g &quot; g\u00e9\ufb01y\u00e9\ufb01ga\ufb01ion. it is note&amp;. that\n\ngg., _ &lt;~ -\n_ LAQ\ufb01\u00a22X\u00a75 cama&#039; to be filed by tke first\n\n&#039;R _ V  ..... \n\n&quot;V, \u00a7aap6nd\u00e9\ufb01tg4q1aimants chaiienging the ordars af\n\nA&amp;he{\u00a2ivi1 ;\ufb01\u00a7g\u00e9 in LAC.1\u00a76f1\u00a7\u00a74 dated 24.7.1935.\n\n_,, go&amp;&amp;ver,&#039;t$\u00a7 said Appeal came to b dismissed far\n\n &quot;g ncn-Pk\u00e9a\ufb01cutie\ufb01.\n\nV&quot; VV*\u00a7. Maaawhile, as the application filed under\n\n* s\u00e9\u00a7t\u00a3\u00a2n 18(1) af the L&amp; Amt was not xeferred ta\n\n&#039;af\u00a3$e sivzl gaurt within the statutory periadg\n\ni?\n\n\/\n\/\n\n \n\n\n\n8.3.94 was not challenged by the State GQVQ\u00a3#mE\ufb01%ud\n\nand it has reached finality.\n\n5. Thereafter; ms&#039; .19\/3\u00a2s&quot;--_V \u00a2axua&quot;V&#039;--v_%fw \n\nregistered by virtue of thaJGrdef\u00a3;;\ufb01,Lgc?2}\u00a78 on\n3G.8.94. In this LAc.19\/,94,.&quot;&quot; ti$eLA.app\u00e9xmm\u00e9-state\nfile\u00e9 objections re-it\u00e9ra\u00a3i\ufb01@ft\ufb01\u00e9:s\u00a7me cbjectiens\n\nas stated in LAC:2fl933;:1?h\u00a7f1e$r\ufb01\u00e9$ Judge after\n\ngiving op\u00a7$$t\ufb01ni;g*,5t6 i b\u00a7th&#039; the parties,\n\nultimat-z-::1y  LA\u00a7:&#039;;~.i9Z&#039;94~\u00bb~V-pi\u00e9zrtly enhancing the\n\ncanpea.-iezticn V as\u00bb   &quot;Asgard dated 5 . as. 3.995.\n\n._\u00a3; Aggri\u00e9v\u00e9\ufb01 b\ufb01 the gala order and the Award\n\nv _ %f.\ufb01\u00a7a\u00a5i\u00e9a\ufb01ngd civil Judge, tbis appeal cme to\n\nAb&amp;&#039;fiie\u00e97g\u00a7n\u00a3e\ufb01ding that the reference Court was\n\nneat &quot;&#039;\u00ab.T}11.S1&quot;&#039;;iiAf;i;5\u00e92A&lt;T3. in \u00e9ireczting the xeference {:43 be\n\nZ&quot;E regi5t\u00e9r\u00a7&amp; and further, there was xx: scqge fur\n\nx&lt;.&quot;\u00e9gha\ufb01\u00a7ament o\u00a3 cmpansation, as the \u00a2laimant3\n\nV&#039;- we\u00a3e net at all entitled for any aoupensation, in\n\n\ufb01giew of tha Lamas being vested with the\n\n\n\n \n\nIG\n\naf acquisitian, therefore, they were entitled to\n\nanly for the benefits available to then: g\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9x\n\nKm&#039;. Lawxai Ra &#039;cm&#039;\\&#039;v&#039;1\u00bb&#039;3  &#039; L.  \n\nsection 47 0f thek\ufb01ct and not ether bene\u00a3;tg;\u00a7g_f; &lt;\n\n12* Apparently, the State @ovgp\ufb01ment -h2s :\n\naise not challanged the er6\u00e9\u00a3\u00e9*adated 3,3\u00a7\u00a74.W\n\ndiracting the Lao to refer :tp\u00e9; mat\u00a3\u00a2g;. w\ufb01i\u00e9h *\n\nultimately was registered&#039;i\u00a7pLAC:i9{9\u00a7Q5$\u00a7\u00a7Mf\u00e9@t\nremains in LA\u00a3.2\/88 tge ag\u00a7e@\u00a7an%\u00a2st\u00a7\u00a3e=did raise\nthe question of  iimitg\u00a3\u00a7\u00a2#  %\u00a7\u00a7  so also\nnaintainabilityvgg tg\u00e9&quot;a\u00a7\u00a71ia\u00a7:@$n \ufb01g Qiew af the\nerders in \u00a7A&amp;\ufb021\u00a7\u00a7f84Eu\ufb01\u00e9%rk$3c\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 38 and 31 of\nthe \u00a3otiHV:g?\u00e9%%\u00a7c\u00a3\u00a7{ $\ufb01\u00e9\u00a3\u00a7\u00e9rEi\u00a7 tha absence of\n\u00a2ha11en\u00a7in\u00a7 &quot; %\u00a7e&#039;: or\u00a7\u00a2%g .;ig \u00a3AC.2\/1988 dated\n8.3.1994; the Stg\ufb01g \u00a7\u00a2\ufb01i&amp; agitate the questisn cf\n\nmintanabii1:ty\u00bb7anaJ&#039;\u00a7eating of the lands with\n\n&#039; &quot;the&quot;\u00a75vernmnt as h\u00e9id in Lac 196\/1984.\n\n\n\n \\&#039;\\\\f\\\n\nmatter, wha\ufb01 wauii be the sonsequanaes 6f &amp;S&amp;Ch\ndeaisien ma\ufb01a by such Court; ?ar this; w\u00a7x%\u00a2fg\u00a3_\nin the follcying deaisians:\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">In the case ef \u00a3jmdh&#8221;\u00a7&amp;jugad \u00a2\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7ng&#8217; &#8216; &amp;<br \/>\nvs, Mbti g\/a Ehssadi ,xg\u00a7oz;ed*-in;_w\u00bbT<br \/>\n19\u00a7l{3\u00a7 SSC136 ra\u00a7\u00a2rte&amp;Vas_under;&#8217;*<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;5. The prine:p1g*,\u00a3a: &#8220;\u00a2ac:\u00a2iggIj&#8221;<br \/>\nthe questian oi iimit\u00e9ticn in a.suit<br \/>\nfiie\u00e9 after an adverse \u00e9r\ufb02er und\u00e9r_aHf<br \/>\nspacial Act is sa11;sett1gd;:&#8217;1\u00a3 the<br \/>\norder impugned in the $uit&#8221;i\u00a7.such<br \/>\n\ufb01ha\ufb01 it has ta b\u00e9 s\u00e9t aside h\u00e9fore<br \/>\nany relief aan&#8221;&#8221;baf granta\ufb01la\ufb01b&#8217; the<br \/>\n\u00a7lainti\u00a3f the grgvigig\ufb01gfqf \u00e9rtiala<br \/>\n166 viii Fae ,\u00e9ttra\u00a2ta\ufb01 &#8216;a\ufb01&amp;&#8221; if me<br \/>\nparticular&#8221;a\u00aeti\u00e9;&amp;&#8221;Qf&#8221;the.<a href=\"\/doc\/1317393\/\" id=\"a_1\">Limitation<br \/>\nAct<\/a> z$&#8211;ag\u00a7licabie th\u00e9 sait must be<br \/>\ngswern\u00e9d by .thea ra\u00a7i\ufb01m\u00e9ry <a href=\"\/doc\/10691\/\" id=\"a_1\">Article<br \/>\n113<\/a>, pres\u00a2xibingga_peria&amp; of three<br \/>\nyaars\u00a7V *Theref\u00e9x\u00e9; in a suit fer<br \/>\ntitle to&#8217;a\ufb01.immwv\u00e9b\u00a3e prcperty which<br \/>\nhas ib\u00e9en &#8220;iha &#8220;gubjeat matter of a<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7r\u00a2ce\u00e9\ufb01ing_un\u00e9ar a special Act if an<br \/>\nyg_a\ufb01ver$e&#8221;&#8216;Q:der mamas in the way of<br \/>\n&#8216;the suceess&#8221;uf the plaintiff he must<\/p>\n<p>._ get _it_ clearad before praceeding<br \/>\n*V\u00a3u;tn\u00e9:;a On the other han\u00e9 if the<br \/>\n_&#8217;ar\u00a7\u00e9x . has been passed without<\/p>\n<p>. *Vjuri\u00a7\u00e9i\u00e9tion, the same aan ba<br \/>\n*, igner\u00e9d as nullity, that is; ncnw<br \/>\nexistent in t\ufb01e eye of law and it is<br \/>\nant necesaary to set it aside; and<br \/>\nA&#8217;*,_$uch a suit will be ccvered by<br \/>\nf\u00e9rticle 65. In th&amp; present case the<br \/>\n&#8220;cantraversial facts have been<br \/>\ndecid\u00e9\ufb01 in faveur of the plainti\ufb01\ufb01 W<br \/>\nagpaliant and the \ufb01indings were nct<br \/>\ncha;1$ngad be\ufb01cra the \ufb01igh Caurta<br \/>\nfhe pogitia\ufb01, thus, is that the<br \/>\n\u00a73ai\ufb01ti\u00a7f was the gamer in<br \/>\naultivating possesg\u00aema a\ufb01 the land<br \/>\nan\ufb01 tha dafen\ufb01ant \ufb01at: %a\u00a7 marely 3<br \/>\nlabcmrar withaut any gight cf a<\/p>\n<p> arda: ma\ufb01a by \ufb01ha<\/p>\n<p>tenant or a sub&#8211;teaant. The<br \/>\nquesticn is as to whether in this<\/p>\n<p>baakground it is neaessary to setw V<\/p>\n<p>asi\u00e9e the arder passad in \ufb01avcur \u00a2\ufb01<br \/>\nthe xespandent un\u00e9er <a href=\"\/doc\/103447\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 2<\/a>?{\u00e9}<\/p>\n<p>9f the %ct before the suit cad&#8221;b\u00a7&gt;&#8217;V.<\/p>\n<p>dacree\u00e9 or \ufb01he\ufb01\ufb01er th\u00e9 piai\ufb01\ufb01if\ufb01 can*_<br \/>\nget a decrae igncring thg Sai\ufb01ldr\ufb01ar&#8217;<br \/>\nin which cas\u00e9  the s\ufb01it=_,<br \/>\nund\u00e9ahtedly will Vb\u00a2_ gcvarn\u00e9\ufb01  b3A <\/p>\n<p>as void;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Axticle 65*<\/p>\n<p>?, The casea re1;e$ a\u00a7bn b\u00a7&#8221;\ufb01h\u00a7 _}<\/p>\n<p>High Court dd: net suppdrt the<br \/>\nimpugned judgment&#8217;   ii\ufb01  S%ate V.<br \/>\nSadh Ram the \u00a2ompens\u00e9ti\u00a2n_V\u00a2\u00a3\u00a3icer<br \/>\nhad passed an brd\u00a7r&#8217;under;S\u00e9\u00a3tion<br \/>\n27(4) af the Rat? ira\ufb01s\ufb01axri\ufb01g the<\/p>\n<p>propri\u00e9ta:y_..vCright__av to&#8221;&#8221; the<br \/>\ncultivating&#8221; ten\u00a7ntm_&#8221;\u00a2f  the land,<br \/>\nexcludi\ufb02g{_ the &#8220;\ufb02&#8217;tr\u00e9@sf standing<br \/>\nt\ufb01erao\ufb01, &#8220;Ehe&#8217;&amp;.Eran\u00a7fer\u00e9e tenants<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01iied *a,1su;t. in respect of the<br \/>\nErees, and the Hi\u00a7h Ceurt held that<br \/>\nthe suit was \ufb01arra\ufb01 by imitation<br \/>\n&amp;it\ufb01a:Vund\u00a2r:Rrtic1e 166 or Article<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\"> 113. &#8216; The_grievance af the tenant<br \/>\n_\u00a7waE act against the exerciaa sf the<br \/>\n&#8216;\u00a7gwer cf &#8216;\ufb01ha&#8221; Camyensatian effiaer<\/p>\n<p>under g\ufb01\u00e9ctian 2?{4} of the Rat,<\/p>\n<p>\u00b0= :a:h\u00a2rx he reiied upan th\u00e9 same.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">-.&#8217;Th\u00e9gQb\u00a7\u00e9f\u00a5a\ufb01iQn$, mentianed beigw,<br \/>\n&#8221; from jt\ufb01e &#8216;judgment cf Fathak, C,3.<\/p>\n<p>\u20ac33&#8217; he \ufb01hen was} are \u00e9nlightening<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; a\ufb01\ufb01. gugparting tha View expreg\ufb01e\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>kyf\ufb01sz<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This ig mat a case whare the<br \/>\ncampengatian<br \/>\ncfficer is a nuility. If the<br \/>\ncsmpansatisn affiaer ha\u00e9 ab initie<br \/>\nma jur\ufb01g\ufb01ictian ts taka the<\/p>\n<p>prasaading 33$ make an arder<br \/>\ntherein, ha gauld \ufb01ave ma<br \/>\njuxig\ufb01iaiicn ta make any Qr\ufb01er at<br \/>\n313% Ia thgt avent; tha antire<\/p>\n<p>ar\ufb01gr ma\ufb01a hy \ufb01im, i\ufb02$1\u00a7\u00e9i\ufb01\u00a7 that<\/p>\n<p>.91;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">1%<\/p>\n<p>thereunder} {maid it turn back: and say <\/p>\n<p>:s.L*::q:.g\u00a7.;_  &#8216; &#8216; i<\/p>\n<p>aaqzzired was wrang as the land has;uvua$t:\u00e9$ug\u00a7VV&#8217;:\u00e9\u00a7&#8217;i~\u20ac::}3i*&#8217;-T &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the Governmarat .\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">Gmzernment, questien cf acqi:-.iri&#8217;:&#8221;sg&#8221; this giienx <\/p>\n<p>would not ariaa. As a \u00e9\u00a31a?:fc:er  :x_f&#8217; fa&#8221;&#8216;c,?\u00e9r;a;Vna;}'&#8221;c;\ufb01\u00a2\u00a7ti\u00a7gn ever<br \/>\naz\u00e9rcse befcara the  \u00e9nj\ufb01; of the<br \/>\nalleged tenants cg  \u00a3p\u00e9  \ufb01lggggg\u00e9\u00e9 had made<br \/>\napplicaticsn ;&#8217;i\u00a3\u00e9f\u00a7; }&#8217;gra:;2._t &lt;}&lt;.\u00a7;&#039;\u00a7#:I:.;&#039;l%.\u00a5&#039;.:\u00a7\ufb01;\u00a3&#039;.1af..L&#039;\u00a2f1\u00a7&#039;;,\u00a7&#039;1&#039;L&#039;?\u00a7.gI&#039;l&#039;t.$. It is<br \/>\nnot even    &#039;a%.V\u00a7p&#039;\u00e91I.ant State that<br \/>\nsaw}: :a&#039;:&#039;;&quot;\u00e9&#039;  tenant under the<br \/>\n1anci3.e:i;*;;i.&quot;  Qf an ebservatior:<br \/>\nmade  &quot;\u00e9\u00a7&#039;r2q:.1is3&#039;.&#039;1::i.z::x2 Gfficeer in the<\/p>\n<p>m:\u00b0i.g3:\u00a7;,;&#039;:a3; awar\u00e9&#039;d&#8211;,afgt gara 3 that compensation eeuld<\/p>\n<p>be.\u00a73ai\u00a2iV..tgA &#039;*~such 3f the perseng an groducticsn bf<\/p>\n<p>&#039;&quot;g_z*\u00e9a{zf;:.&#039;; V&lt;s\u00a7&#039;g,:;cc&#039;;\u00a7\u00a7ancy rights \ufb01rom the iganz\ufb01 \ufb01ribmaaza,<\/p>\n<p>th\u00e9&quot;&#039;\u00ab..ap\u00a7;\u00e9\u00a7;-But Stata has came up with the dafarace<\/p>\n<p> &quot;3gAfva.sting sf ianda with the Government 35 they<br \/>\n &#039;;$2;&#039;\u20ac*;&#039;b&#039;5;Z%3ia\ufb01t&amp;d lands. Thay alga place reliance an<\/p>\n<p>  tfge entries in &#039;him RTQ axtracts which are new<\/p>\n<p>pra\ufb01zzeed by way of a\u00e9aitimnsi evidenaa at Exsk<\/p>\n<p>$.12 ta 3.18.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">:5 the 1and__be:\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7sf}t5&#8242; the_u<\/p>\n<p>reacrd sack avi\u00e9ence if they want&amp;d \u00a2 to<\/p>\n<p>substantiate their defence of vestia\u00a7V 5\u00a3f;\ufb01hai\ufb02<br \/>\nlands with them. We rely upog reporte&amp;fd\u00e9ci2;\u00a2\u00a7 =<br \/>\nin the case cf 3mt.Sanjivi Q Laxmi}\u00a7\ufb01m$ %:&gt;3ta\ufb01\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>af Kannata\ufb01ta reported in *l.Q&#8221;\u00a75 k:;2_} &#8211;:\u00a7z.  w%\u00aba&#8221;s:.&amp;;:\u00a2\u00a2 _v&#8217;  the State<br \/>\nGavernmen\ufb01? ff\u00a7a\ufb02\ufb02f\u00a7\u00a2%\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\ufb01Q the subject mattar<br \/>\ncf&#8217; dis\u00a7ut\u00a2fu$\u00e9g\ufb01\u00a7a\u00a7-\ufb01t#\u00e9\ufb01 Eandiord and the&#8217; persen<br \/>\nclaimkngrta 5% \u00e9 t\u00a7\ufb01$\u00a7t, has to be \ufb01etermined by<br \/>\nthe Trib\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7l_\u00e9\u00a3 \u00a3\ufb01%\u00b0%\u00a7%\u00a7 threshold sf the enquixy<\/p>\n<p>befqi\u00e9utaki\ufb01g_\ufb01#er:tha quastian af registration<\/p>\n<p> of \u00a3hea\ufb01e\ufb01\u00e9nt$ as ocaupantss In that View of the<\/p>\n<p>*matt\u00e9r;Tm\u00a2r\u00e9rehtries in tha name cf third parties<\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01wthgv\u00e9\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01n 12 a\ufb01 ETC extracta as on i.3.1\u00a7?4<\/p>\n<p> =\u00a2r pfi\ufb01r ta gaid \ufb01ate will not ha cf any<\/p>\n<p> a3\u00a7i$ta\ufb01ce E6 the state ta cantend that all the<\/p>\n<p>U lands in questimn vested with the Savernment as<\/p>\n<p>\\.r&#8217;*\u00bb\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>they gate tenante\ufb01 lauds. Sa far as the legal<br \/>\npssition that the Gw\u00a5ernment can\ufb01at acquire its<\/p>\n<p>awn Zan\u00e9; \ufb01\u00e9 refer ta faiiawing decisions:<\/p>\n<p>  is \ufb01at t\ufb01\u00e9 subject<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;,?here\u00a3dfe, in View<\/p>\n<p>Nwfw<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">353<\/span><br \/>\nway af the claimants seeking reference af the<\/p>\n<p>application under Sacticn iS{\u00a7\u00a7 af the Act. As a<\/p>\n<p>mattex of fact, aa notad above, applicatieg&#8217;\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01ar<\/p>\n<p>Sactisn laili %&amp;$ much earlier in t\ufb01e \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01li\u00e9aiia\ufb01.<br \/>\nfiled under \ufb01ectian 33. We h$ve7\u00a7I\u00a7o1a1fa$df \u00a7e@\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>that either dug to ignbr\u00e9nce A63&#8242; in\ufb01Q\u00a2e\ufb01ce,.&#8217;the&#8217;v&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>applicants have fi\ufb01ed apgii\ufb01at\u00e9cn. un@\u00a7;&#8221;}Section\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">33. . V &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>2%. W\u00e9 ala\u00e9  n\u00a2\u00a7\u00a2f \u00a3?%\u00a7: %h\u00e9D7feccrdS that<br \/>\n\ufb01uring the \u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7%\u00a7cg \u00a2f $h\u00a7$ %\u00a7p&amp;%l, theta was a<br \/>\n\ufb01irectien\u00a7\u00a7ei\ufb01\u00a7$$\u00a7i\u00a3 \u00a7S;\u00a7\u00a7;\ufb01\u00a7,\u00a7G3f~ in the Caurt<br \/>\n\u00a7art I\u00e9\ufb01&#8221; i\u00a7\u00e9 ,\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9#%3\u00a3?9n\\ \u00e9\u00a7\u00a7rded, W\u00e9 aise hate<br \/>\nthat \u00a7hg:\u00abL\u00e9ndat\u00a7\u00a2q\ufb01i\u00a7i\u00a3ion \ufb01fficer unfartunately<\/p>\n<p>issue\ufb01 a \u00e9;h&amp;7q1:e&#8217; .iA:*._ Vf\u00e9xrazzr of the party but the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;u ch&amp;\u00a7Ee_#a$ dif\u00e9c\ufb01ly given to the parties without<\/p>\n<p> ;&#8217;de\u00a7ositinqMihe same in the court, However, we are<\/p>\n<p>n\u00a2\u00a3Vgein\u00a7ji\u00a7\ufb01o the said centzovarsy as the same<br \/>\nmatter sf dispute before us\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>oi tke above disaussien, we<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a3\u00a2i\u00a7  that the crdars \ufb01ata\ufb01 2\u20ac.?,19$\u00e9 in L\u00e9\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>H&#8217;~\u00a7\u00e9,1\u00a7EfS\u00e9 is mat an embargc an the right 9f the<\/p>\n<p>claimants ta seek enh&amp;ncament af aampengatzen.<\/p>\n<p>2\u20ac. Then to anothar<\/p>\n<p>coming<\/p>\n<p>factual<\/p>\n<p>contreversy raised by the appellant Stat\u00e9t*\ufb01h\u00a7\u00a3,<br \/>\nthe ETC relied upon by the claimants h\u00e9f\u00a2r$ \u00a3h\u00e9&#8221;:&#8217;<br \/>\nReference Ccurt da not xef1ectmt\u00a7e\u00aba\u00a7\u00a3\ufb01\u00a71@\u00a2\ufb01\u00a3r\u00a7\u00a7a &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>with regard ta the nature of cr\u00e9p\ufb01 Qrc\ufb01\ufb01 it \ufb01\u00a7\u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>ralevant point at time&#8217;ig\u00e9{, i9?\u00a7w?8g \u00e9\u00a7ai$a\u00a7t\u00a7<br \/>\ncontende\ufb01 before thg Raf\u00a7%\u00e9n\u00a2e \u00a7c\u00a7f\u00a7u$ur\u00a7ng the<br \/>\nenquiry \ufb01or enhana\u00e9m\u00a7$t_\u00a7f y\u00a7\ufb01p\u00e9\ufb01$a\u00a7ianA\u00a3$at they<br \/>\nwere growing sugar \u00a2an\u00a7 i$ \ufb01h\u00e9 i\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7Facquirsd as<br \/>\nan the datg\ufb01\u00a7fF\u00e9\ufb01e}im$\ufb01\u00e9iyT\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7fi\u00e9$tisn and finai<br \/>\nn:3*1tificat:&#8217;:&lt;:\u00a7n  &quot;\u00a7:a%&#039;: :\u00e9gd\u00a3ically denied by<br \/>\nthe \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9y=\ufb01\ufb01c\ufb01@\u00a7ef;RQtha\u00a7 &quot;&amp;;d not produce any<br \/>\ndocume\ufb01t\u00e9\u00ab.Ee\u00a3\u00a7\u00a5\u00e9 \u00a3h\u00a7* \u00a7e\u00a7arenee Ceurt when the<\/p>\n<p>enquiry gas can\ufb01u\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9a prior ta the State ccming<\/p>\n<p>w_ be\ufb01\u00a7\u00a3&amp; \u00a3his \ufb01\ufb01uxhvin an apgeal. Even after the<\/p>\n<p> g&#039;r\u00e9maq\ufb01, f\u00a2rr&lt;the iimited purpose of reacrding<\/p>\n<p>ad\ufb01iti\u00a7n\u00a71= \u00e9%idenae they have net brought any<\/p>\n<p>mat%:i\u00e91&#039;\ufb01\u00a7 show that the entries at Ex$.\u00a7.\u00e9 to<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7::a.__wi%h regard to the nature of cxep grmm at<\/p>\n<p>\\\\\u00a3\\<\/p>\n<p>3ih\u00e9\u00b0re1avant paint af time wag an inter\u00a7e1atian<\/p>\n<p>&#039;~~\u00a2f recard.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">2?, \ufb01n tha ather hand; whan \u00a7&amp; ga ta the<\/p>\n<p>csn\ufb01ants sf Exa\u00a7.\u00a7 ta \u00a7.i8 pra\u00e9uce\ufb01 ky t\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01tata<\/p>\n<p>\\n-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">\n<p>3?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">\ufb01avarnment, we are \u00a7ur\u00a7rised to gee bath the<\/p>\n<p>Xerex capxeg an\u00e9 ariginais af Exs. Q24 ta $.18<\/p>\n<p>mat having entries o\ufb01 any nature at ca1umg,i2 so<\/p>\n<p>far as relevant periad 1.a., 19??~?8\ufb01:W&#8221;f\ufb01\u00a7{f\u00a3\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>1\u00a7?4~?5 the entries are ther\u00e9\u00e9a\u00a7&amp;Vs\u00a3ra\ufb01g\u00e9l\u00a7;&#8217;t\ufb015:<\/p>\n<p>antries are from 1\u00a73\u00a7\u00ab9C i\u00a7 sama cas\u00e9_i\ufb01 age or&#8211;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>two RTC and in nthers it is sgbs#\u00a7u%\u00a7\u00a3 \ufb01\ufb01 19\u00a72\u00ab\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">93. In that View \u00a7\ufb01 th\u00e9:m\u00a7%\u00a3\u00e9x? i\u00a7 do\u00e9sunat lie<br \/>\nin the mouth Q\ufb01 thg \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7ia#t%\u00a7\u00a3#\u00a7\u00a7 to say that<br \/>\nthe \u00a2:aiman:s&#8221;g\u00a7\u00a2e %is;\u00e9\u00e9d*\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;c\u00a7\ufb01\u00a3ts by bringing<br \/>\nan xecord \u00a7i\u00a7 \u00a7i\u00a3h:\u00a7\ufb01\ufb02fie%&#8211;\u00a7\u00a7d\u00e9 by them suitably<br \/>\nsuppa;ii\ufb01gi\u00a3\u00a7\u00a2i\u00a7fci\u00a7\u00a7@; \u00a7\ufb01\u00e9f\u00e9\u00a7Gre, we are af the<br \/>\no\u00a7ini\u00a7\ufb01 &#8216;tha\ufb01\ufb01 \u00a3\u00a7eR&#8217;R\u00a7CLj\u00a7\ufb01\u20acracts prcducad by the<\/p>\n<p>cla:mant\u00a7&gt;,\u00a7ef\u00aef&amp; 7tha;7Raferenc@ Ccurt. marked at<\/p>\n<p>a. EX$;?.% ta ?;1$w\u00a7$e genuine and certified cepias<\/p>\n<p>E*&#8211;; g\u00e9th<\/p>\n<p>.&amp;f\u00bbth$Aar\u00a3\u00a7ina1s. 6n the other \ufb01an\ufb01, the State<\/p>\n<p> ;\u00a7 gai*\u00a7k;_%;\u00a7o3iti$n to establish any aspect cf<\/p>\n<p>th\u00e9ir ,\u00a7\u00e9\u00a3\u00e9\ufb01ce to substantiate their cententioa<\/p>\n<p>. a th\u00a7t th\u00e9 claimant did nat gxaw sugar cane craps<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;\u00a7uri\ufb01\u00a7 th\u00e9 relgvant pericd 1\u00a77?~?8 the yaar of<\/p>\n<p>greiiminary notifiaatiea and final<\/p>\n<p>aaquigitien nmtifiaations. In that View ef the<\/p>\n<p>matter; having regar\ufb01 ta the entire ma\ufb01arial as a<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01hale, we are af the a\u00a7ini@n that the a\u00a7\u00a7a1lant<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 Author: Manjula Chellur K.N.Keshavanarayana \u00a3s_y&lt;%s#: * ifse\ufb01il ma: ,,..:. xx rag area sonar \u00a7E~KA\ufb01NA\u00a3$Kg &#039; &#039; cxncuxm BENCH Am \ufb01aa\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01b QATED $313 gag 2?$a QAx \u00a7FA\u00a3HGUS$ 3GQ8~-.&#039; ?RE3E:1??_\u00a7&#039;~._ asxxgzg mas Sv\u00e9wggg \ufb01A\u00a7$u\ufb02A cgELLva aaiwgggg T\ufb01e 3peaig;&#039;La\ufb01\u00a7_\u00a7\u00a2qui\u00e9:t1on Gfficer, Hi\u00e9k\u00e9l Dam [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1702,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\",\"name\":\"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008"},"wordCount":1702,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008","name":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-30T17:40:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-land-acquisition-vs-sri-l-b-desai-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Special Land Acquisition vs Sri L B Desai on 27 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}