{"id":254161,"date":"2009-04-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-09T02:28:25","modified_gmt":"2019-02-08T20:58:25","slug":"dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009<\/div>\n
                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                           Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/01565 dated 19.9.2008\n                             Right to Information Act<\/a> 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant        -          Dr. Ashok Khemka\nRespondent           -      Dep't. of Personnel & Training (DoPT).\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n
:\n<\/p>\n
      By an application of 8.7.’08, Dr. Ashok Khemka of Chandigarh applied to
\nthe Secretary, DoPT seeking the following information with regard to a
\nrepresentation submitted by him regarding his ACRs for the years 2001-02 &
\n2002-03:\n<\/p>\n
         “Please supply me the following information so that I can prove the
\n         truth about the deliberate fraud committed in my ACRs before your
\n         good self.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         1.     Your reasons, if any, for rejecting my representation dated
\n                23.7.2007 along with the relevant file notings of the
\n                Department, observations \/ comments of the Cabinet
\n                Secretary and order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         2.     A copy of letter No. 30\/1\/2003-SI dated 16.11.2007 of the
\n                Chief Secretary Haryana referred to in your above letter
\n                along with any other relevant document or material which the
\n                Department might have considered while rejecting my
\n                representation.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         3.     A copy of all my ACRs with all entries for the following years
\n                : 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         4.     Any ACR in my service record, which in the opinion of the
\n                Department may affect my empanelment as Joint Secretary
\n                in Government of India.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         5.     A copy of the cancelled document earlier created as ACR for
\n                the year 2002-03.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         6.     Which period my ACRs for the years 2001-02 and 2002-03
\n                as existing in your records pertain to? Is any No Record
\n                Certificate for the years 2001-02 and 2002-03 placed in my
\n                service record? If so, to which period this NRC pertains to
\n                and on which date was this NRC certificate placed in your
\n                records? When was the original ACR placed in your
\n                records?”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     To this he received a response on 5.8.08 from Ms. Shanti Puri, Section
\nOfficer (PR), as follows:\n<\/p>\n
                                               1<\/span><\/p>\n
        “the information sought at Sr. No. 3, 4, 5 & 6 in your letter under
\n       reference cannot be disclosed as disclosure of such information
\n       attracts Sec. 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act<\/a>, 2005. As
\n       regards S. No. 1, it is inform that as per O.M. No. 10\/1\/2006-IR
\n       dated 10.4.2008, the disclosure of file noting does not form the part
\n       of information under the RTI Act<\/a> and that it is not to be disclosed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
       As regards S. No. 2, which relates to supply a copy of letter No.
\n       30\/1\/2003-SI dated 16.11.2007 of the Chief Secretary, Haryana, it
\n       is informed that it contains 16 pages & same can be provided on
\n       remittance of requisite fee of Rs. 32\/- i.e. Rs. 2\/- per page.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     In the meantime, however, because Dr. Khemka had invoked the proviso of
\nlife & liberty to sec. 7(1) in moving his initial application, he had already moved
\nhis first appeal on 2.8.08 before Shri Bharat Prasad, Director (PR), DOPT
\npleading as follows, in bold letters :\n<\/p>\n
       “The disclosure of ACRs is mandatory as per judgment and order
\n       dated May 12, 2008 of Hon’ble Judge Markandey Katju of Hon’ble
\n       Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 7631 of 2002 titled Dev
\n       Dutt vs. Union of India<\/a>. Further, the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High
\n       Court has mandated disclosure of ACRs under the RTI Act<\/a> by its
\n       decision dated May 19, 2008 in CWP No. 8396 of 2008 titled State
\n       of Punjab vs. State Information Commission, Punjab<\/a>.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     Upon this appellate authority Shri Chanan Ram Dy. Secretary to Govt. of
\nIndia, DoPT, in his order of 28.7.08 directed as follows:\n<\/p>\n
       “Insofar as information sought against Sr. No. 1, 3, 4, 5 is
\n       concerned, it is stated that the information contained therein are
\n       confidential documents and Rule 8(1)(j) of he RTI Act<\/a>, 2005 also
\n       exempts the disclosure of such information which has no
\n       relationship to any public activity which may cause invasion of
\n       privacy of individual concerned. As such your appeal in so far as
\n       information sought by you against point 1, 3, 4, 5 is hereby
\n       rejected.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     He also stated that “I do not find sufficient reasons to believe that you need
\nto be provided information sought by you within 48 hours due to serious threat to
\nyour life and property.”\n<\/p>\n
      In his prayer before us in second appeal, Dr. Khemka has pleaded as
\nfollows:\n<\/p>\n
                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n
        “Information denied is sought at Sr. Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5 above”\n<\/p>\n
     Dr Khemka’s appeal was followed by a request of 23.3.’09 pleading that his
\nbatch of the IAS was now due for empanelment, and his case may be heard out
\nof turn to allow his name to come up for consideration. The Commission agreed
\nthis to. The appeal was heard through videoconference on 13.4.2009.            The
\nfollowing are present:\n<\/p>\n
       Appellant at NIC Studio, Chandigarh
\n             Dr. Ashok Khemka
\n       Respondents at CIC Studio, New Delhi.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             Shri Chanan Ram, Dy. Secretary
\n             Ms. Shanti Puri, Section Officer<\/p>\n
     Dr. Khemka opened his arguments by submitting that the information sought at Q.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Nos. 2, 3, 5 & 6 has been obtained by him from the State Government in compliance
\nwith the orders of the Supreme Court in Dev Dutt vs. Union of India, Civil Appeal
\nNo. 7631 of 2002.        On the other hand he has alleged that there are some
\ncontradictory ACRs held by the DOPT, hence his question at No. 4. He also seeks
\ndisclosure of the file notings as sought against question No. 1, and argued as to how
\nfile noting is apart of ‘information’ as defined in Sec 2 sub-section(f).\n<\/p>\n
    On the question of compliance with the orders of the Supreme Court in Dev Dutt
\nvs. Union of India, Shri Chanan Ram submitted that although he does not directly deal
\nwith the subject, his information is that his Department is reviewing its policy and will
\nshortly issue instructions in this regard. On file notings, however, he submitted that he
\nis under instructions from the Department that file noting is not to be disclosed. He also
\nsubmitted that the CPIO is not the appropriate authority to judge which ACR will prove
\nan impediment in the procedure of empanelment, which is the subject of the question
\nposed at Sr. No. 4 by appellant Dr. Khemka.\n<\/p>\n
                                DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n
     Since appellant Dr. Khemka does not press for a decision on questions 2,
\n3, 5 & 6, we see no reason for interference by this Commission. On the other<\/p>\n
                                          3<\/span>
\n hand, the disclosure of file notings under the RTI Act<\/a> stands established through
\na   decision   of   the   Commission        dated   29.1.2007   in   Appeal    No.
\nCIC\/OK\/A\/2006\/00154 – Pyare Lal Verma vs. Ministry of Railways<\/a> and several
\ndecisions thereafter. Dr Khemka’s appeal on this issue is therefore allowed. File
\nnoting in this case in which reasons for rejecting his representation dated
\n23.7.2007 along with the relevant observations \/ comments of the Cabinet
\nSecretary and order of the Prime Minister, if any, will, therefore, be disclosed to
\nappellant Dr. Khemka within ten working days of the date of receipt of this
\nDecision Notice.\n<\/p>\n
      On Q. No. 4, however, it is quite clear that CPIO not being the authority for
\nempanelment is in no position to hazard an opinion on which ACR of Dr. Khemka
\nwill be taken into account and which rejected by the screening committee in its
\nprocess of empanelment. Obviously, there is no recorded opinion in this regard,
\nwhich would render it liable to disclosure u\/s 2 (j) read with Sec 2 (f). Since the
\ndisclosure of ACR entries as asked for has already been made, the appeal on
\nthe issue of the response to question 4 is without merit.\n<\/p>\n
     The appeal is, therefore, allowed in part.         There will be no costs.
\nAnnounced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the
\nparties.\n<\/p>\n
(Wajahat Habibullah)
\nChief Information Commissioner
\n13.4.2009<\/p>\n
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO
\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n
(Pankaj Shreyaskar)
\nJoint Registrar
\n13.4.2009<\/p>\n
                                        4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/01565 dated 19.9.2008 Right to Information Act 2005 – Section 19 Appellant – Dr. Ashok Khemka Respondent – Dep’t. of Personnel & Training (DoPT). Facts : By an application of 8.7.’08, Dr. Ashok Khemka […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nDr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1241,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009"},"wordCount":1241,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009","name":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training ... on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-08T20:58:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-ashok-khemka-vs-dept-of-personnel-training-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr. Ashok Khemka vs Dep\u2019T. Of Personnel & Training … on 13 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}