{"id":254457,"date":"2008-10-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008"},"modified":"2014-11-23T05:18:55","modified_gmt":"2014-11-22T23:48:55","slug":"smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
.. 1 ..\nIN THE HIGH OOURT OF' !{ARHA\"1'A.K.A AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 33\" DAY OF OCTOBER %08\nBEFORE\n\nmm Horrsw MEJUBTICE 3.3. Pgm-'f 'f ~ \n\nwan' PETITION No. 97      '\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 Smt. Kari Sankaxnma,
\nW\/0 Basappa,
\nAged 75 years
\nResiding at No.315,
\nHanumantha Nagara,
\nBangalore. ‘ <\/p>\n
Repms\u00e9zgted fay GPA\n<\/p>\n
2.
\nW\/,0
\nAged about  -. ‘
\nResiding at ‘ . ‘  V.\n<\/p>\n
8*
\n}3~an.ga}ore -”  027′.  pmrmonmns<\/p>\n
 _ 1. <D'.'An""'na;a' 1:,<\/p>\n
Sin H; Dasappa, Major,<\/p>\n
 .. , Rcsitijng at No.48,<\/p>\n
_  '}:'!' Main Row, Sud ,
\n" -Ghamundcshwaxi Sweet Stall,<\/p>\n
 Bangalore — 560 027.\n<\/p>\n
Represented by GPA Holder.\n<\/p>\n
 2. Sri. Kantha Raju,<\/p>\n
S\/0 Late Putta Muniyappa,
\nAged about 57 years,
\nResiding at<\/p>\n
…..2….\n<\/p>\n
Mixza Read, Anekla Town,
\nBangalore District.  RESPOIDEWTS<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 22’i’–._of the
\nConstitution of india praying to quash the order  the
\nXI Addl. City Civil Judge, CCH-8, Bangalore: gity 0.3.
\nNo.2276f20{)3 on 28.06.2008 vide Anncxure-E
\nLA. No.4 \ufb01led under Ondezr 6 Re}: 17 read  15\u00bb.1..’_’of’\u00bb
\nCFC, for amendment of the Written statement by the
\nP\ufb01titioner herein.    ‘ ..     AV<\/p>\n
This Petition comm” g on for  A’ ‘T
\nthe Court made thefolk)w1’ng:–_>     . Av ‘E * <\/p>\n
o R nieiig e\n<\/p>\n
01. Petitioners are
\nrejecting their request for   \ufb01vfi\ufb01en statement\n<\/p>\n
02. The     application IA no.4
\n\ufb01led by it-he the defendants before the court<\/p>\n
below under._  17′ read with Section 151 CPC<\/p>\n
 utd  additional paragraphs in the Writiaen<\/p>\n
  med by them. The suit o.s. M22761 2003 is<\/p>\n
 .  the agreement of sale. Petitioners herein have
\n  statement on  The evidence in the
\n commenced during June 2007. PW~1 has led his
\nevfuiience marking the documents Exs.P–1 to P-16. He was<\/p>\n
 ” g\ufb01ssmxamined in part on  At the instance of the<\/p>\n
    herein seek1n’ g speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
.. 3 ..\n<\/p>\n
petitioners, the cmse-examination was deferred. Thexeafter the
\nmatter was adjourned to 23.07.2007. On that day, again 2″‘
\ndefendant and her counsei Weze absent and hence the  was<\/p>\n
adjourned to 22.08.2007. Counsel for the defendoet’:<\/p>\n
memo of retimment, but as notice of retirement  not’Vgxi’v\u00a7:’.n  V’ <\/p>\n
the defendant by the }ea;rned    ‘<\/p>\n
rejected by the court below.<\/p>\n
03. The defendant did not  to  PW-1V’<\/p>\n
despite su\ufb01cient time   in  In
\nsuch cimumstances,  was taken as<\/p>\n
nil and PW-1  meant: plaintiff has got<\/p>\n
  PWS-2, 3 & 4. The plain\ufb01\ufb02
\nclosed    “matter was adjourned for the<\/p>\n
evidence. gf  defenoaots. At this stage, the present<\/p>\n
    Rule 17 came to be \ufb01led seeking<\/p>\n
_\u00abOfVthe’tjWritten statement.<\/p>\n
V  “Rs   seen. from the proposed amendment, 203<\/p>\n
H u  A’4″‘\u00a73.ef\u20ac:nr,lont”intends to incorporate oertam assertions stating’ that<\/p>\n
Videxitity of the property as described in the suit schedule is<\/p>\n
Vt  ‘W1-*ot1g and that the ciescription of the suit schedule pmperty in<\/p>\n
 ” “the suit schedule is not oorxect. The defendant also intends to<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
.. 4 ..\n<\/p>\n
take up a contention that the pIaint:i\ufb01’ was running a chit fund<\/p>\n
businesa and in that connection the plailxtift’ head  the<\/p>\n
si\ufb02ture of the 21″‘ defendant on the blank stamp <\/p>\n
with the property documents as security in    <\/p>\n
chit fund business with the 2″‘ deferefieet’  <\/p>\n
fund came to be closed, that the  (iefeiident  <\/p>\n
over the blank stamp papers, 1:ni1;. Ti;i1e  fo’ hand’<\/p>\n
over the same on one p1’e\u00a7sex_t or the  – . 2
\nOS. The court below    on the
\ngonad that there;    in seeking the<\/p>\n
amendment   sought for was not<\/p>\n
pa .sih1e: :aS  <\/p>\n
06. I have    for the petitioners and<\/p>\n
  ” o.I1_ yecoxti.\n<\/p>\n
07:’     herein above make it very clear that<\/p>\n
_   the plaintiffs was closed, the 2″‘ defendant<\/p>\n
-. :11′?-\u00bbCOI13.C tip: this application see-ldng to introduce a new<\/p>\n
4:~–‘_V ‘dcIe\ufb01ce “\u00e9pntending that the document relied upon by the<\/p>\n
V.   was one for which the signature of the 2″-” defendant<\/p>\n
  taken 01). blank stamp papers along with certain property<\/p>\n
  documents as a security measure in connection with chit fund<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
.. 5 ..\n<\/p>\n
busincss caxrricd on by the pIainti\ufb02’ with the 2″‘ defendant<\/p>\n
Such a defence cannot be pczmittcd to be raised at such a<\/p>\n
belated stage. The court below was right and justified in<\/p>\n
declining the mquest made. Hence, I dc not \ufb01nd  <\/p>\n
or error of jurisdiction in the older passed by    <\/p>\n
As already adverted to herein above,   <\/p>\n
\ufb01led as back as on 26.06.2004 and  <\/p>\n
and his Witnesses was     ‘fsuchc’<\/p>\n
circumstances, it was net for thc ‘dcfciidants to<\/p>\n
come forward with such   :.1_\u00a31 tbc circumstances,<\/p>\n
  _   sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
pxs      Judge\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil .. 1 .. IN THE HIGH OOURT OF’ !{ARHA”1’A.K.A AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 33″ DAY OF OCTOBER %08 BEFORE mm Horrsw MEJUBTICE 3.3. Pgm-‘f ‘f ~ wan’ PETITION No. 97 ‘ 1. Smt. Kari Sankaxnma, W\/0 Basappa, Aged […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":682,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008"},"wordCount":682,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008","name":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-22T23:48:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kari-sankamma-vs-sri-d-annaiah-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Kari Sankamma vs Sri D Annaiah on 3 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}