{"id":254468,"date":"2009-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-31T00:15:54","modified_gmt":"2016-03-30T18:45:54","slug":"the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALo':EEj.VT: ._\n\nDATED THIS THE 231-d DAY OF NOvEMBEI2..A\":%oO\u00e9:\"    \"\n\nPRESENT   ._\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. 9.1). DINAKARAII, EHIEFI\n\nAN}?  _\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTIQ_E'-Y_.G,_SA]\u00a7HAHIT \nWRIT PETITION NIj.S2'37T\/.7\u00a72O4j9 }SgCAT)\n\nBETWEEN    1  \n\n1. THE DIVISIONAL,P'ERS=ONNE~L OFF'I\u00abC~ER__,_i\nPERSONNEL :3RA;NcH~.SEc; _ _ :1'. I\nSOUTH wESTE'RN\"'RIAILwjgay;'--..__--  \nBANGALOREV4\u00bb-SEQ o23.'--V  ~-- \n\n2. THE UNION Or?:1l\\IDIA,   .\nREP. BY ITS GENERAL\" .M'A.NA_GER,\nSOUTH WESTERN I-zAII._w'AY;'\nHUBLI - 589 020. , A .   PETITIONERS\n\n(BY SR1. DEVADAS, SR; ADV.' A\/w SMT. KS. ANASUYA DEVI FOR\n\nM \/  NYAYAMOITRA' ADVOCATES).\n\nANE; \n\n' V SHRI T. ' MIJNISIWATMIY\n\nS \/O. THEERT-.AN; \"\n\n.. ;jAr;Ep ABOUT 45 YEARS,\nI _ EXLCASUAL LABOUR, SALEM DIVN,\n\n, 'sOUTH,wESTERE RAILWAY,\n\n  0\u00bb CHIKKAMPATT1 COLONY,\n  ' 7TM_U\"1'HA:MPATTI POST,\n  _ TDEIA-RMAPURI DISTRICT -- 635 301.  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES  82;
\n227′ OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR,_ ‘TI-‘IE<\/p>\n
RECORDS IN OA.NO.476\/07, ON THE FILE OF ..TH’E.._’CAT;
\nBANGALORE BENCH AND ON CONSIDERATION.  ~
\nMATTER. QUASH THE ORDER OF CAT, BANGALO.RE.jBENC’H.. _
\nDT. 6.5.09, IN OA.NO.476\/O7, VIDEO,’ANN~A’;””‘ae’_’v.D’I~sMISSV ”<\/p>\n
OA.NO.476\/07, FILED BY THE RESPONI5ENT’ANl3_  . _  <\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING UP._ FOR ORDERS, I<\/p>\n
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE’ FQLLOV’J._ING;~
\nORDERF ”\n<\/p>\n
(Delivered byRI_D.D;eI-I’eIRe_\u00a7ee’;’IOJ.) D’
\nThis writ petition is  by;the’.’:DtiVi.Sio_nal Personnel<\/p>\n
Officer, South We.s*;’errI.   respondent in<\/p>\n
Original App1i_catiOn  on the file of the Central
\nAdministratiife  (hereinafter referred to as ‘CAT’)<\/p>\n
Bangalo;-is ‘Bench,’-\u00bb_B_la:igalore, being aggrieved by the order<\/p>\n
‘Tde\u00a3eeI.I’ljQe.oS’I2oo9 wherein, the CAT has allowed the<\/p>\n
applioatipon eil.granted the prayer of the applicant by<\/p>\n
 di_reeting–\u00ab the ‘respondent No.1-the first appellant herein to<\/p>\n
 the exercise of absorption of EX.CL’s against the<\/p>\n
 a\u00a7{1ai1’a_ble”Dl79 Group ‘D’ posts in the manner explained in<\/p>\n
he has been already asked to attend for screening’j”\u00bbo.
\non 30\/ 12\/2004 and 31\/12\/2004 at  <\/p>\n
Institute, Bangalore. Further contents’ of_’ <\/p>\n
Annexure ‘A-5′ would clearly sho_wHthat  <\/p>\n
of Casual Labourers eligible,’ <\/p>\n
entered in the live register _ and vltvhel’-namelcf the<\/p>\n
applicant has also been  Furth__er”,,_the  <\/p>\n
that applicant had been call_od\u00bbv.for__scree*ning
\nabsorption of casual  .an’d__’that_his name
\nhas been found in the
\nby the applica:r1tl_ pp eaniier letters<\/p>\n
Annexures.–~’Fa5l5:_to.  vzerfi’ cancelled since the<\/p>\n
educational:iltguali\ufb01licatiopn hadllbeen prescribed for
\nabsorption,  for the purpose of
\nabsorption a_nd”Vvrouid only in case of initial
\nappcintmentiiip *  it <\/p>\n
V    Thelllbmaterial on record would clearly<\/p>\n
‘ show \u00bbt_ha.te.there is no merit in the contention of<\/p>\n
  the applicants were called for<\/p>\n
screen_ing_Vi’only for the purpose of preparing fresh<\/p>\n
 live re_gi”ster as the intimation would fairly show<\/p>\n
VA  iasikreferred to above that the name of the<\/p>\n
‘applicant had already been entered in the live<\/p>\n
 = …–register and he had been called for absorption of<\/p>\n
casual labourers. The only ground upon which<\/p>\n
3,\u00bb: \\
\n. A K<\/p>\n
the petitioners seems to have rejected the claim of<\/p>\n
the applicant for absorption is age limit.  -1- <\/p>\n
clear from the Railway Board Master .4<\/p>\n
No.38 envisaged at Para. 17.9 as iioll’ow_s’:,–<\/p>\n
“At the time of scree’ri*tirtg’.A_Aoficasual.’_ _  <\/p>\n
labour relaxation in’ page should
\nautomatic if it is \u20acSt(1′.bti:8’h\u20acd “t1′;at_V
\nindividual was within the prescribed age
\nlimit and had been more’ oifless reguiarlyvvi
\nworking. In oldlfcas-‘es,, .wh_er_e”\u00abthe age
\nlimit was not observed,.felaxat.ion of age
\nshould be considered’._syn’tpathe,t–ically.
\nThe by cpos, DR1s  the Chief
\nEngineers }i{L’_on..stru1:_tiion)’_ are” competent to
\ngrarittiitlievreiagftationy  Va’ge””.,:  ‘<\/p>\n
12. .The..faet that. Cefos, ‘Detox\/is and the Chief
\nEngineers  competent to grant
\nrelaxation ‘made is:’i1.ot”—diisiputed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n
Further, haviyngeeregardiwto the fact that the case of<\/p>\n
  thei”ap_p:licant before-“the Tribunal is for absorption<\/p>\n
‘ Land’ 1i.ot’~for_lini_tia1 appointment. What is required<\/p>\n
   is as to whether the appointment<\/p>\n
of”-..cas_ual;Alabour was within the prescribed age<\/p>\n
 limit” when initially recruited as a casual labour<\/p>\n
 Aiandgthe fact that when the petitioner was initially<\/p>\n
i’7eng”agec1 as a casual labour, he was within the age<\/p>\n
 at …~iimit was not disputed as the date of birth of the<\/p>\n
applicant is 25\/ 12\/ 1955 and initial engagement is<\/p>\n
l  Irititexzl\u00e9fes\/No<\/p>\n
to the above said material on record, we are’:”‘–.T
\nsatis\ufb01ed that the \ufb01nding of the Tribunal
\njustified and does not suffer from any  :”
\nillegality as to call for interferenee in
\nthe writ jurisdiction of this Court ah;-ie,\u00a2hpraihlgi3;,s
\nWe hold that the writ petition   V
\nand pass the fo1loWing:– it  _ A”\n<\/p>\n
…\\W\u00b0 R  <\/p>\n
The writ petition–_ is ajcii slfriijs sxed’. ”<\/p>\n
4. Hence, \u00a3911.-hm-.hg \u00a7.t_A_}1e{fl”1tliridi1’1A\u00a5\u00a7”ili1ft31T1_C._1__t\u00a7f’:t’elci by us in Writ
\nPetition No.29′;’74(l’)l7:fi.2>:(5′(‘)ll9l–. ,{Clisp’6stetZ– -gm 18–11–2009), as
\nreferred supra, .vtfrit_:””pe’tition is also liable to be<\/p>\n
dismissed. Ac:lCQ4rdi.ngly, it:_i”s.\u00a7liismissed. N0 order as to costs.<\/p>\n
0’)
\n\u00a32\u00bb<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
  Wei:-…\u00a3-East: Yes\/No
\n  Sf5b\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALo’:EEj.VT: ._ DATED THIS THE 231-d DAY OF NOvEMBEI2..A”:%oO\u00e9:” ” PRESENT ._ THE HON’BLE MR. 9.1). DINAKARAII, EHIEFI AN}? _ THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTIQ_E’-Y_.G,_SA]\u00a7HAHIT WRIT PETITION NIj.S2’37T\/.7\u00a72O4j9 }SgCAT) BETWEEN 1 1. THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":767,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\",\"name\":\"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009"},"wordCount":767,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009","name":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-30T18:45:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-personnel-officer-vs-t-muniswamy-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Divisional Personnel Officer vs T.Muniswamy on 23 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}