{"id":254969,"date":"2011-01-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011"},"modified":"2014-08-14T14:43:54","modified_gmt":"2014-08-14T09:13:54","slug":"smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n

IN ‘I’H}3 HIGH comm’ OF’ K_ARNA’I’AKA AT BANGALORE
\nIf)A”I_’EI3 THIS THE 7% DAY OF JANUARY’
\nBEFORE M M<\/p>\n

THE HONBLE E\\riR.JUSTIC}3-EQ;\u00a7X?.\/I AM<jf\u00abi}!\u00a7}\u00a7i–'AQ\u00a7i':3i3Y 'V<\/p>\n

WRIT PETITION No. 41 1743010 (Gm-%\u00a2PC)V M'
\n\u00a73.{a'I.'w1\u00a7:\u00a3\u00ab:N': 'V V V. 2 <\/p>\n

SM-"1". \\z'\u00a7LJAYAi…AK.S\u00a7–\u00a3M'IV ,
\nw\/0. N. B. JACEANNA'I"Tf4?';Sf\u00a3'E"\u00a7"71'
\nAGED macaw' 6% YEARS '
\nR\/A. NEZRELEKEZRE V1I,IJA{_}F_:~._
\nM'EDIGES\u00a7\u20ac{I M0_13L:_ I _ –\n<\/p>\n

MADEVEUGIRI ‘:’A1;a;;:’ 2:\n<\/p>\n

‘i'{;’MKUIR <\/p>\n

=’ …\u00a7-‘E\u00a7’I’I’I.’IONEZ}:'{<\/p>\n

(BY SR1″ \u00a7*iAE~1.ES}\u00a7 v . 2},r)”\u00a7f;v}.’ ~ V
\nAND: 1 T .\n<\/p>\n

SRE %\\\u00a7A!’}ARA\u00a7” :3, ‘<\/p>\n

33\/0. E\u00a7I~2A’?PAV ‘ .\n<\/p>\n

AGED AB OUT 44. 5?;-:A1%:.s
\nCL(;)’}’E-1 _MIa:R\u00a3: 1′–\u00bb:AN’;.$5
\nl:~I,{)i’\u00a7.AE{\u00a3?,R\u00a5:; F\u00a3EE:I3E’G.F.S\u00a7*’-E1 E’-{QBLE<\/p>\n

” .MA;E)H’U\u20ac:viR\u00a3 fmmK<\/p>\n

\u00bb Vf\u00a7”E;TE\\{T’}{UI5~2:. :;4:v:V3′;z’R_1\u00ab::*z*<\/p>\n

, . . R.E3SP\u20ac}N’E3EN’l.”‘<\/p>\n

.1’. ES FELIEEE \u00a7_ENE}I\u00a7R j5\u00b0a?{“}’I(3\u00a7,i’*3E*3 22%? Aifxfi} 22′? OF
\n‘I”‘H\u00a3*\u00a3 C’QN33’E”‘I’Y[J’FI()N C”)? INQEA PRAYIN\u20acZw TO $E3’i’ ASIDEC TEEIEZ
\n{}I\u00a3I3E2.\u00a7{ E31′. \/’1.0\/2(}1.G\u00a7 PASSEI3 BY ‘I”H\u00a7-S SEZN10\u00a5i Civil, JUDGE<\/p>\n

V ‘A%’L;}MI7{Tf. 53!!’ Ms.’-‘;Z)f”I.{.\u00a7’\u20ac}I\u00a7{\u00a7, IN \u20ac’).Ei\u00a7.N{}.8Z-3\/()6 ON \u00a7.5X.\u00a7’\u20ac{).6 ‘UI’Jf)f\u00a7R<\/p>\n

V’ .\u20acI_)I’~1.I3\u00a7EiR 13 RUL-Ii: ‘>1 I5’;\/W” S\u00a7Z(I.1E31 OF CFC. ‘\\z”\u00a7T7)E ;’\u00a5’xN?\\EE\u00a7Z>{.:3’a ii:<\/p>\n

.3″\n<\/p>\n

M} .,<\/p>\n

” ?e~,:*r$.V\u00a7-gred 2}.pf3\u20aca1″\u00a3iIi”i(Z’\u20ac’f, re\u00e9sisaii\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9i the suit’. by fiiirzg ‘WI’iT:'[f3i1’i<\/p>\n

{f2{3E\\ESZ\u00a7Q[_3E1\\2’1’E.,Y mmw “I'”HEi A.I>\u00a7>;,.1<:A'.1'I:\\z {Laws} EJNDEZR
\nO\u00a5{DI~ZR :3 RUI.,Ii 4 OF (EMT, ON 11% FIE,-IE2 cm ‘.1’2~-15;’. i\u00a5”A(Z’FS 8:
\nC:R(:LJMs’1’AN<:I\u00ab:$ ore' -"1:*1~I;\u00a3: CASE. ea: IDIRECT -'1'1~H\u00ab: (','{")UR'\u00a7T –:::\u00ab\u00a3:'1.,<)::I~J_:3HT1\u00ab~1'\u00a3~:
\nism.-'1}: AND ETC.\n<\/p>\n

THIS w_P. 153 COMING ON \u00a7\u00ab’\u00ab:>\u00a7\u00ab2 I>RL,HL:.A;2.:_;’\\i;%.*yr, <\/p>\n

‘I”‘HI:3 c::::>:jm MADE: ‘f’H}E<3 3\u00ab'w1N<_:: _ _
\noRDE3\u00bb_;\n<\/p>\n

The rejection of p121ir1t1’f:f’s I .A.N<_3.6 L11 \u00e9<;_i{3'A1*'v\u00a33r{is:i*"v1'S<\/p>\n

Ruie 4 CPC to (:<)n.$idef"'zfhe H the'<\/p>\n

ciocument dated 9\/ ix by order
\ncit. 25\/10\/2010 in Senior Civil
\n7'5<\/p>\n

6*:\n<\/p>\n

Juclge 81 JMF”(:”:;j[.L\u00a7xIadhu mi is question in this<\/p>\n

2.’ \ufb01l;’)C”‘{‘.i.J[LiC’}”\u00a31E”.’i”.V i1′).’:\u00a7{‘:.}’,”f’.’L;f.\u20ac3Ci O.S.i\\\u00a70.83\/O6 arraigning<\/p>\n

‘thsij r\u00e9S.\u00a7:><}n\u00a7%3z2.t. hetfsiin 2159 11138 iicfe\ufb01dazii; ':0 :*\u20acx:0vei*<\/p>\n

. \u00a7}Z},SS\u20ac?S'SiQH .\u00e9iIv1(i fin" E1.E'I"\u20ac::\u00a5.I"E:3 of E"\u20acI'1i1 of Rs.46.{)OO _\/ — as also<\/p>\n

" \u00a7:*-de\u20ac\u00a7.i%,.~*etry GE’ p<:ssse:.:ssi0:'1. "\u00a3'ha=% etiefezzdazat, on IEOfLLi(E\u20aci,<\/p>\n

5 <\/span><\/p>\n

4 ‘xx<\/p>\n

“M.\n<\/p>\n

\n

DJ<\/p>\n

si:eit’.en1\u00a33m:. In {the premisse of pieadings of paiiies, the
\ntrial Ccaurt \ufb01reimcd issssues and the parties eni.erm,i’—-,tri2i1,<\/p>\n

After the <:1s1.:re of piaintifi’ \u20ac’v”‘.idfi’fI1(?(‘3, iihjf,<\/p>\n

eniiereci upon his evzidemteg \\7V}1\u20acI}C\u20acf pjr:”‘-..V28:f”1\/12030’i’<\/p>\n

Introduced 8 ci0cume:2i:s mairktgcl un\u00e9:;pp_oe\u00a7ed.,_V \u20ac1E\u00a7~,VE’:}\u00a7i:I)}<\/p>\n

to D8, as neither the pei:i*;_i_o11eri’—:10; heii,v\u00e90L:’r1,\u00a7\u00e9e\u00a3\u00b0’.vs,?er\u00e9’VVL<\/p>\n

presei\ufb02i before c0urt;. ‘I’1″1<'3"'Vi'\ufb01\u00e9tition\u00e9\u00e9i'..\u20ac5I1–v'2'f;.{11\/ 2010
\n\ufb02ied 1.A.No.6 L3Ud\u20acT'Qi*'d\u20acf ri-3-consider
\nthe admissibiiity of 2002 marked<\/p>\n

as Ex.D1 L<\/p>\n

me ;3~.re1*:1iSe \u00b0i1f_1:}21t.f " v:\u00a3f;-vwas iiisufficiently<\/p>\n

ifiijiduiided and direction be
\niss'ue\u20acl_t,\u00e9;i1'i5:_ paiy de\ufb01cit stainp duty and
\npena41iy.'–__ Pi(;cEi:;iiiigg\u00bb~ fhe pf3i'if,iOf.1(3II". the documem:<\/p>\n

'b\u20aci\u00a7'1f\u00a7 an iiz1rQgis'ii.er\u20ac%d nioriigeiger deed e1ii<-:ged.iy exectuteci<\/p>\n

– \u00abbyi::h\u00e9’arei”:gi<)r$ ii'i"'{ii:1e (if im: pei:ii:i<mer in favoiii' of the<\/p>\n

V ?i'{3'f"-:*~:'\u00a3pfg'}"1}(i\u20ac'.?fi'iijfifi\u00e9if\ufb01ild\u00e9lilii. <:v<-3:12-mimii i'h2:'{: p<):%;sessia.n (if<\/p>\n

7'f'h\u20aci'\u00bb'i.1'Iii}Iil\u20ac5}}?7:\u00e9'}ii?\u00a7fiV\u20ac3' pr~:)p<~3rt,y was; cieiiv<'3r'\u20ac:Ci to $316 d\u20ac:fe1'ida.I1'\u00e9;.<\/p>\n

21S5'"— 3: .-_jf:"i(i:r*Egg21g@e in p{}SS\u20acSSit:)I'1,, \u20ac11gI'(}SS\u20ac\u20aci on stamp<\/p>\n

gm<\/p>\n

pEip(;'\/I.' of v'a_1u.e Rs.10{3\/~. Ii. was ihrs specrific case: of the
\npetitivzmer that: the d:gi\u00a7s’i:ered<\/p>\n

nz0:”t.gage deed at:{:1’a(:t,ed the m.c:id<~3ncte of S\u00abt:a..fn1.g:\u00a7' "f\u00a7\u00a5:1\u20ac.j_,f<\/p>\n

undeif Ar$;.34[a) of the Karr1ai;.21ka Si:a:t11pV "i:c; ::<\/p>\n

short: 'Act'.\n<\/p>\n

8. That application w as \u00abb3?\n<\/p>\n

ste1t,en1eI1t. of objections (;f–v.,_\/f}”2*:e re.spQf1’\u20ac\u00a7e}:at,} C:i\u00e91″\u00e9:r’1cia1I1t <\/p>\n

1’nt_c3ra11ia CT{)I1t\u20acI1C\u00a7iHg,’\u20ac}:.g1{. Ord\u00e9f E2116 4 ii-i”in’\u00e9V1pp1icabIe
\nand the abS(~:I1c:e of the c0’u’tis\u00e9IV211f,_\u00abtfi’\u00e9_’;t\u00a7Ii1.:3 of marking of<\/p>\n

the d0cL\u00a3m\u00a7rr1i’:s{_’~is {moi-~21″\u00ab.gfoiun_c1_7t0 COI’}Sid\u20ac’I’ the<\/p>\n

admi::;sibiIif.yvL’:3f_\u00abi:i’i.4f: dQCt;_n1er_:t. The Court. beiow having
\nfrank:-d.\u00a221 .p0i13t: ‘fd:1_%v\u20aciaIjSid\u20ac;ra1:i0n, observetd that BIx.D1,
\nthe n’mVi’Ltg;\u00a7\u00e91g;e2 ‘ .d\u00e9:{:\u20ac,E~,…_”..’L’ when marked in evidence<\/p>\n

L111\u00a7;{ppa:.setd cm. \/2010, the Q11;-sjsiiion <31" a.dmissibi1i'i,y'<\/p>\n

;c::1;*\u00a72\u20ac3:’\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7% 911 She pmrzzisse i:ha%’, ii: was<\/p>\n

_ in$’L;ffi.c:i_\u20ac::1iI}:g_V smmpeci, at a, izzter ssmge of the<\/p>\n

\u00a7 <\/p>\n

‘?-?w.,\/ ‘w<\/p>\n

;}:\u00b0o\u20ac:\u20ac3c;%Cii:i”\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7;”\u00a7-9;, i=i.55 \u00a7;mp<;\u00e9r:11.issi.bic: f0%1owi:r1gg the dt3CiSi(}I1 {if<\/p>\n

{hi-is cauri. I"{?p(}I'i'\u20ac?C.1 in ILR 200'? KAR 2786 emd
\na.Ccz*cii1’1gEy by the erecier imp’L1g;:aeci. I’\u20acj\u20actCf.f”3ii~- the<\/p>\n

appitcatzioal.\n<\/p>\n

4. Although 1ea.r’1:1ed Couiasd t'()1′”.V__'{.’f1’\u00a3;z. <\/p>\n

cxontezadss that Sec:t.ior1s 38 to 3?’ of t:Ifie;’11’aci:’*}::a_sts <\/p>\n

on {he court to \u20ac3X8.IT]i1’1\u20ac d0(:Lu_11\u00e9mt oxg<\u00a7–r <\/p>\n

of st.a.mp d'L1t.y, before its a'{fI113'iss_i():1 'i1T2 "_V\u00e9\\si:<:1e f\u00a7r:e, E am
\nncyt impresged by say because;\n<\/p>\n

the Apex Cotlrt. in KASB-IN\ufb011′{‘}ISA:h’Y;AMOSA KABAIJI,<\/p>\n

ETC. vs. KABADI, ETC.\n<\/p>\n

1’epor.\u20ac:ed \u00a7.–96~1 SC 1077 at paragraph 23\n<\/p>\n

c)bser\\?\u00a3_:d’t,h1.:s\u00a7:’ _ ” __
\n“X X . X T7f?if:,.\u00ab:71’E;\u00a7t:;1II1<:':1?ts:\u00bb were adn1ii'.i:ed in\n<\/p>\n

— ..\u20ac3\\-=’i.d\u20ac4fi.xC\u20ac Eay’ the f1″i:;1E Court and \u00a310 quc3si:i(>n
\nV sjgif :;-1dm’i$s:\u00a7i”r;*%\u00a7\u00a7–\u00ab3′ 01′ t:h{}ss% <i<3<:ument$ {jam be\n<\/p>\n

-:f_{;%3\u00a7-;a1iV\u00e9E{\u00a7___;1\u00a7: 21 \u00a7;\u00bb,1i;\u20acr 3\u00e9:z1g;\u00a7\u20ac: 0? the Emit, or *;’;:1
\nA }2:;\u00a7p.\u00a2:_;11.:;’g’s’\u00a72e Sc;’:<:.37, Si:aI11p.Aci.]",<\/p>\n

3:\n<\/p>\n

Erwwmmwy,<\/p>\n

-‘K.\n<\/p>\n

\n

_(-3,
\nA Eearzleci ssizlggie Judge of this court: in N. S.<\/p>\n

LAKSRMAIAH SETTY VS. R. GOVINI)A?PA I’fZ’p()711;J{‘:f3r(“3 in<\/p>\n

1964(2) MYSORE 1…}. 145, wmze {:or1sidea1*’iI1g_igii\u00e9<\/p>\n

of Secs. 33 to 3”? of the Karnataka St:21::};5’\ufb01c\ufb01.; =h”21{ri’:’:3 <\/p>\n

1’\u00e9:_2\u00a7ard 1:0 21 line 0f1″ep0::”1ied opfmiorjs’ ;~:)J’\u00ab_i4i”\u00a7’1s.__\u00a7:’z,:Ijt”\u00e9gn\u00e9i’
\ntihat. of the Apex Court, observed t’1<111s–:<\/p>\n

"It is also clear i'rom"V'i:;h:\u00e9' C1ec:i\u00e9'\u00a7i'ar'1VL<\u00a7*V\u00e91i1;\u00e9:\u00a7azdy
\ncited above, that .3v'heF\u00e9"tf1L\u00e9a' j'cV( \u00a7u.'1j"t faiA1'\u00a7"t.0"tvake
\naction under .do<tum(-mt
\nin evidencc, 0}3\u20ac1'21i",iO\u00a5l<\/p>\n

subjecf\u00e9 :22' prowdr-rd in<\/p>\n

'i's~uti\u00a7at so far as the
\nZvipartie\u00e9w if}: '"-2:11":-3 " C()I1Cf\u00a3'I'I1\u20acd, the action
\nof the d0:1Ax::1:;~–:my s~:.ubseq1.1<:ni; s1;age of the S'E1it
\n,Q1*\u00ab.+j::.% "az}y appeai or rev.is1'<m. 21ri:3i;r1g there
\n that: 50 fax.' as iih\ufb01 i11t.\u20acresi.s Gf
\n;:<3':H\u00a7:ri:w'Lij& are (_1()I1C\u20ac'I'I1\u20acd, f,h\u20ac-3}? are sc::\u00bbt;1gh{i {:9 bis<\/p>\n

" p_fote(:t,<3;c::.58 :1z’1de:* which the
\npi}V\u00a5\u20ac’i” \u00a319 <1ei:ern1i:1e and \u00e9ewztlare:-3: th\u00e9: pmper<\/p>\n

Q'<\/p>\n

-3-<\/span><\/p>\n

duty and penaity payable in 1’\u20acSpe(,’.i1 of H16?
\niI1st.1’un1e;1t:s5 is vest’.<:d in the court'. of 3.ppea1..__<\/p>\n

or 1'ei"erenn:es anti 110%. in the 1’igi1.1ai (:ou’rt’._,v \u00bb
\nis. ciear E’h<51'e_fo:{'e that once S3035 \u00bb A'
\nimio p\u20ac~:.r21t.i()n, the origilaai c:o111*t_iQ\u00a7e:f;
\npower not merely to r’ef’u’i\u00e9v.2*\u00ab
\nexpress or implied, to rc~:C \u20ac.ixre:’_’_’th’\u00e9
\nin evidencte, but 21130’9tc;\u00ab–_.\u00a7evy aIijI si;21\ufb01\u00a7fJ..\u00a2jdI,1\u00a7y<\/p>\n

or pssnaity in respect cf insi,I’\u00a31:;11′ \u00e911\u20aci”. V\n<\/p>\n

5. in vs; SUSHIL
\nKUMAR AGARWAL Atf.e}”> \u00a3);r1:e cV1. ii:;1 gm%%%-2.907 saw 234,<\/p>\n

the Apex ;_i.oi’.i{:\u00e9f(i**””‘0n facts that a<\/p>\n

cieve1\ufb01\u00a7prI1\u00e9:1i’1:1ffagre\u00e9\u00e9n;–t%iii’. v_cit. _– 16\/ 1\/ 1995 was exhibited
\nxvithotit \u00a31213? 0i3j(}\u00a2ti_iii1._:TVi’;11′,.–{.he part of the appellant. on
\n1?\/’ 2 \/ 2OVG;.’3,V,% \u00e9hg\u00e9 pai’.t5i{~’s;._’-7i1.21v\u00a7:11g ae:1d::<:\u20acd their rfzspemivc<\/p>\n

\u20ac\u00a5'\u00a7fj\u00a7.QI3(i\u20ac' <)11V"*16\/2\/2-Z005 and when the mex\ufb01er was-;<\/p>\n

p{\u00a7S\u00a71\u20ac:{\u00a7' '\u00a73.T}f~\u00a2;i:'\u00a7\u00a7'E.2.En\u20ac%11i.S on tbs: sgzz\u00e9\u00e9: an :2;-'hi<:h daiie tbs<\/p>\n

:1pp<;:1E}a:;t.-\u00a7'i1:2:\u00a7;.um E1I3p1i[\ufb01E1ti(}r1$g one-3. ;fe31" .:f{:ca_Ei.i:1_g; the<\/p>\n

\u20ac3:*Ci'Cr X2003 and arlotihssr is send the d0cum<3m:<\/p>\n

to the Collector for .irnpm1:_1cimg I':.he;'e::m in terms of<\/p>\n

S'ut: any 0bje:c:t:ion a11cI…….1i}1_e’Tgrfivzll<\/p>\n

eont.i;1ueci. ii. was held that OIECE3 the_d’Qe1::f:’1e:1t3 is’ 9′<\/p>\n

marked in ev:’.de:1ee, the ::<)3;.\u00a51;1%~,1A-iw iv
\nre0per1i.:1g the same. V ' . VV . V\n<\/p>\n

6. So also is the V. J. as
\nhe then Was, in K.\n<\/p>\n

reported in 2090 that once
\na Cannot be called
\nin t_iv1ve g’1*0L1.r1d that it was not
\nduly .x,2Qc>rds, Qnce the court: admits a<\/p>\n

d<)c:u.r:.1e11't;;-\u00abaevezz 1\u00a7J14(2.;ig\u00a71;?, saueh admission beeomee {\u00a311211<\/p>\n

a11.'{%_:\u00e9{?e, E161″, zmijg an iihe part. of the eg}p:.}site<\/p>\n

eg:-Lin3eE, b:;igiiso on the part of the Court: Ifmving regard<\/p>\n

{:3 {he ei”,2\u00a7i_:i\u00e923*\u00a7,f eb1igai:ion 1.EI1d(31″ 8220.83 of the AC3;’..<\/p>\n

5 5′
\n3 <\/span>
\n=.-“‘=-<~" 3<\/p>\n

.9.\n<\/p>\n

‘F’. Keeping; in mind iihfif c)bserv21\u00a3.ic):1s sf this ecmrt<\/p>\n

and that: of the Apex \u20ac202,111 in the rerpormd op.ii:’i,;:>”ns,<\/p>\n

supra, it is izwciless to si:at:e that EX.D1, _.n_1;;e1fR’@f:i; i’:7;<\/p>\n

evidence unopposed on 28\/1\/ZOEO f%..r”1a?1_ <\/p>\n

Co1.,1.1*t, 1.A.N0.8 urider Order 4;\n<\/p>\n

petitioner 1:10 rectal} the s21id_:>_rder \u00ab1z12i’;<kiI1gTTTv\u00a7\u00a7,<: Cic}c:,1';.r1\u00e9:~n$:[= <\/p>\n

on the p':'em.ise tha.i: the ci{\u00a7<:fLi111c:r1t "w_21VST–ins\u00a3;ffi<:ie:nt1y
\nStamped. was justifie23;)}y rej\u20acCteCi.–. <\/p>\n

8. Even.’ 0’i.11er’W\u00a7_S'<:w,.V t;}f16;c1r5e1i'1%i'\u00a7'Ii*t. termed as a
\nmortgage de\u00e9d,$i"1O::gh t1Iii*egist\u00e91-"\u00a3:'d—-b11t on stamp paper
\nva1L1<-id '.~.?1&jsewherc-3 held that for a
\n_;:{\u00e9[rt,y by 21 party, admissible in<\/p>\n

\u20aci”V.}.’\u00a7i–:f3E3C:E’ ezxrez\u00e9”ifins:;fficier1t.1y 5-st:a.mped.. H; is moi: kI1(}W11<\/p>\n

‘ 21$ $.51. ?’1f\u00a7w_Ai;’h;_\u00a73 dzzqtumam is pm:’p{>r:::: -1 is be pm: :13 \u00a5.,1:E’>\u20ac E3};<\/p>\n

t%\u00a5:\u00a7b::c7i\u00e9\u00e9;r3,i:”_;i.\u00bb:;%.; 3.53 to w\u00a7:1e3;:h{:’r it is for esi’ab1ishi:1g \u20ac116<\/p>\n

._;..\n<\/p>\n

‘::21’t11:.r\u00b0c;% \u00a5:3\u00a7ft3.\u00e9)s\\~3essi<:=I1 of the dc:;:i'<3;:";.r:ia;1t: <::v{:~r ilhff s,u,.i'\u00e9i<\/p>\n

M,<\/p>\n

"""*-Mzwzx<\/p>\n

far\u00bb
\nsch\ufb01\u00e9duie pmper'\u00a3:y or for any <}t'm3r purp<)se and<\/p>\n

i.h.t:*.rt3f<;)re on that': grmmszi tax). the p@t.ii:i:):1e:1' is dis<%Tii{:i:t.}.eci<\/p>\n

to ques\ufb01ozfz the (}1."C1E'.I' (it. 28\/1\/2010, <\/p>\n

um'czgis-:.t<3red nzortgage deed E1x.D1 in _t..If_1_<:_A'$..L.1i'i–:,A '~ '<\/p>\n

In '\u00e9ihe result, }i)t';'i',iti.{)I} b_<5:i.I1gAivi1:Ti1{;;if:–.f12e:jit_\u00bb.,.iS<\/p>\n

arding1y re} eciied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN ‘I’H}3 HIGH comm’ OF’ K_ARNA’I’AKA AT BANGALORE If)A”I_’EI3 THIS THE 7% DAY OF JANUARY’ BEFORE M M THE HONBLE E\\riR.JUSTIC}3-EQ;\u00a7X?.\/I AM<jf\u00abi}!\u00a7}\u00a7i–'AQ\u00a7i':3i3Y 'V WRIT PETITION No. 41 1743010 (Gm-%\u00a2PC)V M' \u00a73.{a'I.'w1\u00a7:\u00a3\u00ab:N': 'V V V. 2 SM-"1". \\z'\u00a7LJAYAi…AK.S\u00a7–\u00a3M'IV , w\/0. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":2210,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011"},"wordCount":2210,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011","name":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-14T09:13:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-vijayalakshmi-vs-sri-nagaraju-on-7-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Vijayalakshmi vs Sri Nagaraju on 7 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254969\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}