{"id":254974,"date":"2009-08-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-01-03T03:15:00","modified_gmt":"2015-01-02T21:45:00","slug":"shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 37894 of 2003(J)\n\n\n1. SHAJI S\/O. PARAMESWARAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n2. BENNY S\/O. THOMAS, MUNDAYANIYIL HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n1. NIXON PAUL, THAIKKATTIL HOUSE,\n\n3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOMY GEORGE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.M.JOSHI\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :21\/08\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                   V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n         ---------------------------------------------\n          W.P (C).No. 37894 of 2003 - J\n         ---------------------------------------------\n        Dated this the 21st day of August, 2009\n\n                    J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">          The petitioner is the claimant in O.P.(MV)<\/p>\n<p>No.1293 of 1990, pending before the Motor Accidents<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal (for short the &#8216;M.A.C.T.&#8217;), Kottayam.<\/p>\n<p>He approaches this Court with a prayer to quash<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 order of the M.A.C.T., Kottayam.              It is also<\/p>\n<p>prayed to restore O.P.(MV) No.1293\/1990 to the file<\/p>\n<p>of the said M.A.C.T. The third prayer is to issue a writ<\/p>\n<p>of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or<\/p>\n<p>direction,  directing     the    M.A.C.T.,     Kottayam      to<\/p>\n<p>reconstruct the file of O.P.(MV) No.1293\/1990 and<\/p>\n<p>dispose of the matter on merit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     2.   According to the petitioner, on 15.4.1990,<\/p>\n<p>at about 10.45 a.m. while he was travelling in an<\/p>\n<p>Autorickshaw, due to the over speed and negligent<\/p>\n<p>driving of the second respondent, the           vehicle    lost<\/p>\n<p>control and the petitioner was thrown out of the<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                         :-2-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">vehicle and met with an accident and he was<\/p>\n<p>hospitalised and he had undergone two operations<\/p>\n<p>in the Medical College Hospital because of the<\/p>\n<p>seven injuries sustained by him during the said<\/p>\n<p>accident.    Thus, he preferred the above claim<\/p>\n<p>petition claiming an amount of Rs.1,62,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation.         The said claim petition was<\/p>\n<p>dismissed on 24.2.1992 as no court fee was paid.<\/p>\n<p>But, on 24.3.1992, he had filed a restoration petition<\/p>\n<p>as I.A.No.911 of 1992. Ext.P2 is the copy of such<\/p>\n<p>petition. It was adjourned for return of notice to<\/p>\n<p>18.8.1992. In the mean while, the third respondent<\/p>\n<p>therein filed objection and the same was adjourned<\/p>\n<p>for return of notice of R1 and R2 to 14.1.1993. On<\/p>\n<p>14.1.1993, the second respondent was declared as<\/p>\n<p>ex parte and the case was adjourned for return of<\/p>\n<p>notice of R1 to 10.2.1993. The petition was again<\/p>\n<p>adjourned to 1.4.1993 and on that day, it was<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                         :-3-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">adjourned to 31.8.1995. After 31.8.1995, there was<\/p>\n<p>no posting.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">     3. According to the petitioner, on enquiry, it<\/p>\n<p>was realised that the file was missing from the<\/p>\n<p>records of the court. Though the court staff,<\/p>\n<p>including the Bench Clerk, assured him to trace out<\/p>\n<p>the file, the same was not located and hence, he<\/p>\n<p>filed I.A.No.2588 of 1999, a complaint before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal to trace out the file.   It is specifically<\/p>\n<p>averred in page 6 of the petition that when the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner contacted the Bench Clerk, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was informed that the learned Presiding Officer of<\/p>\n<p>the M.A.C.T. had instructed the claimant to file a<\/p>\n<p>copy of the restoration petition since the original<\/p>\n<p>was missing from the file. Thus, according to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, a copy of the restoration petition was<\/p>\n<p>filed based upon which steps were ordered and the<\/p>\n<p>case was adjourned for return of notice to R1 and<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                          :-4-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">R2 to 30.9.1999. According to the petitioner, in the<\/p>\n<p>mean while, he paid the full court fee as insisted by<\/p>\n<p>the court on 23.2.2002.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">     4.   That being the position, on 26.1.2002, the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.T. issued Ext.P3 order by which I.A.No.911 of<\/p>\n<p>1992 was dismissed stating, that was a copy of<\/p>\n<p>petition filed on 24.3.1992 and appropriate course,<\/p>\n<p>which ought to have been adopted by the petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>was for reconstruction of the original petition by<\/p>\n<p>getting an order from the High Court for permission<\/p>\n<p>to reconstruct the original petition and filing a copy<\/p>\n<p>of the petition with an antedate and seeking for an<\/p>\n<p>order on such petition, is quite unknown. It is the<\/p>\n<p>above order challenged in this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">     5.   When        the case  is   taken    up   for<\/p>\n<p>consideration today, none of the counsel was<\/p>\n<p>present to argue the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">     6.   Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                          :-5-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\"><a href=\"\/doc\/785258\/\" id=\"a_1\">Vehicles Act<\/a>, 1988 are specifically incorporated with<\/p>\n<p>a view to grant relief to the victims of the accident<\/p>\n<p>and their dependents. The cause of action for filing<\/p>\n<p>the writ petition itself arose due to the dismissal of<\/p>\n<p>the claim petition not on merit, but for not paying<\/p>\n<p>the court fee. Due to the denial, whatsoever the<\/p>\n<p>reason for restoration of the petition, the ultimate<\/p>\n<p>result is the denial of the welfare measures<\/p>\n<p>contemplated by the above provisions to the<\/p>\n<p>claimant if he is otherwise deserved for it.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, even in the absence of counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>contesting parties, I am inclined to consider the<\/p>\n<p>petition on merit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">     7. By order dated 10.2.2009, this Court<\/p>\n<p>directed the Registry to obtain a report from the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.T., Kottayam as to whether the records in O.P<\/p>\n<p>(MV)     No.1293\/1990        including   copies     of<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.911\/1992, are available.      In reply to the<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                          :-6-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">memo sent from the Registry of this Court, the<\/p>\n<p>Presiding Officer of the M.A.C.T., Kottayam, in his<\/p>\n<p>letter dated 12.2.2009 informed that the records of<\/p>\n<p>O.P(MV) No.1293 of 1990 are traced out and<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No.1293\/1990 and I.A.No.2588\/99 were brought<\/p>\n<p>to his notice. But, it is reported that I.A.No.911 of<\/p>\n<p>1992 is not traced out. It is reported that he had<\/p>\n<p>also come across with the order passed by his<\/p>\n<p>predecessor in respect of I.A.No.911\/92 in O.P.(MV)<\/p>\n<p>No.1293\/90. It is also stated that though a thorough<\/p>\n<p>search was undertaken, I.A.No.911 of 1992 is not<\/p>\n<p>traced out.       But the case records in O.P(MV)<\/p>\n<p>No.1293 of 1990 are available.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">     8.   In the light of the averments contained in<\/p>\n<p>the writ petition and from the report of the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.T., Kottayam, it appears that I.A.No.911 of<\/p>\n<p>1992 was mis-placed from the case bundle for no<\/p>\n<p>fault of the petitioner\/claimant. Though it is stated<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                          :-7-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">in the writ petition that copy of I.A.No.911 of 1992<\/p>\n<p>was filed as directed by the Presiding Officer, the<\/p>\n<p>said contention or said assertion is not supported by<\/p>\n<p>any material or evidence.      Therefore, the reason<\/p>\n<p>assigned by the M.A.C.T. in Ext.P3 to reject the<\/p>\n<p>petition cannot be found as illegal or arbitrary or<\/p>\n<p>improper.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">     9.   When this writ petition came up for<\/p>\n<p>admission, this Court ordered urgent notice to the<\/p>\n<p>respondents.      Thus, the service is complete and<\/p>\n<p>necessary parties are on record and for deciding the<\/p>\n<p>question of restoration of the claim petition, the<\/p>\n<p>same need not be remitted back. In fact, the claim<\/p>\n<p>petition pertains to the year 1990, connected with<\/p>\n<p>an accident taken place on 15.4.1990. Initially, the<\/p>\n<p>claim petition was dismissed for not paying the<\/p>\n<p>court fee, which has been, subsequently, paid by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. The case was not finally disposed of on<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                           :-8-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">merit for the last 19 years due to the reason that the<\/p>\n<p>file, in the above O.P.(MV) including I.A.No.911 of<\/p>\n<p>1992, could not be traced out. As there is no fault<\/p>\n<p>on the part of the petitioner, other than the payment<\/p>\n<p>of the court fee at appropriate time, for the mis-<\/p>\n<p>placement of the file or failure in tracing out of the<\/p>\n<p>file, the petitioner shall not be deprived of his right<\/p>\n<p>to get compensation, if the same is otherwise proper<\/p>\n<p>and in order and allowable on merit.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">      10. In the light of the above facts and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances and the discussion, I am of the view<\/p>\n<p>that this writ petition can be disposed of directing<\/p>\n<p>the M.A.C.T., Kottayam to restore O.P(MV) No.1293<\/p>\n<p>of 1990 to file and dispose of the same on merit,<\/p>\n<p>after hearing all the parties concerned on securing<\/p>\n<p>their presence. In the light of the above direction,<\/p>\n<p>no further orders are necessary, in terms of the<\/p>\n<p>third prayer in the writ petition.      As this Court<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                         :-9-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">ordered to restore O.P(MV) No.1293 of 1990 to the<\/p>\n<p>file of the M.A.C.T., Ext.P3 order stands quashed.<\/p>\n<p>The M.A.C.T., Kottayam is directed to see that the<\/p>\n<p>matter is disposed of as expeditiously as possible as<\/p>\n<p>the same pertains to the year 1990.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">          The writ petition is disposed of as above.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">                                    V.K.Mohanan,<br \/>\n                                       Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">MBS\/<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                         :-10-:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_21\">\n<p id=\"p_22\">                                 V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_23\">                         &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_24\">&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_25\">\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                  Crl.R.P.NO. OF 200<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>                            &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>                        &#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>                                    J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) NO.37894 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>                         :-11-:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\"><p>                               DATED: -2-2008<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 37894 of 2003(J) 1. SHAJI S\/O. PARAMESWARAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 2. BENNY S\/O. THOMAS, MUNDAYANIYIL HOUSE, &#8230; Respondent 1. NIXON PAUL, THAIKKATTIL HOUSE, 3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.JOMY GEORGE For Respondent :SRI.P.M.JOSHI The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1375,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009"},"wordCount":1375,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009","name":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-02T21:45:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-unknown-on-21-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shaji vs Unknown on 21 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254974\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}