{"id":255043,"date":"2009-10-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-28T12:34:42","modified_gmt":"2015-09-28T07:04:42","slug":"mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE)\nDATES THIS THE 30* DAY OF' OCTOBER 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'.8LE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J.GUNJA\u00a7:;%&amp;% ' 5   \n\nWRIT PETITION NOS.3584-85\/.2Q_()9(\u00a7','\u00a71\\;fi;;F\u00a7fi):  %  A\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1. Mangalore Taluk Scheduled \"\nTribes Large Scale Mu1tipurpos'\u20acu.  _\nCo-operative Society Lt\ufb02f'   V\nNiangalore, represented.._\":j* \n\nBy its President --   \nSri.RuPmayya Naik,   .  '\nAge 48 years, ,   \n\n2. Beltllazigady 'I'a1uE{\"::\"3(i11c:d'u,le':.d\nTribes Large Scale I\u00a7?I1\u00a71itiji&gt;'\u00a5.1I'pose\n{3o~operativ\u00e9 -vsc\u00e9cigty L1_.:d;; \"\nV Belthfazigady, rtpresente\u00e9\n * by i!:.s\u00b0PIjes1c1ciI2t ---  \"\"\" \n Sri'Ven1;:a.p\u00a7$'~Naik,\n.\u00a7\u00a7gt:T_5-4 year 3.\"   ...PETI'I'I(j)NERS\n{By Sf'i,Ari;{1 Shyam, Aciv. for\n IV1'--[S;'Dhannasrw:e A-ssts., Advs.)\n\n Z A' ' A'. V  \u00e9 ' '   I  'Sfate of Karnataka,\n\n\"  By' its Secretary,\n \" Department of Forest,\n' \" Aranya Bhavan,\nMaileshwaram,\nBangalore.\n\n\n\n2. Thfi Deputy Conservator\nOf Forests,\nKundapm' Sub----Divisi(&gt;a,\n\nKun\u00e9apur.  T' K: ~  \n\n(By Sr'i.N.B.Vishwa_nafh, AGA)= \n\nThese writ petitions are; __fi1r.=;d uhdc1*.Ar$jcE\u00a2sv~VV235\nanti 22'? 0f the Constitution oi\"'*!;i:*\u00a7ia wii:h_ a~pra1};fer to\nquash the impugned, Iio\ufb01\ufb01catiors,\/pubiicatiqz\u00e9 at\nArmexure 'A' dated I9\u00a7\u20ac\u00a5_1.2{\")OV9V L\"i.-sszied by the 2M\nrespondent in so far as' it -ri~:_1_af1.,  s Vtezi Mu;;1abidri and<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Vencmr units are C0ncem3\u00a71.&#8221;  V&#8217; &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;i&#8217;hes\u00a7__V Wrif  on for preliminary<br \/>\nhearing    dayfthe Ceurt made the<br \/>\nfo1i{)Wing:&#8211;,_ . &#8212;      &#8216; ~<\/p>\n<p>7 \u00a2RbER<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  -A A &#8216;&#8221;I*1ie5\u00bb&#8211;g)&lt;=:ti&#039;i3ionersVV7a\u00e9i*\u00e9 (3o~opemtive Society, which are<\/p>\n<p>as &quot;LaI1I3pS Society&quot;, The same is<\/p>\n<p>  r5g7sftt3redv_r~LLt1id\u00a3ei&#039; the Karnataka Co\u00bbopera:\u00a3ive Socziaties<\/p>\n<p>&quot;   S.&lt;$(:ieti\u20acs have been functioning with the Gbjfzi\ufb02t<\/p>\n<p> ;)i*a$f\u00a70\u00a3ing the mterest of Schedt\ufb01ed Tribes by giving<\/p>\n<p>  _113c:&quot;:}ssa;ty benefits and facilities for their welfare. The<\/p>\n<p> Goverrment having regarci to its policy ha\u00e9 issued an<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-3-<\/span><br \/>\norder on 20.07.2001 in respect of certain Lamps<\/p>\n<p>Societies in Karnataka, wherein they were given <\/p>\n<p>ooileet Inirior forest produce from the forest    _<\/p>\n<p>nominal charge. Subsequently,    it  <\/p>\n<p>issued another order dated 23.O\ufb01~;,2(){&#8216;J2A.<\/p>\n<p>bank on eolleetion of Haimgdag pmjuceaeifissms me i<\/p>\n<p>forest In the State Govemo1ei\u00a7&#8217;i:..oirder,.. &#8216;ii. igy\ufb02agvvfiaiade<br \/>\neiear that the right 1-.oA  produce is<br \/>\nrequired to be :&#8221;&#8216;ei&lt;:oepi: in the<br \/>\narea where       functioning.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Annexure &#8216;B&#8217; is&#8217;\u00ab&#8221;.:h.e'&lt;Goveromeot order, wherein the<\/p>\n<p>have takes.  for-&#8230;t,iirehah\ufb02ita\ufb01on of the oibal<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;aim Anhexirire &#039;C&#039; is a zioti\ufb01catiori, wherein it is<\/p>\n<p>Arstiaitecl;  of operation of Lamps Societies is to<\/p>\n<p> ._N&#039;e&#039;\u00a7erthe1ess, the respondents have issued<\/p>\n<p> 3 parser \ufb01xfjiieatiori, a eopy of which is produced at<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;A21i1e3:11r*eV&quot;&#039;A&#039; mdim\ufb01ng that the tenders are invited for<\/p>\n<p>  of removing the forest produce from several<\/p>\n<p>&#039;4 including the area, where the petitioners are<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>operating. The said noti\ufb01cation is quos\ufb01oned in<br \/>\nwrit petmon. p b\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2. This Court entertained the writ petitiori  *<\/p>\n<p>passed an i1&#8243;it6I&#8217;i\ufb02} order only inasmuch&#8217;<br \/>\nand Venoor units are concemsd.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">was granted for a perim of  ..Latsr <\/p>\n<p>interim order was contixmogsd.  . ._\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">3. &#8216;\u00a7&#8217;h-3 iearned couiis&#8217;o1&#8243;the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>submits  \ufb021s.1io\ufb01\ufb01ca\u00a3ion issued at<br \/>\nAnnsxur\u00e9&#8217;-._&#8217;C&#8217;,&#8217;_    of the petitioner &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Socie is tod&#8217;&#8212;bevvsxcliids\u00e9 .-Whenever a tender is to be<br \/>\nV&#8217; v_ ._ S&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;C3365:-.j figr\ufb02lsf&#8217;  that pursuant to Annexure<\/p>\n<p>5B&#8221;,  had issued a memo to Ishabiiitate<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V&#8217;   the &#8216;so\u00e9istiss  similar nature.<\/p>\n<p> so  is&amp;r.N.B.Vishwa.n,a,t11, learned Additional<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7Z_&#8217;_:o&#8221;t:smment Advcxzate appearing for the respondsnis<\/p>\n<p>T :s1&#8217;1&#8217;ij:n.its that 121 between Annexures &#8216;B&#8217; 83 &#8216;C&#8217; another<\/p>\n<p>no\ufb01\ufb01cation has been issued. \ufb02<br \/>\n. I<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">&#8211; 5 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5. A perusal ef Axmexure &#8216;C&#8217; would clearly indieate<\/p>\n<p>that the area of operation where the petitioner &#8212; _<\/p>\n<p>is operating is excluded an\u00e9 the remaining   .<\/p>\n<p>put up for &#8216;aCti{3i&#8217;l. indee\u00e9 3. gnerueai\u00e9 sf    &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>discloses that the area where<br \/>\noperating is 21150 ineluded  atii:ti__oi1. %<br \/>\nTo my mind, it is contrary teeV-t;ee&#8221;L_:n6ti\ufb01cetion.:\u00a7.ssft1ed at<br \/>\nAnnexure &#8216;C&#8217;. Anotllee teeter, weigh in<br \/>\nfavour of the   had granted<\/p>\n<p>an interim QI&#8217;de1*&#8211;. V1:*eesi3:fit:&#8217;i&#8217;;i.1j;g&#8221;t&#8217;t;e&#8221;_actie*I1 only in so fa}: as<\/p>\n<p>restricting the V  4&#8217;e;s\u00a7e1udi;1g the area Where the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners  regard to the fact that<\/p>\n<p> , the  process .i$___al::eady over in respect of the 0tI;1er<\/p>\n<p> \u00a2XG1tidL3.Jg&#8221;&#8216;th6 area of the petitioner, i am of the<\/p>\n<p>vie; tkeiatv  purpese Weuld be served by keeping<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;$113 seritvttpietition pending. Even etherwise, i am ef the<\/p>\n<p>   tt\ufb01at the two viilages i.e., Moodubidr\u00e9. and Venzjr are<\/p>\n<p> _.__&#8221;&#8221;.&#8217;\u00a5:0  excluded until the earlier zxoti\ufb01eatien Annexure &#8216;C&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>  is either withdrawn or modi\ufb01ed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">Fetitien stands disposed of aecordjngiy.<\/p>\n<p>,\u00a3.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">6. M. N. B.Vishwa;nath, learned  &#8216;  _<\/p>\n<p>Government Advocate appearing for resp;;\u00a7mii\u00a7rif;$&#8221;V~.  ~<\/p>\n<p>permitted to file memo 0f appear2*s&#8217;::;a.;:..withiI1_*  <\/p>\n<p>SP8<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE) DATES THIS THE 30* DAY OF&#8217; OCTOBER 2009 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;.8LE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J.GUNJA\u00a7:;%&amp;% &#8216; 5 WRIT PETITION NOS.3584-85\/.2Q_()9(\u00a7&#8217;,&#8217;\u00a71\\;fi;;F\u00a7fi): % A BETWEEN : 1. Mangalore Taluk Scheduled [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":639,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009"},"wordCount":639,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009","name":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-28T07:04:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangalore-taluk-scheduled-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mangalore Taluk Scheduled vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}