{"id":255047,"date":"2009-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-10-29T15:49:31","modified_gmt":"2016-10-29T10:19:31","slug":"t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n
.. g 0-'\nE53 TH? HIEH COURT G? KARNATAKA AT BANGALOQE\n\n\u00a7\/WE!) \"rs-4:5 THE 4?\" may or AUGQST, 2909\n\nPQESENT\n\nTHE HONBEE MFEJUSTICE    \n\nArsm -\n\nTHE H0?i\\i'B{.E MRJUSTZCE '}:.\u00a7\\I:L'af\u00a7Ex\u00a7JU\u00e9(3\u00a7AL\ufb01~ (--.@::?:3\u00bb\u00ab.%\n\nR.F.A.NGv;iSV1\/20{\u00a7g;{P\u00a3R'3.'.=   \nBhZ\"i'w35:B3N: V' V' A' V'\n\n1. \"E'.{}.Sui:shakar '\n\n 3\/ {3;.;\u00a31t\u20ac'~rF.-\u00abEf_{.'VC\u00a7T3\u00a7':V  '{-:;h$'5if\u00a7'\n'xfi a'-4I'\u00e9\"a1ikav3} Ext}:\n\n\" Eizilgaior\u00e9 City\n\nVfv\u00e9otxr, at E'\\\u00a5o.'.2C\u00a5\/ 1, Tank Band Resad\nBrindavan Nagar\n\n\n\nS\ufb01tiioioxay, Mathikcre  \nBangalore .. APP\u00a7)I,L}\u00a7.\u00a7lT\u00a7E;'  L-  V \" \n\n{By Sri M.RA\/ijayaraghavam, Adv.,)\n\nRNI}:\n\n1. S::I1t.R.E<1I*ii{1\ufb02:a Devi.\n\nAged 30 years\n\nR\/at.\u00a7'~\u00a50.}4\n\nNorth Veli Strcet,\n\nMadurai\u00bb:\n\n(Tamil Nadu) _ % _\n\n11-aw attain\u00e9d majoxitff  \n\nElam: to procceci with suit '\n\nSince    _   \nw\/o.sri  .    "   \nNow. No'.'i7;.}g_3}.?'1'_ V    \u00bb\nRamaJ:a\u00a7\u00a7a-ii\ufb01caci  ' ._  ',  V'\n\n2. VM.?fhj1nn1sg?oti\u00a7c3.aA  \n\ufb01ged 53$ ye::L?s{'  \nS\/o,?s.5'izi:.ft.}i91:3Vg,oiis:':ia'.. " A _.\nPr:c\u00abp.S1i1'e$h  3:; R\u00e9staumnt\n, $0.231, c::1iekpet, Main Road\n'-.._Ea13;'ga}i1owing:-- ..  I\n\n  >V\nThis is the defendallts' \njudgnlent and decree of th<\u20ac_'1.'     V\nsuit of the piaimitff and   in the\n\nsuit scheduie pr\u20ac)p&I1:y."=  ? _ \n\n2. }\u00ab'o:r ti\u00e9ie  \u00ab:)f--~'t}0i1v\u00e9::ien\u00a7;\u00a7: . the parties are\n\nreferred to    If\u00e9i%'?}:LI'r'e'x:1..Vt0"';I1"tE"1e originai suit.\n\n 'i'h0u:g:i'1i'V-\u00bb of the propertias are\n\n\u00a3z1enti{3I1\u20ac:c\u00a3{*-Li: ttg\u00e9 ~f\u00a7ia3ii1E:.:."~~S(:he:duie, the property is only\n\n ..,_o:1c:f,_: f\u00a3};E1;E:;{'ei1)f\u00e9;\u00abV,.i=if:\u20ac: subject matter of the suit is\n\n pv:\u00a7\u00ab\u00a7{;3e;*t3s:_"i;~e;a\u00a7{~1;;g 9305.289 and 231 {old i\\Eos.846 and\n\n at Chickpet, Bangaisr\ufb01 City, measuring\n\n "-.~.. *.,,';1'X845 Cc}nsisting of gonna, first and second floors, a\n\n"':V'\u00a7:<2\ufb01\ufb01:1ercia1 compiex. 'miss prepexty feii to the share sf\n\n  .\u00ab Kiicgai ijhetty in a famiiy partitian under a reglstere\u00e9\n\n\n\nsale: deed dated 29.3. 1955. The sa_ic\u00a3'\u00a3'.1:<.Z..Gopa1 \n\nhad three sens, vizx, "1'.{_}.\u00a31'; of her_ ifs\ufb01i $har6 in {he suit scheduie\n\n  \n\n _;:\u00bb'%_\u00a3*%\u00a2L1\ufb01V' sezvi:3<2 -:31' S1iI}C3.IIl{}I1S, the d\u20acf\u20acI}d8_I1'fS\n\n" i;j'~._;\u00e9n1;;eres:i "2;a.;:atp@arance, \ufb01ied a detaiisd wrifgtzen stateinent\n\nA  \ufb01snte\ufb01\ufb01ing {ha ciaim of the piairltiff. '1'\u00a7'1\u20acy da Hat\n\n  'di.$;;ute the reiatioaship between. the partias. it is their\n\n\n\n-5-\n\nspeci\ufb01c case that Ragliavendra, p1ai:1tiff's I"ath\u00e9:fA~  \n\navecatiorl. ms heaith was not W633, _  hca;'r'.:__ \n\nprobiem, He had borrowed Eoaris 1'"rjc\u00a7m \n\ninciuding Syndicate i3;a1:1k. ~ _\u00a3'-is l"ias"'t:a1<ezj_\u00bb,--\u00a7;i?3,.c%  \n\nfrom the defenda:1ts. He   in\nfavour Of defendsmts'   and\ncash from the ;d_efendA8;.{1f$}~..  amount of\ni<ls.35,\u00a3}0Uj_-V   in deposit in the\n\ufb01ama of     as the piaintiffs\nfath@;i.;VvV'had.'  and re\ufb01nquished his right\nurzdsr   the p\u00a3ai;I1ti\ufb01"s suit is not\n\nInaj;f1it\u00e9.L*1abie\u00a7"  sxiit is aigo bad for ;:}.0:1-j0i13::i&r of the\n\n 3f:e;:_:ess;arj\u00a7f . \u00a73.3rtj.\u20acs, as the \u00e9ianghiers are not 1:13.656\n\ng"=_3f1:ia$;'  T\u00a71\u20ac\u00a7'*\u00e9:E7Gre, they have soughi for dismissai of the\n\n3211?; \n\nH *   {En the aforasaid pigadings, $113 Trig} \u00e9jaurt has\n\n  _,_f;flaIned as many 33 ? $332153 and :5 additianai issues,\n\nV' \u00a7?\u00a7T1iCI'1 are as Ibiiowstw \n\n\n\n1. Whether ma pia\u00e9ntiif proves that 'r1\u00ab:::r\u00a7_j\n\nfather and defendants 1 and 2 we:1p\u20acrtiesV?. . _ ' \"\n\n whether m\u00a2%%%<[\u00a7\u00a2ur:,fe\u00a2 'paid not\n\nsu1"ficie'11f,? _ A I\n\n3: 4.'i.J:\\?J%.'1;eth;_\u00e9f't1*1\u00a7i.\u00a7  proves that\n. 2  _if~_1a:=.': p_1it__up_.-C\u00e9grisffii\u00e9tions and made\n5.. i3';npf:;vsii\u00a3ieniS"4'  {I16 suit scheduie\n\n" * A.  _  ouf\ufb01f his own funds?\n\n" =._\u20ac; . . '3."c:\u00bb-.  her ciaim, plaintiff was\n\n_\u00a7:X"a;11i:}ed"a_$'PW.,'?2E She 3150 examined Sri S\ufb01nivasan,\n\n'A  :A\u00ab.i1i4\u00e91t; ernai unctie as I:'W.} and produced five\n\nV'"T.-..:V\u00a70};i's\ufb01;f2.\u00a2I'i\u00a7s'V'\u00a7.x:hi<:=h are marksd as }$x.P}. :9 Pa. (311 behalf\n\n  'fdef*e:';da11ts, first defertzdaxzt was examineci as\n\nn  1 and {hay aim garo\u00e9uced six \u00e9OC1.1fI.}611tS whiah an':\n\n9'  :\u00a7:a_,=:*\u00a7 E ':9 \u00a336.. PW.1 was not oiferad for CI'\u20ac3$S-\n\n\u20ac}{a_II(}iI1\u20ac:'KE.i{}IL \n\n\n\n7C '\u00a3'he Trig} iimzrt an appreciatien of the afar-ifgsajd\nam} and documentary evidence, held that  \nhas established that she, her father and  \nan\u00e9 2 CO3i\"1Siit1l'\u00a3\u20ac{;i a joint famiijrg'  A\nis 3 joint fajniiy yroperty, there   \njoint famiiy during the <::f"' h\u00e9r  VV'V!;1% 3*VVi\u00a7;tf1er'VV\nhad 1 jsr\ufb01 share: in \ufb01i\u00e9 sh;\u00a7 ' is eiifitied to\n1\/3rd share in the   Trial ()O'\u00a31I'{\ncieciined ES     injunctian as\n\nthere is 13.9 .\u00a73i\u00a7d\u20acf\u00a3{:6'  .ti1eV' ezfect that there is any\n\naifsniggi by  2 to induct 8113;' person in\n\n{he sc:f1e\u20ac'i:._j}*e  '_;.'\u00a3ia Trial Court f'urt.he:* heici that\n\nthcsuit is r 10*:_bad  far non-\u00abjoincier of the nszcessary\n\n'  ._\u00a5:_1e\u00a3d that th\ufb01 piainti\ufb01' is entitied to mesne\n\n'1:\ufb01\u00a7*<;fi:$.\u00a7 ' -:i\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9i"\u00e9ndants have failed to estab\ufb01sh me\n\n re1\u00a7"1:g:;1\u00a7.$iiii}e:1t. by the ;:)1aimiff's fathm and have failed\n\nA if i\u00e9 'c:::;stablisE"1 their case of putting up canstiuetiens and\n\nIL\/\n\n\n\n_ 2; -\nmaking improvemem Gut of their fun\u00e9g. '\u00a3'\u00a31ereii\u00a7:ie, it\n\ndeemed the suit as prayeci for.\n\n8. Sri Vija}-?a1'aghavan, ieamed\u00e9  \nfor the appeilants, assaiiing  \nand decree, contsnded  ;:~;3g\u00a3;t_\ufb01i;c.\u00a7:i"'33\u00a3<\u00e9:aded' ' L'\nijy the defendants:-* ._.is 'Vg$\u00a7iid \u00a7i1<::c\u00a7\u00a2{ -_..\u00a733;'\u00a7 Written\ndocuments, the evidT$i'i:1ey in respect of his\n (jazlrt has not propezsiy\nappre%\ufb01iaf\u00a7:edVt\u00a31\u00a7:_. recurd and committed arror\n\nin haiidixlig!  tjier\u00e9 was no paxtiti\ufb01n. Be 3130\n\n s\u00a7ibi:1if\u00a7ed' gihat  suit is bad for 110:1\u00bb\u00a70ir1der of\n\n .rz\u20accefAs'$\u00e9;;r'*,jf' \u00a7\ufb01).\u00a7.t7'\".\u00a7i\u20ac$ as the daughters are :10: made parties\n\n'\u00a30\"\"\u00a5:E1e..__' Sui? and thczrefom he prayed that the judgnraeni\n\n  n:r--m__<:\u00a3 \u00e9velcfreee sf the 'i'3f'i'ai (3{3uI*t is {(3 be set aside and the\n\n"   %i1'i't: be dismisseci. \n\n\n\n_;{;,\n\n Pegr contra, the iea:'I1\u20acd cemasai appaaring for\nthe retspendents supparted the itnpugxeci \n\nd\u20acCI'\u20ac\u20ac.\n\n10. I:+"r{)m the afarssaid ;ma';i_(4:1'i;\u00a7i  '\u00a31\u20ac'}vL\u00a3"L' *~.I;';1V*\u00a7?\u00a514E_1i\n\ncontentions, the paints tha\ufb01azjise for Q1__iI'VVb\u20ac;(}1':1.5S'\u00a7.{7\u00a7\ufb01?1'?'a1Z3,{}Ik. V "\n\n\ufb01ff\ufb01i --\n\n1) W.ht3:ther... _V  '\u00bb~:V.f\u00a7;&i"titi0\u00a71 as\n\n  'by  30 as ":0\n\n   1\/3rd share in\n\n ....    \n<\/pre>\n
\u00a7 \u00ab ’13}  Suit is bad \u20ac01′ 110.1:1-\n<\/p>\n
VA -\u00a7QVi:-“;\u20acw\u00a7%;r”‘.~th\u20ac partias as Cemtended by<\/p>\n
 ‘ih\ufb01\u00e9iafiandants?\n<\/p>\n
 ‘i*\u00a7:\u00a2:;”‘r\u20ac\u00a3ati0I1ship between ma \u00a7a\u00a7.’T,i\u20acS is 1’10: 311<\/p>\n
di’i?sp1:i\u00e9.’\u00bb  Suit prspezfy feii :0 the \u00abshare 0f the<\/p>\n
V ” \u00e9gfe\ufb01dants\ufb01 father under a registere\u00e9 partitia\ufb01 fi\u00e9\ufb01d<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01\u00e9fa\u00e9 3963. 193$ a3 per }::1X.\u00a7?’2. i\ufb01efe\ufb02dmzts and<\/p>\n
_,;;_<\/p>\n
p\u00a3s.a,i:”3.i:iff’$ father Kaghavendra are the “Sri<\/p>\n
Gopala chatty, whs constituted a   <\/p>\n
family. During tha \ufb01fethne 0:15;   T.\n<\/p>\n
was :10 partitio\ufb02 in the fa::m_i\u00a33:. Afft\u00e9r tt1e:{\u00a3\u20aca:;\u00bb1i:f1 231″ f}\u00e9pa {:s\u00ab,<\/p>\n
chatty, three sons c0ntin\ufb01\u00e9a%jGi\u00a71t  i;\u00e9’;\u00a7isVVV3_is0 moi:
\nin dispute that   }’5%#\u00e9h$V\u20ac11QT3s 1710
\nregstered pa;f{itioI1_.d_<\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7i jvg\ufb01iistence severing
\nthe joi13t_    the property by
\nII183Z\u20ac3$m8::I}d    so, the plaintiff being
\nth\u20ac:';;daLt\u00e9Eit:j.\u00e91fV@_\u00a7:i'i;\u00a3a\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7}\u00e9\u00a7z\u00a2ndra, is er1t\u00a7:!:led to 1\/ Sn: Sham,
\nas  or: record Cieariy estabiishes<\/p>\n
':;.'i,':\u00a72\u00a7 existericzfikji' joint faxniiy. In order ':0 deny the<\/p>\n
.'  of the plaintiff, the defendants have set<\/p>\n
 ~.  '\u00a7;:_;;:: \u00a33; i:i;i_&a'\u00a33rai gjartitian, The plea as set up by the<\/p>\n
\u00e9\u00e9ffeiigia\ufb01ts is; very vague. The piaim: did not mentie\ufb01<\/p>\n
 .. AA 't\u00a7f;at "mere was an orai partitierx, under which the
\n  piaiI1tiff"'s fatfler rsiingui\ufb01hed his 1;\/'Bid share by takitlg
\n' j\ufb01we\ufb01argf worth Rs.1,{){),UO\u20ac)j~\u00bb~ from the {ie1'.'e}:1<:iaI1t$ and<\/p>\n
E,\u00bb<\/p>\n
I… –\n<\/p>\n
\n
-\u00a72-\n<\/p>\n
that tbs piaintiffs father was given ce\ufb01aggi <\/p>\n
vs;h.ici1 was beioxiging in joint faxniiy.  <\/p>\n
what is pieacied is that he had.” i501′:r0\u00a7v\u00a3:c\u00a3  \u00bb<\/p>\n
he did not f\ufb01tuffl and Eh\u20acF\u20ac\u00a71(;I’3
\nhad reiiriquisiaed Ezis V.    \u00a3135
\n\ufb01vidence cf EJW. 1, f(>\u00a7i:1_1e  {hat there
\n953$ an era} pa1’iiti0%;    which date is
\nmissing in 1:i%c1\u00e9;:: \u00a7\u00a7i*itt(-,:;:1 $\u00a3z,\u00a7%ferr1\u00a7\u00a71’fft.I*\u00bb.}i_\u00a7\u00a7WyeVer, the material<\/p>\n
an recor\u00e9ri $i4i(;n.i%S”— ‘th z};1*’i.’j x I:.he…rs<:2j1edu\u00a3e proparty was in<\/p>\n
0c{:u}\u00a73ati\u20acs1:1AV–\u00ab.\ufb021<%"f\u00a7:ia;z;\u00abtS and fhereibra it becajne<\/p>\n
\ufb01ecessargr 1:0 f\ufb01\ufb01 1523;: .fi:3r \u00a5?ace::vering the passessien from<\/p>\n
'\u00a3h\u00a7: tei*1a11%:s."'Afiifeei Suits catne {(3 ha fiisci by the joint<\/p>\n
'    in {}Jo'.\u00a7'\u20acc:3s.;E8E3;%\/ 1982, 3&2; 1982 and<\/p>\n
  recavexy of gmssessiorz and arraars 0:'<\/p>\n
r\u00e9iii giff.ae'1*' the d\u00e9ath 01"' {ha piaintiifs fa.ti*1\u00ab:3r. Ef rea\ufb01y<\/p>\n
  "\u00a7%;:3gh$\u00a7iJ$ndm had r'e\u00a7ir1qz1i$h\u20ac& his share in the Sqzh\u00e9duie<\/p>\n
""-Lgjf\u00e9iperty arm it \u20acX\u20ac\u00a71E3\u00a7.VE3\u00a7:v' beiamge\u00e9 ie d\u20acf?5I1<:\u00a3.a;r1'\u00a3$,<\/p>\n
2 " fixere was rm Qccasian fag" tbs d\u00a2fe;{1da:'1$:$ E and 2 {.0<\/p>\n
K\/%<\/p>\n
..}:;.\n<\/p>\n
impiead the piajmiff, the daughter of i<agJ}ai?:3'::\ufb01f\u00a7izf\u00e9;,.. in<\/p>\n
the mid $111313 it is their spccific case  <\/p>\n
suit that the property is a j<:'ji\u00a7it"'fa:ni1iy .; '\ufb01.if1t3}.? j  A'<\/p>\n
have 1\/ 31"" share in the pi.'Gp\u20acA:f;:T\u00a7f E1:L1Ci tE\u00a7 r;:;\u00a7;i*9r\ufb01 a
\nbasis, a dscree was saugfitu' "1111 {\ufb01at  :.:$i1' re{:<3fcVl
\nshews that the te\ufb01ag\ufb01t   \/3 of the
\nrents EdiI'\u20acC\ufb01jf to   \u00a7<9imisSi0::: of the
\nde\u00a7'enda1m,_\u00a7   constitute a
\n Vtg\ufb01zonstratizig that on the
\ndatv\ufb01 Of   c:0m:in'u\u20acd and that.\n<\/p>\n
theri\u00e9’ was $33..’  1:116 famiij\u00e9. \ufb01ler\ufb01fora, ‘there<\/p>\n
fs;-gas rm \u00e9rai. _ip\u00e9::”‘titV\u00a7G:1 on 12.1 1. E981 aid that Ei\u00e9iii\ufb01 was<\/p>\n
A ‘ . “:’1<_3t_ 'i:;t::;ii<)Vr."1ad in wzitien statement 311$ 131$ \u00a7;)I'\u20acS\u20acI1Z suit;<\/p>\n
 .  year }98& "i'\u00a3'x\u20acr\u20acf'0re,. the pag\ufb01tian Set up<\/p>\n
Ey \u20ac:;%\u00a7\u00e9"<i;3fc:i1<iaI1t.s ig an attempt ta deny {E16 p\u00a7a\u00a71"1E;iff'$<\/p>\n
" ' \u00e9ggiiimate Share in the yraperty. 11: is to be remembsredi.<\/p>\n
f\u00e9iai. in aid the 8\u00a73{}V\u20ac three Suits, ggiaimtifi' was made 3<\/p>\n
M,<\/p>\n
-35-<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a781’i}” 811d as sh\u00e9: was minor, ii is {ha <\/p>\n
whe actad a3 her guardian in the said suits};-._:   ‘ <\/p>\n
12. That apart, the matariai  ‘fe\u00e9mr\u00e9i <\/p>\n
i.i:1& case \u00a3311: $231131 by .\u20aci\u20acfe:1’V:V*\u00e9%  ‘gfs\ufb01structe\u00e9 Ciuring
\nthe iifetiI::1\u20ac 7g_’:f  \u00e9\u00a7;\u00a7:dV_*.%’\u00a7;r\u20ac in accupatian of
\nEh\ufb01  \u00a7%.?\u00e9\u00a7:T*:::’*\u00e9:is(: ixii\ufb01aisd for recevery
\nof pbssessi\u00e9ii;   p’:’0par1::i6:$ situateci in prime
\nigcajitj\u00e9    in {\ufb01e evizienca, \u20ac\u00a7}{\u20ac;\u20ac\u00a7{ {\ufb01e<\/p>\n
@i?i\u00a3\u00a3\u20acI1C\u20ac {;sf”‘*\u00a3:\u00a7;\u00e9”1Er;\u00e9at d<3:fend3.nt, it is stated that the<\/p>\n
 _\u20acV:1tVir\u00e9;"L'g':\u00a711;"1d :"1 \u20ac$u(:$i*&is in the 9c::L19atia:"3 0%' tenants. No<\/p>\n
   AV&_5jg:1ciic:ate \ufb02ank \ufb01iaeti a suit; which suit was<\/p>\n
\u00a3;i.\u00a2\u00a7:re\u00a3:;<i;' " 7–;*~;*:\u00e9%.::1:\u00a2':11:ic13 gjroceedings were zirzitiated arid<\/p>\n
\u00a3\u00a76f\u20ac:J"1 \u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7\u20acS 1 and 2 havsz digciaarge\u00e9 \u00a3213 decrafai<\/p>\n
" .. AA a\u00a73:?;au_i*1t. "\u00a7'h\u00abe\u00a7*@\u00a7ez'\u20ac, Wh\ufb01il 'aha yiai\ufb02iiif is siaiinizig har<\/p>\n
$13123 in 'iifflff pr<3p@rt;y; SE25 has to bear the i\ufb01aiaiiifies<\/p>\n
ta\/"\n<\/p>\n
\n
-;\u00a7-\n<\/p>\n
Wfxich are ef {he j0,’i:t1t famiiy E0 {E16 extent ‘share.<\/p>\n
Tize said caiculatitm is to its made in fifie, \ufb01.;fi\u00e9\u00a7i'” \u00e9i\u00e9cfegj<\/p>\n
proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
18. Under t}:1ese_-::i_;;'{:uri1sf\u00a3;a._ \ufb01.ces,.vi%z\u00e9 afe ‘3’s.\u00e9tt\u00a7sfi-::d
\nthat the Triai Court, o19};L’~V\u00a2a re fui ” cz)\ufb02i1T:sikief{:1ti<}:1 of the
\nmateriai an reco1*ri;"%\u00ab-in -t3a1fti\u00e9uV1a;9,"\u00ab.the Legal proceedings
\nand the adgnissienshlada ti_1\u20ac"(.;i'3.iIV3\u00a7,"V'–. Ems rightiy heid that<\/p>\n
the suit   prsperfy, joint famiiy<\/p>\n
existed Vv.dwa\u00a3e'-.G:i" tf::e~-shit, there was no partition
\naxii\ufb01 iis  {:0 1 ji\ufb01fd share in the schexduie
\ngropeiiy, x2:hiQ\ufb017} \u00e9gjtimate1y helcmgs iii} her.<\/p>\n
  in 39 far as the ccmtentien that suit is had far<\/p>\n
'" ._:\u00ab10"i1\u00a5_i1<*3i:;:.f;\u20ac3::"' of necessar}? parties are cc_mCer11ed, a3 the<\/p>\n
 'ria'a:1:gh'\u00e9i\u00e9rs sf (jopaia Ohettjs were aireadgs married prior<\/p>\n
V " *=._jt9 }3*8:;\u00a7. Even if may had right, in the: propa\ufb01iy, their<\/p>\n
" Hfathar having {iia\u00e9 ii': 1935, they have not move\u00e9 a Iitii\ufb01<\/p>\n
finger \u00a319 aeak thair reme\u00e9iy. at any rate, mereiy beacause<\/p>\n
'L\/,<\/p>\n
-\u00a7{\u00a7-\n<\/p>\n
they were not made parties, the 0133131 Of t,E:;s:’.’<\/p>\n
cannat be Ixegatived, Under thes\ufb01 circu;r:1V s:an\u20ac\u00a7je3.,_ file _ <\/p>\n
Trial eijteurt was jusitifie\u00e9. that   ‘1’*1.;{:;-1:’
\njoiudar for necassary partit=:s..4___ ‘ ‘ ‘ A ‘V<\/p>\n
in the resuit, we do  \ufb01zgd  in this
\nappeal’ Accardinglga;\n<\/p>\n
 % ;_   1 :L &3 jd\/”\n<\/p>\n
%kf9 jLgTUDGE<\/p>\n
 %% V.  H,
\n*_k\u00a7SB@E<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda .. g 0-‘ E53 TH? HIEH COURT G? KARNATAKA AT BANGALOQE \u00a7\/WE!) “rs-4:5 THE 4?” may or AUGQST, 2909 PQESENT THE HONBEE MFEJUSTICE Arsm – THE H0?i\\i’B{.E MRJUSTZCE ‘}:.\u00a7\\I:L’af\u00a7Ex\u00a7JU\u00e9(3\u00a7AL\ufb01~ (–.@::?:3\u00bb\u00ab.% R.F.A.NGv;iSV1\/20{\u00a7g;{P\u00a3R’3.’.= BhZ”i’w35:B3N: V’ V’ A’ V’ 1. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nT G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1112,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\",\"name\":\"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009"},"wordCount":1112,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009","name":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-29T10:19:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-g-subhakar-vs-r-krithika-devi-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T G Subhakar vs R Krithika Devi on 4 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}