{"id":25521,"date":"2011-06-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-02T22:42:27","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T17:12:27","slug":"mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                             Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796\n                                                     Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/003344\/11165Adjunct\n                                                                    Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/003344\n Relevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal<\/p>\n<p>Appellant                           :       Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta<br \/>\n                                            F-2194, Sector-16,<br \/>\n                                            Rohini, Delhi-89<\/p>\n<p>Respondent                          :       Mr. M. P. Gupta<br \/>\n                                            PIO &amp; S-E II<br \/>\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi<br \/>\n                                            (Rohini Zone)<br \/>\n                                            Sector-5, Rohini, Delhi-85<\/p>\n<p>RTI application filed on            :       13\/08\/2010<br \/>\nPIO replied                         :       09\/09\/2010<br \/>\nFirst appeal filed on               :       29\/09\/2010<br \/>\nFirst Appellate Authority order     :       27\/10\/2010<br \/>\nSecond Appeal received on           :       29\/11\/2010<br \/>\nSl.                              Information Sought                                     Reply of the PIO\n<\/p>\n<p>1. In sector 16 Rohini a road has been declared as commercial road. In this road    Not related to General<br \/>\n    details are required of Parking lots constructed by MCD for the public          branch,<br \/>\n    including site plan.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Details of commercial establishments under the MCD who have paid the             Details not available with<br \/>\n    parking charges and what the MCD has done to that sum.                          the general branch.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. If parking lots haven&#8217;t been constructed then whether they have the right to     Details not available with<br \/>\n    park their vehicles on the road. Whether MCD will take any action on the        the general branch.<br \/>\n    matter. Also because of this the DTC has deprived bus services to the people<br \/>\n    living in this locality.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. When will the MCD clear the illegal possession in this area?                     Illegal possessions are cleared<br \/>\n                                                                                    timely.\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for the First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Incomplete and unsatisfactory reply from the PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n<\/p>\n<p>PIO to gather information from concerned departments and give it to the appellant within 3 weeks.<br \/>\nGrounds for the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Non compliance of FAA&#8217;s order by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during the hearing held on 28\/01\/2011:<br \/>\nThe following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. S. R. Meena, EE(B-II) and Mr. R. K. Sharma, EE(M-IV) on behalf of Mr. M. P. Gupta,<br \/>\n               PIO &amp; S-E II ; Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AE ;\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;The PIO admits that no information has been supplied to the Appellant inspite of the clear order of the<br \/>\nFirst Appellate Authority (FAA). It is significant that the matter related to illegal and unauthorized<br \/>\nproperties and MCD officers appear to be ensuring that information is not provided about these.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                Page 1 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> The Respondent states that the deemed PIO was Mr. Mahesh, OI(B) who had been given the order of the<br \/>\nFAA to provide the information.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision dated 28\/01\/2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal was allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      &#8220;Mr. S. R. Meena, EE(B-II) is directed to provide the complete information to the<br \/>\nAppellant before 10 February 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>        The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the<br \/>\nDeemed PIO Mr. Mahesh, OI(B) within 30 days as required by the law.<br \/>\nFrom the facts before the Commission it appears that the deemed PIO is guilty of not furnishing information<br \/>\nwithin the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the<br \/>\nrequirement of the RTI Act. He has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which raises a<br \/>\nreasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide. The First Appellate Authority has<br \/>\nclearly ordered the information to be given. It appears that the PIO&#8217;s actions attract the penal provisions of<br \/>\nSection 20 (1). A showcause notice is being issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the<br \/>\nCommission to show cause why penalty should not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n<p>Deemed PIO Mr. Mahesh, OI(B) will present himself before the Commission at the above address on<br \/>\n14 March, 2011 at 11.00am alongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be<br \/>\nimposed on him as mandated under Section 20 (1). He will also submit proof of having given the<br \/>\ninformation to the appellant.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Facts leading to showcause hearing on 06\/06\/2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>        On 14\/03\/2011 during the showcause hearing, the deemed PIO &amp; OI(B) Mr. Mahesh appeared and<br \/>\nsubmitted that since Query nos. 1, 3 &amp; 4 of the RTI application dated 13\/08\/2010 pertain to the EE(M-IV) &amp;<br \/>\nEE(Proj-III), the RTI application was earlier transferred to EE(M-IV) &amp; EE(Proj-III). Mr. Mahesh also<br \/>\nclaimed that he is not the person responsible for not providing the information. Further a reply dated<br \/>\n08\/02\/2011 to the Appellant by Deemed PIO &amp; EE(B-II) Mr. S.R. Meena, on perusal of which it appears<br \/>\nthat with respect to Query nos. 1 &amp; 2, the RTI application was transferred to the PIO &amp; ADC, RP Cell on<br \/>\n03\/12\/2010. However the Appellant submitted that no information has been furnished by the PIO &amp; ADC,<br \/>\nRP Cell and moreover the information provided to him by Mr. S.R. Meena is incomplete and unsatisfactory.\n<\/p>\n<p>        Therefore, the Commission directed the PIO &amp; SE-II Mr. M.P. Gupta to review the reply dated<br \/>\n08\/02\/2011 and provide complete and correct information to the Appellant before 27\/05\/2011. Further, the<br \/>\nCommission decided to schedule another hearing in this matter on 06\/06\/2011 at 11:30am. The<br \/>\nCommission directed to present Mr. M.P. Gupta, Mr. S.R. Meena, and Mr. Mahesh and the PIO &amp;<br \/>\nADC, R.P. Cell to present themselves before Commission on 06\/06\/2011 at 11.00 am along with their<br \/>\nwritten explanations to show cause why penalty should not be imposed and disciplinary action not be<br \/>\nrecommended against them for failing to comply with the provisions of RTI Act, 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant facts emerging during the showcause hearing on 06\/06\/2011:<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. N.K. Gupta;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. M.P. Gupta, PIO &amp; SE-II, Mr. Punit Kumar Sharma, APIO Suptd., R.P.Cell, Mr. S.R.<br \/>\nMeena, APIO &amp; EE(B-II), Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Deemed PIO &amp; AE(B-II), Mr. Mahesh, Deemed PIO &amp;<br \/>\nOI(B) and Mr. S.S. Meena, Deemed PIO &amp; JE(B);\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO Mr. M.P. Gupta has submitted that after the Commission&#8217;s order dated 28\/01\/2011<br \/>\nwhatever information available was provided to the Appellant on 08\/02\/0211. Further to the Commission&#8217;s<br \/>\nnotice dated 06\/05\/2011 a reply dated 26\/05\/2011 with updated information has been provided to the<br \/>\nAppellant. The Appellant is still unsatisfied with the information provided to him.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                  Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        The APIO Mr. Punit Kumar Sharma from RP Cell has submitted that the information regarding<br \/>\nQuery no.1 had already been provided to the Appellant vide letter dated 24\/12\/2010, now the Appellant has<br \/>\naccepted the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO has provided the information as sought by the Appellant that the parking place has not been<br \/>\ndecided so far. The PIO has stated that the matter is under consideration and the Appellant would like the<br \/>\ndetails of the matter that is under consideration. The rest of the information has all been provided to the<br \/>\nAppellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO claims that he sought the assistance of Mr. S. R. Meena, EE to supply the information as<br \/>\nper FAA&#8217;s order. Mr. S. R. Meena claims that he sought the assistance of Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, AE, who<br \/>\ninturn claims that he had asked Mr. S. S. Meena, JE to provide the information. Mr. S. S. Meena, JE claims<br \/>\nthat this information was not with him and states that his assistance has not been sought for providing the<br \/>\ninformation. In view of this the Commission directs Mr. S. R. Meena, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. S. S.<br \/>\nMeena to appear before the Commission on 08 June 2011 at 11.30AM alongwith relevant documents to<br \/>\nshow who was responsible for implementing the order of the FAA.\n<\/p>\n<p>Adjunct Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Commission directs the PIO to provide attested photocopies of the proposal<br \/>\nalongwith all communications and file notings to the Appellant before 20 June 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Commission also directed Mr. S. R. Meena, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. S. S.<br \/>\nMeena to appear before the Commission on 08 June 2011 at 11.30AM alongwith relevant<br \/>\ndocuments to show who was responsible for implementing the order of the FAA.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                          Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                                Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                             06 June 2011<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (Su)<\/p>\n<p>CC to,<\/p>\n<p>     1-         Mr. S. R. Meena, EE,<br \/>\n     2-         Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, AE<br \/>\n     3-         Mr. S. S. Meena, JE<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                               Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/003344\/11165Adjunct Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/003344 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta F-2194, Sector-16, Rohini, Delhi-89 Respondent : [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1326,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011"},"wordCount":1326,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011","name":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T17:12:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-naresh-kumar-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}