{"id":255303,"date":"2008-09-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008"},"modified":"2014-08-04T15:40:35","modified_gmt":"2014-08-04T10:10:35","slug":"seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH comm\" or KARNATAKA AT BANGAJ..01-f:.E_\nDATED THIS THE 30\"' DAY OF sE1='I'E1\\m1:n ;      % \n\nrHEHo1v:g1.2: MRJUSIYCES.       , \nmnpmrrowwaszazgm (Lg Ld\ufb02l\ufb01i   '  \n\nBEFORE\n\nBetween:\n\n1\n\n1 (a)\n\n109)\n\nSince deceased by hail\n\nSri D.V.Manfznath,   \" 1 .. I\nsu'olateD.Ye:2k\u00a7*38Sh3ii8h;   .... ..\naaedalwt\ufb02    \n\n515 D-Y-  \"  \ns\/o ia1e\"D;   \n\nageai aboutV38'      \n\ndfojate   \n\n mt Raina' ',\n610 Eats\" Seethamma,\n\n\n\n \n\n1(a)\n\n2(3)\n2(1))\n2(0)\n\n2(4)\n2(8)\n\nSmt. D.V. Savitha,\ndfo late See\ufb01\naged about 22 years.\n\nAll we r\/a No.106!23, 12* Main, \n\n11\"' B Cross, Maileshwaram,\nBangalore - 560 003. T.\n\nSu\ufb01. D.S. Chayma,\nSimzae dead by her \n\nKa\ufb021aYaYiai,t3\ufb02jor.    \n\nD.S.Ravi Kzz_ntm;,maj6rJ.\" :  '\n\nus;   \nn.s.vmm   A  M'. .\n\nas. \n\nA  4 S5'. A  Mmthy,\n\n  75 years,\nWk} V. Krishna Murthy.\n\nSfo1ateV. Kn1shnaMur\ufb021y,\n\nAgedabout42y%.\n\n\n\n5 Sri K. Girish Murthy,\nAged about 40 yeam,\nS,\/0 Iate V. Krishna Murthy.\n\n6 Smt. Poornima K. Murthy, \nAged about 34 y\u00e9ars,\n\nI)\/olaiie V, Krishna Murthy. V  * . \u00ab.  \n\n[By Sri R.N.N3.rasirnha Murthy, Sr;Ad;f.\"fm sf}  A\n\nSN. Ramaprasad, Adv. fo1'Pet1's.1L('a}'t0.Vi{g)    \n\nPetitioner Nos.2(a} to Zfh), are ciei\u00e9ied vi:iis':_\n\nOrder dated 20.7.2007. \u00a7   g V   \"  _\nPetition in Si} far as 3\"' petiti=:.m\u00a2r*is 've'-\ufb01hdizn\u00e9znvvide\nOrder dated 20.8.2908   _  ' - _  '  \u00ab \" '\nPetition disxnisssdw in so far as_\u00a7$etit.idt:%c{r.Nos;j4, 5\n\nAnd 6 are conizenz\u00e9d 7_vJde\"arc'k=:: da1tc1j.3O.9V.:Z003.]\n\nAnd : . . ' . ..\n\n1 state of Ka;na:az\u00a2%ai;%  % 'Af: %  \nDepazttneni ofVIi1di1&11'ies; \u00e9:z1ri'Cot1n11e1'ce,\nVidhaxia Bangai\u00e9re ---- 560 001,\nRegytd. By' its F'ri1\u00a7cip\u00e9:.i S\u00e9c1'e$a1'y'.\n\n  \u00e9 %%The%co:::,missiener,j\n\n \" ~  Iixdustziai Areas Development Board,\n  @iv1't1=9t'r::\u00ab1Vt'::v1VV]'E-'a1'ish.\/at Rzilding,\n* A \"Nmpa\ufb02i'\u00a7;;1ga Road, Baaxgalore -- 560 (109.\n\n '   Land Acquisition Of\ufb01cer,\n\nx T Kamaiaka Industrial Areas Development Board,\nW '   .Zona10\ufb01'ic:e,\n*  Fiat No.~rt~88,\u00bb'B, 14\"' Cross, KIADB,\nMS. B1c:g., III Block, 4*\" Zone,\nPeenya Industrial Area, Bangalore -\u00bb~ 560 (15 8.\n\n\n\n4 Shri R.M. Goknidas,\n\nRe-ptd. By his power of attorney holder,\nSri D.S. Desmmde,\n\nR\/a No.8, 2'\" Cross,\n\n4\"' stock, Thyagaajmagu,\nBangalore -- 560 928.\n\n5 Air India Ltd,\n\nA coxwany incorporated mxzler\nC%ies Act, having its \nO\ufb02ioe at Hansalaya  \" \n\nNew De\ufb01\ufb01 - no oo1,.__ .  % \"\nAndhavingits bx'ax1ci:.\u00a3:~\ufb01qc\u00a32_a12.j_\u00bb'vV   '\nUnity Building, LC. Road,  ' \"\n\nRe-ptd. \n\n[By Sri M.Keshava Raddy,' AGE, an-\"R:\n_ Sri P.Y1;jC , Adv, for R2 av. 123\n \"Sri N;  Sr. Adafifm' Stm.K.S.Am1w.yadevi,\n'~._Adv;\u00abfotR_5V.. \n deigted vide order dated 20.7.2097]\n\nan-u\n\n'    1%  is \ufb01led unda Articles 226 & 227 of\n .1   ofln\ufb01a, praying to (31% Anmxure C dated\n\n V .   this day the Court pronounced the following:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
In this cue, the petitioners” nirmve   M<\/p>\n
validity of the noti\ufb01cation at    <\/p>\n
declarm g the am memmed therei__ ‘n  ”    <\/p>\n
17.1.2006 proposing to   <\/p>\n
mml\ufb01, V by
\nthe wjections of_’\ufb02i\u00e9}petn1 ‘  3%  fa}  the mas,
\nand the  =1′. dated 20.5.2006 imed
\nunder se\u00a2.2$(4) hf   Indian!’ Areas<\/p>\n
   for short) in tweet of the<\/p>\n
  “oners are the ownws of the pett11on’ ‘<\/p>\n
 X (   ‘WW’ % at Udaywri village, Kasaba Hobli,
\n_   %  Talmc, Bangalore Diwict. The am mm
\n %% ‘%k1;ssJismeameao<i\ufb01muiona\u00a2Amexm'c':mdasecaoa3(1)<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
Petitioner Nm.2(a) to 201) and respondent No.4 have been<\/p>\n
deleted from array efthe parties. Petitioner No.3 (Smt. Sartijzt <\/p>\n
K. Murthy') has withdrawn the writ petition in se far   ii <\/p>\n
lands are concerned. It is submitted at the Bar  .<\/p>\n
N034, 5 and 6 do not press the writ petitiien \u00abthat veill V\u00bb  i r.t <\/p>\n
\ufb01le a memo accordingly, In the light\u00e9ef the S\u00e9iid   ii<\/p>\n
writ petition is dismissed in so far petitiitiizer Nois.'–t,_t5' endif\ufb01
\nare concerned. Therefore,  ;\u00a7\u00a7etiti<it1er'(si'r2s:e deceased<\/p>\n
by her legal representatives) is ztlone eerttestitzgi  in<\/p>\n
so far as  lii1ids'ere_The' lands in dispute in this<\/p>\n
writ petiticii  so  No.1 is concerned are<\/p>\n
S3!.No.4\u00a7=\u00e9;’1    Sy.No.46!2 measuring 1<\/span><\/p>\n
I–giere    measuring 30 guntas.<\/p>\n
i A   Ei\u00e9arasizrtha Murthy, learned Senior Counsel<\/p>\n
*   the petitioners would contend that the first<\/p>\n
   (since deceased by her L.Rs.) owns about 7 acres of<\/p>\n
  iabutting Sy.Nos.46z’I, 46;? and 4653. If these {ends are<\/p>\n
?\n<\/p>\n
1,
\n‘V’<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
acquired in full, there may not be any access to the other <\/p>\n
lands ofthe first petitioner. He \ufb01nther submits that out of {lied * <\/p>\n
aforesaid three survey numbers, the first petitioner   “ii  <\/p>\n
objection for acquisition of Sy,No.46!I and    <\/p>\n
a\ufb01idavit is also filed by petitioner No.   ‘He: it <\/p>\n
submits that acquisition pmeeedings of   it<\/p>\n
to an extent of 1 acre 34 guntes. maybe
\nis the only access available to ‘these   (since
\ndeceased by her     is further
\nargued that the   objections to the
\nprelimhmtjf     been considered
\npmperly bgiythe   h\ufb01arther argued that the<\/p>\n
request ofthe ti’i%hV_i’respondent’ only to acquire about 6<\/p>\n
 3 ‘acres  the “respondent has proposw to acquire .<\/p>\n
were   the impugzed noti\ufb01cations.<\/p>\n
i’   hand, learned Counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
 \ufb01t ‘ u  respondents have sought to _;’usti1’y the impugned order and<\/p>\n
 ‘–.thei_netif’i};atiot1s.<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
6. I have cam\ufb01zlly considered the argunmnsgif’  _
\nteamed cam: made at the Bar and paused \u00abwk-nm%%%   ”  <\/p>\n
plwonmecord.\n<\/p>\n
7. 1: is not in dispute thm  Vibe<\/p>\n
owner ofhee items of   4613. It<\/p>\n
isaiso not in awn-e_ ‘ _   tint  <\/p>\n
acres of mi   $9\/2. A sket\u00e9rh has
\n26.9.2993,  R ,fg;w;m’%i’%    there 3 no aceew to<\/p>\n
   1; m 34<\/p>\n
   letters ‘wen’ mmsmo <\/p>\n
‘  l\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9 acwwto their rmimmg  Time  no
\n‘   the \ufb01\ufb02h respenda $1 about 6 was oflaad<\/p>\n
kj fch’ its purpose and than me zmk proposed :0 be mm 53<\/p>\n
kg<\/p>\n
1′<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
more mm 3 acres. The Special Deputy camumszomr gfshg<\/p>\n
copy of which is pmaaced along    <\/p>\n
26.9.2003)hasstated\ufb02xatther6q”1T\u00b0mV   <\/p>\n
in med of6 mm mm; mg ‘~ip wll&”‘ L   <\/p>\n
acre 34 gum in sy.No.4s}\u00a7{;s%%\u00b0’=%d'” A  a\ufb01iaava
\ndated 25.9.2oos\u00a7%:i%::%.\u00a7jiaero;e\u00a2   day, the<\/p>\n
L.Rs. ofthe   airreada’ the other<\/p>\n
lan$.\n<\/p>\n
V, _; s.” Having  %% to :me facts and  ‘ of the<\/p>\n
  ‘ . I maths<\/p>\n
   of lands in Sy.No.46f2 to an<\/p>\n
 V -V   34 gmas is req\ufb01red to be q1&d. In the
\nW &   peum ‘ meoeeds md it is  ‘ % allowed ’31<\/p>\n
-‘   noii\ufb01m5ons a Annexzures ‘C’, ‘D’ and ‘J’ and the<\/p>\n
 atAme:azre’G’E::so\u00a3armSy.No.46\/2toanextmof<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
-..\n<\/p>\n
\n
I were 34 guretas (marked by letters ‘ABCD’ in the   <\/p>\n
emiosed with the memo \ufb01led on 2s.9.2oos)%;s% 1;.areeg\u00a7JL,LL <% .%<\/p>\n
quashed. No costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH comm” or KARNATAKA AT BANGAJ..01-f:.E_ DATED THIS THE 30″‘ DAY OF sE1=’I’E1\\m1:n ; % rHEHo1v:g1.2: MRJUSIYCES. , mnpmrrowwaszazgm (Lg Ld\ufb02l\ufb01i ‘ BEFORE Between: 1 1 (a) 109) Since deceased by hail Sri D.V.Manfznath, ” 1 .. I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSeethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":615,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008"},"wordCount":615,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008","name":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-04T10:10:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/seethamma-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Seethamma vs State Of Karnataka on 30 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255303"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255303\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}