{"id":255603,"date":"2008-10-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008"},"modified":"2014-09-02T16:15:03","modified_gmt":"2014-09-02T10:45:03","slug":"the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendrakumar &amp; B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">1N'mE HIGH COURT 011' KARNATA1iYLENDi\u00a7\u00a7V 'VKU}NIAR' %\n\nAND  V'\nTHE HONBLE MR;-\u00ab'iB'S'I;1I\u20acE..SUBH2\u00a7s.S}{B. Am\n ' %f\ufb01:'-'.:i:i'nA:v:.N0_o 462%s'}%2'e0%1&amp;i{LAc)\n\nBE\";'wEE.\u00a7I;     \n\nThe Assistant, \nAnd Laxjgci' Acquisitia\ufb01-~(}fi'1Cer,\n\nE\u00e9larwar. v, 'V . ._ Appcliant\n\ne;\u00a7s\u00a7.,sz\u00a7,_:;.\":~;. Kf1lk'&amp;:12.i,___{3m\u00ab\"\u00a3. Adv.)\n\n s1~3gmq Vithal Naik,\n,. S.f.nce deceased by LES:\n\nLL ~  Nanda S\ufb01kant Naik,\n\nage: 42 years, Occ: Cmpenter,\n\n 15, Kishore Srikant Naik,\n\nag\ufb01: 35 years, Occ: Pvt. Senricva.\n\n\n\n1C. Smt.La1ita Srikant Naik,\nage: 38 years, Occ: House wife.\n\nAil are r\/:) Sanlquwada, Baad,\nKarwar.\n\n2. Ramacias V1313} Naik,\nAged about 45 years,' \n\n3. Kamala Vithal Najk, _ \nAged about  -A \n\nAll are agicuiturists,  VA ,\nResiding at SaI1_kruwada,.  V\nBaad, KaxWa;a;'4.n_  ' \n\n4. '1'1*ieE;\u00a7;:cu\u20aci-;ve Ex,;gine:gf','\"\" 'V\n:Kar:1ata;ks:'t.. __E!o:mil,\nElibli I3hs'isii3:1;'   , \nHub1i..~   .  .. Respondents<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">(83% Ravi&#8221;L&#8217;}.V_,VS&#8217;abf1ahit, Adv. for R2, R3;<\/p>\n<p>  31&#8217;i..1:L\u00a3&#8217;2.g-~.?I&#8217;a\u00a7haI1th&#8221;&#8216;\u00a3&#8217;;VPandit, Adv. for R1 to R8))<\/p>\n<p> .  *1*i?;i,s,r\u00bba::\u00ab?;s; is \ufb01led under <a href=\"\/doc\/165686982\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 54(1)<\/a> of the Land<\/p>\n<p>A&lt;:guisi\u00a7:.i.Q:1- Act, praying to set asicie the ju\u00e9gxnent and<br \/>\naward\ufb01aied 16.3.2001 mada by the ieamed Additional<\/p>\n<p> C7113! &quot;  Judge (Sr. D11), at Kazwar, in LAC<br \/>\n&#039;  Ni:;-..29\/ 19991, 3316,. etc,<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  This appeal coming 01&#039;: for hearing on LA, this<\/p>\n<p>    flay, Subhagh B. Adi, J., delivem\u00e9 {km foliowing:<\/p>\n<p>JEEDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Though this appeal was listed for ord\u00e9f   <\/p>\n<p>impleading, with the consent c$fWb;&lt;}t;h._ the-:<\/p>\n<p>matter is taken up for f1na1Vdisp&lt;:)Sai;&#039;&#8211;._.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. This appeal byAV_td&gt;fi\u00a2:.._Sta\u00a7te,..&#8217;que:sf.i&lt;i3r1i11g the<\/p>\n<p>enhancanlent of com\ufb01enmtidrz  , t1::\u00a2 leamed Civil<\/p>\n<p>Judge: in   a\ufb02d award<\/p>\n<p>dated .&quot;:.I&quot;&#039;9V;&#039;.{&#8230;)&#039;\u00a2..:&#039;V&#039;.2:.&#039;,:.k&#039;:?&#039;i(&#039;)   d t<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3.&#8221;    ta 3 ciajming to be owners<\/p>\n<p>of t1;1e&#8221; landd  by the State sought for reference<\/p>\n<p> lief  to the Civil Court under Sectien 18(1) of<\/p>\n<p> Act. It is alleged that their lands<\/p>\n<p>Wei&#8217;:  in pursuance of a notification dated<\/p>\n<p>    for the purpose of constnzction of houses by<br \/>\n   Kaxnataka Housing Board and in pzzrsuance of the<\/p>\n<p> Edie} riotiiicatiezz, an award Cams {:0 be passed on<\/p>\n<p>15.13886 \ufb01xing the market value of the iands acquired<\/p>\n<p>at Rs. 1625\/ ~ per gunta. Claimanta; being not satis\ufb01ed<\/p>\n<p>with the determination of COI11p\u20acI1SatiOI&#8221;\u00a3 by<br \/>\nAcquisition Officer, sought for reference of<br \/>\nthe Civil Judge (Sr. D11), Ka1wai&#8217;,&#8221;&#8216;m3deFl<br \/>\nthe Land Acquisition Acfi.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">ieagmed Additional Civil  thee&#8217;<br \/>\nreference as LAC .  adduced<br \/>\nevidence in support   of<br \/>\ne0mpez1satir:1er% &#8216;d;-.V_1te;:3 .= V ig%.%\u00a7;2Mo03)\u00a7kk<br \/>\nmodi\ufb01ed the award   ii\ufb01urt inter<br \/>\naiia \ufb01xing the :markct%_   at Rs.7,000\/ &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>per gunta  StafufC1{\u00b0\u00a7&#8217;:&#8211;ben:\u00e9\ufb01ts like additional<br \/>\nmar1\u00a7et%&#8217;va1:\u00a7;,  &#8220;ir3;tei:*est on the same.<\/p>\n<p>5;   learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Agisgbbate,  for the State submitted that in the<\/p>\n<p> :1\u00e9\u00a71Vr1t decision of the Apex Court in the case of<\/p>\n<p>  Vs. Union of India, reported in LACC<\/p>\n<p> 2501, the claimants are not entitled for<\/p>\n<p> .. &#8220;i1*1f\u00a7r\u00e9\u00e9t, 021 seiatiurn. I-ie 2:130 submitted that the<\/p>\n<p> Civil Judge ( Sr. Dn.) as well as this {hurt have<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; not considered tha said dscisiorz.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7&gt;1:%:*2%<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">6. As already stated, 3. Divisicn<br \/>\nCourt while dispe:::s;iI1g of a large x1umber\u00a7}f\u00bb &#8216;<br \/>\nout of thr; same<br \/>\nN0.622\/2001 &amp; conxzectcd<br \/>\n14.7.2003 (correctd by  datcidai has<br \/>\nmodi\ufb01cd the  cf&#8217; &#8216;th\u00e9 i\u00e9Va rned Civil<br \/>\nJ udge. The   fer the State<br \/>\ndoes not_   Cgnsidering the<\/p>\n<p>submissitm    VC0ur1se1 appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the State; Wt:   is no error committed by<\/p>\n<p>the _   far as granting of statutory<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- under Section 23 of the Land<\/p>\n<p>   As the Division Bench of this Court<\/p>\n<p> alr\u00e9rr\ufb01yil disposed sf large number of MFAS arising<\/p>\n<p> out &#8220;of__3;he same noti\ufb01ca\ufb01on, and the said judgment is<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;rmeiiher modi\ufb01ed nor set aside, when the State has<\/p>\n<p>  A. iaccepte\u00e9 the: ju\u00e9gment and award of this Court in<\/p>\n<p>respect of the other similarly placed ciaimants, we do<\/p>\n<p>.r<\/p>\n<p>not find any justi\ufb01cation to di\ufb01er with ..<\/p>\n<p>judgrnent-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">7. Accordingly, in t.hr~:&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;1ight &#8216;pf :::\u00e9:&#8217;:.sic;1<\/p>\n<p>Bench judgment of this   <\/p>\n<p>connected I{l3.fLt\u20acI&#8217;S, dated .. by &#8216; ordef&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>dated 12.9.2003), a\ufb02.$f_ing &#8216;oii1:: t&#8221;i1.c;- sa\u00a5ne&#8221;*n6fi\ufb02cation,<br \/>\nthese appeals are    Ciaimants are<\/p>\n<p>entitled fozj\u00bb    .. other statutory<\/p>\n<p>bene\ufb01t\u00e9g as -by &#8211; this Court: in the abovxa<\/p>\n<p>referred   V .\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\"> V&#8217;  _ ;&#8217;}XC,C{}r\u00e91&#8242;;;I1glj5x%V,&#8217;E\u00a7\u00a3ate Appeal is partly ailowed. Parties<\/p>\n<p>   cost in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">Sd\/-%<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-1<br \/>\nTudg\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>Su\ufb01&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendrakumar &amp; B.Adi 1N&#8217;mE HIGH COURT 011&#8242; KARNATA1iYLENDi\u00a7\u00a7V &#8216;VKU}NIAR&#8217; % AND V&#8217; THE HONBLE MR;-\u00ab&#8217;iB&#8217;S&#8217;I;1I\u20acE..SUBH2\u00a7s.S}{B. Am &#8216; %f\ufb01:&#8217;-&#8216;.:i:i&#8217;nA:v:.N0_o 462%s&#8217;}%2&#8217;e0%1&amp;i{LAc) BE&#8221;;&#8217;wEE.\u00a7I; The Assistant, And Laxjgci&#8217; Acquisitia\ufb01-~(}fi&#8217;1Cer, E\u00e9larwar. v, &#8216;V . ._ Appcliant e;\u00a7s\u00a7.,sz\u00a7,_:;.&#8221;:~;. Kf1lk&#8217;&amp;:12.i,___{3m\u00ab&#8221;\u00a3. Adv.) s1~3gmq Vithal Naik, ,. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":628,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\",\"name\":\"The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008"},"wordCount":628,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008","name":"The Assistant Commissioner And ... vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-02T10:45:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-and-vs-srikanth-vithal-naik-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Assistant Commissioner And &#8230; vs Srikanth Vithal Naik on 31 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255603\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}