{"id":255630,"date":"2008-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008"},"modified":"2015-01-30T21:37:36","modified_gmt":"2015-01-30T16:07:36","slug":"the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">-L\n\nIN THE HIGH .:C!URT QF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATES TEES THE 24111 DAY OF !*.'!.A..'.,-H 2()08_p. _d \n\n \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nThe Managing Director,\nKarnataka State Road\n\nTransport Corporation,\n\nK.H. Road,\n\nBANGALORE; .  ._\n\nBy its Chief Law Q\ufb01icer. .. PE'I'I'I'IONER\n\n(By Smt.H.R.Reni11s Union;\n234, Utf.;a_r1a.r_1hi,_'1\\J11;tt\"Roe1d,\u00bb* _ \n\nMYSORE, . \"   .. RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> my si\u00a5i\u00a7d&#8217;:&#8217;v;ee&#8211;s. Nailc. Adv*;3*&#8217; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p> . r&#8217;ede&#8217;rhis W1fi_tvVPet3i\ufb01on is \ufb01led under Articles 2-26 65 227 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of india praying to quash the order in reference<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A _No.89f96\u00bb._&#8217;Dt;f}1.12.2000 vide Ann-W by the Induatriai &#8216;T&#8217;rii::unai,<\/p>\n<p> ~~as_:&#8217;:a1eo comendum Dt.27.04.2001 in Ref.No.89l1996<\/p>\n<p>% d d  \ufb01e Indnsnial Tribunal, Mysore vide Ann-X, etc.,.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;    Petition coming on for Hearing this day. the Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; .__&#8221;&#8221;1:na;;:ie the foilowing:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">_.___:&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">An award dated 1&#8243; December 2000 in Ref.No.&#8217;9[&#8216;1996 is<\/p>\n<p>called in question.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">,-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\u00e9a\ufb01k<\/p>\n<p>administration. it is the p&#8221;&#8216;e ee CI<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">2. The Union sought for reference of the dispute on the<\/p>\n<p>the .&#8221;.!m=..&#8217;.&#8217;;,&#8217;e.&#8217;r.-er.! of &#8230;.-S&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>l :-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">{.l.; vrntr-urea:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">serdority  ctii other bene\ufb01ts to on&#8217;  _<br \/>\nConductor, M.C.No.71O with&#8211;retrospeietitge &#8216;ejffsct if},<br \/>\nviolation of  of,&#8230;sef:\u00a3iiemeni*-. dated f<\/p>\n<p>17.2.1962, 18.3.1974, 16.2.1\u00b0978..qizd 15. 1&#8217;1t.19s9?\u00ab_.  \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>.12) LF not what other relief! ;,._ the&#8221; s_\u00a2_zi::!.u &#8220;is<br \/>\nentitled to?  &#8216; r &#8221; *&#8217; V\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">3. On these issues; p-thc&#8217;-,__ ffIi}\u00a2d;&#8221;  Tribunal on an<\/p>\n<p>interpretation of    workman has<br \/>\ncompleted   and he is appointed<br \/>\nafter    he is entitled for<br \/>\n the completion of 240 days and<\/p>\n<p>directed &#8216;Vpetitionei&#8221;%Vp&#8217;Cotporstion to implement the settlement<\/p>\n<p>V dated\u00bb  111. 1989,,  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\"> 4._  Counsel appearing for the Corporation<\/p>\n<p>snbmittedi  settlement dated 15.11.1989 is not by the<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9  ivhut it is only con\ufb01ned to Mysore Division and<br \/>\nV&#8217; V&#8217;  snbmitted that. the settlement has to be only by the<\/p>\n<p>  not by the divisions. It is also submitted that,<\/p>\n<p>post of Conductor by adopting the multi stage process. first by<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>Division, Mysore justt\ufb01ed in denying tEnte_,scxtie:  M<\/p>\n<p>\/!\\<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;*tii?y&#8217;ing the ave-.il.abL.i.,_; of pests. h-1r.ling -1&#8217;  test,<br \/>\nconducting interviews and thereafter pre&#8217;pm&#8221;inf.z the<br \/>\nshowing persons likely to be absorbed in a<br \/>\nthen gradually include the P\ufb01rsons  ,_\u20ac_ielec1;&#8221;1ist.:te:   &#8216;V<br \/>\nlist, wherein the persons in Badli<br \/>\nand when the vacancy arises<br \/>\nbasis depending upon the numlier,V:&#8217;of_p days   their<br \/>\nservices are utilized in a   perscns in Badli<br \/>\nlis. a&#8230; ta1\u00ab:..n on p.   completion of<br \/>\nand further  .tlaat;V:lsiriee&#8217;~tht&#8217;\u00a7r&#8217;*&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;de&#8221;t w&#8221;s apminted<br \/>\nas a   services were engaged as<br \/>\nwhen the accordingly. he is paid and from<\/p>\n<p>the Barlli &#8221; he was  on probation and thereafter, on<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;campletionV. of the ilprotiation period, he is absorbed as regular<\/p>\n<p> cannot claim the regularization w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>completing  days of his service. It is also submitted that<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;%.&#8221;&#8216;~r- s&#8221;e&#8221;rr.itted that \ufb01e claita is te+.r.r.~np-.=&#8230;t1&#8217;..e; FI.1.rt..h.er it is<br \/>\n&#8221; ..__'&#8221;&#8216;sul2mitted that, even from the da&#8221; of &#8220;t&#8221;&#8216;-me&#8221;t. tir&#8217; ddifpute is<\/p>\n<p>lljraised nearly after 7 years and submitted that the industrial&#8217; &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal was not justified in granting retrospective relief. It is<\/p>\n<p>further submitted that, the issue was in respect of four<\/p>\n<p>I K&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p>settlements whereas, the Industrial Tribunal has considered only<br \/>\none settlement and not all, all the settlements an&#8217;. independent<\/p>\n<p> they are in supersession of earlier settlement.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">5. Sri.V.S.Naik. learned Cou.nse1__sfor*'&#8221;thei: <\/p>\n<p>submitted that, the settlement dated   <\/p>\n<p>no fault can be found from said\u00bb   *<\/p>\n<p>submitted that, in terms of the settlement. one ithefiparties by<\/p>\n<p>name S.S..,sns.ka:&#8217; &#8230;a._ b_.e-.f&#8217;_o,&#8217;-;_n_sied  he is junior to the<\/p>\n<p>entitled for the ..it1eeiieetive.re1ie\u00a3  &#8216;the said settlers&#8211;&#8216;t Wes<br \/>\nnot given e\ufb01&#8217;ect..td:.insofa::&#8217;asl1*e&#8217;s1iondei;.this concemed. respondent<br \/>\nsought for xefeienee&#8230;__ He __su_btnitted that the Reference Court<\/p>\n<p>on consideration ofVthe.&#8217;sett*1eii1cnt-has granted the relief.<\/p>\n<p> It is no&#8217;t&#8217;=in______dispute that the is'&#8221;e 1&#8217;-&#8216;fe&#8217;T&#8221;d &#8220;&#8216; the<\/p>\n<p> involves the consideration of four setitlements,<\/p>\n<p>ea meg, i196t2. =ii9i&#8217;k4, 1978 and 1939 settlement. However, the<\/p>\n<p> has considered only one settlement dated<\/p>\n<p>it &#8216;V V  1,:198&#8243;9 and has not taken into account the other settlements<\/p>\n<p>  effect. Further the Industrial Tribunal has also not<\/p>\n<p>it  V&#8217; eonsidemd the e\ufb02ect of  of oonsequential relief.<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; Admitted._,&#8217;, the consequential __1_&#8217;_f sought for by the respondent<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">-..-._J&#8230;_<\/p>\n<p>includes the flxn&#8217;:ll..l. n *1&#8242; se&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;it:y&#8217;. the gran. o. pm&#8230;o..~.on. wl.1_&#8217;._h<\/p>\n<p>will have a result in aifectzing the other employees. whose<\/p>\n<p>seniority is already \ufb01xed. In such circumstances, the <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;!&#8217;ri..una1 only &#8230;.-1yi..g the 1989 settlement eiier1\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>be granted to the respondent Wit&#8217;l&#8221;1&#8217;i\ufb01.<\/p>\n<p>other employees, in my view, the.eonon-consideratiriui.   *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>issue by the Industrial Tribunal  ,justii\ufb01cd}f  V<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal is required to consider  its cniiretjf including<br \/>\nthe earlier settlements and   tlieliiie-j1_s3i\u00a7.)cindent could be<br \/>\ngranted with the xeiie\ufb01l  it\u00ab:iiecesseiyv_ioVf&#8217;remit the matter to<\/p>\n<p>the l__dus1_:rial  ,  ,<br \/>\nAccdrdidg1iy;idh: _;W1it4.:Petition is allowed. The awand dated<\/p>\n<p>lat Decemberu._24O00&#8217;i;n&#8217;i?ef.!\u00a7o;$\u00a7\/31996 is quashed. }The matter is<\/p>\n<p>remitted; to _1j.he  to consider the issue referred<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\"> 2.: i._   four months from the datie of receipt of<\/p>\n<p>sd!-&#8216;<br \/>\nju\u00e9qe &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>KNMI-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi -L IN THE HIGH .:C!URT QF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATES TEES THE 24111 DAY OF !*.&#8217;!.A..&#8217;.,-H 2()08_p. _d BETWEEN: The Managing Director, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, K.H. Road, BANGALORE; . ._ By its [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":854,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\",\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008"},"wordCount":854,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008","name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And ... on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-30T16:07:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-the-president-ksrtc-staff-and-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs The President Ksrtc Staff And &#8230; on 24 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255630\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}