{"id":255701,"date":"2009-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-16T17:10:58","modified_gmt":"2017-10-16T11:40:58","slug":"ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda And Swamy<\/div>\n
IN THE mar\u00bb: com? or xARNA'rA;\u00a7i.%a 1%  ' ;   \n\nCIRCUIT BEHCKAT DHARWAI1,     %\n\nRated this the 61:13. day of\n\nFRESEM\n\nTHE HOIWBLE mR.JUsTI\u00e9E\u00a7i* mmua \nTHE HOWELE nm...mfsrrzc:s  Namwgana swam?\n\n'W A 1531,5139  (Gn\u00a2+:\u00e9;\ufb01$)\n\nBETWEEN:     \n\nM\/5. ENDIA sU:;:;\u00ab.ARS'.,& REFINEZREES agsm.\n\nHAVENG  '\u00a7:z'\u00a3:::r7;r;:,E\":;T132:\u00a7;*?:E1f>-- QFFE\u20ac\u00a7E\";AT\nC;EIETWAD\u20ac}E\u00ab5832'1\"1--~.__W  M J\n\nHQSPET, mS'I'.B%3IJLARY\"'   \n\nREPR. BY ITS-.MA_NA'\u00a3}ElR .. \n\nme av, D,  S.SH1V,%E{UEs&--AE<--._ "\n\n3\/0 S.3x'\u00a7_%;'ERANNA' ~  ,.'API~'ELLAN"3'\n\nx  1% fig?' S\u00a7"{\u00a7;&.E%Tj.:I'\u20ac3vSI\u00a7ASHIBE\u00a3;'aRA 9:}? ;<;E:i~;W & Ci\u20ac3\u00bb~--1'%'a.}:)V)\n\n  \n\nA 1 ':':%:;*.\u20ac\u00ab: S-E.CR ;E'\u00a3'\u00a7aRY Ti} GGVERNMEIQT\n\n i\\;}  _  \n\n SQMMERCE & INDUSTRIES DEPARFMENT\n\nN "G<;3~_VE\u00a7\u20acNMENT 0;: KARNATAKA,\n\n'--  v1_sj*Ij";'L<::ER:NT'\u00a7::~\u00a7m::~\u00e9*z?L%i\ufb01cuiigj\ufb01 - = \" \nHQSPEIT SUB DIVISION * ~   \nHQSPET M-\u00bb 588 201\n\n6 'I'HE ASSIST\ufb01d'sET cozvm1ss;{):\u00a21\u00a7;RVV%'w\"\n.H<i)S."f~"'E'I' SUB }3I"R;'ISl?<.*3?;%k'._    \n$0393? W 583 201 \n\n7 H0393'? RA1T\u00a7--:ARsa %$A_mA  ..  A\n181? Ram,  % \u00ab   \n%~:\u00a7:':'i  ' %\n\n8 sADAs1\u00a7:x:A_L,f$U{\u00e9{APS*::1',=:>. % \nma. :3,  VK?s\u00a7\"'FR\\Q\u00a7:\u00a7._ALAMA'{\"FI\nPOST E-*JA\u20ac?\u00bbA\u00a7vZAL\" If .  \nNAiNEG;\u00a7%.LI'E'ALL!K. -- _ L _A\nIZ>ES'?_VBAG;\ufb01;L_I%{(}T'-   ...RESPOE\\IDEN'FS\n\n V'  . -\u00ab(B\u00a7*' :SR'fE. C';S.PA'fIE;\u00a5'AGA FOR R 14%\n. '$9: '\u00bb?.VP;I{\u00a3}VLKARN\u00a3~\u00a7DV FQR R?)\n\n-000-\n\nThis   filed under Seci:io11.4 of 333 Karnaiaka High\n\n\" iv\u00e9\ufb01aj\u00e9irt Act, .1961, praying to set. aside the order dt\ufb01j 1.2;':Z0{}8\n.1 --V..pa:t~;:s;:~:~d  WP N.3 1332\/ 2008.\n\n'   REA coming on for orders befom the $01,221 this \ufb01ay,\n\n GOWDA,J., delivered the fcliowingi\n\nmnemxr\nT}'1iS awit appeal is directed against the zssrder\n\nd't..5\/ 112;' 2098 passed by ma iearrzad Singla Judge OI'{h'3f'\u00a7.i}g\nE\u00a72x:\/\/\n\n \n\n\n\nEsme 0f natice to the rr3sp(n\"1dent;S in writ. petiiiazx \u00a7\u00b0\u00a7;<::*..<V*i\u00a7_T.._f:;%";~:--':\nappeliagzt, in the Writ petitizm the fe\ufb01ewimg :*e?;i\u00a7%\u00a7f$' "ei1I:,j*;.:i\u00a7.f iii\u00e9e\n\n\u00a7E'}.{\u20acI'i111 prayer ware sought. \n(a) issue: a Writ 0:" 1'r:aI1d\u00e9z;:{:t;s=.{1irr':w,<:tii"1g tbg\u00e9"---, if\nr\ufb01zspondent 1 to 6 is step'-._ the  Ai}1ega}'=; \nt:r'a1::sp\u20ac::'t\/ \ufb01xport of sugagtezne frcym the  \u00a7f'\u20ac3Sj\u00a7'i"\u00a2It':\ufb01{\u00a7\narea 0:' the petitioner fact:21j\u00a7'=. as n0:iii:er:i..= tinder\nneti\ufb01caticn Vida Annex:.11*e~A_,__  ' '  \n\n(33) Issue 21 "\u00ab\u00a37'ZE*i'f  Qf' Z1"i;ajT1\u20ac}\ufb02\u00a3Z\u00a3\u00a5.f1}T\u00a7_1.&$-, \u20ac\ufb01'\u00a3'\u20acCf'.i\u20ac3I1,\norder preventmg the\ufb027"?"17'E3:s};1G1?.%.'\u00a7.<"?1V?\u00a7\u00a3 02" 1:3\nmembers or  gowy::':'*s- -- [of " ._s;~a11gai"(:aIn5e of the\npetitioners  ,t*;:~*;$ \u00e9:"ved ;2":LI:'\u00e9a'*. "\u00a7r\u00a7;;_1;____VVf'transp01'ting\nsugarcAa11e..<::3x1tif;\u00a7::y"trc1<\u00a7I} '1956."=--ii';;.  V'  \n\n(C) Issue: a'?.w:'i:"<;rf mandamus, dircjction :0\nrcspoiad\u00e9\ufb01t 3 \u20ac0.t\u20ac:~..L4t0.i:1%\u00a7i%ate })r0ceedi11gs Lind\ufb01r the\nprovisitrngm' of' VEJss\u00e9nf;ia_1"'Comzlaedities Act, 1933\nagainst V'Lr\u00a7?;sp0nd\u20ac'.at' No.8 for violating the\npro\u00a7:i$.i<_:ms of..Sug31'Cane {Central} Qrder 3.966.\n\nV  I\u00e9rzue: writ of Mandamus, directiozi, orders\n ' gii1':3:ct,i3{;ig~ \u00a3116' respondents No.7, its 11::<::m.ber$ and<\/pre>\n
 grows;-“.Sf”–\u00ab.,{)f .A’.T’*.’::L’\u00a3g&:1*ca::ze to suppij; sugarcane \u00a30
\n‘petitioner’L\u00a7;L1’gar factory ag contempiated undar the
\n\u00a731′(3E?:i$5._:}}f;’:S4-\u00e9}fSi1gaI’C\u00a3i1″1\u20ac (Cantroii Order, 1966 and<\/p>\n
_ _ (‘\u20ac31 Issue such other di;r’\u20ac:c1:io11, aerdsr as
\n \u00e9\ufb01eans fit in t:h<.=: facts and circumstas;1.c<:s of the
\ncase irzciuding this cost.\n<\/p>\n
INTERIM PRAYER<\/p>\n
F01′ the reasons stated in para 39 abave, K is
\nrespectftz\ufb01y pray\ufb01d that, the raspondeni I :0 6 1:0
\ntake i1ZI1I}1\u20ac:di&\u20ac\u20ac steps Ea praveni.\n<\/p>\n
tra11sp0r1;i;.z1g\/ expo’rf:iI1g Qf Sugarcans by the
\nrespondent. No.7′, its members or grewtars sf<\/p>\n
\\\\\\\/<\/p>\n
 parag*aph ‘G5 application, it is stated as \u00a71&re11mis::r:<\/p>\n
sugarcanc from peiitiorzers sugaritane @’0\\\u00a7\u00a3.’i\ufb01g’
\nmserved arsag to any Qthfsrr sugar factory i11c1.}.;_\u00e9i.i,.iVigL -. ‘2
\nrespondent 1103, pendixlg dispesai of ‘f1I\u20ac–:__abGVC–.. -1-
\nWrit petition in the i1f}tSI”\u20acS”t ofjustice and e\u00e9;1;;itjg,*’?. L”<\/p>\n
2. This {hurt at the stage
\n20\/12\/2:303 passed the fcsiiswi\ufb01g %’ a R
\n“C’rI_” R  \u00a35
\nHeard courage}  thsi’  A —\n<\/p>\n
Enterglrn order    ffii2;j\u00e9\u00a2teci to<\/p>\n
strictly? coillpiy glaussi\u00e9   ‘:’3.1;:ga1*i:arr3\u00a3%” Camtrol
\nOr\u00e9\u00e9r and p:~ee.;:;:: i\ufb01\ufb01gai *:m\ufb01spai”tati.:3m.<\/p>\n
33.53 135 ‘ .. w.  ‘ 32; S. ..,_??i”Gcess withm 3
\ndays; fai1i\ufb01:g.L*%_.x:{I;i<;h ._ai.ppea1\u00ab stands dismissed
\nwithoizt  V 'r&f\u00a7:r-e1f;::<:f_ ~ . ' to Bench."\n<\/p>\n
:3. g ‘rFh61″\u00e9&.\u00a7\u00a7BI”  a\ufb01p\ufb01ca\ufb01on is flied by the 7*?”<\/p>\n
 ..;_?’\/ 12}\u00a7Q08 seeking ta Vacate the inzerim<\/p>\n
01*'(ii\u20ac;?’r:E)f\u00a7g’  documents as Annexuresmiil is 52?. In<\/p>\n
 _  The respondent submits that, due to the
\n” misztnazaagenzent and other Variaus reasons, the
\n‘g_a’pp:e11an’z; Company has become a sick i11dI.1Strj;i
\n   anti hence they have apgaroached the BIFR for
\n‘ ‘V V. —-r\u20ach3.b\ufb01itatiQr1. The BIFR seems to have declared
\nthe sai\u00e9 cempanjg as sick ixadustry. The appi-Lilansz<\/p>\n
is not at all paying the 3.1110111}: to the farmcrs due<\/p>\n
to them regulariy. I11 fact in the year 290:2\u00bb-\u00abO3 and
\n2003~\u00ae4, ths company has net paid mi\ufb01ixnum
\nprice. fixed by Ttha central gavarnment. The
\nappellant company has to pay about Rs.2.00<\/p>\n
\u00a7’e:~.\u00a2.\/<\/p>\n
Vt<\/p>\n
crores ts tha farmers’ The respandarri associa4:&:>:’1\u00ab.._
\nhag approached the \ufb01irscter of $ugar Cane, fez?  , ”
\npaj\u00e9fiii\u00e9flt cf the arrears of the sugar can:-1: _.}:vla-‘;\u00a7.<~:;\u00a5.::*3″”–._I’e*i–\ufb01..”\u00a7~7′.,
\nBut hmvever, the appeiiani comifzaxiy has  ,0;1i};f~.._. ”
\nRs.83\u20ac}\/- pm’ MT. Similarij,-:5 for the ‘year 2i}\u00a3*.3V~{)4,”;<\/p>\n
221 minimum price of Rs.895,, 5{}_ pe:”‘l\\.z1.’i’,. uw_aS”~.:{‘i\u00a7;”:3s:i”<\/p>\n
by the {tantra} C\u00abovcrI1m\u20ac111t’.a._  But i10v_s\u00e9e’\\5er,V;th\u20ac
\nappe\ufb01ant: company; 313$ p;~3i{1–. “\u00a7?sI840f– Apex’ ..ii}’E.’I’.
\nThs ‘?*~?* raspondent’ ._\u00e9<;;?;so:\u00a7ia\u00a7:iQ'r1i1a7$.% appmached
\nthe Director at" S"tw1g:\u00e9ar\u00a2ai.1z1<f:V.'\u00a5"tg}  'i.a:pp1*0\u00a7:*iate
\nEl\u00e9itit\ufb01i agajnst__the appgiiarit c01'\ufb01}3a11}\u00a7~–'t0 \u00a7't3COVf3I'
\ntbs \u00a2':i\ufb02i10t1I1t_f'_{'\u00a3i}IZi\u00a7_ th-:3 ap\u00a7e3iiaf1?"_z:_Gmp\u00bbany 3116 pay
\nthe same its }}*.':jh,1*;{‘3.:e3r, on 26\/412008.
\nThe copy I:)f 71:.I3;”;: orrlers’-\u00a7+aT$S\u20acd \ufb01by ‘C1116 Directm’ of
\nS1.zgarCa11e_\u00e9-.re Iifz;::z*eW.i;\u00a7:I:1 p1’d<.'hiC\u20acd anti marked a5
\nA\ufb02I}\u20acLX11I_'f3S-VR \u00a7_  R'?,."'~'I_'1'm Direrzter of Su.ga3;<:ax1e
\neven \ufb021<::i;1gh has'""\u00a7)a;S$\u00e9a:1 i}he Grder an :26\/4fi1E0O78,
\nthe agpeliarzt CeIi3p.3;13:1'1as not paid. the arxiount<\/p>\n
as directeii. by Ehr: Iii'-ireatsr of S11g&':\u00a71'C{:1l'1\u20ac$"<\/p>\n
   13% para i3"VQ"'—';"~3;\u00ab1e application, ii is spaei\ufb01saily stated<\/p>\n
*4?\u00bb Vthat 'th\u00e9 appeliarat, compa\ufb01y, without: there<\/p>\n
 '–…\u00bbbeing   r\u00a2as;\u00e9}r::: has ur\ufb01latezaliy cancaliezi the agreezizemt<\/p>\n
 1\/2{\u00a5\u20ac?\u00a7x":.a:1d refusad 1:0 pay' the sugarcane prics at the<\/p>\n
'1._'_:"agi=\u00a7\u00e9'::{i_:4\u00e9}:e. It is its case that the apgeliant csnapany hag ta<\/p>\n
.   aipproxinzatalgs R366 csmrcs to the sugarcazie grewsr<\/p>\n
1 *  ' \u00bbf\u00a3;;z'm&1*s.\n<\/p>\n
5. The Iearriad 301311361 far the 73% respondemt<\/p>\n
Mr.V.P.Ku1}<:ar:1i further suhmits that the farz11\u20ac1's, whe are<\/p>\n
hM\/<\/p>\n
the members of the 'W1 respoiiszi\u00e9izt, appr0a\u00a37.h\ufb01f:i:\u00a7'4'['-.th\u20ac<\/p>\n
mazzagament sevsral timeg and deznand\u00e9-2d to paji {h\u00e9ii?L:'~d;ii'.'::g\u00a7; <\/p>\n
that the appeiiam; h\u00e9reilu, just to 3;voj{\u00a7…pg3.y*n1::%ifi{"i1\u00e9:;3  " \u00bb <\/p>\n
N0. 101\/200? and obtairzed iI}j111'iC\u00a3iC.i_ 1 ~';c:1*:t.'1.\u00abs?:r" <\/p>\n
pztzvented the farmers from"j.;;ip.proa::hj11g_ T'i\u00a711A\u00e9\u00ab:._j"appt\u00a7\u00a3}an'\u00a3~ '<\/p>\n
company. T336 interiin 0rci_\u00a2r gra;f1.:%\u00a7\u00a7iLv.i1i.}.AOV};j;'2OO7 by
\nthe iearrxed Additional Cfi\ufb01ril' glhudgg  F (3., Heme:
\nis prsduced at An\u00a71\u00e9:\u00a7\u00a7;L1:fe~\u00a7\u00a7'?  '.i%151e:..}\u00ab:%:;')1icat:1on.<\/p>\n
5, A11      Apieadecz aims: in the
\nwrit petiticag   learned cminsel fax:\n<\/p>\n
the 3.ppa1i%:*1\u00a5;;! “Mr. ‘”subzI1i*:S that they are met<\/p>\n
gerr):1an<:.ar:_d r<%:'1<~::1.Ie.1"r\u00a3:"' faf \u20ac.E\u00a7e purpoge of seeekisag the \ufb01bOV<fi<\/p>\n
'gf\u00a2i\u00a7\u20acfsV if; {fie aifiii petition or the ir;\u20ac.\u20acm'm. order in this wrii<\/p>\n
a_\u00a7p:?a\u00a3V\u00abag;$i;is;s'\u00a7 ire fSfp.<\u00a71'1t disputed by the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
:’\u00e9i\u00a7:;\u00a7f\u00e9I3aT:\u00a7t i1*1-ail: it is deciared as 3. sick industry under the<\/p>\n
  1tjfQ\u00a7.ri’s\u00a7i’0:i:\u00a7 Bf S.I.C.A Act. [:5 rehabilitatiaxa i\ufb01\ufb01lfi\ufb01d unciar tha<\/p>\n
VT :’\u00a7\u00a7:’\u00a7’:\u20acr1\u00a3e approved by BIFR is 3:13} subsisting as on mday.<\/p>\n
F\ufb01rmar 13118 erders passed by flhfi’ C(i}I};”i111iSSiOI}\u20acI” for Game<\/p>\n
Devalepment as per Ar1neXures~R1 ta R3 dirscting the<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
i’w\/<\/p>\n
 na.*~:1_ order made under paragaph 6?} cf sub–<:iat;$e {1}
\n a.p;j;\u00a7\u00abies, 311311 be bound to supply or purchase, as the
\n799456: may be, that quazitity of s'LzgarcaI1\u20ac swayed by<\/p>\n
' V '"a3:1}:* Wiifui fajiure on the part of th\u00e9 e3u.garcaI1s<\/p>\n
resarve\ufb01 area, the quantity or percentag6:g-
\noperative society of sugarcany\u00e9: “‘g1?r5fa;\u00e9s”s’_’
\noperating in the reserved (area; ‘i:hI’9u1gh.__s’u;:1_1″‘VV
\nsociety, shail supply  “iih\u00e9 “fZ*:*..<':;;v:;=:\u00bb.5;..',,,.VTAi1TA
\n(30I1C\u20aci'I1Cd\u00a7 :    " ' <\/p>\n
((1) direct a taugarczane g:*t3\u00a7%*::;r 0:'  \u00e9T:1ga:*Ce.r1e
\ngrowers' czwoperaigivtz—– sr}Cir?:_ty, "supppA_E\u00a7;ir1g
\nsugarcane to __a'i'~.. fa<;\u20actor\u00a7;,f" ~._\u00a3:H.}.\u20ac\u00a7, the factory
\nconcerned to 611:6:  a'I::  :2ggi*\u00a2r::m\u20acnt to
\nsuppiy or pnrc11;\u00a21_s;e3.VVas_ \ufb01f1\u20ac"C:raSE3..';3fI*e3u;'\u00a7F be, the
\nq1:ant:ity_:of__sugj\u00e9rCa11\u20ac  mlcisf paragaph<\/p>\n
(a) <:Iiire<:.:  nii kh\u00e91iuj._$a1'i s\u00e9ggar or sugar shall
\n,\u00a7::r::'= .m27:111ii%3;.\u20actL11'?\u00a2d. frtjrn-v"Sugarcar1s cxctept<\/p>\n
1._un&\u00a7\u20ac1*’\u20ac\u00a5._{1CiV \u00a31″; ac\ufb01tzgjdaiiae with the conditicns<\/p>\n
Vsp\u00e9ci\ufb01sd ~\u00a7ht:*_1ic:g:1\u00a2e issued in this behaif;
\nif) p1’0}2i}3i.’i: Q1′-_re’~:.tr’\u00a7;\u00bb:’;ii 9:’ othmwise reguiats the
\n” ‘mgport  sugarcane fmm any area {incltzding<\/p>\n
 a_ ::;eserved\u00bb- —– -area) except; under and in
\nascofdgancc with a yarinit issued in mi:-3<\/p>\n
  VA  <\/p>\n
(~23. E23813? sugarcane gmwer, sugarcane gowers’
\n<:0–r:}p<:ir2~;1tiv6: saciefcy and factsxy, to Wham or ta which<\/p>\n
f\ufb01he ageetnamt entered inte under the paragagzah mad<\/p>\n
gmwer, sugarcane growers' cooperative society or the
\nfactory to (10 so, shall coxmtituta a breach 9f the
\n}Z}'I'()ViSi01"1S of this (")rd6z':" \u00a5<\/p>\n
Ym\/\/<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
10. Thee ieamed 931311361 for ma Eipp\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01fit.-=f__}}8C\u20ac{i<\/p>\n
strong relianctsz upan the Cforzstitutional Beyich ci:::gcH:f:%;is:\u00a7;i2–\u00a7;;fV’f3:”:\u20ac:<\/p>\n
supreme Cami m the case of UP. CO–QPER}fFI\u00a7?\u00a7;” <\/p>\n
UNIGNS FEBERATEONS v. WEST’ “.”S:I%VI:.\u20ac}f$’\u00a7:\u00a7\u20ac’VV: rvi::,i;~;S<\/p>\n
\ufb01;SSC}CIATI<I3\u00a7sE & QTI<{E3I~&S e?;:i:.,Vetc.,\u00bb \u00abg:;\u00e9x:::{L%'2of4 .%%L\u00a7\u00a7;g: :3\u20ac’;\u00a7*;’}.V i\u00a71;rcz:1fi\u00e9I,i_”t}1 eState can \ufb01x price<\/p>\n
for purcha-.fse.\u00a3)f A \u00e9’e;1_gg{i’::,2z:1s\u00bb.\u00a7$’c2″Q:* \u00e9.1’1\u20aci…abave the minimmlz price
\nfixed by the Gentrai’  Tina word “GOV\u20ac1’I.iIIl\u20ac:\ufb02’\u00a3” in<\/p>\n
such pfGf’OH1i;az4-.4_}\u00e91g3f\u20ac:\u20acn1\u20ac’31s:’\u00abf\u20ac.f\u20ac1’S in {he State {i’rav$r1’2m\u20acm<\/p>\n
3154;). ‘?\u00a7:\u00a3f::r<f:1_i<33'<;, th\u00e9""\u20ac:s::.u;'1sei has subzrzitteci that the decision<\/p>\n
i'v$'-ap\u00a7:31ica\u00a731\u00a7 '*:<\u00a7 facts 0f the case: ag the word 'mgulatfz'<\/p>\n
 %.__ ;1sed in. "iihe  if} the Sugarcane: Contra} Omar has gas:<\/p>\n
 wider ma\u00e9gi\ufb01g and therefore the I'\u20acIi\u20acfS sought; for againsi<\/p>\n
" x:\u00e9\u20ac;'per1\u00e9ents parti<i:ulaz*Iy Regpondent N032 311:3<\/p>\n
V'  f+r;\u00e9*$poif:dent N033, are maintailiabie.\n<\/p>\n
11, The above said subniission 1% asgaiiad by the<\/p>\n
 ~ \u00a3earr:\u20ac{i COURSE} for the 791 .F\u20acSp0I1d\u20acI1E com.eI1d.i11g {hat the<\/p>\n
mid decisien has no application to thfi facts of tha saga; that<\/p>\n
Mx<\/p>\n
I1<\/p>\n
Eh\ufb01f matter is requirs\ufb02 :0 be cazasitiered by tha <\/p>\n
Judge with rarference to the reievant facts pa2fti\u00a7–:1:’ia\u00a7~\u00a7f\u00a7%’* <\/p>\n
regard is agraement. to be \u00e9zzterarzi i:at.Q…b:\u00a7; 513$’ “g\u00a7t’\u20ac:\u00e9w\u00a5:::*S”‘o:’\u00abwi\ufb02\u00e9 V’<\/p>\n
2,1 {:<3~0;:%e:"a\u00a7iv\u00e9: society of sugarcane "\u00a7?;*0:*\u00e9%_.?\u20ac14S in 81%: ;4;11gh :\u00a7:\u00a7r1&’v._j$’::g:2:i’ca11\u20ac:’~ V<\/p>\n
\u00a33 gown in tat: reserved agfea, f1″\u00a7t3f”–*.”, iS fir; staf:;1t\u20ac3r}%\\..:3b1igati01’1
\nfer fjil\ufb01f\ufb02 to supply the sa1i1’\u20ac:T ti)’  a\u00a7’\u00a75\u00a7i\u00a3.\u00a7a:nt iaugar factary,
\nThemfore, he csntz\u00e9rmis  ‘  ;;:*\u00a7’\u00a7i3R\u00a7C&. xplaceci upozx {ha<\/p>\n
d\u20acCiSi0I’.l of the “‘;”\u00a7”L:_p%f:%ri\u00a3;e’  bjgr-\u00ab _*\u00a7;11\u20ac\u00bb appa\ufb01anfs (:\u20ac}*’L\u00a311S\u20ac},<\/p>\n
I”f:.ff:IT\u20acC}. t().r’\u00a23E}\u20ac}.V;\u20ac ,.V -ig “ii::Z$p3.9;:<:d, E23396 it is 133: appiicabia E0<\/p>\n
the fasts {2f"'t31i5$' etasj\u00e9x'  'V<\/p>\n
12. ‘eViiih_  r:\u00a7:E::\u00e95z;%geV:%:_”..:%\u00a2 the afmesaid rival legai<\/p>\n
mzat\u00e9ntis-gas ‘x33:*ge<i"':”cic::*<\/p>\n
 vpassa’::i ‘b3\u00e9*  kf\ufb01\u00e9piflg in view that the writ, appeal is<\/p>\n
 pI*’\u00e9:fer:’\u20ac:\u20aci :3g a\u00a731$t the amiss ordered in the Writ petition.<\/p>\n
  ‘ . ‘  substan\ufb01al question wcmi\ufb01 833136 in wr*iI:. appeai<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01xer; an i1″l\u20ac\u20acI’1GCi\ufb01’,GI’\u00a7\u00a3’ order OF main {}I’d\u20acf’ an gmarits is<\/p>\n
 .;g_af\u00a2sser{ie1″ where<\/p>\n
\\’vvL\/\/<\/p>\n
12<\/span>
\ni}{}?,iC\u20ac is igsurzci and interim 0:*{3e:r is\u00bb; m’*d.t::’\u00e9:ai 2.3; ‘$3.15: \u00a7\u20ac:2s.:me:ci<\/p>\n
Sifigi\ufb01 .}’t1dg*a \u20ac:’;Xs\u20ac’:’I’C\u00a7.S}:11g his {iiscr6ti011ar\u00a7.; pawer. if 35%;. sat<\/p>\n
asizi\u00e9t {ha Oftifii’ is$’:.::i2″1g ncstice in tbs writ pc:t;:if,i'<3:1_;-.._:ti;:z\u00a7\u00a7::*e%<\/p>\n
I"\u20acIE}8i1'IS I10tl"1i:"1g \ufb01iinf <:onside:'ati:'31"1 by this \u00a31'_0'L–::\/tt_.{f~., T'}f1.:\u20ac3\u20ac7\u00a7.A z';:fiTt V. 'V<\/p>\n
appeal 5:311:16? be entertained 31 3.11. ::.\u00a7}.!11\u20ac:A:1. f5\u00a31\u00a7;e,.I"ag\u00a7:1*:1\u20ac\u00e9<\/p>\n
misi er consideraiticm. of interim: p:4\u00e9:3ei\u00a21’V-.Q1’11y.’af3;\u00e91″ h\u00e9exxing thee
\ncorxtestizlg respondents rxamieiy ‘7E’t31;.;:”<~3s"p':)zi:f.*3.:t31\u00a71t and also ether<\/p>\n
r\u20ac:sp0ndeI1t3, the interim Qfii\ufb02gf' is :3-a\u00a7;s\u00e9d*_ag ;%s1\u00a7iist. R3.<\/p>\n
14. ‘?31I3di*;3\u00a7ut\u00e9gi’–.fact”ihai the a1;>p::\u00a31a11t {:m:za.pan\u00a7;
\nis a sick if\u00e9dii\ufb01t\ufb01i? _ tize E\ufb01aard of Irxdusiriai am}<\/p>\n
Piilanaiai }7\u00a3e:C’t:.:1str1_1c:tioi1,’>.- ‘T’ha reT\u00a7’::ahi1:%’ia_tie11 schezne<\/p>\n
_a\u00a7;3;3:fQv;\u00e9\u00a7i’\u00b0~ b;j.zt.j’:’;_\u20ac BTi\u00a7’.F:’_~—i3″s’5′::’i1} in ap\u00e9zrafiera. This fact is not<\/p>\n
S\u00e9at\u00e9d   *petiti0n 01′ in this wri’s: appeal, But the<\/p>\n
‘ V’ 3,…v}i\ufb01g&\ufb01{‘i>};iV\u00e93\u20actf;V\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7?; E116 mtzmbers of \u00a3113 ‘?”=h respojgdsnt an\u00e9 the<\/p>\n
-4%T.[‘_;’~a.jg\u00a7p\u00a71\u00a3ant f.E> crarss. ‘\u00a7’}:e1*e:f<};'e, havizzg<\/p>\n
regard to the tiridisglttt\ufb01d fa<:t$ r1a:."z}.eIjs_;' ':'.he:"'<=:– E3 353.0 \u00e9igf\ufb01\ufb01iii\ufb01\ufb01iii".<\/p>\n
\\m\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 Author: V.Gopalagowda And Swamy IN THE mar\u00bb: com? or xARNA’rA;\u00a7i.%a 1% ‘ ; CIRCUIT BEHCKAT DHARWAI1, % Rated this the 61:13. day of FRESEM THE HOIWBLE mR.JUsTI\u00e9E\u00a7i* mmua THE HOWELE nm…mfsrrzc:s Namwgana swam? ‘W A 1531,5139 (Gn\u00a2+:\u00e9;\ufb01$) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2011,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009"},"wordCount":2011,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009","name":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries ... vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-16T11:40:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-india-sugars-and-refineries-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S India Sugars And Refineries … vs The Secretary To Government on 6 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255701"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255701\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}