{"id":256773,"date":"2009-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-17T23:57:54","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T18:27:54","slug":"harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)                              {1}\n\n\n      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n\n                               R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)\n                               Date of Decision:July 07, 2009\n\nHarish Kumar\n\n\n\n                                              ---Appellant\n                   versus\n\n\nShri Suresh Kumar and another\n\n                                              ---Respondents\n\nCoram:       HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA\n\n                 ***\n\nPresent:     Mr.Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate,\n             for the appellant.\n\n                   ***\n\nSABINA, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">             Plaintiff- Harish Kumar filed a suit for permanent injunction<\/p>\n<p>restraining the defendants from cutting and removing the trees standing in<\/p>\n<p>Khasra No. 33 Rectangle No. 26 situated in village Jaroda, H.B.No. 403<\/p>\n<p>Tehsil Jagadhari District Yamuna Nagar. The suit of the plaintiff was<\/p>\n<p>dismissed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagadhari vide judgment and<\/p>\n<p>decree dated 8.6.2002.In appeal, the said judgment and decree were upheld<\/p>\n<p>by Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar vide judgment and decree<\/p>\n<p>dated 14.5.2008. Hence, the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                   The case of the parties as noticed by learned Additional<\/p>\n<p>District Judge, Yamuna Nagar, in paras 2 and 3 of its judgment, is as under:-<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">             &#8220;As per the case of the plaintiff, Jai Gopal, grand-father of the<br \/>\n R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)                           {2}<\/p>\n<p>          plaintiff was the owner of the suit land and after his death, the<\/p>\n<p>          suit land was inherited by his father Krishan Chand and<\/p>\n<p>          defendant No. 1 Saran Behari Lal in equal shares and in this<\/p>\n<p>          way Krishan Chand, father of the plaintiff was owner in<\/p>\n<p>          possession of \u00bd share of the suit land, but, defendant No. 1 in<\/p>\n<p>          collusion with the revenue officials got entered the land<\/p>\n<p>          measuring 1 K- 6 M more in khasra No. 33\/\/27 fraudulently.<\/p>\n<p>          However, at the spot plaintiff and defendants are in possession<\/p>\n<p>          of one-half share each. Taking undue advantage of the wrong<\/p>\n<p>          entries in the revenue record defendants have started to cut and<\/p>\n<p>          remove the standing trees in the land in dispute illegally and<\/p>\n<p>          forcibly.   Thus, he has sought a decree for permanent<\/p>\n<p>          injunction restraining the defendants from cutting and<\/p>\n<p>          removing the trees sanding in khasra numbers 33\/\/26 and<\/p>\n<p>          33\/\/27 and also from interfering in the possession of the<\/p>\n<p>          plaintiff over the suit land in any manner whatsoever and from<\/p>\n<p>          changing the nature of the suit land.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">                      Defendants appeared and filed their written<\/p>\n<p>          statement controverting all the claim put forth by the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>          and it is pleaded that Krishan Chand, father of the plaintiff and<\/p>\n<p>          Saran Behari Lal, defendants No. 1 were owner of Khasra No.<\/p>\n<p>          637, measuring 12 Bighas- 11 Biswas which was partitioned<\/p>\n<p>          vide mutation No. 250, Khasra No. 637 was bifurcated into<\/p>\n<p>          khasra numbers 637\/1 (4-14) and 637\/2 (7-14), khasra no.<\/p>\n<p>          637\/1 had come to the share of Krishan Chand, father of the<\/p>\n<p>          plaintiff and khasra No. 637\/2 came in the share of defendant<br \/>\n R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)                                 {3}<\/p>\n<p>             No. 1. Thereafter, consolidation took place and all the khasra<\/p>\n<p>             numbers have been changed into new khasra numbers                 i.e.<\/p>\n<p>             khasra numbers 33\/\/26, 33\/\/27 and 33\/\/28, khasra numbers<\/p>\n<p>             33\/\/26 and 33\/\/28 measuring 13 K-6 M (garden) and 33\/\/28 (0-<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">             5) (Gair mumkin tubewell) together with other land is owned<\/p>\n<p>             and possessed by the plaintiff and khasra No. 33\/\/27 measuring<\/p>\n<p>             14-19 is owned and possessed by the defendants. Partition had<\/p>\n<p>             taken place in the life time of Krishan Chand, father of the<\/p>\n<p>             plaintiff by metes and bounds in the year 1957-58. The factum<\/p>\n<p>             of any sort of their collusion with the revenue officials has been<\/p>\n<p>             vehemently denied. It is pleaded that the plaintiff has no right,<\/p>\n<p>             title or interest in the suit property.     While challenging the<\/p>\n<p>             locus standi and cause of action of the plaintiff to file the<\/p>\n<p>             present    suit   it is pleaded that the suit of the plaintiff is<\/p>\n<p>             hopelessly time barred and his suit being false and frivolous is<\/p>\n<p>             liable to be dismissed.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">             On pleadings of the parties, following issued were framed by<\/p>\n<p>the learned trial court:-\n<\/p>\n<p>             (1)Whether the suit land is joint between the parties to the suit?<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">\n<p id=\"p_7\">             OPP<\/p>\n<p>             (2)Whether the plaintiff is estopped from filing the present suit<\/p>\n<p>                by his own acts and conducts? OPD<\/p>\n<p>             (3)Whether the plaintiff has no right, title or interest in the suit<\/p>\n<p>                property? OPD<\/p>\n<p>             (4)Whether the plaintiff has no locus-standi to file the present<\/p>\n<p>                suit? OPD<br \/>\n R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)                               {4}<\/p>\n<p>            (5)Whether the plaintiff has no cause of action for filing the<\/p>\n<p>               present suit? OPD<\/p>\n<p>            (6)Whether the suit of the plaintiff is hopelessly time barred?<\/p>\n<p>               OPD<\/p>\n<p>            (7)Whether the suit of the plaintiff is false, frivolous and has<\/p>\n<p>               been filed simply to harass the defendants and the defendants<\/p>\n<p>               are entitled to special costs u\/s 35-A CPC ? OPD<\/p>\n<p>            (8)Relief.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">            After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>opinion that the present appeal does not warrant interference by this Court.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">            Sharan Behari Lal-defendant No.1 and Krishan Chand, father<\/p>\n<p>of plaintiff, are sons of Jai Gopal. Undisputedly, mutation No. 250 (Ex.D-<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">2) was sanctioned in favour of Krishan Chand and Sharan Behari Lal in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1960. In this regard, an entry was incorporated in the revenue record<\/p>\n<p>by the order of the court. Kishan Chand was given three khasra Nos. 637\/1<\/p>\n<p>(4-14), 640 (1-11), 641 (1-9). Thus, he got total land measuring 7 kanals 14<\/p>\n<p>marlas. Sharan Behari Lal, on the other hand got Khasra No. 637\/2, (7-14).<\/p>\n<p>Besides this Khasra No. 805\/1 (2-2) also came to the share of Krishan<\/p>\n<p>Chand whereas Khasra No. 804(1-7) and Khasra No. 805\/2(0-15), in all<\/p>\n<p>measuring 2 kanals 2 marlas came to the share of Sharan Behari Lal. Both<\/p>\n<p>Sharan Behari Lal and Krishan Chand came in separate possession of<\/p>\n<p>Khasra numbers as per the partition by way of mutual agreement. During<\/p>\n<p>consolidation, new khasra numbers were allotted to Sharan Behari Lal and<\/p>\n<p>Krishan Chand. Sharan Behari Lal was allotted Khasra No. 33 Rectangle<\/p>\n<p>No. 27(14-19) in lieu of old Khasra numbers wheras Khasra No. 33<\/p>\n<p>Rectangle No. 26 was allotted to Krishan Chand. In these circumstances,<br \/>\n R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M)                              {5}<\/p>\n<p>both the courts below have rightly held that since at the time of partition by<\/p>\n<p>way of mutual agreement both Krishan Chand and Sharan Behari Lal had<\/p>\n<p>got 19 kanals and 16 marlas of land each, then the plea of the plaintiff that<\/p>\n<p>he had got less land during partition, is without any basis. Moreover, the<\/p>\n<p>mutation was also sanctioned in terms of the partition by way of mutual<\/p>\n<p>agreement.    Later on during consolidation, Krishan Chand and Sharan<\/p>\n<p>Behari Lal were allotted new Khasra numbers. The plaintiff could not seek<\/p>\n<p>injunction with regard to the khasra number which has come to Sharan<\/p>\n<p>Behari Lal during consolidation. Thus, both the courts below have rightly<\/p>\n<p>dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">             No substantial question of law arises in this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the same is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">                                                   (SABINA)<br \/>\n                                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>July 07, 2009<br \/>\nPARAMJIT\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M) {1} In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh R.S.A.No. 1174 of 2009(O&amp;M) Date of Decision:July 07, 2009 Harish Kumar &#8212;Appellant versus Shri Suresh Kumar and another &#8212;Respondents Coram: HON&#8217;BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-256773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1034,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"wordCount":1034,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009","name":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T18:27:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-shri-suresh-kumar-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Harish Kumar vs Shri Suresh Kumar And Another on 7 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}