{"id":257010,"date":"2010-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-18T21:26:16","modified_gmt":"2016-12-18T15:56:16","slug":"mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                               Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                              CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001004\n                                                                                             Dated\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                               :   Shri\u00a0N.K.\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Ram\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                        :   DG:\u00a0Doordarshan\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.     The\u00a0applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.24.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0APIO,\u00a0DG:\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0following\u00a0information:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">       i)       Copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0full\u00a0report\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0preliminary\u00a0enquiry\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0atrocity\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Kempaiah, \u00a0 Executive \u00a0 Producer, \u00a0 DDK, \u00a0 Bangalore \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 applicant \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       V.K.Agarwal,\u00a0CE(I\/C),\u00a0DDK,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">       ii)      All\u00a0the\u00a0notings,\u00a0correspondence\u00a0and\u00a0ATR\u00a0further\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0referred\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       preliminary\u00a0enquiry\u00a0report.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">       On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.30.9.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0DG:\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0at\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0another\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       dt.17.10.09\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0On\u00a0still\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       1.11.09 \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 CIC. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 CIC \u00a0 vide \u00a0 its \u00a0 order \u00a0 dt.26.11.09 \u00a0 directed \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0by\u00a029.12.09\u00a0and\u00a0directed\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       delay\u00a0by\u00a015.1.10.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\n<p id=\"p_5\">2.     The \u00a0 Bench \u00a0 of \u00a0 Mrs. \u00a0 Annapurna \u00a0 Dixit, \u00a0 Information \u00a0 Commissioner, \u00a0 scheduled \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       January\u00a019,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">\n<p id=\"p_7\">3.     Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">4.     The\u00a0applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">5.     The\u00a0Complainant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0partial\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a09.12.09\u00a0and\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0written\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0on\u00a019.12.09\u00a0seeking\u00a0further\u00a0clarification\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0duly\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0on\u00a030.12.09.\u00a0 \u00a0Not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       satisfied,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0on\u00a013.1.10\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0no\u00a0response\u00a0till\u00a0then.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       He\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0DG:\u00a0DD\u00a0wrote\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0National\u00a0Commission\u00a0<br \/>\n      of \u00a0 SC\/ST \u00a0 and \u00a0 Ministry \u00a0 of \u00a0 Information \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 Broadcasting \u00a0 acquitting \u00a0 him \u00a0 (the \u00a0 Complainant) \u00a0 of \u00a0 all\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     charges. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 alleged \u00a0 that \u00a0 documents \u00a0 provided \u00a0 to \u00a0 him \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 certified\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     because \u00a0 of \u00a0 which \u00a0 he \u00a0 was \u00a0 put \u00a0 into \u00a0 great \u00a0 difficulty\u00a0 while \u00a0 filing \u00a0 a \u00a0 petition \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 CAT. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Complainant\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0letters\u00a0are\u00a0being\u00a0sent\u00a0under\u00a0RTI\u00a0by\u00a0Suneetha\u00a0Bharal,\u00a0DDA\u00a0without\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     indicating\u00a0whether\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0CPIO\u00a0or\u00a0the\u00a0deemed\u00a0PIO.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">6.   In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0Complainant\u00a0is\u00a0seeking\u00a0various\u00a0correspondences\u00a0and\u00a0letters\u00a0which\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     easily\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0if\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0files,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     to\u00a0provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0requires,\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0attest\u00a0each\u00a0page\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0already\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0when\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     visits\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0office\u00a0for\u00a0inspection.\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a031.01.2010\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a007.02.2010.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">7.   The\u00a0Commission\u00a0further\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0only\u00a0on\u00a09.12.09\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     application\u00a0dated\u00a024.08.09.\u00a0Since\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0APIO,\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     been\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a028.09.09,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0delay\u00a0of\u00a071\u00a0days\u00a0in\u00a0providing\u00a0information\u00a0[28.09.09\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     to \u00a0 09.12.09, \u00a0 exclusive \u00a0 of \u00a0 both \u00a0 dates). \u00a0 No \u00a0 explanation \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 provided \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 order \u00a0 dtd\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     26.11.2009\u00a0wherein\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0was\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0send\u00a0her\u00a0explanation\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     by\u00a015th\u00a0January\u00a02010,\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Show\u00a0Cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.\u00a025,000\/\u00ad\u00a0may\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0levied\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     for\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information.\u00a0Moreover,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     today\u00a0(i.e.\u00a019.01.2010)\u00a0despite\u00a0clear\u00a0direction\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CIC.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0has\u00a0waived\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fair\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0by\u00a015th\u00a0January\u00a02010\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     on\u00a019.01.2010\u00a0thereby\u00a0indicating\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0has\u00a0nothing\u00a0to\u00a0say\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0matter.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">8.   Accordingly, \u00a0 Ms. \u00a0 Suneetha \u00a0 Bharal, \u00a0 DDA, \u00a0 DG:Doordarshan \u00a0 is \u00a0 directed \u00a0 to \u00a0 pay \u00a0 a \u00a0 sum \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Rs.17,750\/\u00ad[Rs.\u00a0250\/\u00ad\u00a0x\u00a071]\u00a0in\u00a05\u00a0equal\u00a0monthly\u00a0installments\u00a0@\u00a0Rs.3550\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0month.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">9.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0recover\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.17,750\/\u00ad\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0payable\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     to\u00a0Ms.\u00a0Suneetha\u00a0Bharal,\u00a0DDA,\u00a0DG:Doordarshan\u00a0by\u00a0way\u00a0of\u00a0Demand\u00a0Draft\u00a0drawn\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0&#8216;PAO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     CAT&#8217;\u00a0in\u00a05\u00a0equal\u00a0monthly\u00a0instalments.\u00a0The\u00a0first\u00a0installment\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a010th\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     March\u00a02010\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a0installment\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0by\u00a010th\u00a0July\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Demand\u00a0Draft\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     be \u00a0 addressed \u00a0 to \u00a0Shri \u00a0 G. \u00a0 Subramanian, \u00a0 Under \u00a0 Secretary \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 Deputy \u00a0 Registrar, \u00a0 Central\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0Club\u00a0Building,\u00a0Old\u00a0JNU\u00a0Campus,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0067.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">                                     (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                           Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">1.    Shri\u00a0N.K.Mohan\u00a0Ram<br \/>\n      GF\u00ad8,\u00a0&#8216;Atria\u00a0Villa&#8217;<br \/>\n      Palace\u00a0Guttahalli\u00a0Main\u00a0Road<br \/>\n      Malleshwaram<br \/>\n      Bangalore\u00a0560\u00a0003<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">2.    Ms.Suneetha\u00a0Bharal<br \/>\n      Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(A)<br \/>\n      DG:Doordarshan<br \/>\n      Copernicus\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n      New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">3.    The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n      DG:Doordarshan<br \/>\n      Copernicus\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n      New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">4.    The\u00a0Director\u00a0General<br \/>\n      Doordarshan<br \/>\n      Mandi\u00a0House<br \/>\n      New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">5.    Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_21\">6.    Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/001004 Dated\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0N.K.\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Ram Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : DG:\u00a0Doordarshan Background 1. The\u00a0applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.24.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0APIO,\u00a0DG:\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0 the\u00a0following\u00a0information: i) Copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0full\u00a0report\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0preliminary\u00a0enquiry\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0atrocity\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.\u00a0 Kempaiah, \u00a0 Executive \u00a0 Producer, \u00a0 DDK, \u00a0 Bangalore \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 applicant \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 Shri\u00a0 V.K.Agarwal,\u00a0CE(I\/C),\u00a0DDK,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi ii) All\u00a0the\u00a0notings,\u00a0correspondence\u00a0and\u00a0ATR\u00a0further\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0referred\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-257010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":754,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010"},"wordCount":754,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010","name":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-18T15:56:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-k-mohanram-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.N K Mohanram vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 19 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257010\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}