{"id":257234,"date":"2010-08-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-05-07T11:41:47","modified_gmt":"2017-05-07T06:11:47","slug":"smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                        FA No.35 of 2005\n                       SMT.KRISHNA KUMARI\n                              Versus\n                       BINOD MISHRA &amp; ORS\n                            -----------\n\n                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">36.   06\/08\/2010.           Heard     the    parties   on     the     Interlocutory<\/p>\n<p>                    Application No.6799 of 2007.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                            This Interlocutory application has been filed by<\/p>\n<p>                    the respondent No.1 on 10.12.2007 praying therein for<\/p>\n<p>                    recalling the order dated 04.10.2007.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">                            For the purpose of deciding this application the<\/p>\n<p>                    short facts may be stated that the plaintiff-respondent<\/p>\n<p>                    filed the partition suit being partition suit No.83 of<\/p>\n<p>                    1982. The said partition suit has been decreed and the<\/p>\n<p>                    defendant No.3, Smt. Krishna Kumari Devi has filed this<\/p>\n<p>                    First Appeal against the said preliminary decree. During<\/p>\n<p>                    the pendency of this Appeal, I.A. No.4164 of 2007 was<\/p>\n<p>                    filed by the appellant seeking permission to sell one<\/p>\n<p>                    biggha land of Khata No.1705, Plot No.5633 and 10<\/p>\n<p>                    kattha land of R.S. Plot No.372, 5 decimals of R.S. Plot<\/p>\n<p>                    No.377 and 12 decimals of R.S. Plot No.735 because<\/p>\n<p>                    the appellant was earlier restrained from selling any<\/p>\n<p>                    property.   By terms of order dated 04.10.2007, this<\/p>\n<p>                    Court   allowed    the   I.A.   with    respect   to   property<\/p>\n<p>                    mentioned in paragraph 22 of the petition, i.e., 1<\/p>\n<p>                    biggha out of Khata No.1705, R.S. Plot No.5633.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Subsequently,   to       recall   this    order,     the   plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>respondents have filed this I.A. No.6799 of 2007 on the<\/p>\n<p>ground that by surprising facts, the appellant has<\/p>\n<p>obtained this order.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">       The learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent<\/p>\n<p>submitted that for obtaining permission to sell medical<\/p>\n<p>prescriptions have been annexed which are from the<\/p>\n<p>year 2002-2005 and during this period, the appellant<\/p>\n<p>has sold the following properties :\n<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       (a)        4 decimals out of Plot No.823 on\n\n                  06.10.2004 for Rs.30,000\/-.\n\n       (b)        8       decimals       in   sale   deed     dated\n\n                  25.01.2000 for one lakh.\n\n       (c)        4 decimal plot No.5632 and 5633 by\n\n                  3 sale deed dated 25.01.2006 for\n\n                  Rs.1.5 lakh.\n\n       (d)        4 decimal          of the above plot for\n\n                  Rs.1,62,000\/-.\n\n       (e)        8 decimal plot No.823 sale deed\n\n                  dated 18.06.2006 for Rs.3 lakhs.\n\n       (f)        6 decimal out of above plot No.823\n\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_4\">                  dated 18.06.2006 for Rs.1,25,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_2\">       (g)        2 decimal of the said plot on the\n\n                  same date to another persons for\n\n                  Rs.75,000\/-\n\n       (h)        6 decimal of that plot on the same\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                     3<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n                    date    to    Ramjhari      Devi    for\n\n                    Rs.2,13,750\/-.\n\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_5\">        The learned counsel further submitted that in<\/p>\n<p>fact the appellant has received more than 27 lakhs for<\/p>\n<p>the lands sold by her during this period, but in the sale<\/p>\n<p>deeds   only   13   lakhs   and   odd   has   been   shown.<\/p>\n<p>According to the learned counsel, a substantial amount<\/p>\n<p>has been received by her but on the ground of ailment,<\/p>\n<p>she is selling the property and for that earlier, she<\/p>\n<p>violated the order of injunction, she was punished by<\/p>\n<p>the trial Court which was upheld by this Court.        The<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel further submitted that considering all<\/p>\n<p>these facts which are suppressed by the appellant, this<\/p>\n<p>Court by terms of order dated 24.01.2008 directed the<\/p>\n<p>parties to maintain status quo regarding remaining<\/p>\n<p>portion of plot No.5633. It appears that while passing<\/p>\n<p>the said orders, the appellant had already sold 12<\/p>\n<p>kattha land.    It was prayed by the respondents to<\/p>\n<p>modify the order dated 04.10.2007 to the extent that<\/p>\n<p>she is permitted to sell only 12 kattha instead of 1<\/p>\n<p>biggha of plot No.5633 because she had already sold 12<\/p>\n<p>kattha land. It further appears that while hearing this<\/p>\n<p>I.A. this Court by terms of order dated 16.01.2009<\/p>\n<p>further restrained the appellant from negotiating for<\/p>\n<p>sale.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">        Counter affidavit, reply to counter affidavit and<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                        4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>rejoinder etc. have been filed by the parties.                 The<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>monthly expense of the appellant is about Rs.52,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>and she is suffering from cancer.           However as stated<\/p>\n<p>above,     Hon&#8217;ble     Bench     passed     the     order    dated<\/p>\n<p>04.10.2007 considering the facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n<p>the case, restrained the appellant from selling any<\/p>\n<p>further.       The    same    order   was   passed     again   on<\/p>\n<p>16.01.2009 by another Bench of this Court. It further<\/p>\n<p>appears that since 2007 for last 2\u00bd years, the appellant<\/p>\n<p>has been restrained by this Court from selling any<\/p>\n<p>property and now, therefore, after such a long period, it<\/p>\n<p>will not be proper to vacate the same.                  In such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, the order dated 4th October, 2007 is<\/p>\n<p>modified to the extent that the appellant is permitted to<\/p>\n<p>sell only 12 kattha land of plot No.5633.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">         The learned counsel for the appellant submitted<\/p>\n<p>that in fact after getting permission dated 04.10.2007,<\/p>\n<p>the appellant has sold other 8 kattha land also and sale<\/p>\n<p>deed has been executed but because of restrained order<\/p>\n<p>dated 24.01.2008, the sale deed could not be presented<\/p>\n<p>for registration. The learned counsel further submitted<\/p>\n<p>that after taking the money, the appellant has spent the<\/p>\n<p>same.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">         Even if the appellants version is accepted that<\/p>\n<p>sale    deed    has    been     executed     then     also   from<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>24.01.2008, still today i.e., for about 2 \u00bd years, the<\/p>\n<p>same has not been registered.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">       From the above discussion of the materials<\/p>\n<p>available on record, the statements made in the<\/p>\n<p>Interlocutory application, counter affidavit and reply<\/p>\n<p>and rejoinder etc., it appears that during the period of<\/p>\n<p>2003-2006, property of more than 13 lakhs has already<\/p>\n<p>sold by the appellant and the only ground is that the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is ailing old lady. It may be mentioned that<\/p>\n<p>she has one son and one daughter also. No statements<\/p>\n<p>have been made by her that they are not helping her.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">       Considering the above facts and circumstances<\/p>\n<p>of the case, I direct that the order dated 24.01.2008<\/p>\n<p>and 16.01.2009 shall continue till the disposal of the<\/p>\n<p>First Appeal. In other words, the appellant is restrained<\/p>\n<p>from selling any further property by registering any<\/p>\n<p>document either sell or gift.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">       In view of the above contentions of the parties,<\/p>\n<p>it is desirable that the appeal itself be heard at an early<\/p>\n<p>date. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 &amp; 2<\/p>\n<p>submitted that he will file Vakalatnama on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.3 to 5 and the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant submitted that he will see that the appellant&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>daughter, respondent No.6 and son respondent No.7<\/p>\n<p>shall appear by filing Vakalatnama within one week.<\/p>\n<p>The learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent also<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">                                6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            submitted that Vakalatnama will be filed within one<\/p>\n<p>            week.    If Vakalatnama are field as stated above, the<\/p>\n<p>            Appeal itself may be listed for final hearing under the<\/p>\n<p>            heading for Hearing in the first week of September,<\/p>\n<p>            2010 without paper book.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">                    It is stated that the respondent No.8 is stranger<\/p>\n<p>            to the family and has neither filed written statement nor<\/p>\n<p>            contested the suit and, therefore, he is not required to<\/p>\n<p>            be heard in the Appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">                    The Interlocutory Application No.6799 of 2007 is<\/p>\n<p>            disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">\n<pre id=\"pre_3\">Sanjeev\/-                          (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.35 of 2005 SMT.KRISHNA KUMARI Versus BINOD MISHRA &amp; ORS &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; ORDER 36. 06\/08\/2010. Heard the parties on the Interlocutory Application No.6799 of 2007. This Interlocutory application has been filed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-257234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":971,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010"},"wordCount":971,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010","name":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-07T06:11:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-krishna-kumari-vs-binod-mishra-amp-ors-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Krishna Kumari vs Binod Mishra &amp;Amp; Ors on 6 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257234\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}