{"id":25745,"date":"2010-09-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-19T00:40:32","modified_gmt":"2015-05-18T19:10:32","slug":"n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 3781 of 2005(A)\n\n\n1. N.SATHIAN, TEACHER,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. V.M.PRADEEPAN, TEACHER,\n3. R.VINOD KUMAR, TEACHER,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA- NOTICE FOR WHOM\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n3. THE MANAGER, IRINGOTH U.P.SCHOOL,\n\n4. THE MANAGER,\n\n5. THE MANAGER,\n\n6. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.CHANDRASEKHARAN (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON\n\n Dated :15\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.\n                 = = = = = = = = == = = = == = = = = = =\n                          W.P.(C) No. 3781 OF 2005\n                 = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = =\n        DATED THIS, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010.\n\n\n                                 J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      Petitioners are specialist teachers working in various aided schools in<\/p>\n
Kozhikode District, who commenced their services with effect from<\/p>\n
28.12.1992, 8.6.1993 and 2.7.1992 respectively.          In spite of several<\/p>\n
representations and such other proceedings, their appointments were not<\/p>\n
approved till Ext.P8 order was passed by the Government on 23.3.2001<\/p>\n
wherein it was observed as follows:\n<\/p>\n
             ” xxxxxxxx          xxxxxxxxx         xxxxxxxx<\/p>\n
                          3.   Government have examined the
\n             case in detail and are pleased to approve the
\n             appointments of Sri. N. Sathyan as Drawing
\n             teacher, Iringath U.P. School, Sri. V.M. Pradeepan
\n             as Drawing teacher, Vilayatoor, Elampilad M.U.P.\n<\/p>\n
             School and Sri. Vinodkumar R. as Drawing teacher
\n             in Muyipoth M.U.P. School in the posts that
\n             existed in their respective schools.”\n<\/p>\n
Projecting the further grievance that no consequential orders were passed<\/p>\n
pursuant to Ext.P8, the petitioners approached this Court by filing O.P. No.<\/p>\n
38308 of 2001, which culminated in Ext.P9 judgment, whereby the second<\/p>\n
respondent was directed to pass consequential orders on the claim of the<\/p>\n
petitioners for approval of their appointments on the basis of Ext.P8 order,<\/p>\n
in accordance with law, within one month as specified. It was also made<\/p>\n
WP(C) 3781\/2005                        2<\/span><\/p>\n
clear by this Court that on approval of the appointment of the petitioners,<\/p>\n
the salary due to them shall be released within one month thereafter. The<\/p>\n
case of the petitioners is that pursuant to the above verdict of this Court,<\/p>\n
consequential orders were passed by the second respondent, however,<\/p>\n
granting approval with effect from 16.7.2001 and confining the benefit of<\/p>\n
salary only with effect from that date as borne by Exts. P10 to P12<\/p>\n
appointment orders.    Even though the petitioners sought to challenge the<\/p>\n
denial of salary with retrospective effect before the higher departmental<\/p>\n
authorities, the same did not turn up fruitful as evident from Ext.P14 to P16,<\/p>\n
which, in turn, are under challenge in this writ petition.<\/p>\n
      2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there<\/p>\n
is absolutely no reason for restricting the benefit of salary to the petitioners<\/p>\n
with effect from 16.7.2001 and that the petitioners are entitled to have the<\/p>\n
salary with retrospective effect. Reliance is also sought to be placed on<\/p>\n
Exts.P1 to P7 Government orders whereby such benefits are extended to<\/p>\n
similarly situated persons. According to the petitioners, denial of the<\/p>\n
benefits, to    which   they are entitled to,      is   an instance of clear<\/p>\n
discrimination and bitter arbitrariness.\n<\/p>\n
      3.   The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the<\/p>\n
respondents submits,     with reference to the contention in the counter<\/p>\n
WP(C) 3781\/2005                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
affidavit filed, that no posts were existing in the concerned schools to have<\/p>\n
accommodated the petitioners, for giving approval with effect from<\/p>\n
retrospective date and to have given salary accordingly. It is pointed out<\/p>\n
that pursuant to Ext.P9 judgment, consequential orders were passed based<\/p>\n
on Ext. P8 Government order, whereby supernumerary specialist teacher<\/p>\n
posts were sanctioned in respect of staff fixation orders of the succeeding<\/p>\n
year to the respective schools and that the salary has been disbursed to the<\/p>\n
petitioners with effect from 16.7.2001. It is also stated that the continuation<\/p>\n
of the petitioners in the schools earlier was quite unauthorized and that the<\/p>\n
manager of the aided school had appointed the petitioners in irregular posts<\/p>\n
and hence their appointments cannot be approved with retrospective effect.<\/p>\n
      4. True, the petitioners might have been continuing as aforesaid,<\/p>\n
though such posts were not sanctioned         and as such salary cannot be<\/p>\n
claimed as a matter of right. But the consequential orders (Exts. P10 to<\/p>\n
P12) passed by the concerned authorities (on the basis of Ext.P8 order<\/p>\n
passed by the Government deciding to approve the appointment) do not<\/p>\n
give any plausible explanation, as apparent from the records, to sustain the<\/p>\n
stand taken by the concerned respondents in limiting the benefit of salary to<\/p>\n
be with effect from 16.7.2001, in spite of the admitted fact that the<\/p>\n
petitioners were continuing in the school with effect from 1992-93. When<\/p>\n
WP(C) 3781\/2005                        4<\/span><\/p>\n
reference is made in Exts.P10 to P12 that the approval was given with effect<\/p>\n
from 16.7.2001 (referring Government vide Ext.P8 order), this Court does<\/p>\n
not find any such observation stated as made by the Government in Ext.P8<\/p>\n
order).   It was the scope of the said order ie. Ext.P8, which was examined<\/p>\n
by this Court while passing Ext.P9 judgment,            whereby the second<\/p>\n
respondent was directed to pass consequential orders making it clear that<\/p>\n
the salary shall be disbursed accordingly. Similarly, absolutely nothing is<\/p>\n
forthcoming from the part of the respondents with regard to the course<\/p>\n
pursued by the Government\/authorities in respect of other persons similarly<\/p>\n
situated like the petitioners, giving the benefit of salary with retrospective<\/p>\n
effect as borne out by Exts.P1 to P7; but for stating that it was done only as<\/p>\n
a special case on “humanitarian consideration”.               The so called<\/p>\n
“humanitarian consideration”      as projected by the learned Government<\/p>\n
Pleader, why happened to be not extended to the petitioners or whether<\/p>\n
there is anything ‘inhuman’ in their case, is not discernible from the<\/p>\n
materials on record. As it stands so, the reason for treating the petitioners,<\/p>\n
placing them on a different pedestal than the beneficiaries of Exts. P1 to P7,<\/p>\n
has necessarily to be examined by the Government, more so when Ext.P8<\/p>\n
order granting approval, after taking note of the service of the petitioners<\/p>\n
from 1992-93 stipulates to have them accommodated in the posts “existed”<\/p>\n
WP(C) 3781\/2005                        5<\/span><\/p>\n
in the concerned schools and obviously not with reference to any future<\/p>\n
vacancy.\n<\/p>\n
      5. In the above circumstances, the impugned orders are set aside and<\/p>\n
the first respondent is directed to consider the matter with regard to the<\/p>\n
extent of salary payable to the petitioners pursuant to Ext.P8 order granting<\/p>\n
approval, in the light of the contents of Ext.P9 judgment and also in the<\/p>\n
light of Exts. P1 to P7 orders granting benefits retrospectively to some<\/p>\n
others who are stated as similarly situated. Proceedings in this regard shall<\/p>\n
be finalised, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, as<\/p>\n
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from<\/p>\n
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the first respondent finds<\/p>\n
that any amount is liable to be paid to the petitioners as above, the same<\/p>\n
shall be caused to be disbursed within a further period of two months<\/p>\n
thereafter.\n<\/p>\n
      The writ petition is allowed to the above extent. There will be no<\/p>\n
order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                          P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
\n                                                                   (JUDGE)<\/p>\n
KNC\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 3781 of 2005(A) 1. N.SATHIAN, TEACHER, … Petitioner 2. V.M.PRADEEPAN, TEACHER, 3. R.VINOD KUMAR, TEACHER, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA- NOTICE FOR WHOM … Respondent 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, 3. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nN.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1096,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\",\"name\":\"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010"},"wordCount":1096,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010","name":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-18T19:10:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sathian-vs-state-of-kerala-notice-for-whom-on-15-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N.Sathian vs State Of Kerala- Notice For Whom on 15 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}