{"id":257821,"date":"2010-06-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2"},"modified":"2014-08-21T16:29:58","modified_gmt":"2014-08-21T10:59:58","slug":"captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24644 of 2003(H)\n\n\n1. CAPTAIN C.P.GIRILAL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB MATHEW MANALIL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.C.C.THOMAS, SC, K.S.E.B\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :22\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.\n\n                ------------------------------\n               W.P.(C).No.24644 of 2003\n                ------------------------------\n\n          Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2010\n\n\n                    J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     1.     The petitioner is challenging Ext.P5 demand<\/p>\n<p>for payment of an amount of Rs.1,03,434\/-, towards<\/p>\n<p>penalty   on   detection     of    unauthorised     additional<\/p>\n<p>connected load. Petitioner is a consumer of Electricity<\/p>\n<p>for running a restaurant, under the 2nd respondent with<\/p>\n<p>Consumer No:1139. According to the petitioner, he has<\/p>\n<p>approached the 2nd respondent during January 2000 for<\/p>\n<p>converting the connection as 3-Phase supply. The 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent had introduced one Sri.Mathew John, a<\/p>\n<p>licensed Wireman, to do the necessary wiring and to<\/p>\n<p>complete the required formalities for getting the<\/p>\n<p>connection altered as 3-Phase.          It is stated that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had paid an amount of Rs.20,100\/- to the said<\/p>\n<p>Sri.Mathew John.     But he has not done anything as<\/p>\n<p>promised. On 6.3.2000 the petitioner lodged a complaint<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03              -2-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">\n<p>against Sri.Mathew John before the police authorities, a<\/p>\n<p>copy of which is marked as Ext.P1. According to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, as a vengeance against the said action,<\/p>\n<p>authorities of 1st respondent Board conducted an<\/p>\n<p>inspection at the premises on 24.3.2000. Based on the<\/p>\n<p>inspection Ext.P2 demand was issued directing the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to remit a sum of Rs.59,517\/- on or before<\/p>\n<p>10.4.2000. Through Ext.P3 the petitioner requested to<\/p>\n<p>furnish split up details of the demand. But such request<\/p>\n<p>was not responded and therefore he submitted Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>representation to the Chairman of the 1st respondent<\/p>\n<p>Board, in the year 2000 itself. As per the averments in<\/p>\n<p>the writ petition there was no response, but Ext.P5 notice<\/p>\n<p>was issued in July 2003 threatening recovery steps<\/p>\n<p>alleging default in payment of      Rs.1,03,434\/-.   It is<\/p>\n<p>contended that the entire action of the respondents are<\/p>\n<p>totally malafide as it is motivated by extraneous<\/p>\n<p>considerations and since it is taken only to wreak<\/p>\n<p>vengeance against the petitioner because he instituted<\/p>\n<p>criminal complaint against the above said Sri.Mathew<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03              -3-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">\n<p>John.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">      2.       Respondents in their counter affidavit had<\/p>\n<p>produced Ext.R1(a), which is the Mahazar prepared by<\/p>\n<p>the Anti Power Theft Squad (APTS) at the time of<\/p>\n<p>inspection.      It contains a list of installations and<\/p>\n<p>Electrical appliances found at the premises.          The<\/p>\n<p>Mahazar contains signature of the Manager of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, Sri.Deepu. According to the respondents, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was using unauthorised additional load of 6<\/p>\n<p>KW.      Ext.R1(b) is the notice issued to the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>enclosing Ext.R1(c) bill for penal charges. The amount<\/p>\n<p>demanded in Ext.R1(c) was subsequently corrected and<\/p>\n<p>per Exts.R1(d) and R1(e) were issued for Rs.57,357\/-.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.R1(f) is a statement given by the petitioner to the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent conceding that he had already removed the<\/p>\n<p>additional connected load of 6KW and therefore<\/p>\n<p>requesting to refrain from disconnecting the supply. It is<\/p>\n<p>pertinent to note that the date of Ext.R1(f) is 29.3.2000,<\/p>\n<p>whereas according to the petitioner on 29.3.2000 he had<\/p>\n<p>submitted Ext.P3. But the respondent denies receipt of<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03                -4-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p>any such letter as Ext.P3.         On a comparison of the<\/p>\n<p>signature contained in Exts.P3 and R1(f), I am of the<\/p>\n<p>opinion that Ext.R1(f) bears true signature of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">      3.    It is revealed through the counter affidavit that,<\/p>\n<p>against the demand under Ext.R1(d) the petitioner had<\/p>\n<p>filed a civil suit as O.S.732\/2000 before the Munsiff<\/p>\n<p>Court, Thiruvananthapuram and obtained an injunction<\/p>\n<p>against disconnection of supply.         But he failed to<\/p>\n<p>prosecute the suit by paying balance court fee and<\/p>\n<p>consequently the suit was dismissed on 26.9.2001, as per<\/p>\n<p>Judgment Ext.R1(i).        It is further revealed that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had also filed an appeal before the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority,      the   Deputy    Chief   Engineer     (APTS),<\/p>\n<p>Thiruvananthapuram. Ext.R1(j) is a letter issued by the<\/p>\n<p>said authority requiring the petitioner to pay 25% as pre-<\/p>\n<p>condition for granting stay against realisation of the<\/p>\n<p>amount in dispute, pending disposal of the appeal. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was also requested to furnish further<\/p>\n<p>documents and details with respect to the subject matter<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03               -5-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p>of the appeal. But the petitioner had not pursued that<\/p>\n<p>remedy also, nor had he remitted 25% as demanded.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">      4.    It is evident and clear that the petitioner had<\/p>\n<p>suppressed material facts regarding the steps taken by<\/p>\n<p>him to challenge the impugned demand before the civil<\/p>\n<p>court and before the Appellate Authority. It is evident<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner has not approached this court with<\/p>\n<p>clean hands revealing all relevant facts on the issue. At<\/p>\n<p>the same time argument of the petitioner is that this<\/p>\n<p>court need to look into the allegations of malafides and<\/p>\n<p>should take note of the manifest injustice done with<\/p>\n<p>respect to raising a high demand of penal charges.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">      5.    With respect to the allegations of malafides,<\/p>\n<p>apart from assertion of the petitioner that the entire<\/p>\n<p>action was instigated due to vengeance, because the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner      had   initiated criminal   action   against<\/p>\n<p>Sri.Mathew John, there is nothing on record to show that<\/p>\n<p>the inspection conducted by the APTS was on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>any such action. On the other hand, there is no denial<\/p>\n<p>from the side of the petitioner with respect to the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03              -6-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">\n<p>unauthorised additional load.      As per the provisions<\/p>\n<p>contained in the Conditions of Supply of Electrical<\/p>\n<p>Energy, usage of unauthorised additional load is liable to<\/p>\n<p>be imposed with penalty. If the consumer has got any<\/p>\n<p>dispute regarding the liability or with respect to<\/p>\n<p>correctness of such penal charges imposed, the said<\/p>\n<p>regulations provide for effective appellate remedy. In the<\/p>\n<p>case at hand, the petitioner has chosen to resort to such<\/p>\n<p>remedy by filing appeal. But he failed to pursue the said<\/p>\n<p>remedy.       Apart from that he has also impugned the<\/p>\n<p>demand by filing civil suit, which also he failed to pursue.<\/p>\n<p>Further, as stated above, the petitioner had purposefully<\/p>\n<p>suppressed all such material facts in this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">      6.    Under the above mentioned circumstances I am<\/p>\n<p>of the opinion that this court is not justified in examining<\/p>\n<p>correctness of the demand or to enter upon any<\/p>\n<p>adjudication on disputed facts regarding basis on which<\/p>\n<p>such demand is raised. Therefore, I am of the considered<\/p>\n<p>opinion that the writ petition could not be entertained<\/p>\n<p>and the same is liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">W.P.(C).24644\/03              -7-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">\n<p id=\"p_14\">      7.    However, learned counsel for the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>brought to my attention a Division Bench decision of this<\/p>\n<p>court in W.A.No:1231\/2003 dt.9.11.2005. It is held<\/p>\n<p>therein that in case of detection of unauthorised<\/p>\n<p>connected load, imposition of maximum penalty is<\/p>\n<p>unwarranted in all cases. In other words, when there is<\/p>\n<p>no theft or mischief done with any intention to extort<\/p>\n<p>electrical energy, mere installation of unauthorised<\/p>\n<p>connected load may not invite maximum penalty provided<\/p>\n<p>under the relevant regulations. Considering the dictum<\/p>\n<p>laid in the above said judgment, I am of the opinion that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner can be given a chance to make<\/p>\n<p>representation before the 1st respondent seeking for re-<\/p>\n<p>consideration of the quantum of penalty imposed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">      8.    If the petitioner makes any representation as<\/p>\n<p>above to the Secretary of the 1st respondent Board, the<\/p>\n<p>same will be considered and appropriate decision will be<\/p>\n<p>taken by the Secretary, after affording an opportunity of<\/p>\n<p>hearing to the petitioner as early as possible, at any rate<\/p>\n<p>within a period of two months from the date of receipt of<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).24644\/03            -8-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">\n<p>such representation. It is also left to the petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>move before that authority seeking to keep in abeyance<\/p>\n<p>any coercive steps for recovery till such a decision is<\/p>\n<p>taken.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">      The writ petition is disposed of with the above<\/p>\n<p>directions.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">\n<p id=\"p_19\">                       C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">okb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24644 of 2003(H) 1. CAPTAIN C.P.GIRILAL, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, &#8230; Respondent 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB MATHEW MANALIL For Respondent :SRI.C.C.THOMAS, SC, K.S.E.B The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-257821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1284,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2"},"wordCount":1284,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2","name":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-21T10:59:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/captain-c-p-girilal-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-22-june-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Captain C.P.Girilal vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 22 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257821\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}