{"id":258061,"date":"2009-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-16T08:47:09","modified_gmt":"2017-03-16T03:17:09","slug":"the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
EN *m\u00a7\u00ab: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA_ AT    \"\n\nDATED THIS THE 28\"' DAY OF     5 T  A\n\nBEFORE' ._ \"'~~.._ m u j\nTHEHcw'B;.EMR.Jzss2\"1c\u00a7: ,s:%..4uk5%i9zs;z%.;\\:42\u00a3:z;?;I2% \n\nRgavmg FIRSTg4P\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7;@ M). Qgg:._{,g._\n\nBetween:\n\nThe Bazzgaiore BeveEop1ne'\u00a7:;_siXui};_cqfit3;.  \nT.Chowdaiah Road,      \nK11maraPark W;:s_;\u00a3,  1'\n\nBangaIr::re-~2}') , H = 'I, .  .\nRapid. Byits (3;{3n1r:i\u00a7ssiGiH:r_.,  \u00ab. ' '  Appellant\".\n\n(By 3;-1' 1.G.Gacheh;nama1i; ;  %\n\nArid 3 .\n\n1 A  Fhilm, 'V .\n\n' _ Six)  \nPaiiatiil\u00e9 'N 531%\": Eaiai\ufb02ze Society',\nHenna: RC-a\u00a7;'\u00a7:}1a}fa3{af6 Viiiage,\nBanziswadi PM,\n\nVA [  - ,. ,  V..Bangai\u00e9r\u00a7_ 560 043.\n\n   \n\n.  SEQ TX. Pappy,\n _ N53, 32, Anjarzeya Swamy Tempie,\nV 'f3\"BIock Extansion,\n\n .  Marappa Garden,\n\nBangaiora --- 560 646..\n\n \n\n\n\nciaim petitimis on 8.4.1938 and 6.6.1988    \nkathedars had chaiienged the said acquigi\ufb01qn  2 \"  ~.  \nW.?.\"N0.30451,f1983 dam 2.7.1937, w:i1ich .jwas:~f\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a7z:\u00a74i2*.3g;\u00a7! \ufb01\ufb01; i\u00a7i\u00a7- ,'__ j\nHigh Ceurt. The kathedars have rec:=:\u00a712\u00a2i;~ai..\u00a71e   .\n\non 23.9.1989 and 2.5.9.1989 and posse\u00a7g'\u00a7c\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a2f1_;;eV'1a1;\u00e9:  \n\non 26.12.1988 and was handea;::\u00a7\u00a7n--:::<\u00a7wti:;L%A se\u00e9ti\u00e9n on\n29.12.1998<\/pre>\n
 for fennatien of th\u00a7..ia,\u00a7}g::t.    already<\/p>\n
been acquire\u00e9 by    ;>’a.\ufb01\ufb021ority (‘BDA”<\/p>\n
far simr\ufb01),  ques2i* xr\u00e9s\ufb01ing    EDA \u00abfees moi arise. The<\/p>\n
piainiiff does 110\u00a3i’:3.i2e  Vi\u00e9iie or irxteresi; aver {lie sa\ufb01i ian\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n
5.”  the b3Si$– pf the Vpieadizxgs of tile parties, iha cozzrt<\/p>\n
I Eyel\ufb01iv’  framed. vfe\ufb01owing issues:\n<\/p>\n
   -vr\u00e9verty?\n<\/p>\n
“3”;*–\u00a5\u00a7’1ai\u00a7%i1\u00a3:r i\u00a51e piainti\ufb01’ provea that he is the ewner esf
\n x the gixit. apmperty and that he is in posgession of suit<\/p>\n
9′
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\n‘2<\/p>\n
2. Eli\u00e9hetizer \ufb01le plaintiff proves thai on 2.14i.1995′-gt
\nabeut 3 pm, {he o\ufb02icials ei’ \ufb01rs: def\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a31′.i3i\u00a7{   ‘<\/p>\n
in his possessien efsuit property?\n<\/p>\n
3. Wixe\ufb02lef DJ: proves that {he siz\u00e9f rm   S<\/p>\n
under Seetion 64 eftlze     <\/p>\n
4. Whether the piairiti\ufb01”   {frayed<\/p>\n
for?\n<\/p>\n
S Wizf\ufb01t   ‘ <\/p>\n
6.  “as ?.WI and ducunlenis<\/p>\n
BEEP} to E_:<.P3{:}iE:a;ve bfafszjz  in his evidence. The ieame\u00e9i<\/p>\n
_v'{\u00a7i<3::1\u00a71sa1.. $;;pg:\u00a3{ri;1g f0rV"Vf'1$:%%-\u00abAdefendant has cms5\u00abe:x:ami:;ed 3319:<\/p>\n
piaiz\u00e9ti\ufb01ii'\u00a7~}\u00a7x;gr.<;f%,%::\u00a7\u00a7;"~z1{\u00a7wi\u00e9erzce was let it: by me defendants' After<\/p>\n
' V'  . , csnsidetriiiig the 0272;: aiiz\u00e9 dacrazneniary evidence an regard, the csauri<\/p>\n
 \ufb01\u00e9igw has a'\u00a2;=:\u00e9r's:_e\u00e9 133% gait.\n<\/p>\n
 V’ ., ” E  i:G’Gachchinan1a\ufb01L ieameci Counsei appearing far the<\/p>\n
I\u00bb   iilouid contend ihai the property in questiezn has a\ufb01rea\u00e9y<\/p>\n
?\n<\/p>\n
:53<\/p>\n
8. On the ether hand, ieamed Ceunsel appea\ufb01x3gA–‘\u00a7\ufb01”   j” <\/p>\n
respentienis submits that the plaintiff is; ..t%:\u00a2_ owii\u00e9f ”    <\/p>\n
p0SS\u00a3SS\u00a7GI1 afthe pmperties in questmr: haxsiiig  ‘d~  7 A<\/p>\n
under the sale deeds EXPI to Ex.?=$\u00a7TVfl”\u00a71\u00a2’ pi\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7$\ufb01i’  <\/p>\n
sanctioned {\ufb02ax} from the cetnpetent a::tIi:6riti\u00a3~svL and’  up
\ncmasizuciien thereon an\u00e9 that  T    g\u00e9\u00e9ogsgssitxn and
\nenjeymezzi of the sai\u00e9 ‘p;f’opetf\u00a3i\u00e9.\u20ac_i.”  is’  .\u00ab;\u00a7i\u00a7ie11d\u00a2d that
\ncotxsiderizig the  evigicace an rewrd. The
\ncourt below has :17 ght3\u00a73’Vc’\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7;r;\u00a7\u00a3%\u00e9 _:.\u00e9\u00a7:i:it. It is \ufb01zrther submitted that<\/p>\n
the appeiism haS”‘z1p\u20ac:3:1aEie_ {Sui 34%:-$3 far producti-im sf a\ufb01diiaionai<\/p>\n
*-j”?\u00a7v?i.dx’\u00a7\u00a51C\u20ac.*\u00a3’J\u00a7–‘:thi5\u00a7A;~31;ags3. ”  _____ <\/p>\n
H ‘9:.iss%   Viiae {ivai c9111;er:11\u00a7::sns oftiie ieartla\u00e9 Cimnsel<\/p>\n
  far {he pa19\ufb01a:ag,”‘:11e.q\u00a3:esti9ns fer cunsi\u00e9ieraiien in this appeai aye:<\/p>\n
  i{:I”:}”‘.\u00a7f’$’?h%%%hfa’f the appIica:\u00a3z\u00a3c::u21~I.:i\u00a5J?\u20acG,2;’2{I\ufb028 fiieeti by \ufb01ze<\/p>\n
:kgpge1:\u00a2:\u00a3}u\ufb01de: Qrder 4;; Rule 27 0f CFC seeking pmductien of<\/p>\n
‘ V ‘ ‘ v .   evidense requires 1:0 be allewed?<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
$1<\/p>\n
‘H<\/p>\n
tbs coart beta-W. The ci_<3cun1e111:s produced aicvng \u00a7\u00a7='i:\u00a3rl1"
\nappiicatiorn are essential \ufb01n' proper ad}udicaii\u00a3m__\u00a73f"\u00a3h\u00e9"c\u00e9s$\u00e9i_.jV
\n\ufb01zrther contended that if the appeliazzt is nei:.pe1:\u00a7i2ifie\u20aci'TTise if<\/p>\n
the said docamenis, the appellant bei1ig_'a~.ggub1iC"-insiituii\u00e9gi vskffiii <\/p>\n
put to yea': loss and injury.  fofnthe.\n<\/p>\n
submits that the pmperty in qu\u00e9\ufb01iazz ‘t:\u00a71<i}fags" .aPP\u20ac1iant and –<\/p>\n
production of the saifx' _.d\u20ac)\u00a3':t,ii\ufb01\u00a3\u00a77i}'{$:  Cam to
\nproncvunce the "\n<\/p>\n
12. The ri:sp:}z\u00a7\u00e9i’Ve:i’I::e.fia1;%\u00a2’M’;:\u00a7::>i’\ufb02ied any objections to the said<\/p>\n
appiicatien. ‘I’\u00a7Vis,\u00a2.__4 Vd:)c\u00a3i\ufb011\u00e9\u00a71\u00a3%g”\u00a7:\u00a30duced aiang with the mid<\/p>\n
   \ufb01oti\ufb01catiati dated 3.11.19’?7, \ufb01saai
\n f::}\u00a7iS\u00a7;\u00e91’\u00a3*3:;1  award dateii 4.18.1932, the mahazar<\/p>\n
 ‘ V for  :31″ the prepezty in questietx, extract of
\n v\ufb02xg iayd\ufb01i   the letter if the \ufb01rst resp\u00e9mderci ‘\u00a30 the EDA.
\n s:,:it- the plaizzii\ufb02’ is far injiznctieaz, Tixerefere, the<\/p>\n
H\u00bb  H’   szzensideration in the appeai is whether the piaintiff is in<\/p>\n
 ‘   possession of the suit. schwule progeny? The -decuments<\/p>\n
?\n<\/p>\n
;E<\/p>\n
R2;\n<\/p>\n
‘J<\/p>\n
x\ufb02l<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
produced aiong with the appiication are necessary 13:} censider as to<\/p>\n
whether ihe piaintiff is in iawful possession efthe property. Ina-…
\nsuit for in_\u00a7unctic:>11, the Caurt has ta: .\u00a3nciden\u00a5:aii}r g0  ,,
\nquestion oftitie to the property. in my view, the saici doe’u;\u00a7\u00e9::\u00a7:ais’ajr%\u00e9 ” <\/p>\n
necessary to pronemlce the judgment”. T}1er\u00e9i’\u00e9rre\u00ab,.t}1\u00a3: appIiT\u00a2a$i3:1+’– ‘<\/p>\n
I.A.NG.2\/2608 requires ta be ailcmseci. V<\/p>\n
Rg.Pt:\u00a3::2 No. (til:\n<\/p>\n
13. As 13ojtic\u00e9d’abs)}?’e,M 31\u00a2’  def3ndants have \ufb01ie\u00e9 their w;*ii:ien
\nstaienlent. ‘1″h’~: witnmi; \ufb01t” was aiso eross-exaniined by<\/p>\n
the ieamed Co1ii1s:.\u00e9l’f:if the defendams. However, the<\/p>\n
_ .d\u00a7fendan1}\u00a7: ‘have nei  {‘iIi\u00a7*’ evidence. The plaintiff in his<\/p>\n
V. $1  has given the deiaiis of purchase 0f the<\/p>\n
praig\u00e9atii\ufb01\u00e9g   In the crass-exarrxinaiiorg I”.’\u00a7\u00a5i has stated<\/p>\n
Vtizat he $30: as R) the acquisiiion cf the Sand in qzsea\ufb01iorz. \ufb01e<\/p>\n
H H ”  h’a$ .”\ufb01:r\u00a5.her $:”i;a;i;e\u00e9 that he dces not know about issuance 91″ the<\/p>\n
‘pf\u00e9iixi\ufb01nafy’ 3336} final notificatitms issued by the cozzzpeterni<\/p>\n
 “–%s\u00a7{\u00a710__t5it\u00e9es far aarquisiiien 9f the Kama in qaesticsn, it is fizr\ufb01ier<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
840.200′? passed by the seam below is hereb\ufb01gr\u00e9ef  ”
\nis remanded to the court beiow for 21 \ufb01esh  (in   V’
\nwith law. The mat Court is directed    ”\n<\/p>\n
{he parties to produce acic\ufb01itigfflai
\ndocuments produced by the app\u00e91\u00a7\u00e9ii..*__1t’  \u00a311<\/p>\n
this ajprpeai) and     with<\/p>\n
Iaw’.N0c0s1:s.     ‘ _
\n   JUDGE<\/p>\n
82\u00bbm;J:2\u00a7;_?20{:;;\u00ab     _____ <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer EN *m\u00a7\u00ab: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA_ AT ” DATED THIS THE 28″‘ DAY OF 5 T A BEFORE’ ._ “‘~~.._ m u j THEHcw’B;.EMR.Jzss2″1c\u00a7: ,s:%..4uk5%i9zs;z%.;\\:42\u00a3:z;?;I2% Rgavmg FIRSTg4P\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7;@ M). Qgg:._{,g._ Between: The Bazzgaiore BeveEop1ne’\u00a7:;_siXui};_cqfit3;. T.Chowdaiah Road, K11maraPark W;:s_;\u00a3, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-258061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":867,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\",\"name\":\"The Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009"},"wordCount":867,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009","name":"The Bangalore Development ... vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-16T03:17:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-development-vs-mr-fr-philip-on-28-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Bangalore Development … vs Mr Fr Philip on 28 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258061"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258061\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}