{"id":25821,"date":"2010-07-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010"},"modified":"2018-04-11T10:43:28","modified_gmt":"2018-04-11T05:13:28","slug":"hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n
Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010<\/div>\n
      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR\n\nSINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE J.K.MAHESHWARI\n\n             CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1505 OF 1995\n\n                             Hemraj\n                               Vs.\n                           State of M.P.\n\n       Shri H.S.Dubey and Shri Abhinav Dubey, learned counsel\n       for the appellant.\n       Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Panel Advocate for the\n       respondent\/State.\n\n\n                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
                          (6\/07\/2010)<\/p>\n
      This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1st<\/p>\n
November, 1995 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara<\/p>\n
in Sessions Trial No.32\/93 convicting the appellant for the offence<\/p>\n
under Section 498-A, IPC and directing him to undergo rigorous<\/p>\n
imprisonment of two years with fine of Rs.500\/-, in default of<\/p>\n
payment of fine, additional imprisonment of six months.<\/p>\n
2.    As per prosecution story, deceased-Munni Bai @ Manorama<\/p>\n
was married with Hemraj in 1988. After about one and half year of<\/p>\n
the marriage, Shiv Prasad made a demand of Rs.10,000\/- and<\/p>\n
present appellant-Hemraj of motorcycle while mother-in-law Laxmi<\/p>\n
Bai demanded Gold to the extent of seven tolas. Deceased Munni<\/p>\n
Bai said to his father Kharagram regarding such demand of dowry<\/p>\n
to which he shown his inability. While the deceased was with her<\/p>\n
parents, Hemraj came there to take her and demanded motorcycle.<\/p>\n
On some suggestions, he had become agreed to go with<\/p>\n
deceased. After about one month deceased wrote a letter to her
\n                                   2     Cr.A No.1505\/1995<\/span><\/p>\n
father Kharagram for satisfying the demand and to come at her in-<\/p>\n
laws home. When a child was born, Kharagram paid Rs.1100\/- in<\/p>\n
cash and sent some clothes of Rs.700\/-. At that time, cash amount<\/p>\n
was returned with an insistence to pay Rs.10,000\/- and a<\/p>\n
motorcycle. Brother of the deceased namely Shiv Kumar went to<\/p>\n
the house of in-laws of the deceased on 6\/4\/1992, at that time,<\/p>\n
deceased was badly beaten by means of lathi.      Such incidents<\/p>\n
have been repeated from time to time. About 15 days prior to the<\/p>\n
date of incident, Hemraj went to parental house of the deceased<\/p>\n
and demanded motorcycle and said that otherwise they could not<\/p>\n
see the face of the deceased and on 5\/6\/1992 deceased after<\/p>\n
pouring kerosene on her body put into the fire.\n<\/p>\n
3.    On receiving information, Marg was registered by Police<\/p>\n
Station, Tendukheda and during investigation while recording the<\/p>\n
statement of Kharagram (PW-4), father of the deceased, offence<\/p>\n
under Sections 304-B and 498-A, IPC was registered against<\/p>\n
accused Hemraj, Shiv Prasad and Laxmi Bai.\n<\/p>\n
4.    Laxmi Bai was acquitted by the trial Court while Hemraj and<\/p>\n
Shiv Prasad were convicted for the offence under Section 498-A,<\/p>\n
IPC and acquitted them for the charge under Section 304-B, IPC.<\/p>\n
During pendency of this appeal, Shiv Prasad died and the appeal<\/p>\n
stood abated against him.      Now this appeal is on behalf of<\/p>\n
appellant-Hemraj, husband of the deceased, against the conviction<\/p>\n
and sentence for the charge under Section 498-A, IPC as<\/p>\n
aforementioned.\n<\/p>\n
                                  3      Cr.A No.1505\/1995<\/span><\/p>\n
5.    Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has<\/p>\n
strenuously urged that the conviction is solely relying upon the<\/p>\n
testimony of Kharagram (PW-4) while the incidents of harassment,<\/p>\n
cruelty and demand of dowry as narrated by him, is on the basis of<\/p>\n
the statement of his sons namely Shiv Kumar and Rammu @<\/p>\n
Ramkumar. The prosecution has not examined Shiv Kumar and<\/p>\n
Rammu @ Ramkumar and has not called those witnesses in the<\/p>\n
witness box, however, the allegation of demand of dowry, cruelty<\/p>\n
and harassment as alleged by the prosecution could not be<\/p>\n
established by the cogent evidence. Therefore, the finding<\/p>\n
recorded by the trial Court convicting the appellant for the charge<\/p>\n
under Section 498-A, IPC is liable to be set aside and the appeal<\/p>\n
deserves to be allowed.\n<\/p>\n
6.    Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Panel Lawyer for the<\/p>\n
respondent\/State, has drawn my attention to the statement of<\/p>\n
Kharagram (PW-4) and submitted that in his statement, he himself<\/p>\n
stated several incidents of harassment, cruelty and demand of<\/p>\n
dowry which were conveyed to him by the deceased.             It is<\/p>\n
submitted by him that except one or two incidents which were<\/p>\n
reported by Shiv Kumar and Rammu @ Ramkumar, brother of the<\/p>\n
deceased, all other incidents regarding harassment, cruelty and<\/p>\n
demand of dowry were reported directly by the deceased against<\/p>\n
Hemraj, Shiv Prasad and Laxmi Bai to Kharagram (PW-4) which<\/p>\n
were specifically stated by him before the Court.       In   cross-<\/p>\n
examination, testimony of Kharagram (PW-4) remained vivid,
\n                                      4      Cr.A No.1505\/1995<\/span><\/p>\n
however, the conviction has rightly been based by the trial Court on<\/p>\n
the sole testimony of Kharagram (PW-4) which is not liable to be<\/p>\n
interfered with by this Court. In view of the said submissions, it is<\/p>\n
urged that the conviction and sentence of appellant be maintained.<\/p>\n
7.      At this stage, Shri Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant,<\/p>\n
submits that in an alternative if this Court is of the opinion that the<\/p>\n
conviction for the charge under Section 498-A, IPC is found<\/p>\n
established, then the sentence as awarded by the trial Court may<\/p>\n
be reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant by<\/p>\n
increasing some amount of fine. The attention of this Court has<\/p>\n
been drawn by him that the incident had taken place on 5\/6\/1992<\/p>\n
and the period of 18 years has already been passed away. The<\/p>\n
appellant was taken into custody on 15\/7\/1992 and released on<\/p>\n
bail as per order dated 12\/1\/1993, however, remained in custody<\/p>\n
for about four months. Thus, by increasing some amount of fine,<\/p>\n
sentence already undergone may be treated as sufficient.<\/p>\n
8.      After having heard learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n
parties, I have gone through the record and perused the allegations<\/p>\n
as alleged by the prosecution which is based on the testimony of<\/p>\n
Kharagram (PW-4), father of the deceased. The said testimony<\/p>\n
found worthy of credence by the trial Court and relying upon the<\/p>\n
same trial Court recorded the finding of conviction for the charge<\/p>\n
under     Section   498-A,    IPC.       Learned   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n
appellant\/accused is not in a position to demonstrate that such<\/p>\n
finding is perverse and the argument of learned Panel Lawyer
\n                                  5      Cr.A No.1505\/1995<\/span><\/p>\n
found support from the record. Thus, in the opinion of this court,<\/p>\n
the finding as recorded by the trial Court convicting the appellant<\/p>\n
under Section 498-A, IPC is liable to be upheld.<\/p>\n
9.     In view of the aforesaid, the alternate prayer of learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the appellant is of some substance. On perusal of the<\/p>\n
record, the incident had taken place on            5\/6\/1992 and the<\/p>\n
impugned judgment has been passed on 1st November, 1995.<\/p>\n
The appellant has remained into custody about four months. The<\/p>\n
appeal is pending since last more than 15 years, however, at this<\/p>\n
stage, the opinion of this Court to send back the appellant into<\/p>\n
custody may not be appropriate.      Thus, looking to the date of<\/p>\n
incident and the period of pendency of this appeal and the fact that<\/p>\n
the appellant has already undergone the sentence for about four<\/p>\n
months and deposited a fine of Rs.500\/-, as directed by the trial<\/p>\n
Court, however, by increasing the amount of fine of Rs.7,000\/-<\/p>\n
more making total such amount of fine to Rs.7,500\/-, the sentence<\/p>\n
of two years as awarded by the trial Court deserves to be reduced<\/p>\n
and such amount of fine be deposited by the appellant within two<\/p>\n
months from today. It is made clear that in default of depositing<\/p>\n
such amount, the appellant shall undergo sentence as awarded by<\/p>\n
the trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
10.    In view of foregoing, this appeal is allowed in part.    The<\/p>\n
conviction of appellant for the charge under Section 498-A, IPC is<\/p>\n
hereby maintained but the sentence of two year is reduced to the<\/p>\n
extent of sentence already undergone by the appellant subject to
\n                                   6      Cr.A No.1505\/1995<\/span><\/p>\n
enhancing the amount of fine of Rs.7,000\/- which is liable to be<\/p>\n
deposited within a period of two months from today. In default, the<\/p>\n
sentence as awarded by the trial Court, shall be restored, and the<\/p>\n
concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate is at liberty to issue warrant of<\/p>\n
arrest against the appellant to send him jail to serve out the<\/p>\n
remaining part of the sentence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                        (J.K.MAHESHWARI)
\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n
ts\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE J.K.MAHESHWARI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1505 OF 1995 Hemraj Vs. State of M.P. Shri H.S.Dubey and Shri Abhinav Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1288,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010"},"wordCount":1288,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010","name":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T05:13:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemraj-anr-vs-the-state-of-m-p-on-6-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hemraj & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 6 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25821\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}