{"id":25835,"date":"2009-09-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-15T00:05:57","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T18:35:57","slug":"basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED TI-Hs THE 15TH DAY OF sEpTEMB_\u00a7:R-,C2_i\u00a2_\u00e9   _\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. J'{}STI.CE .A.s. .;\u00a76\u00a7>A\u00a7%raA'   V\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL N9. 5313\/'2\u00a2o9\";1g3:m,j':A\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nBASAVARAJ s\/0\nBASAPPA UDNUR,\n\nAGE:39 YEARS,\nOCCBUSINESS, -- V ;\nR\/AT GULEDGUDDA,  -- \nTAL: BADAMI;   --\n\nD1sTR1cT:13.AGA\u00a7;1{:Q*r.Q$s%  1; . 1' V  APPELLANT\n(By Sri. S.B';}-\u00a7E~3-F3'BAL--L'IV  ADVS.)\nAND5;  'A C\n\n1. SMTSUMITRA W\/'Q  '\nMALLAPPA'vPATTAR, -~\nAGE; 53 YEARS, '\n\n;\u00ab:'=sCc_:}~IQUsE\"i--:c>.I,_r3~ WORK,\n\n_ 'R\/OCBIJAPUR,\n\n' \"TAL;vBEJAPUR-586 101.\n\n. 'sCRI.1RA'3s\u00a7N:A s\/0\n'---BHIM1'XNfNA PATTAR @\nSANGAM,\n\nAGE'; 43 YEARS,\n\nL3' ' \n\n \" 'QCC:BUSINESS,\n= .._R.;'AT GULEDGUDDA,\n\n$\n\n';\n\n\n\nTAL:BADAMI ,\nDISTRICT:BAGALKOT~587203.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(BY SRI.B.M.ANGADI, ADV. FOR R1 82; R2)<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEcTIoN;’_:i’0o’ _
\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT 82; DECREE DATED 1.?\/..2i\/200.9
\nPASSED IN R.A.NO.14\/2006 ON THE  “CI\\.?.IL” <\/p>\n
JDUGE(SR.DN.),I3ADAIvII, ALL0wvING”THEe_A-PPEALRFILED
\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT ANEi_”~’DECRE_E DATED<\/p>\n
21\/12\/2005 PASSED IN O.S\u00bb.N_O.19l0\/A1998 0N”.ITHE”PII.E”oP’=_
\nTHE CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN.),E.ADAMI, DEcREEI1N’G’TH.E’SUIT-~.<\/p>\n
FILED FOR PERMANENT INJUNGTIQN.\n<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL CO~MINCr ‘oN3..1Eo’R. ADIVIISSION THIS
\nDAY, THE COURT DELl'{“ERE–\u00a3) THE ‘PoI,LowING:<\/p>\n
The 1. epepeIfieIri–_: “Ii.e:etm_ i–S 1li,Iie_ plaintiff in O.S. No.
\n190\/1998,’ thlel’lf:S1Ilt\u00bbe.’l4irIIA_:ll’C;1.IeStion was filed Seeking for
\njudgment”eand.V “0iI:”;ll..”‘permanent injunction. The trial<\/p>\n
Co\ufb01rtll by itSV.’jl.i\u00abC’1:gl?l”1HC’flt and decree dtd. 21\/12\/2005 had<\/p>\n
A de.oreevdS~uit in favour of the plaintiff. The 15* defendant<\/p>\n
 .jnla.d_qiiezdfionedlllthe judgment and decree of the trial Court in<\/p>\n
Relgular: I\ufb02pfoeal before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) Badami in<\/p>\n
V.   ARi~;A’. No’). 14\/ 2006. The Lower Appellate Court has reversed<\/p>\n
C .ltlhe”l”1nding recorded bytbhe Trial Court and has dismissed<\/p>\n
the suit by allowing the appeal. The plaintiff therefore is
\nbefore this Court, against the divergent judgment rendered
\nby the Court Below.\n<\/p>\n
2. Heard the learned counsel for parties <\/p>\n
the appeal papers.\n<\/p>\n
:3. The case of the plaintiffbefoire  lCo.urt”.is<\/p>\n
that the plaintiff was the tenant  of <\/p>\n
schedule property, which is byhthe lit  In a i it<\/p>\n
suit between the same partie.s..iii:n..O:Sg. No.”’24_\/19.598, which<\/p>\n
has been filed by the pri:=sents_pilainitifffseeking for injunction<\/p>\n
against the .lSi’idefensdarit’landlord against interference, the
\nparties  entered’  compromise. In that View even<\/p>\n
tho_iighn.as per’-the original lease agreement the plaintiff was<\/p>\n
 ‘to_iva_ciaite  year 2000 he had agreed to vacate at the<\/p>\n
 ._earlier*  time in the year 1998 and consequent<\/p>\n
agieeeineintwas that in the event of 13* defendant were to sell<\/p>\n
 the property, the same would be offered at the first instance<\/p>\n
 the plaintiff and accordingly the plaintiff vacated the<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
95<\/span><\/p>\n
premises. Subsequently the plaintiff has contended that
\nsince he had noticed an advertisement in the newspaper
\nwith regard to the sale property he had approached thetrial<\/p>\n
Court in the present suit to injunct the IS’ defenidatri’tii”~rio’nji<\/p>\n
seiiing the property to any other person and that V’ <\/p>\n
the injunction was sought. ‘f’hejdefe’ndant before_thie:i\u00ab’tria1<\/p>\n
Court had disputed the case putforth the >1.I’)i=.”.-!._ib1″1″E.1:1′.f. ” ,1}:<\/p>\n
iight of the rival contentionsv,..jthe triai…Cou_r_t uhadmframedd<\/p>\n
three issues for its consideration} The piain-tiff examined
\nhimself as P.W.1 and niar?g:ed’Latt–.Exs.P~1 to 5 and<\/p>\n
witness was a1sov.._exa;_rnined; asi’~F’.W.2.”;\u00ab The 1st defendant<\/p>\n
examined iherseif  D.W.I.’1 and a witness was examined as
\nD.W.2.7.’I’h~e Ti’iai”Court._on.anaiysing the evidence has come<\/p>\n
to a. CO\ufb02C1tI’SiCY1′.that.”.th\u00e9: injunction as sought for is to be<\/p>\n
   As again’s’t”the \ufb01nding rendered by the Triai Court<\/p>\n
 “when. “defendant was before the Lower Appeilate<\/p>\n
Court, the Appeiiate Court apart from reappreciating<\/p>\n
 the evidence has come to the conclusion that even in the<\/p>\n
A  nature of the understanding in 0.8. No. 24\/1998 a copy of<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
“3<\/p>\n
‘which was marked as Ex.P–3, the suit in the present nature<\/p>\n
would not be maintainable since the plaintiff Wouldto<\/p>\n
seek appropriate remedy in accordance with  :,\u00a2h_e <\/p>\n
instant case no such declaration hasbeen sought; . <\/p>\n
4. The learned counsel ‘for appellant hoewie-izere_Vsou_ghtl to  *<\/p>\n
assail the said \ufb01nding of   l(}1ourt and
\ncontend that the ptl\ufb01\u00e9  the Lower
\nAppellate Courtywith   of the suit
\nitself would”  of law for
\nconsideratlion\u00ab::_i’_iinal.this   learned counsel for
\nrespondelnti’  said contention would
\ncontend. that inlwppithe._iaets~evolving in the present case the<\/p>\n
Lower Appiellaltew Court at the first instance has rendered a<\/p>\n
   fact withregard to the nature of right claimed and<\/p>\n
  sthete.feretitt’lvthet View has held that the prayer made in the<\/p>\n
preisent_siuil\u00a7_ could not have been granted by the Trial court<\/p>\n
 and therefore the judgment is perfectly justified.<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
-5<\/p>\n
5. In the light of the facts noticed above and the
\ncontentions urged by the learned counsel, the fact relating to
\nthe earlier suit in ().S. No. 24\/1998 ending in the nature of<\/p>\n
the Order passed as marked as Ex.P–3 is <\/p>\n
However, what requires to be noticed is that even_hin”th’ath”~<\/p>\n
background as to whether the suit’–pres–entl\u00a7:”\ufb01l’edV  the 9<\/p>\n
plaintiff in o.s. No. 190\/ 1998 hadto “conisir1le1′.e_d<\/p>\n
to enforce the alleged right of -pre.–_emp.tion wuhi-ch”\u20ac=1rlieri’suit. in order to
\nconsider this aspect ofithte   the plaint \ufb01led<\/p>\n
in O.S. No. 190\/  vindicate”. th\u00e9ttieven though the<\/p>\n
plainztiffmhiadtjl’nari:ated:Zthe vwith regard to the earlier
\nmanner  ended in O.S. No. 24\/ 1998 the<\/p>\n
ultimate cause of .Iacti.on'” iivhich has been pleaded in the suit<\/p>\n
  is-ithatfthe A13′ defendant in the suit is likely to put the 2’25<\/p>\n
  in possession pursuant to a lease. It is in that<\/p>\n
 the made in the suit for injunction would have to<\/p>\n
be considered in the present suit. Therefore, if this is<\/p>\n
9′ .no’t’iced the suit as framed was not rnaintainable and to the<\/p>\n
al<\/p>\n
”v<\/p>\n
said extent the Lower Appellate Court in any event was<\/p>\n
justified in coming to a conclusion with regard_i:’toi’~t.the<\/p>\n
maintainability of the suit. All that requires <\/p>\n
is that even at this stage if the plaintiff ccnte:n_d,s”‘t.hat the <\/p>\n
pre–emption right is to be enforcedipand’ if:’itiis_iope’n t’o:”h._iIiE;1Vtin<\/p>\n
accordance with law and if such proceedings =airei..’in.itiated the V *<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings rendered in the present rela’ting to that aspect
\nof the matter would  andiall questions
\nwould remain open for,.con.sid._edratio”np!’~.Ci1t;–l’l’that view of the
\nmatter the  ‘la\ufb01vas  the appellant in
\nmy View etonsideration since ultimately
\nthe facts in  unnoticed and a \ufb01nding<\/p>\n
has been rendered by ;’\u00a7ppe’ilate Court.\n<\/p>\n
6. Accordinglyiltim appeal being devoid of merit, stands<\/p>\n
disposed. of) order as to costs. Accordingly, Misc. Civil<\/p>\n
 1o41’i”2t.J\/20-oh;ee[is.\u00a7”1ii;7\/2009 and 106529\/2009 also stand<\/p>\n
 vdisposed of–;..__  ‘  it Sd\/5″\n<\/p>\n
REESE<\/p>\n
7.. Hum I ct: Krriri?’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED TI-Hs THE 15TH DAY OF sEpTEMB_\u00a7:R-,C2_i\u00a2_\u00e9 _ BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. J'{}STI.CE .A.s. .;\u00a76\u00a7>A\u00a7%raA’ V REGULAR SECOND APPEAL N9. 5313\/’2\u00a2o9″;1g3:m,j’:A BETWEEN: BASAVARAJ s\/0 BASAPPA UDNUR, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBasavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1084,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009"},"wordCount":1084,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009","name":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-14T18:35:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavaraj-so-basappa-udnur-vs-smt-sumitra-wo-mallappa-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basavaraj, S\/O. Basappa Udnur vs Smt. Sumitra, W\/O. Mallappa … on 15 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25835","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25835"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25835\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}