{"id":258766,"date":"2008-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-21T01:24:30","modified_gmt":"2015-09-20T19:54:30","slug":"state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Swamy<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN THE men Comm' 0? KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED Tms THE 25% DAY 09' MAY 2003\nf'RESEN'i' 3 % V\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.sREEDHAi?:_f;2A.(:\u00a7:'V:    \u00ab\nAND   \u00e9 \"   4'\nTHE HON'BLE MR. Jugrlca L.\ufb01AR;\u00a7YANA\"SWAl\\\u00a7;r': : '\u00ab.T '~:\nCRL.A. No. \u00e92\u00a7\u00a7\"oF2b'c2 % V    j\nBETWEEN: % . V  L_ _ .'\nS'I'A'FE BY RAJAJzNAG--:{g.     \nBANGALORE -- V : ~ ' \" A\n\n   \n(BY SR1 ANAND K; is:.Ag.\\_(AL(3e:MA'E?\u00a7\u00a2I, HCGP3 \n\nAND:  1111   \"\n\n1 NATARA\u00abJA~    '\ns\/0 RAMAswAM\u00a5,.4s..yEARs\nNo.8, 4%: Bi..OC.K'  \" \nRAJAJINA\u20ac}AR=J' '\nB.}E3NGALORE\"'---V.' _\n\n '  ' =SfiA1\u00a7'i5KrL4ki\\\ufb01MA\n\n  Vwj {} V.ELALEI\u00a7irIAN\n.  1'2{\u00a5;51\"E~i\"CROSS\n2ND STAGE\nIBFDIIEANAGAR\nBANGALORE\n  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> ..(3Y skis. PATIL AND ASSOCIATES FOR R1)<\/p>\n<p> B.S.MANIAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U\/S. 373(1) &amp;\u00bb (3) CR.P.C. BY THE<br \/>\n  3?? ma THE STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HUMBLE COURT MAY<\/p>\n<p>BE PLEASE!) T0 GRANT LEAVE TO FiLE AN APPEAL AGAINST<br \/>\nTHE JUDGMENT mt 24,1o.2o00 PASSED BY THE xxv ADDL.<br \/>\n0.0. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE iN s.c.m.1-as\/93,<br \/>\nAcQU:&#8217;mNG THE RES?ONli)EN&#8217;1&#8217;~ ACCUSED FOR &#8216;THE QFEENCE<br \/>\nPUMSHABLE U\/S. 498&#8211;A AND 304-13 R\/W SEC. 34&#8217;.;&#8217;mj&#8211;.dAND<br \/>\nSECS. 3 az. 4 OF THE D.P. ACT.  4 &#8211;\u00ab &#8216;~ .;. <\/p>\n<p>This appeal is coming on for hearing this d\u00a7.v*&#8211;,&#8211;\u00bb .. <\/p>\n<p>RAO, d., delivered the following:&#8211; <\/p>\n<p>Junemsz\u00e9zi  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>The case of the pro-.==.&lt;:c11t:ioV1d1&#8211;.i:\u00a7\u00a7*j &quot;tilat A611:   is L\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>married to Al on 14.2.1933 PW1d.&#8211;{\ufb01dd$her)A.a\ufb01d&quot; ?W2VA.{:9.istc\ufb01 and<br \/>\nPW3 (father) of the deccas\u00e9d; Rs.5,000\/&#8211; and<br \/>\nother gold jewe\ufb02c\ufb01gs&#039;  df\ufb01\ufb01jr;  of A1 and A3 is<br \/>\nthe sister ofA1\u00a7&#039;      &#039;V  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. Vii&#8217;;   persons subjected the<br \/>\ndeceased  and were demanding that<\/p>\n<p>PW3 shouid  L _4 &#8216;site in favour of the accused in<\/p>\n<p>vpo;1siders\u00a7j:if\u00a7n* of   The deceased sustained burn<\/p>\n<p> _911_:: The dccaascd was admitted to hospital.<\/p>\n<p> _    statement of the deceased at Ex.P.5. The<\/p>\n<p> crmtentd&#8221; of &#8220;t}:ic&#8221;\u00e9\ufb01mp1aint disclose that the deceased tumbled on<\/p>\n<p>__&lt;:y1i:ider and sustained accidental burn injuries. On the<\/p>\n<p> j;&#039;,;4;_e\u00a7is.VV&quot;of Ex.P.5, a UDR case is registered. The deceased<\/p>\n<p>&#039;T dsmgmbca to the injuries on 17.5.1939.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3. FW3, later on, gave eoxnpiaint as per Ex.P.1 alleging that<br \/>\nthe deceased is done to death by the accused or that heVstt\u00e9pects<\/p>\n<p>that the deceased had committed suicide on of<\/p>\n<p>harassment or cruelty. The Investigation O\ufb01cer   <\/p>\n<p>letters written by the deceased. The  <\/p>\n<p>deceased and the disputed  the  t\ufb01vefevsent <\/p>\n<p>handwriting expert. PW9 is the nanggmng   <\/p>\n<p>the handwriting expert,  in the<\/p>\n<p>disputed letters and in   are by one and<\/p>\n<p>the same   failed to produce<\/p>\n<p>either the  tdh%1;cae o:ect letters alleged to have<br \/>\nbeen W1itten&#8217;h\u00a7f   during trial. PW1 to<br \/>\nPW3 have  case.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">4. The   that the oral evidence of PW1 to<\/p>\n<p> is   \u00abeu\ufb01ers from infirmitics. The tn&#8217;a1 Court has ~<\/p>\n<p>acquitted&#8217; mg The State is in appeal.<\/p>\n<p>   to note that the prosecution has primarily<\/p>\n<p>    the contents of Ex.P.5 which exeulpates the<\/p>\n<p> the charge U\/s. 304-8. The letters alleged to have<\/p>\n<p>It   by the deceased have not been produced before the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;  T  Copy of the letters are also not produced. In that view, the<\/p>\n<p>6%<\/p>\n<p>Court has absolutely no bene\ufb01t of going thmugh the nattgre 0 1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>the allegations made in the letters in order to appreciate. th\u00a2t&#8217;case<\/p>\n<p>of cruelty made out by the prosecution. The   iv<\/p>\n<p>PW3 remains on record with regard togegilggatimis&#8217;  T35\u00bb. \u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>trial court has found that the evidence or Pm 31x; mm M<\/p>\n<p>discrepancies and in\ufb01rmitics. Ittislp bct\ufb01otcci <\/p>\n<p>when the statement of the   it was<br \/>\nfound to be a case of  1  latct tm has \ufb01led<br \/>\nvague compiaint malging  the alternative<br \/>\nsuicide on aocoztjgitt   case made out by<br \/>\nPW3 in the  t&#8217;a&#8217;t&#8217;t:.\u00a7rV&#8221;t11ot1ght. The trial Court<br \/>\nhas  granted acquittal. We do<\/p>\n<p>not \ufb01nd ma\u00e9onstti)&#8217;  with the order of acquittal. The<\/p>\n<p>appeal ig  \u00bb _ <\/p>\n<p>Sdf-\u00e9<br \/>\nIudgg<br \/>\nSd\/-&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Swamy IN THE men Comm&#8217; 0? KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED Tms THE 25% DAY 09&#8242; MAY 2003 f&#8217;RESEN&#8217;i&#8217; 3 % V THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K.sREEDHAi?:_f;2A.(:\u00a7:&#8217;V: \u00ab AND \u00e9 &#8221; 4&#8242; THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. Jugrlca L.\ufb01AR;\u00a7YANA&#8221;SWAl\\\u00a7;r&#8217;: : &#8216;\u00ab.T &#8216;~: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-258766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":580,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\",\"name\":\"State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008"},"wordCount":580,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008","name":"State By Rajajinagar Police ... vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-20T19:54:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rajajinagar-police-vs-nataraja-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Rajajinagar Police &#8230; vs Nataraja on 26 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}