{"id":258790,"date":"2010-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-11-10T22:21:34","modified_gmt":"2018-11-10T16:51:34","slug":"dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                            Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000354\n                                                                                                 Dated\u00a0August\u00a027,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                    :    Col.\u00a0N.K.Rishi\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                             :    AI.I.M.S\n\n\n\n                               Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0Order\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0dt.26.4.10\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.      The\u00a0relevant\u00a0para\u00a0\u00a06\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0is\u00a0reproduced\u00a0below:<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>        &#8216;6.      The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>        i)       to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0period \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        for\u00a0which\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0its\u00a0non\u00adavailability,\u00a0while \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        enclosing\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0for\u00a0preservation\u00a0of\u00a0records.\u00a0.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>        ii)      to\u00a0allow\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0all\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\/registers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a05\u00a0years\u00a0over\u00a0a\u00a0period \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a05\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0\u00a0requires.\u00a0In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        voluminous\u00a0information\u00a0being\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0impact\u00a0that\u00a0use\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0large\u00a0quantity \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of \u00a0 paper \u00a0 would\u00a0 have \u00a0 on\u00a0 the\u00a0 environment,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0advises\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 to\u00a0 inspect\u00a0 the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        registers\u00a0and\u00a0identify\u00a0only\u00a0those\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0really\u00a0requires.\u00a0\u00a0Information\u00a0upto\u00a0a\u00a0maximum\u00a0of\u00a0100 \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        pages\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0For\u00a0the\u00a0remaining,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0pay\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0rate\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        page\u00a0as\u00a0photocopying\u00a0charges&#8217;.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\">\n<\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2.      The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.1.6.10\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0consequent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        directions\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0registers\/records\u00a0for\u00a05\u00a0days,\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0shown\u00a0only\u00a0some\u00a0registers\u00a0\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        two\u00a0security\u00a0agencies\u00a0(only\u00a0278\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0441\u00a0registers)\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0inspection\u00a0 \u00a0was\u00a0completed\u00a0 \u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        approximately\u00a0\u00a0five\u00a0hours\u00a0on\u00a0first\u00a0two\u00a0days.\u00a0\u00a0Similarly,\u00a0AIIMS\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0given\u00a0him\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a0destruction\u00a0 of\u00a0 records\u00a0older\u00a0 than\u00a05\u00a0years\u00a0or\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0affidavit\u00a0for\u00a0affirming\u00a0that\u00a0records\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        destroyed,\u00a0\u00a0nor\u00a0rules\u00a0for\u00a0preservation\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0records.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0requested\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        provided\u00a0to\u00a0him:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">        i)       Photocopies \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 documents \u00a0 listed \u00a0 at \u00a0 Paras \u00a0 2\u00ad4, \u00a0 6(a) \u00a0 for \u00a0 three \u00a0 agencies \u00a0 during \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        previous\u00a0five\u00a0years\u00a0i.e.\u00a01.2.05\u00a0to\u00a0date\u00a0which\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0shown\/provisioned\u00a0to\u00a0me.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">        ii)        To \u00a0 show \u00a0 balance \u00a0 of \u00a0 163 \u00a0 attendance \u00a0 register \u00a0 for \u00a0 his \u00a0 perusal \u00a0 and \u00a0 selection \u00a0 thereof \u00a0 for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       provision\u00a0of\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0selected\u00a0registers.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">       iii)       Complete\u00a0record\u00a0of\u00a0ex\u00adservicemen\u00a0employed,\u00a0duly\u00a0certified\u00a0by\u00a0DCSO\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0Para\u00a06(b)\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       application\u00a0dt.10.11.09.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">       iv)        Photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0destruction\u00a0of\u00a0documents\/registers,\u00a0older\u00a0than\u00a05\u00a0years\u00a0and\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       of \u00a0 the \u00a0 affidavit \u00a0 thereof. \u00a0 \u00a0 In \u00a0 case \u00a0 records \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 destroyed, \u00a0 he \u00a0 may \u00a0 \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided \u00a0 with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0paras\u00a02\u00ad4\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0agencies\u00a0employed\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a01.11.94\u00a0to\u00a0date.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">2.     The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0August\u00a027,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p id=\"p_8\">3.     Shri\u00a0 Rajiv\u00a0 Lochan,\u00a0 Dy.\u00a0 CSO,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0Deepak\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Security\u00a0Officer\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0K.D.Sharma,\u00a0Stores\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Officer\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">\n<p id=\"p_10\">4.     The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">5.     The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a02(a)\u00a0to\u00a02(g),\u00a02(k)\u00a0to\u00a02(n),\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0points\u00a03,\u00a04\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       6(a)\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0expected\u00a0to\u00a0keep\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0clause\u00a0is\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0terms\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       conditions \u00a0 for \u00a0 contract \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 agency \u00a0 providing \u00a0 security \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Institute. \u00a0 Only \u00a0 the \u00a0 concerned\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       contractor\u00a0is\u00a0expected\u00a0to\u00a0retain\u00a0such\u00a0records\u00a0with\u00a0him.\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a02(i),\u00a0he\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0denied\u00a0having\u00a0received.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       to\u00a0point\u00a02(j),\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0immediately\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0interview\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0security\u00a0guards\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       been\u00a0conducted\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0 \u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0written\u00a0either\u00a0&#8216;accepted&#8217;\u00a0or\u00a0 \u00a0&#8216;rejected&#8217;\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       returned \u00a0 the \u00a0 documents \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 contractor. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 refuted \u00a0 this \u00a0 by \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       documents\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0returned\u00a0to\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0maintained\u00a0their\u00a0position\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a06(b),\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0attendance\u00a0of\u00a0security\u00a0guards\u00a0employed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0contractor,\u00a0as\u00a0\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0them\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       already\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0provided.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">\n<p id=\"p_13\">6.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_4\"><p>       i)         to\u00a0allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                  time\u00a0 with\u00a0 regard\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a02(h)\u00a0and\u00a02(i)\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0of\u00a0163\u00a0<br \/>\n                     remaining \u00a0 registers \u00a0 over\u00a0 a\u00a0 period\u00a0 of \u00a0 3 \u00a0 consecutive\u00a0 days\u00a0 during\u00a0 working\u00a0 hours\u00a0 \u00a0 and\u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0requires,\u00a0\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0upto\u00a050\u00a0pages\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    to\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0photocopying\u00a0charges\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0remaining.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_5\"><p>         ii)        to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a02(a)\u00a0to\u00a02(g),\u00a02(k)\u00a0to\u00a02(n),\u00a0points\u00a03,\u00a04\u00a0and\u00a06(a)\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    with\u00a0them\u00a0and\u00a0giving\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0their\u00a0non\u00a0availability\u00a0.\u00a0 \u00a0Complete\u00a0information\u00a0including\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a030\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_6\"><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_14\">7.       The\u00a0undersigned\u00a0 \u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0powers\u00a0vested\u00a0on\u00a0her\u00a0 \u00a0u\/s\u00a018(2)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Authority\u00a0to\u00a0conduct\u00a0an\u00a0enquiry\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0\u00a0point\u00a02(j)\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         contradictory\u00a0submissions\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         enquiry\u00a0 report\u00a0 to\u00a0 be\u00a0 shared\u00a0 with\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0 \u00a0by\u00a030\u00a0September,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         2010.\u00a0.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">\n<p id=\"p_16\">8.       The\u00a0complaint\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">                                                                                                     \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                             Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">1.       Col.\u00a0N.K.Rishi<br \/>\n         Director<br \/>\n         VNA\u00a0Security\u00a0Services\u00a0(P)\u00a0Ltd<br \/>\n         D\u00ad7\/7340<br \/>\n         Vasant\u00a0Kunj<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0070<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">2.       The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n         All\u00a0India\u00a0Institute\u00a0of\u00a0Medical\u00a0Sciences<br \/>\n         O\/o\u00a0Chief\u00a0Admn.\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Ansari\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_21\">3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         All\u00a0India\u00a0Institute\u00a0of\u00a0Medical\u00a0Sciences<br \/>\n      O\/o\u00a0Prof.\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Head\u00a0(Pharmacology)<br \/>\n     Ansari\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_22\">4.   Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000354 Dated\u00a0August\u00a027,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Col.\u00a0N.K.Rishi Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : AI.I.M.S Adjunct\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0Order\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0dt.26.4.10 Background 1. The\u00a0relevant\u00a0para\u00a0\u00a06\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0is\u00a0reproduced\u00a0below: &#8216;6. The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0as\u00a0follows: i) to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0period \u00a0 for\u00a0which\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0its\u00a0non\u00adavailability,\u00a0while \u00a0 enclosing\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0for\u00a0preservation\u00a0of\u00a0records.\u00a0. ii) to\u00a0allow\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0all\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\/registers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a05\u00a0years\u00a0over\u00a0a\u00a0period \u00a0 of\u00a05\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0he\u00a0\u00a0requires.\u00a0In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the \u00a0 voluminous\u00a0information\u00a0being\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0impact\u00a0that\u00a0use\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0large\u00a0quantity \u00a0 of \u00a0 paper \u00a0 would\u00a0 have \u00a0 on\u00a0 the\u00a0 environment,\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-258790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":895,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010"},"wordCount":895,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010","name":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-10T16:51:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-k-rishi-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.N K Rishi vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 27 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258790"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258790\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}