{"id":259091,"date":"2008-10-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-06-14T17:01:58","modified_gmt":"2018-06-14T11:31:58","slug":"d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">(BY SR1. R. B. SATHYANARAYANA S\u00a7NGH,\nHCGP FOR R4 TO 4)\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER.A'ART:\u00a7.CL.;m 225 \nAND 227 01:' THE CONSTITUTIVON' {AF I;4:\u00a71D1A,* 1yQA*mgc;L-Afro' . 'V\nQUASH THE ORDER DA'I\"E\u00a3).14?.9,2QO7} PASSED 'BY..%'Fi:\u00a7.E.'R~ \n\n2 IN CASE N0.1NA.cR.7\/o6--o71\u00ab.w\u00bbDE AN:~:\u00a7:xLIRE\u00a7;a._2r;tszD\nETC.     '   \n\nTHIS WRYI' PETITION EQMING (5I~*I_\u00a73'G--\u00a7t cz\ufb01aa\ufb01as ms\nDAY, THE COURT MADE THE E'()_LLQWIN\"G:..._A \n\nHeargjl\u00e9   c(.:):1';M.ir'v%;..\\&lt;_;x;;1V&#039;-fc2f&quot;&#039;ti1e petitioner and\nalso the i?1gas1\u00a2\u00a7+. %\n\n 2. . Z A&#039;   pejiition under articles 226 and\n\n227  r;}f Lhe&#039;  of In\u00e9ia, the p\ufb01titioner has\n\n;:.j\u00a73\u00a71r:a\u00a5. ix? &#039;q2,\u00a7\u00a2$\u00a7\ufb01o\u00a71, the orders \u00e9ated 14.9.2007 and\n\n . 19\u00a3\u00a7&#039;2..Vpass&amp;d by the 2&amp;4 respondent and also the<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">  Anekal, in Casa No.INA.CR.7\/2{)06&#8211;O&#8217;7<\/p>\n<p> 1043\/ 1979-80 vi\u00e9e Annexu;res&#8211;A as D2.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">3. By the impugrled order at Annexure-1:32, the<br \/>\nLand Tribzznal, Anakal, has ganted occupancy rights,<br \/>\nill favour of tha fathar of the petitiener, in respect of<\/p>\n<p>Sy.I&#8217;\u20ac&lt;).7 of Indiabeie vi\ufb02age E0 the extent: of 0.37 guntas.<\/p>\n<p>By the: impugned arder at Annexure~A, the 2&amp;3<\/p>\n<p>L\/<\/p>\n<p>respondent has rejected the claim of the petitieiaer for<br \/>\ngrant of occupancy rights, in respect Of  .&#039; of<\/p>\n<p>land in Sy.N0.7 of Incllabeie village.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">4. Aggrieved by . \u00bb that,  &#8221; petitien\ufb01v  3 \ufb01}e(i.<\/p>\n<p>this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">5. In brief,   &#8216;th.e&#8217;\u00bb&#8217;1\u00a7etitioner&#8217;s father<\/p>\n<p>Dyavaiah  in respect of<br \/>\nSy.No.7  extent of 1 acre and<br \/>\n29  has ganted occupancy<br \/>\n   ex&#8221; 37 guntas, on the ground, %he<\/p>\n<p>peVtitjoner&#8217;sV_:fat.herAexe\ufb01ed 9 acres 7 guntas of land and if<\/p>\n<p>   ia:1dt* ..eIai113ed\/&#8217;is gamed, it would exceed the limit<\/p>\n<p>Lr<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;,  prescribed by the Act. Thereafter, the<\/p>\n<p>Ap~etiti_eI1ei5~&#8217;has \ufb01led application for grant of occupancy<\/p>\n<p> ts rig\ufb01ts respect of 32 guntas of me in Sy.N0.7 of<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;  Intilsbele village which has been rejected and therefere,<\/p>\n<p> this wxit petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">6. The learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>contended that the Land &#8216;I&#8217;ribunai and 3136 the 23d<\/p>\n<p>:\/<\/p>\n<p>respondent have failed to consider that 9 acres and 7<br \/>\nguntas of land was owned by the joint family and not by<\/p>\n<p>the father of the petitioner or the petitioner exc11;:i.:iffe.ly<\/p>\n<p>and therefore, the impugned order trannot be   _<\/p>\n<p>in law. He also submitted that t1}OL!g}}.-ti&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\nTribunal has held] the father   3 <\/p>\n<p>cuitivating the land claimed   it    &gt;<\/p>\n<p>occupancy rights only _ in res_p_eet_ e\u00a3f_37.&#8221;g,*ti_r1&#8217;tas;%on the<\/p>\n<p>ground, if the land&#8217;  father of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8221;&#8216;isgrati\ufb01ed,  &#8216;womdwrrejiceed the limit i.e., 4<\/p>\n<p>    Act, which is totally<\/p>\n<p>incorrect. a He &#8216;also__ that 9 acres and &#8216;7 guntae<\/p>\n<p> of 1.\u00ab::.i;d  oWned&#8221;~b-yethe joint family and not by the<\/p>\n<p> fat.herr.o\u00a7.;:\u00a7et;it,io:1er or the petitioner exclusively and<\/p>\n<p>ther_efore,.&#8217;theet:;impug11ed order cannot be sustained in<\/p>\n<p> H&#8221;e,V__Aiherefore, submitte\u00e9 that the matter requires<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  &#8220;&#8216;~;%eeorl\u20ac;ideration.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">7 . As against this, the learned Govt. Pieader<br \/>\nsubmitted that the father of the petitioner and also the<br \/>\npetitioner have stated before the Land Tribunal that<\/p>\n<p>L.\/&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p>\u00a5h.e_&#8217;z\u20ac{5O&#8217;*&#8221;&#8216;&gt; _<br \/>\nland an\u00e9 A11&#8217; the land slammed by the father _&#8230;the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is garzted, it would exceed tiza limit&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p>hectares prescribed by the Act. Therea\ufb01ex;  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>has \ufb01led an application claiming&#8221;32&#8243;g!:n&#8217;ta$ \u00ab%\u00a7fV:\u00bbI.a\ufb01d&#8211;&#8216;.<\/p>\n<p>Sy.No7 of Indiabele viliage which  i1$\u00a7,1f$\u00e9(&#8216;:I1\u00bb.i&#8217;g\u20ac\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7Ct\u20acd&#8217;V,*::d\u00a7i&#8217;V<\/p>\n<p>the geund, the claim of 1&#8243;1iS&#8221;vL.L:.ff\u00a7\u00e9a:therV. H16<br \/>\nsame land has a1ready&#8217;:&#8221;becn censieigim. IjEEi\u00e9&#8221;a}\u00e9f~o held,<br \/>\nthe land has vested in thft Stsitef-&#8216;\u00abbev.1:m_s&#8217;.uIned to the<br \/>\nState. Neither&#8221;t}ir;f1&#8217;1&#8217;ibi.1z1:\u00ab;i*V1510:&#8217; the\u00a7&#8221;29_?\u00a7V.respondent have<br \/>\ncoxgsiderecz  % and 7 guntas of land<\/p>\n<p>belonged :0 the=joizf1t ,_f:a1_I1\ufb02y or\/\\_ the petitioner or\/\\ his<\/p>\n<p>V fatI1cf:j.&#8217; &#8221;  Ac1umit\u00a7fcCi1y,&#8217;V&#8217; the material on record i.e.,<\/p>\n<p>   and G i.e., Pa.I1chayat,h Parikath,<\/p>\n<p> c\u00a7_s.No.34\/1935 and judgment passed in<\/p>\n<p>V V . R.A.V\u00a7~fO.\u00a3\u00e9\/20&#8217;O2 ciearly Show that 9 acires and 7 guntas<\/p>\n<p> 1a.;1dVV&#8217;belonged to the joint family and not tor the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner or\/k his father exclusivaly. Therefore, in my<\/p>\n<p>V<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00e9tjizxsidered view, the matter requires reconsidemtien.<\/p>\n<p>I 1. Accordingly, the wait petitien is allewed and<br \/>\nthe impugned \u20ac)I&#8217;d\u20acI&#8217;s gassed by the 28% respondent and<\/p>\n<p>also\u00bb the Land Tribunal, Anekal, vide Anmexures-A 8% D2<\/p>\n<p>(&#8216;\/4<\/p>\n<p>are hereby quashed and the matter is remittgci&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>2nd respondent, with a direction to re\u00bb{:c:\u00a71:&#8217;sic1jc&#8217;:.1fVVL&#8217;<br \/>\nsame, in accordanca with iaw at1\u00a5iiV&#8217;i:r1\u00ab me<br \/>\nobservations made: above. .    &#8221; &#8221; &#8216; V  <\/p>\n<p>3% v   . _  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 Author: H.Billappa (BY SR1. R. B. SATHYANARAYANA S\u00a7NGH, HCGP FOR R4 TO 4) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER.A&#8217;ART:\u00a7.CL.;m 225 AND 227 01:&#8217; THE CONSTITUTIVON&#8217; {AF I;4:\u00a71D1A,* 1yQA*mgc;L-Afro&#8217; . &#8216;V QUASH THE ORDER DA&#8217;I&#8221;E\u00a3).14?.9,2QO7} PASSED &#8216;BY..%&#8217;Fi:\u00a7.E.&#8217;R~ 2 IN CASE N0.1NA.cR.7\/o6&#8211;o71\u00ab.w\u00bbDE AN:~:\u00a7:xLIRE\u00a7;a._2r;tszD ETC. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":655,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\",\"name\":\"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008"},"wordCount":655,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008","name":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-14T11:31:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-narasimhamurthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-30-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D Narasimhamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}