{"id":259801,"date":"2010-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-24T22:00:01","modified_gmt":"2019-02-24T16:30:01","slug":"sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 23\"] DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. LIUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALAV.'\u00a7$_{TVSk'!\u00a7u?'A.V\"2V\n\nWRIT PETITION NOS.26003--26004\/2010    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSRI B.R.Manjappa,\nS\/o. fate Rangappa,\nAged about 49 years,\nResiding at No.60,\nSonna Thammanahaiiig \nVinayaka Layout, A ._  p\n12\"' Cross, virgonagar post,' ' .\nBangaiore -- 560.049.  ' V\n\n,     PETITIONER\n\n(By  B.M:,SD\u00a7--':y'a[TT9T'a.sacF._ 8: Associates, Advs.)\nAND: A A A A A\n\n1.  S ,.Chand*r.a_VVM'ohan,\n-S\/'o  P. \\.'\u00bbV._ Ra m a re--d--d'y,\n\n =._Agec\u00a7 .ab_o\"ut 32 years,\n* ,No,,.4-,.,_3'\u00a7\"\"C,ross,\n\n._ ''-\\(,8;'La'yout,,'\u00bb~.*&lt;.R.Puram,\n&#039; ,_Banga.|or&quot;s3__ 4- 560 036.\n\n Srn~~RK&#039;..Padmanabhan,\nA. ,S\/o.&quot;EVl.R.Chandrashekar Murthy.\n\n _ R2. deieted\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">   Sri T.Narayanaswamy, Adv, for R1)<\/p>\n<p>These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and<br \/>\n227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order<br \/>\ndated 29.3.2010, passed in O.S.No.-442\/2009 by the__ find<br \/>\nAddl, Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bangalore Rural District,., at<br \/>\nBangalore vide Annexure &#8211;H and order dated 2G&#8217;.t~?,&#8217;2..O&#8217;.tO<\/p>\n<p>passed in M.A.No.31\/10 by the Adhoc District and&#8230;$_es_ssions<br \/>\nJudge, FTC&#8211;I Bangalore Rural District, Bangaloire ~<\/p>\n<p>An nexure &#8211;J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">These petitions coming on forliilpreiritnlirnaty-C,he&#8211;ari_ng&#8221;VVin&#8221;&#8216;\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;B&#8217; group this day, the Court made&#8221;~the;&#8217;fol!sowsi\u00bbng&#8217;:  . <\/p>\n<p>oases;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">Respondent\/plaintiff has&#8221;&#8211; instit-z,,i_ted ACCOV.-5.4912\/2009<br \/>\nagainst petitioner\/defendarit  of Civil Judge<\/p>\n<p>(Sr.Dn.), Bangaio&#8217;r&#8217;e_ Rural&#8217;if\ufb01iistrjicti,-&#8216;.|3angaiore, for relief of<\/p>\n<p>declaration&#8217; &#8216;_Aof~C.5t,it|_elviandjyfonr pehrrnanent injunction. Along<br \/>\nwith the&#8221;su&#8221;it,  to restrain the defendants<\/p>\n<p>from ,.puttingu&#8221;upAconstruction or changing the nature of the<\/p>\n<p>. V.&#8221;&#8216;suVit&#8217;s-property_ti|I thellldisposal of the suit. The Trial Court<\/p>\n<p>s&#8211;alVlo_eviied:,:&#8217;I\u00bb&#8211;.._i\u00a7.;if restrained the defendants from putting<\/p>\n<p>up any t:o~nst.ruction in the suit property tiil the disposal of<\/p>\n<p> sui&#8217;tv.i,__i*I.A.2 filed by the 2&#8243;&#8221; defendant under 0.39 R.4<\/p>\n<p>V\u00e9ffwas Qonsequently dismissed. Aggrieved, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;E&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;&#8216;.\ufb01_gp_\u00e9titioner filed M.A.31\/2010 in the Court below. The<\/p>\n<p>B<\/p>\n<p>{ I<\/p>\n<p>appeal having been found to be devoid of merit, has been<br \/>\ndismissed. Challenging the said order and judgment, the<\/p>\n<p>2&#8243;&#8221; defendant has filed these writ petitions.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">2.. indisputably, the suit property belonged.&#8217;_jto_&#8217;__&#8221;o&#8217;n_e<\/p>\n<p>Subbaiah Setty. He had sold the suit propertyV:&#8217;4_:i~&#8211;n.Vfavour oft  0 <\/p>\n<p>one K.S.Thippeswamy. Said Thi;opesvra:nj&#8221;\u00a5 p&#8217;a&#8217;s..:<\/p>\n<p>property to the petitioner on_:.?.5.8.1A9E38. The&#8217;.-&#8216;original\u00b0&#8217;sa&#8217;l&#8217;eV&#8221;g<\/p>\n<p>deed of the suit property isiihot&#8217; in th&#8217;e..custocly of the<br \/>\npetitioner. The pIainvt;iffV~._cla_i&#8217;rns_igithatlfthe petitioner had<br \/>\nexecuted a general powerofy alttofne&#8217;y.j\u00a2d&#8217;a.t;3;j.&#8217;.-20.11.1999 in<\/p>\n<p>respecf:&#8221;&#8216;of&#8217; irrfavour of one Mr.Gandhi,<br \/>\nwho has sold -th&#8217;e&#8217;:_i&#8217;~pro.pe.rt\\,.- under a sale deed dated<\/p>\n<p>19.4.2000 in f.av.o_u.r loft defendant 1 Sri R.C.Padmanabhan<\/p>\n<p>he Ahias&#8217;&#8211;purchased the property on 3.5.2006.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;pla:&#8217;i-n_t&#8221;iff&#8221;li:;:&#8217;having the custody of the title deed of suit<\/p>\n<p>pro,p&#8217;e\u00abrty_\u00e9o&#8217;fv&#8217;dthe petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">3. Noticing the material facts, the Courts below have<\/p>\n<p> the impugned order\/judgment, respectively. The<\/p>\n<p> Courts below in exercise of their jurisdic\ufb01on, prima facie<\/p>\n<p>__,,,.\u00bb-r&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">-1<\/p>\n<p>finding merit in the case of the plaintiff, have passed the<br \/>\nimpugned orders. The suit schedule property has a small<\/p>\n<p>shed and the rest of the area is vacant. Fror&#8217;n:&#8221;&#8216;\u00bbt.he<\/p>\n<p>photographs produced, it could be seen that, <\/p>\n<p>been put up.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">4. The petitioner contends that,  had &#8216;n.ot~&#8211;.e&#8217;&gt;&#8221;f_V&#8217;i&#8217;vir.Gan&#8217;d7hi <\/p>\n<p>stated that, for availing of u'&#8221;&#8216;ioa&#8217;r1,_V  deed was<br \/>\ndelivered to Mr.Gandhl;._ylit=o r.i_&#8217;as,.com_m_iAt&#8217;ted breach of trust<br \/>\nand has acted dishonesgtlyl  pleaded by<\/p>\n<p>the    is a matter for trial.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">Howevehpthei pet&#8217;i&#8217;tifo.n&#8217;erfixaa filed o.s.2o2\/2005 against<\/p>\n<p>R.C.P_adman&#8221;ah,ha~n.Twho had purchased the property from<\/p>\n<p>_In the&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;said suit, though an application was<\/p>\n<p>  Gandhi and the plaintiff, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was__&#8217;4&#8217;unsu.cce,ssfu|. However, the suit has been decreed<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;nagainst,_F%.C.Padmanabhan on 1.12.2008. Much prior to<\/p>\n<p>,,,f.&#8221;_tah.e,'&#8221;asaaid decree, the plaintiff has purchased the suit<\/p>\n<p>  property i.e., on 3.5.2006 from R.C.Pail\u00a3&#8217;anabhan.<\/p>\n<p>,&#8211; .\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\n<p id=\"p_9\">5. Keeping in view the said factors_,..___ no<\/p>\n<p>interference with the impugned order\/judgment <\/p>\n<p>for. However, neither of the parties shall <\/p>\n<p>the suit schedule property i.e., either by way&#8221;&#8216;of&#8217;ldeernc.l&#8217;i_tion&#8230; &#8216;Au<\/p>\n<p>or putting up any kind of construction&#8217;tiilere&#8217;i~n_:&#8217;ti.ll_ <\/p>\n<p>and disposal of the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">Since the pieadin&#8221;gs_&#8217;of the ip.aj&#8217;rtVi&#8217;els._Aare\u00abcVo&#8217;rr&#8217;:&#8217;;3Viete, the<br \/>\nTrial Court is directed &#8216;V  of the suit<br \/>\nexpeditiously,  Trial Court to<br \/>\nundertake  to frame the issues<br \/>\non the\u00abnext&#8217;V.V.da.te\u00e9:&#8217;:\u00e9}3f&#8221;&#8211;hea,ri&#8217;ng\ufb01&#8217;$122010. The parties<br \/>\nare at li&#8217;!)Aert&#8217;y toiiepq.-.ii\u00e9;a:;;,&#8230;es, in the Triai Court within a<\/p>\n<p>period of  from: today. The list of documents shall<\/p>\n<p>*v,._i3e  the'&#8221;pa.rt..ies before 18.12.2010. The plaintiff<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;sh\u00e9&#8217;il~i.ad.duicei. complete his side of evidence within 3<\/p>\n<p>m\u00bbi=.;ils; vfrt\u00a7&#8217;in..athe date the suit is posted for trial. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.V_defehd.aV&#8217;nt shall adduce and complete his side of evidence<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;..jijwiith&#8217;i\u00abhA&#8217; B\ufb02irnonths from the date of the closure of plaintiff&#8217;S<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  side def &#8216;evidence. The Trial Court is directed to hear the<\/p>\n<p>it,<\/p>\n<p>arguments and dispose of the suit as eariy as pract\u00e9gabie<br \/>\nand at any event, within a period of 3 months <\/p>\n<p>date the trial of the suit is compiete.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">Writ petitions stand disposedhfwaccoraingitkf  in<\/p>\n<p>Ksj\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23&#8243;] DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. LIUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALAV.&#8217;\u00a7$_{TVSk&#8217;!\u00a7u?&#8217;A.V&#8221;2V WRIT PETITION NOS.26003&#8211;26004\/2010 BETWEEN: SRI B.R.Manjappa, S\/o. fate Rangappa, Aged about 49 years, Residing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":846,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010"},"wordCount":846,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010","name":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-24T16:30:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-manjappa-vs-sri-s-chandramohan-on-23-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B R Manjappa vs Sri S Chandramohan on 23 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259801\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}