{"id":259832,"date":"2011-02-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011"},"modified":"2019-03-28T23:59:14","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T18:29:14","slug":"mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                        File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176\n                                                                               CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a017,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a017,\u00a02011\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Saidur\u00a0Rahman\n           R\/o\u00a0Running\u00a0Shed\u00a0Colony\n           L.D\u00ad14A,\u00a0Tehri\u00a0Pulia\n           Alambagh\n           Lucknow\u00a0226\u00a0005\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Northern\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Lucknow\u00a0Division\n           Lucknow\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Prakash,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.S.Kaushik,\u00a0APO\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176\n                                                                                                CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177\n\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176<\/p>\n
1.     The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dt.20.5.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 DRM \u00a0 Office, \u00a0 Northern \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Lucknow \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 information \u00a0 against \u00a0 5 \u00a0 points \u00a0 with \u00a0 regard\u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0 medical\u00a0 classification \u00a0 of \u00a0 those\u00a0<\/p>\n
       employees\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Mechanical\u00a0Branch.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0ule\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0RTI\u00a0fees\u00a0that\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n
       been\u00a0deposited\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0\u00a0refunded\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0supplied\u00a0\/\u00a0supplied\u00a0late.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vijay\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       DPO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a022.6.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0refund\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0Fee,\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0<\/p>\n
       that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0rule.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.23.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0commenting\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vishnu\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
       replied\u00a0on\u00a016.8.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0whatever\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       provided\u00a0including\u00a0\u00a054\u00a0pages\u00a0of\u00a0rule\u00a0on\u00a03.8.10.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n
       a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.29.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\n<\/p>\n
\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177<\/p>\n
2.     The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dt.11.6.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 DRM \u00a0 Office, \u00a0 Northern \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Lucknow\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a06\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0alleged\u00a0 \u00a0fake\u00a0appointment\u00a0letter\u00a0<\/p>\n
       which\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0one\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bal\u00a0Kishen.\u00a0\u00a0Ms.Renu\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a015.7.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n
       point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.23.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 commenting \u00a0 on \u00a0 the\u00a0 reply\u00a0 provided. \u00a0 \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Vishnu\u00a0 Kumar,\u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
       replied\u00a0on\u00a019.8.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0informed\u00a0on\u00a08.7.10\u00a0and\u00a012.7.10\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
       prima\u00a0facie\u00a0Shri\u00a0Tirath\u00a0Nath\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0who\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0found\u00a0guilty\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0chargesheet\u00a0has\u00a0
\n               been\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Tirath\u00a0Nath\u00a0which\u00a0has\u00a0also\u00a0been\u00a0shared\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0<\/p>\n
              with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.29.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
     Decision<\/p>\n
     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176<\/p>\n
     3.       During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0\u00a0audio\u00a0conferencing\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n
              wants\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a02\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
     4.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
              the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a0 17.3.11\u00a0and\u00a0 the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0o\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n
              24.3.11.\n<\/p>\n
\n
     5.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177<\/p>\n
6.            During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 submitted\u00a0 that\u00a0 annexures\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0 charge\u00a0 sheet\u00a0 have\u00a0 not\u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
     provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0without\u00a0these\u00a0annexure\u00a0the\u00a0chargesheet\u00a0made\u00a0no\u00a0sense\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0framed\u00a0<\/p>\n
     have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0described\u00a0in\u00a0it.\n<\/p>\n
          \u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
     7.       The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 \u00a0 therefore \u00a0 directs\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 to\u00a0 provide\u00a0 the\u00a0 annexures\u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0 charge\u00a0 sheet\u00a0 after\u00a0<\/p>\n
              invoking\u00a0sec.10(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0if\u00a0required\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0sever\u00a0those\u00a0portions\u00a0that\u00a0are\u00a0exempt\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0<\/p>\n
              u\/s\u00a08(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0inform\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0besides\u00a0Shri\u00a0Titath\u00a0Nath,\u00a0no\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n
              person\u00a0is\u00a0involved\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0fake\u00a0appointment.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a017.3.11\u00a0<\/p>\n
              and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0by\u00a024.3.11.<\/p>\n
     8.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                        \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                Information\u00a0Commissioner
\n     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0
\n (G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.      Shri\u00a0Saidur\u00a0Rahman
\n        R\/o\u00a0Running\u00a0Shed\u00a0Colony
\n        L.D\u00ad14A,\u00a0Tehri\u00a0Pulia
\n        Alambagh
\n        Lucknow\u00a0226\u00a0005<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n        Northern\u00a0Railway
\n        Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n        Lucknow\u00a0Division
\n        Lucknow<\/p>\n
3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n        Northern\u00a0Railway
\n        Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n        Lucknow\u00a0Division
\n        Lucknow<\/p>\n
4.      Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a017,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a017,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Saidur\u00a0Rahman R\/o\u00a0Running\u00a0Shed\u00a0Colony L.D\u00ad14A,\u00a0Tehri\u00a0Pulia Alambagh Lucknow\u00a0226\u00a0005 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio. Respondents Northern\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office Lucknow\u00a0Division Lucknow Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Prakash,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.S.Kaushik,\u00a0APO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000177 ORDER Background CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000176 1. The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":552,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011"},"wordCount":552,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011","name":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T18:29:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-saidur-rehman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-17-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 17 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}