{"id":259875,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-07T13:47:21","modified_gmt":"2017-11-07T08:17:21","slug":"the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1626 of 2009()\n\n\n1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE ASSISTANT GENEREAL MANGER,\n3. THE BRANCH MANGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA,\n4. THE CHIEF MANAGER ( P &amp; HRD),\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. REV.P.V.JACOB,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA)\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :03\/08\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n     K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR &amp; C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n\n                  ------------------------------\n                     W.A. No.1626 of 2009\n                  ------------------------------\n\n              Dated this, the 3rd day of August, 2009\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Balakrishnan Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">            The respondents in W.P.(C) No.11502 of 2008 are<\/p>\n<p>the appellants. The respondent herein was the writ petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>He is the father of Ms.Racheal, who was an Assistant working<\/p>\n<p>under the appellants. She died at the age of 35 years after<\/p>\n<p>rendering 15 years service on 19.4.2005. She was unmarried<\/p>\n<p>and the respondent&#8217;s family was dependant on her income for<\/p>\n<p>their livelihood. The brother of the deceased, the respondent&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>son, applied for appointment under the dying-in-harness<\/p>\n<p>scheme, which was then in existence on 21.5.2005. But, the<\/p>\n<p>said application was rejected by Ext.P2 communication dated<\/p>\n<p>24.6.2005, on the ground that, the service of Ms.Racheal was<\/p>\n<p>not blemishless.      Later, the appellants introduced Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>scheme to help the dependants of employees, who died in<\/p>\n<p>harness. As per the new scheme, instead of granting<\/p>\n<p>compassionate appointment to the dependants, an ex-gratia<\/p>\n<p>W.A. No.1626 of 2009:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">                                 &#8211; 2 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">lumpsum payment was introduced. The disqualification of the<\/p>\n<p>dependants of employees who suffered punishment was<\/p>\n<p>removed and therefore, dependants of those, whose service<\/p>\n<p>not treated as blemishless, were also included under the new<\/p>\n<p>Scheme         as    beneficiaries.  Therefore, the respondent<\/p>\n<p>submitted an application to get the benefits payable to the<\/p>\n<p>dependants of deceased employee on 23.1.2006 under the<\/p>\n<p>new Scheme. The said application was rejected by Ext.P8<\/p>\n<p>order dated 28.1.2008, on the ground that, since the<\/p>\n<p>application for appointment under the dying in harness<\/p>\n<p>scheme has already been rejected, a fresh application is not<\/p>\n<p>maintainable as per the new Scheme. Challenging Ext.P8<\/p>\n<p>order, the writ petition was filed. The learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>after hearing both sides, gave a liberal interpretation to the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Ext.P4 and directed the consideration of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent for ex-gratia payment on account of the<\/p>\n<p>pre-mature death of his daughter, while in service.       The<\/p>\n<p>respondents in the writ petition, feeling aggrieved, have<\/p>\n<p>preferred this writ appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">W.A. No.1626 of 2009:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">                              &#8211; 3 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">            2.    The learned   counsel   for  the  appellants,<\/p>\n<p>Mr.George Thomas Mevada, submitted that as per the new<\/p>\n<p>Scheme, a dependant whose application has already been<\/p>\n<p>rejected under the old scheme is ineligible to apply under the<\/p>\n<p>new Scheme. Therefore, the direction issued by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Single Judge is unjustified.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">            3 Under the old Scheme, the sin of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>employee will visit his dependants. But, that provision has<\/p>\n<p>been done away with under the new Scheme. Further, the<\/p>\n<p>new Scheme provided that if an application filed under the old<\/p>\n<p>Scheme is not disposed of, then the concerned applicant will<\/p>\n<p>be eligible to get the benefit of the new Scheme. So, the<\/p>\n<p>removal of disqualification of the dependants of deceased<\/p>\n<p>employee with a blemished service       has been removed with<\/p>\n<p>retrospective effect in relation to persons whose applications<\/p>\n<p>were pending. If, in their case, retrospectivity can be given,<\/p>\n<p>we find no reason why the provision cannot be given<\/p>\n<p>retrospective effect in relation to the applicants like the<\/p>\n<p>respondent herein. If it is held that the provisions of the new<\/p>\n<p>scheme will not apply to the case of the applicant in case the<\/p>\n<p>W.A. No.1626 of 2009:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">                              &#8211; 4 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">application under the old scheme has already been disposed<\/p>\n<p>of, the provisions under Ext.P4 scheme will be suffering from<\/p>\n<p>the vice of under-inclusiveness. Normally, a provision should<\/p>\n<p>be interpreted to make it constitutionally valid. If that be so,<\/p>\n<p>the only way to save Ext.P4 provision from the vice of<\/p>\n<p>under-inclusiveness in the classification of dependants, is to<\/p>\n<p>interpret to have retrospective operation and therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>applications of persons like the respondent are also liable to<\/p>\n<p>be considered under the new Scheme, Ext.P4. So, we are of<\/p>\n<p>the view that regarding the interpretation of Ext.P4, the<\/p>\n<p>learned Single Judge has taken a plausible view.        So, we<\/p>\n<p>sustain the direction issued by the learned Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">            Further, as per the old scheme, the dependants in<\/p>\n<p>this case were ineligible to apply. So, the respondent&#8217;s son&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>application itself was not maintainable. So, its submission or<\/p>\n<p>rejection is of no consequence.         So, the respondent&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>application can be treated as the first application. For this<\/p>\n<p>reason also, the direction of the learned Judge can be<\/p>\n<p>sustained.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">W.A. No.1626 of 2009:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>                                &#8211; 5 &#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>            In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\"><p>                                     K. Balakrishnan Nair,<br \/>\n                                               Judge.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_4\"><p>                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_5\"><p>                                        C.T. Ravikumar,<br \/>\n                                               Judge.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_12\">DK.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">\n<p id=\"p_14\">                       (True copy)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1626 of 2009() 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, &#8230; Petitioner 2. THE ASSISTANT GENEREAL MANGER, 3. THE BRANCH MANGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, 4. THE CHIEF MANAGER ( P &amp; HRD), Vs 1. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":739,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":739,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009","name":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T08:17:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-chief-general-manager-vs-rev-p-v-jacob-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Chief General Manager vs Rev.P.V.Jacob on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}