{"id":259925,"date":"1954-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1954-08-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954"},"modified":"2017-12-21T09:13:43","modified_gmt":"2017-12-21T03:43:43","slug":"g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","title":{"rendered":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Andhra High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1955 AP 79<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Rao<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> (1) The question in this Second Appeal is whether the contract dated 14.5.1945 and 18.5.1945 for the sale of groundnut kernel are hit at by the provisions of  the Oil-sees Forward Contracts Prohibition Order 1943.  The facts either admitted or found may be briefly narrated. The defenants are a firm of  merchants doing business to groundnut at Nandyal under the name and style of  Messrs. G. Chinna  Konda Reddy &amp; G. P. Venkata  Reddi. The plaintiff is the East Asiatic Company (India) Limited. Madras. The defendant&#8217;s entered into two contracts with the plaintiff on 14.5.1945 and on 18.5.1945 for the sale of groundjut kernel.  The first contract was for the sale of 318 bags of groundnut kernel. The second contract also was for the sale of 318 bags of groundnut kernel. By the dates of the contracts the groundnut crop was fully harvested and was in the market. It is also in evidence that at the time the suit contracts were made, there was considerable difficulty in securing wagon accommodation. Because of  that fact, in regard to the first contract, it was agreed that the delivery was to be completed from the 14th of  May and before 30.6.1945. In respect of the second contract, delivery was agreed to be made from the 18th of  May and before 30.6.1945. The defendants failed to supply 16 bags of  kernel under the first contract and the entire quantity under the second contract. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for recovery of  damages from the defendants.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">  (2) The defedants, inter alia, contended that the suit contracts were void being forward contracts under the provisions of the Oil-Seeds Forward Contracts Prohibition Order, 1943. They also pleaded that the Provincial Government of  Madras imposed a ban on the export of groundnut kernel to places outside the Madras Presidency and therefore the contracts became impossible of performance. Both the Courts negatived the said plea, and gave a decree to the plaintiff.  The defendants preferred the above appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">  (3) Before me, the learned counsel for the appellants raised two contentions which his clients have unsuccessfully pleaded before the lower Courts. The first question is whether the contracts were void under the Oil-Seeds Forward Contracts Prohibition  Order 1943. A forward contract is defined in Cl. (ii) of  S. 2 of the said Order.  It says :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">   &#8220;Forward Contract means a contract for the delivery of oil-sees at some future date.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">  Rajamannar  C. J. in &#8212; &#8216;Hanumanthiah  v.  Thimmiah&#8217;,   (A) explained the words &#8220;at some future time&#8221; to mean &#8220;at some time in future &#8220;. In that case, the contracts were entered into on 18.8.1945 and on 19.8.1945 and delivery in respect of  these two contracts were to be made in December 1945 and in December 1945 or January 1946 respectively.  It was, therefore, obvious that under the said two contracts, delivery was agreed to be made only at some time in future. Can it be said in the present  case that delivery was agreed to be made at some time in future ?  The groundnut crop was full harvested and was in the market. There was diffculty in securing wagon accommodation. Under the contracts, the parties clearly contemplated delivery on the dates of the contracts. If the defendants insisted upon delivering the groundnut  on 14.5.1945 and on 18.5.1945  the plaintiff could not have legally refused them.  Reasonable time was given to complete delivery of the entire goods only because of the transport difficulties.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">  (4) It was contended that, as the defendants were permitted and had a right to deliver the goods at a future date, the contracts were forward contracts. But to be a forward contract, the parties must agree to deliver the goods at a future date. Under the present contracts the parties contemplated delivery of  goods on the dates of the contracts. The parties did not agree for the delivery of  the goods at a future date. They  agreed for delivery immediately, though extention of  time was given for the convenience of the defendants to get over the transport difficulties.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">  (5) The learned could for the appellants relied  upon  an unreported judgment of  Govindarajachari  J. in &#8212; &#8216;C. R. P. Nos. 1032 to 1034 of 1946 (Mad) (B).  There the contract was dated 31.1.1945 in respect of the sale of groundnut kernal and the due date of  delivery was given as before the end of  January.  The learned Judge held that if delivery under the contract can be given and is permitted to be given under its stipulations on a date later than the date on which  the contract is entered into, it would be a forward contract within the meaning of  that Order.  But it will be seen from the facts of that case that unlike in the present case, the parties did not contemplate delivery on the date of the contract itself.  This decision, therefore, does not govern the present case. I would, therefore, hold agreeing with the Court below that the suit contracts were not forward contracts and therefore they were valid and enforceable.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">  (6) There is no force in the second contention for the contracts themselves specifically provided for the contingency of the Government imposing a ban on the export of groundnut kernel.  Clause 10 says:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">   &#8220;Under no circumstances including prohibition of  export from any particular district or native or foreign territory can sellers claim impossibility of performance of this contract.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\"> In view of that specific term,  this argument has not been pressed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">  (7) In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\"> (8) Appeal dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Andhra High Court G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 Equivalent citations: AIR 1955 AP 79 Bench: S Rao JUDGMENT (1) The question in this Second Appeal is whether the contract dated 14.5.1945 and 18.5.1945 for the sale of groundnut kernel are hit at by the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-andhra-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954\",\"datePublished\":\"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\"},\"wordCount\":930,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Andhra High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\",\"name\":\"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954","datePublished":"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954"},"wordCount":930,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Andhra High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954","name":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1954-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-21T03:43:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-chinna-konda-reddy-and-anr-vs-east-asiatic-company-india-ltd-on-5-august-1954#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G. Chinna Konda Reddy And Anr. vs East Asiatic Company (India) Ltd. on 5 August, 1954"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}