{"id":260177,"date":"2010-01-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-03-07T12:00:59","modified_gmt":"2016-03-07T06:30:59","slug":"c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nE.)ateC] this the 5\" day ofJanua1'y. 2010 \nBEFOREC\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE B s~Pz \u00a7':*:L*V.T<\/a>.::: . 3\nWRIT PETITION Not 1362:? o1]20.134\n\u00a33a1'1g~a_}0r.e -- 560 OE\n\n   V Kfi's3h,1j_.'_g;n1L1 H by\n\/-V:L(Q'i'dv\"k1b()LI{ 59 years\n\nV' 'V .V V S\/CA<\/a> \\*'::\ufb01l\u00ab\"_;11,21sL.1k)baiah\n\n' F.{'>., S.R.H.S. COI()I1y\nJaya11agar H I:'3Ioc.k [Cast\n\"Bai1ga10re -- 560 O1 '1\n\n' 4' Sn' Kan'1n'1am d 1' 1'1\n' Aged aboui 60 years\nS\/0 Iate Abdui E3ash<:=c:*\n\n \n\n\n\nR(3sicii1'1g 211. No.32. 5*" C1'c')ses's\n[I3y1-asat11ci1-:1. S.R.E-----1.8. CoEo11_v\nJayar1aga1- 1*' I31o<.~k filasl\nE-3e1r":g;a1E()1'<: -560 01 I\n\nSml. Sakzlmma\n\nAged about 59 _\\\/I_()\ufb01i_\\'\u00bb\u00bbv.__ \n\nJayanagar 1*\" I~3Ic);C'}<,_Eia1s'1V\nBangalore ~58O OH\u00bb _ --\n\nSri Ramu \n\nAged :ibo;_1E.  year\nE3.\/C):Ve:nk:11'?1E~7}3a:.  _ \nResiding at Nc_j;;\/$8'-. " \n5"' Crossv. 8*'? I.\\2ia.i*n.\u00a2 \n\nV . \u00a33yras:i.n_cire*.... S.R';.H.S. Coiony\n JayanagaI'=..1\u00e9* Biock E221:-31\n I3.g1{1ga,z1o1'c= --5V6U'O I I\n  :'31_f1"Bashe.\u00a2r Ahmed\n "abou\ufb01 52 3,\/ea1's\n"  S\/of\u00e9gbdjul Khadar\n\nRe~sidij,:~1g at No.46\n\n' .5"-'%\u00a2vC1*oss. 5"' Main\n\n.i"3y1"asandra. S. R. H . S. Colony\n\nA'  Jayanagar EH' Block East\n Bangaiore W560 01 1\n\n \n\n\n\n10\n\n11\n\nSri R1'217.ur Rehamaxl\n\nAged about 56 _VB\u00a31l".'-S\n\nS \/ 0 Abdul Re}"12211'ne111\nNo.47. 5"' Cross. 5*" \u00a7\\\/Iain\nByrzexsandrzl. S.R.H.S. Coiony\nJayanagar 18* Bkoctk E2131.\nBangalore W560 01 1\n\nSri Raju\n\nAged about 70 years\n\nS\/0 Basawachari\n\nNo.37. 5'" Cross. 5"' Main\n\nByrasandra. S.R.H.S. Colony\n\nJaya11e1g211* W Block Easi. \nBangalore M560 ()1 1 '\n\nSmt. Chand Su11ar1:\u00ab.1\nAged about 35 y\u20ac;ir.s\u00a7\n\nW\/0 late Mehaboo\u00abb.TPe_1As1qa ;   C'\n\nNo.29. 4'" Cross\n\n8" Main. S._R.}*I.S,-C--3.l.<\u00a7ny = _  \n\nByrasan.dr'a_ \n\nJay2111a_g;a1' .i7*"" _B1:)(;tk Ezisi  = C C\n\nB2inga!01f\u20ac----.--56\u00a3)_  1'-.11.'\/,,VL   " V_  V\n\nSml \u00a7'eJagz1'::1\u00e9;nj~  ~.. __   \nAgeti. 'E1b0l}1'.V'5\u00a7-8 grea \n\n_ \/0 lit? EN ag_\u00a7r:311C1vrz1 ' \n N43. 4'"'M_faia1\n 5'--i{Cr_0ss. S.'R';~}---E\u00ab.'S. Colony\n\nByrja.s.'g1':3_d1'e1\n\n   _Jay'w,1"agar 1*" Block Ez1.--v'45ESO 01 I\n\n12\u00bb.\n\nS-mi .. Na1*as\u00a3111'1I1121\n\n about 55 years\n\n\\\/'z\/..,\"'o late Piaiah\n\nAA  Residing at No.31\n\n 8\" Main. S.R.1wI.S. Cc:)1ny\n\nByrasa1r1d1'a\n\n\n\nI3\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16 \n\nJz.1ya1'1a1g,z1:' 1*' Block E32151.\nE3z111gal<)re W560 O1 1\n\nSri D I,a.ks]1ma1121\nAged about 40 years\nS\/0 late MLmibyrappa\n\nRssiding at No.38\n\n5"' Main. 5*" Main\n\nByrasandm. S.R.I--1.8. Colonyv--V\n\nJ21yar1agar 1-5' Biock Iias\u00e9.\nBangalore -560 01 1\n\nSri Sekaran\nAged abom 49 years\n\nS\/0 P R Sub1*21:1121.;_j1_\\_,r a.ncE .....  \n\nLakshmamma. __  _ _\nNo.27, 4"" Cross. 5"*Mai':1 \n\nByrasandra. S.R.H.S.'T'C()!i)'1*1 y:b\n\nJayanagar AIS Blog-'k "E*3e1..\u00a7i\nBelngalore' 011 \u00a7 \n\nSri    ;  V\n\nS\/.e.,K .VKf_i"\u00a7hi"1\u00ab;E11_3]3&1\u00a7  V V' "\n\niflo.-49'; ":3.'\u00a5 _VCrc5;sS, _5i='\u00a7 I'\\\/'Iz1i1'1_ V\n\nFiyra-.s21:1d '2'-:1  Q 1''? : E-312 S.' Coiony\nJ-a'ya11e1\u00a7\u00a7a11--* V1" __If3}_0re -560 01 1\n\nS';1.71i. R. Shailaja\n\n Aged about 23 years\n_fW\/0 T. Shekz-1.1'\n\nNo.44. 5*\" Cmss. 4\"' MEEiiI'1\n\n\n\n18\n\nAND:\n\nI3y1'z1sa1'1ci1'a.2. S.R.i LS' C01(.)11_v\nJz1ye'1:'mga:\". W Blocrk I-\u00a34531.\nI-:3z111g,e:11():\"L* ~ 560 O1 1\n\nSri R. L()kessh\n\nAged about 42 years\n\nS\/() 12119 Ramaiah\n\nNo.36. 5'-3' Cmss, 8\"' Main\nByraszmdra. S.R.E-LS. C(.)}(my\nJayanagal' 1*' Block E32131\nBanga}()1'c M560 01 1\n\n[By Sri N R NVa'ga__;-aj. f'2u'1,\\-*'c3;i'23'I'(*]='   \n\nThe Secretary _ VA ;  'V   ~\nIiousirxg 8: Urban {)e\\_=_e'1c)p11':*c{1t _  V' .\nKarr1a1.aka Gove1\"nni1em.--.Se(:rgtafiat.  ---- \nM S BL:i}dit1gs_ _A \"  .4  ' \nBanga.1o:%e  .091   \"    \n\nT he Cu3.;I1:ii_1i\u00a7f;s_si0V:':\u00a3>:\"._V  \n\nP{LVar1'121iak;a_V i\"fo7i ;sir_1 Boexrd.\nC:.-1u\\re'1'y. i--3'}\"1\u00e9f1xzg1i'A1 \"  ' '\nE3a';1_g_1a--1() --_ 550 _ 0'09 \" ~ . \n\nThe ASSisVtz1J'1I.'V'--Excct\ufb01ixre Engirlccx\"\n\n\"  Baizgalori-7 '~'.1b\\v1'1 i?1211'111i:'1g OI'!'i('G\n- . ._ \"K151 8.. \"C a u ve1*_\\'\/\"\"ii3\"r1 E1V:;1E1\n\n  Bai11g21lE3a:c M 560 009\n\n.'Fi':\u00e9 AVCELI pt{;'1*i'i'1t.er1ci\u20acn1\n\n SDSTE3  (3.9. I-'i0S})i.ta}.\n H\u00a3g'Su~:\"R0a1d\n\nBalggaiore ~ 560 029 ...R\u20acSp011Cie.nEs\n(By Sri R. Dev2;1cias. AGA for R1 zmd 4:\nSri B S Hadinaanl' for  Rae Ass(i:cia1.es,\nAdV()C\u00a31E\u20ac'S for R2 and 3)\n\n -....\"Peti{iQ:T\u20ac1\"\n\n\n\nh\n\nThis Writ E\"e1iii0n is filed 1..1nd(?r ar{.i(*1es 226 and 227 of\nthe consmuticm of India. praying to quash Ihe 0rd\u00a731's of\ncancellation daieci 1~4\u00ab2005 vide An1'}exure~P to P17. H  *\n\nWRIT' PE3TET1ON No. 17040 (H2005 (LB~RES}\nBETWPZEN:\n\n} Sri Syed Nasruliah\n\nAged about 40 years\n\nS\/0 bate Abdul Rahim\n\nResiding at. No.30\n\n4\"' Cross. 43\" Main  \nByrasandra. S.R.H.S. C01on'y._\nJayanaggar 1* Block. -A  V\nBangalom ~56O 012.1:  --_ h \"\n\n2 Sn11.dabeen'I'a1j  \nAged about-233 years ' \u00ab _  - \nW\/0 Srl ?_'Sa1%.i2Li1EaV'1.r_jk~.{jC21St .\nBv:;1I1g5{211().1'C '--~ 0 H.  .. '\n\n3 Sri Ei)aw00d_ MoEi1=.,\n; 'Aged abon 1:.' 39 ye;<1rs\n0 Sn' C N'IOh_E\u00a5,\ufb02':I1'J\u20acd Ibrahim\n, R'e"s:din.g at No.34\n  5':f'VC1'QsS',..8"' Main\n  S.R.}--LS. Colony\n 1*" Block \nB_a:r:g;a}'0re M560 0}. 1\n\n j  Rahamathurmisa\n\n'  Aged about 30 years\n W\/0 Sn' Syed Ziauiiah\nResiding a1. No.40\/10\n5'" Cross. Byzfasandra\n\n\n\nAND:\n\n7\n\nl3_\\\/msa nd 1'2-1. S. R. H . S. Colony\n\nJayanagar 1*' Block East\nl3a11ga10re 4560 O1 1\n\n81111. K. l\\?aveedaL1r1r1issa\n\nAged about 35 yean-s\n\nW\/0 Sri l\\\/Eollamed Khil(ll)i,.1Cl(;liI1\nResiding at No.35\n\n5'" Cross. Byrasandra\n\nS.R.I"I.S. Colony\n\nJayanagar 1"' Block I22-Isl.\nBangalom -560 01 1\n\n(By Sri N R Naga1'aj;'AcEvQ('rale]  \n\nThe Secretary  . '\nHousing 8! Urban D\u20ac\\'\u20aclV()}',)!"1"i~Ef1'1l\nKarnataka Govcrlmlenl S\u00a3"lC'v.I_"\u00e9'l\u00a3;1I'iE1l 2\nM 8 Buildings _   \nl3angalore -- 560 vz;)]Q~~1l_ \n\nFlih_.'3...,C'()VVl'"5i1_i'.1'1l.$\u00a7'i-:i()l1Gif'V  ' l' \nlV(a:'1'1a1tfallV<\u00bb:-1. l'l(;&;I Si 1 1 \u00ab.}3a1 rcl\n(;'.,_z1L1\\:e1yl5}'.:\u00e9i-van  .. ' '\n\nI Bang9.\u00ablorc*   \n\nThe A.\u00e9:<.:is11a 1V11'i'- EXr:(" L'1l'l\\w'c Erlginecr\n\n E32111g21l():;uTown l-?'la111'1i1'1\u00a7.', 0l'l"i(rC\n l{{_H,B,~Vl.C21 L1ve1'y"'i3l1 ave-;11'1\n\n~Baif7gal0re W 560 029\n\n  l3;lnE:aIc;;je W 560 009\n\n 'KSILI [l\u00a7:'1'i.i1teI1der11,\n' SDS"\u00a3"E3AT&. CD. l-Iospiial\n\nl-l\u00bb{)s.,L.1r"'R()ad\n...Respcmden1.s\n\n(By Sri R. I')eVadas. AGA for R1: .\nSmi. ['3ha1'e1Ihi Nagesh. Aclvocaie for R2 and R3:\nR(*s}:)()1'1(.lc=1'11 -4 56' Wed]\n\n'_ ." . P61 l1.'ispc('1. ()E'I---4101159 N0. 30. 34. 40 and 35 all dated\n2-4-2005<\/pre>\n
 vide \/\\1111ex141:’c?\u00abI”> 11″) P4 1*cs;pec?1′.i\\.-‘c1_\u00bb_’. <\/p>\n
These writ’ \u00a7)\u20act.i1i011s (*0mi:1g 011 for [)r\u20ac1iII}iI’1;1}f:1\/ .hV\u20ac’311*Ti11′;;f, in
\n‘E? C}1’o1.1p this c1a_\\_1. 1116 C01111 anadc the i'<)11(;\\.\u00bb'i:'11g;.: '  h 9' '
\nO R D E R A'<\/p>\n
In these two batch of vvrii p(:A'11't.1:-.'J1'i:_s."Ih;.)e1:i't.i0I1\u00a21$__j\u00e9ireh<\/p>\n
challerlging the S('_'[)J:1i'E11C' Q,rd.ers 15';1.Ss1%d bjf. . A\u00e9_}siS1L2111{'<\/p>\n
Executive Elrlgirleer. Ka:*11211.21kz1 H0L:sir;.g 1E3':()e1rVLj!. Cauvary
\nBhavenl. Ba1nga101'e. ()r1'__U\u00abi.04_'\u00a7A2OQ5' .1ja11'(:–1:.11ir1g the alloimem. of<\/p>\n
houses (',()I1Sf.i'11('1.\u20acd by 1116' I_3(:L:\/i'1:ci2\u00bb1,1::–1d\u00e91'-'jSR}–=IS Scheme to the<\/p>\n
1e.11e1111:V.}111. S.D.S. TB and Cl)
\n I-“3–:>1A11g:\u00ab;1h)1*\u00e9;””}121d 1’ais\u20acd 0bje(‘.’1.i()11 for such a11.0imer1t
\n had dimcted 10 (ronsider {he Said
\n(.)’bj,%b1’.i()1?s”hetail and a(\u00e9c01*c1i1’1g1y it wars 11<.)ti('ec\u00a3 that the
\nh0L1s\u20ac':: :(1:()nstrL1(*t.ed were 1101 urlder the ownership of the
\n H0usi11g E31,):-111'd. as they \\7v'E'.1"\u20ac.' c()11s11'11<'11'ec1 on the<\/p>\n
lafand be1011gi11g 10 the Crux-'<;\u00e91':'1:11(-111 and I'u1*1.11<.=1* 1.11211. as per the<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
orders; already passs-:.ed in dif\u00a7’ei’ei1i cases by the High Coui’t.. the<\/p>\n
Govei’imieni qu2u’1.Cr53 Could not. be alloiied for ihe private use
\nof the i’ei12ii’ii.s in o(tei.ip2;1i.ion and hence the order alloiiing the
\nhouses was required to be e.em(“.e1ied. All the peiilioneifs who<\/p>\n
are either the ailloilees or the siieeessors in {‘.i’1.ie”irom”..rhe<\/p>\n
ai.i.o1’i’.ees have joined iogeiher 10 file ihese Ixxrcf.-A4″ba1eh'<.oi7' _'w:n":.<\/p>\n
petitions. ('ha\u00a71e1igiiig.._{ ihe order 01' (12:1.i1'(:e1i\u00a31iio'i1.   iv<\/p>\n
2. The brief facts necessary i’o_i’i iheiiidisponsaii 5i*~.:’iie;=,e<\/p>\n
eases, stated in i’1Lii.she11 ‘\u00bb:a_i_1″e.,. iha{i”- the i’13e1.i\u00abi:i’c3:1ers;\/theiifi’<\/p>\n
predecessors had fiied a_1pp1ie21’a:_i_(_)e1i:s._be{iore theVQ()vveirm’1ie1it. on<\/p>\n
18.06.1990 seeking a]1di.1’i.i<?I'1'1\ufb01(J35}1(5'EiVS'f'S;ilheli. were in their<\/p>\n
oceupai1,ion. 2.15;.ein\u00a73i.oye,eE\u00a7~.oi'"i.he 4*" respo1'ideiii\u00ab S.[).S. TB and
\nCD Hc)spi'i.2i]." Barigai<)re.V "Whey had s()ug1e1i allotment. of ihese<\/p>\n
1'l0L},SijS on owi'1ership basis pi1rsa.ian': to the Goverrmiem Order<\/p>\n
.Ada1'.\u20ac:d i[i\u00ab–989. which is produced 211. Amiexure~A. As per<\/p>\n
iheeaiti."'"Q1fcieV\u00a7""2is many as 25 quarters occupied by the<\/p>\n
emfj'ioye.es 'oi the ersl while i\\\/ieiiiai. Hos"-;pi1'.211 {now knows as<\/p>\n
.e\u00bb."f\u20ac1D\/if–1.AVNSs) were permitted in be aiiioiied in i\u00b0avour of those<\/p>\n
 The petitioners requested for similar i.rea1.mer1i and<\/p>\n
if)<\/p>\n
for allotment. of the houses in their oCt't1p\u00a3tt.ion. as was done in
\nthe ease otthe mnployees of the Mental Hos\u00a7)ita1. It istihe (vase<\/p>\n
of the petiitioners that t}1()L.I\u00a7.{h the ap1)Eieati()ns \\Metfe–sLsh'mVii.t.ed<\/p>\n
to the Government. the. Gove1'mne1tt fW()1"~'4~""c'lI'.Clt'.VdVV*' 't.h_e'se\ufb02<\/p>\n
applications to the Karnataka i"ic)Lis.~jri'nAg 'B0ar'.:} with'~vi'i'_istru:etio-nsb<\/p>\n
to Consider the ease for allotment in"\u00aba.ce.ofda11oe_with  The<\/p>\n
petitioners fL.\u00a3t'U1Cl' urge that t;–r,)4ti'~:._Vtheh"FWD,_andVn'~i.hVe"HousingV<\/p>\n
Department intimate\u00e9lv   'VB0.ard.  action in
\naccordance with law in thetaF'l'12tii\u20ac}d\u00a7'\u00a7t'  Thml\u00e9ih '~'\u00ab\u20ac"i9iiI1
\ndocuments 21131'p.:ft)dt::iee'd'::;it'1_::    retteeting the
\neommunieat      and the Housing
\n to the Karnataka Housing
\nBozirdfit is  Court in the present case to go
\ndeep int4o'"ihis  to observe that considering the<\/p>\n
(:ase.{ot" the ap'piie;'1t1t.s,V the Ka1'nata}<.a Housing Board decided<\/p>\n
.to<..a11otufi'he*~,houses in favour of the petitioneis\/t.heir<\/p>\n
"p.rede~c.essor.s 'atnd letters i.ntimat.ing the allotment came to be<\/p>\n
isstied   1996. This was i'oi_1owed by exe(.:ut.ion of the<\/p>\n
.t.':=sa\u00a7;;i_stefe'd iease–ct1m~sale agreements dated i1.07.i996.<\/p>\n
 conditions were stipulated for payment of the value and<\/p>\n
a1lo1me1'1ts mzxde we1'e req1.1i1'ed to be ('.ar1ce11ed. To this show
\ncause notice. \u00e9he pe\u00a3iI.ior1c1's filer! ()b}<r(71io1'1s '-2135 per
\nAnnexure~O. "FhereaI'1er, the impugned o.a:1Ce1121tiori.o1*ders-are<\/p>\n
passed cancellirlg the zxllotmem made.\n<\/p>\n
6. Several Cor11:er11ions .1iT\u00a32;ec1′  V14_’eam_ed’.\n<\/p>\n
Counsel for the petitioners z.1ssai1ir1g.&t.11:e”v~;iliddi’t.y”aod <\/p>\n
the impugrled (‘.ai’1(‘\u20ac’H211.i()I’I ‘o_1’de1’s i1:iC1L1d.ir1gg._1he~-.irnporta111d’<\/p>\n
contention that the KarI_1atak2~1 I’;I_ot:~vsi11g,_ Board had rio power or
\nj1.1risdi(:1.ior1 to Canoe’: th’eVr\u00ab\u00a3111o\u20aczn;3b’z1t 4’CnVfde1\u00ab’s3., or1Ce the absolute
\nsale deed was 1″egis1.e1*ed-“in ..f’f;j1’~.r(V)1–:r”\u00bbg)I” 1_h_ej’)eiitior1ers. it is also<\/p>\n
contended the: t;”g’ie._va11ot1111.e1’11. _.was’ z\ufb01\u00e9ide by the Karnataka
\nE-1oL:sing\u00a7 E3’oz1:’dVrmf1y_\u00e91t1e’I’-d_{1*1e’:31′.ate Government forwarded the
\napp1ic:21t1oi’1’s__ arjdx’im’V1rr1121′;e’\u00a7\u20ac the Karnataka I~ic)usi11g Board to<\/p>\n
Illztlce e=;11otn1er1’i;–..A in Va(:Cord21nce with law, as per the<\/p>\n
.eomn’1uV11ir:u1_io*:1s issued. vide AImex.ures~C and D. It is also<\/p>\n
 Kar1’122L1,aka HOLESi1’1g Board and the State<\/p>\n
Go\\}ern1=n:ent””a1″e estopped from taking up the contention that<\/p>\n
 Ehee_’a11o’E”n1em was made without: zmthoriiy of law or without<\/p>\n
llaviiigf 0w:'”se:’si1i;) 1’ig11ts by the ii;-11*:’1at.21l<z1 1—–Iotising B()\u00a3–11"d. over<\/p>\n
it.\n<\/p>\n
7. The lezarnecl Government Adx-‘()(:ate._ appearing for<\/p>\n
the State Government submits that there was no G0vet*nn1ent.<\/p>\n
Order authorising the K2-i1’n21t2ika. Housing BOE:i7d ”<\/p>\n
allotment of the houses in i’.2’1\\rmJ11* oi” the en’1p_1.(iy.eeskit’ t.he’4{“*i’<\/p>\n
respondent. On the other harideizi  \u00a7)r()ee-e.ed1’\u00a51;;,sv”C3\ufb01” the<\/p>\n
meeting held under the C11ai1*n121ns11ip_ ofthe Cii_i_ei”Se1::rei;2i1*y 6::<\/p>\n
07.1 1.200}, a deei.si0n was t.akezi*i.() the ‘effe’e.te_.t.=}121i.bthe houses
\ngiven to the G0vemmVc’i1~t,V_ se:\\~i2ti’it’s.:’asm”eQ_i’i”i(1i211V\u00e9i(:e’On’1m0dat,i0n<\/p>\n
shall not be pe1*mit.ted to be e’c3{t\\=Vey6:d”–t{2.Vt.i’;_en”: on ownership<\/p>\n
basis by zmliiizigfpemi2in.ei”kt ttll0t,men’ts and that the houses
\ntinder SR1:-SS\/RHi3_2Sc:i1e’i”gete 01′ the KHB given to variotis
\nc”1ep.\u00a3?t}1ft:’11ete1ts i”c”):”*–_.13eiI1gV useci as qt:.au’te.1’s for their empioyees<\/p>\n
.wm,:id .:’et\u00e91’i\u00ab.r1ed as quz1:’t,e1’s for G0verm’1’1e11t employees. The<\/p>\n
of the meeting dated 07,11,200} is produced<\/p>\n
at Q\/3X’n11eXt:i*e’\u00a5R9 211011;}; with the stmement of objections. He<\/p>\n
 ._\u20acAh:?r_ei'():5e contends that the allotmem matde and the sale deed<\/p>\n
e(.:Lit.ed subsequent. to the pi’0c-eedirigs Am1exure–R–9. Cannot:<\/p>\n
lh<\/p>\n
have 2e11’1y legal S.’:1I1(‘l.ll_V. ex-‘(>1’1 2:1SSL1I’11l1″l\u00a7_{ that the K21r’112:1t.akz1
\nE—\u00a3()us1’1’1g Board has mrteci on the strettgth oi” the State
\nC:OV\u20acI’I’1I’11\u20acI1l i’c)1’wa1’di1h1gthe E1ppll(?21l.iO1’1S filed by 1l1Cj_)vG1’_lL’if)VI1\u20ac1’S<\/p>\n
t.o it.\n<\/p>\n
8. L\u20acE1I’I1\u20acCl Cotlnscl 2-11:)p:\u00a7’.2-11’ib1h1.g’jfor .’tj_h’e. ‘l1′.Sl’.I’L1(‘l\u20acCl on the land
\nbelonging to the C:1’11h_1′(‘:1’1Vt.  I-“=’lt)Lisi’1”;g.3Boa1’c1 has taken<\/p>\n
decision to ca:r”1Cl\u00e9’}j.l,lth\u00ab2 :\u00e91ll(}\u00a7l,II’l%fI1l\u00b0\\’lll}lC’l7l…C\u00a7a1’1l’1Ol be found fault<\/p>\n
with.\n<\/p>\n
9.  _ .[“ll21″v’i;’1.g”l1\u20ac21’1f(il”-the l~’cz’11’11ecf (‘0Lli’1S(_’l for the parties
\nartcl on oo..1_1Sidc:’2-1~1_iohA’t:if_ t’l\u00ab–1_o’tt:1e.tt\u00a3-\u00e9rizztls on 1*ec~o1*d. E find that the<\/p>\n
a.ct,ioh~ of the. A’ ‘1’e’s;>oV1’1cI(=,1-11 Kamataka Hc)usin.gg Board in<\/p>\n
lV”(’21Il'(tellf’tl1g ll”1\u00a7’. allotrttent. is illegal! and LI1’1SL1Si.8lI1’c1l’)l\u20ac in law.<\/p>\n
I  E:'{‘u.1:\u00a7’sil1.1’glEiol:i:1″d hacl irtitiially allotted the houses as back as<\/p>\n
on {r3__.’7. l..996fai’1d the registctvd lease cum sale agreernentls were<\/p>\n
VV'”\u20actX\u20ac(YL1l:\u20ac\u00a3lZOE} 11.7.1996. On the very gr()1.1nd the-1t. it had no<\/p>\n
power to make such allonnenis as the houses were c\u00e9onsirucied
\non {he land beioiigiaigg to the Pubiie Works Deparinient. the<\/p>\n
Housing Board had earlier cancelled the e1i1o.tm_e’;’1i’~v. on<\/p>\n
11.5.1998. When ihis Court sez aside ihe said c~;m.\u00a2~e:1’1′;:{ip\ufb01 an_y(‘i,<\/p>\n
reserved liberty to issue fresh n()1iee…;1.11d p–as’s”o.r_derE:~ ai’res1’1′;”<\/p>\n
the Housing Board passed a 4’;-can ::’c”a.i.I’~i(‘\u00a2;”iiaiion o:fCl.e:”iA:1Vo:1<\/p>\n
26.12.2000 3:1SSig1’ii1}g ihe *\\l’e’r.y reason  lgiousesii<\/p>\n
oonsi;ruCted by the ieiousing    belonging
\nto the Governnieni E3–o-a.rd~hbad no right io alioi
\nthe same. Why-:_n the…  this Court
\nchallenging  {.’\u00a2E:.:i”}i1(‘.(::’_’.v_”‘VEV.1’V’Li0’i1:.:v0:f:’Vi1’H{;i’iII1\u20acl’11 by filing writ<\/p>\n
petitions in  the Housing Board<\/p>\n
oughi to h:.–1ve.de’i”ei3d’tid”i1s”‘:2.c:tio11 and should have sou.ght for
\nsusiainingfhe rfzinceiiziiionj<):'c1e1's before {his Court. instead. ii
\ninviie}.d the pei.i'tione1\u00b0s ior discussion and passed 21 resoluiiori<\/p>\n
.on=7.6.2'0O2"ifo.. rt()i'ifim1 the ailotmerii. Ii collected the differerice<\/p>\n
an'ie–L_irii'VV"oi"?-I;'he.:"value of the sites and passed an order dated<\/p>\n
9.5.2003 Vicle Annex'ure~L and withdrew the cancellation orders<\/p>\n
0  .j:iss?.1_ed on 26.12.2000. if at 211! the Hoiising Board was of the<\/p>\n
r'.iWi121t. it had no power or authority to make allotment. how<\/p>\n
i.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE E.)ateC] this the 5″ day ofJanua1’y. 2010 BEFOREC THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE B s~Pz \u00a7’:*:L*V.T.::: . 3 WRIT PETITION Not 1362:? o1]20.134 \u00a33a1’1g~a_}0r.e — 560 OE V Kfi’s3h,1j_.’_g;n1L1 H […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nC Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1834,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\",\"name\":\"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010"},"wordCount":1834,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010","name":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-07T06:30:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-papi-reddy-vs-the-secy-housing-and-urban-devlpt-on-5-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C Papi Reddy vs The Secy Housing And Urban Devlpt on 5 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260177\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}