{"id":260230,"date":"1917-12-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1917-12-04T18:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917"},"modified":"2014-07-31T10:05:26","modified_gmt":"2014-07-31T04:35:26","slug":"srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","title":{"rendered":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 44 Ind Cas 319<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Aiyar, Napier<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1. We accept the finding that the contract was a wagering one. The further question is whether the money deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant as the security for the performance of his part of the contract is recoverable. There is no question of limitation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2. The lower Courts held that <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 65<\/a> of the Contract Act was applicable to the transaction. We are unable to agree with them. <a href=\"\/doc\/1295756\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 30<\/a> makes a wagering contract void ab initio and to such a class of contracts <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 65<\/a> has no application. <a href=\"\/doc\/1946174\/\" id=\"a_3\">In Ledu v. Hira Lal Base<\/a> 29 Ind. Cas. 625 : 43 C. 115 : 21 C.L.J. 537 : 19 C.W.N. 919 this view was taken. Despite the inclination of the learned Judges of the Bombay High Court in the earlier cases to apply <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_4\">Section 65<\/a> to such contrasts, the later view is in agreement with the Calcutta view. <a href=\"\/doc\/554778\/\" id=\"a_5\">See Parshottam Veribhai v. Chhotrasangji Madhavsangji<\/a> 40 Ind. Cas. 1002 : 41 B. 546 : 19 Bom. L.R. 545. In this Court, Oldfield and Bakewell, JJ., held in <a href=\"\/doc\/380954\/\" id=\"a_6\">Srinivasa Aiyar v. Sesha Iyer<\/a> 41 Ind. Cas. 783 : 6 L.W. 42 : 34 M.L.J. 282 that <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_7\">Section 65<\/a> does not cover monies paid under a marriage brokerage contract. That principle is applicable to the present case. The question still remains whether the plaintiff is entitled to sue for the recovery of the money paid by him in furtherance of the contract of wager. We are clear that the direct prohibition contained in <a href=\"\/doc\/1295756\/\" id=\"a_8\">Section 30<\/a> does not prevent such a claim. This is not a suit to recover any money won on any wager&#8221;, nor is the suit to recover money &#8220;entrusted to any person to abide the result of any game or other uncertain event on which any wager is made.&#8221; In our opinion this latter clause applies only to oases of monies left with stakeholders. it may be, as Mr. Ramachandra Iyer suggested, that the money is sometimes left with one of the parties to the contract on account of his solvency or respectability. Bat the position he would occupy with reference to the money so paid will be that of a stakeholder. The entrustment referred to in the section can have no meaning when the money is left as a security for the due performance of the contract. We, therefore, hold that <a href=\"\/doc\/1295756\/\" id=\"a_9\">Section 30<\/a> does not prohibit the maintainability of such a suit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3. This takes us to the general right of parties whose monies are in the hands of another without the latter having any right to retain them. Ordinarily the person who paid the money is entitled to claim it back. But there may be such a conduct on the part of the person paying it as to disentitle him from recovering it; one instance is that of being a party to the perpetrated fraud. Another instance is where moral turpitude is attributable to the person who paid the money. The decision in <a href=\"\/doc\/1946174\/\" id=\"a_10\">Ledu v. Hira Lal Bose<\/a> 29 Ind. Cas. 625 : 43 C. 115 : 21 C.L.J. 537 : 19 C.W.N. 919 is an illustration of the latter class of cases. The observations of the learned Judges in that case show that if there is no moral delinquency, the plaintiff can sue to recover. <a href=\"\/doc\/1858135\/\" id=\"a_11\">Gulabchand Paramchand v. Fulbai Harichand<\/a> 3 Ind. Cas. 748 : 33 B. 411 : 11 Bom. L.R. 649 and <a href=\"\/doc\/239124\/\" id=\"a_12\">Haribhai Hansji v. Nathubhai Ratnaji<\/a> 23 Ind. Cas. 602 : 38 B. 249 : 16 Bom. L.R. 62 lay down the same principle.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">4. These decisions derive support from a catena of English decisions which have held that even against a stakeholder a suit for money will lie if he had not parted with the stake money and the claim is founded not on the result of the wager. It is an a fortiori conclusion from these authorities that where money is not left with a stakeholder nor entrusted on condition that its disposal is to be determined by the result of the uncertain event, the money deposited as security must be returned. Hampden v. Walsh (1876) 1 Q.B.D. 189 at p. 196 : 45 L.J.Q.B. 238 : 33 L.T. 852 : 24 W.R 607; O&#8217;Sullivan v. Thomas (1895) 1 Q.B. 698 : 64 L.J.Q.B. 398 : 15 R. 253 : 72 L.T. 285 : 43 W.B. 269 : 59 J.P. 134; Burge v. Ashley (1900) 1 Q.B. 744 : 69 L.J.Q.B. 538 : 82 L.T. 518 : 48 W.R. 438 : 16 T.L.R. 263 enunciates the proposition we have referred to.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">5. In our opinion the general principle that a plaintiff whose hands have not been tainted by corruption and who has not committed any act which fixes him with having been a party to a fraud is entitled to get back the money which he left with another is applicable to the present Case. We uphold the judgment of the Courts below on this ground and dismiss the second appeal with costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">6. The memorandum of objections is also dismissed with costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 Equivalent citations: 44 Ind Cas 319 Bench: S Aiyar, Napier JUDGMENT 1. We accept the finding that the contract was a wagering one. The further question is whether the money deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant as the security for the performance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917\",\"datePublished\":\"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\",\"name\":\"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917","datePublished":"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917","name":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1917-12-04T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-31T04:35:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/srikakolapur-venkataraju-vs-gudivada-ramanujam-on-5-december-1917#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Srikakolapur Venkataraju vs Gudivada Ramanujam on 5 December, 1917"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}