{"id":260349,"date":"2009-07-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-05-13T07:08:34","modified_gmt":"2018-05-13T01:38:34","slug":"orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
IN $92 HIGH coum as KARNATAKA AT BAN\u00a7Ai_ORE %  i\n\nmares mxs we 24\"' my OF JULY, 2999   %  \n\nT BEFGRE\n\"me HONBLE muuswica N.w}agRk%\n\n\u00a7,s$ANo.1362\/2007 (Iik:;1:;  L\n%;%\u00a7i}'l'Wi\u00a7E}N:    \n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 {j\u00e9rekandi Vishwanathappa  ‘  v
\nS\/o.Basa\u00a7;:pa  .\n<\/p>\n
Agad 278 years: 1   =.\n<\/p>\n
Occ: Accmznts Q\ufb01id\ufb01f {P_{:r’;d.}    <\/p>\n
2. U.V.Basava.IajA___  ~.:;__ _ ..\n<\/p>\n
S \/o.Vishwa:iat\u00a31%:?ppa  ‘
\nAged 56 years ._ —   ‘
\nO-cc: Engineer, 4.\n<\/p>\n
3. {.}.V.Prakash .\n<\/p>\n
S] e:).vishw;:1i:2J.happ9; . _ VV
\n   ”  ….. .. 9
\n{;’.\u00a7:(:: ‘”\u00a3;3;gi1:&eif _ <\/p>\n
A11  r’:%:’sideI14ff;:=-.V bf  – . .\n<\/p>\n
  Sri Re\ufb01uka Bxtei\ufb01gief\ufb01, i~’,\u00a3:i.Koad
\n “”:>swanagc.re~5_ss1 .3..\u00ab:;>7 .3 APPELLANTS<\/p>\n
‘ (,\u00a7.5f.%’:V  :;~’.~e%”, %’;TP.:~1;:i\u00a5, ;*1dv.,<\/p>\n
\/-”\n<\/p>\n
%\u00bb.\/<\/p>\n
– 3 .,
\nJAI3_,I3\u00a3L\ufb01\u00a7WEm\u00a7_”1′<\/p>\n
‘Finis is the defendants’ secrttazixd agpeai <\/p>\n
COI1(Z:1}.I”I’\u20acfi\u00a7 \ufb01ndings recorded by the <\/p>\n
the defen\ufb01aiilts have been ts\u00e9gfgngftliiy’ ” \ufb01{i\u20ac~giOsSsss.ed”. <\/p>\n
during 131$ pendency 01′ t.\u00a5f1ea =.suitT
\np\ufb01aintiff is entitled ta ma\ufb01i\u00e9atgoty ‘ 11:1-“_”:L’,Ev:1~1i’.1.C’3T.if.’:If’1″A’lA”\u00ab:.1_’LV\u00a3i1=’v ggsxrft:
\nback in possession ‘\u20ac;}”1Ci\u20ac:I’  of .$p\u00a2r::i;t”ic Ke\ufb01af<\/p>\n
Act, 1963.\n<\/p>\n
AV.2%;–vT\u00a3+f<\u00a7'rvj.th\u00e91iiyany\u00e9s\u00e9 0t*"c\u00ab;\u00abn'{zeI1ience, the parties are<\/p>\n
rei\u00e9zfafd "\u00a36 33:  Vaff \u00e9'=:'f_\u00e9fi'5:_r14ed its in the orig\u00e9rxai suit-<\/p>\n
 3, "i'}1e Si:1bje \u00e9,:i: .n:1atte:r of the suit is a shop<\/p>\n
 A\u00a7;Vj;4i(:,\u00a71*;i:%\u00a7?}\u00a28:VA'be,;s:ri11g Door No.65?\/BA, measuring 13.25 fix<\/p>\n
  ._ _sif.%fi::{teci at Mandipet in vavangere City.<\/p>\n
\u00a7_)'\u20acf$I}.{ii3.1I}1:'; is the awner of the said property. The<\/p>\n
  Adffen\u00e9i\u00e9ints lmsed the sai\u00e9 progeny ta that pigsjnti\ufb01' an a<\/p>\n
"'..iii0I'it.\u00a31\u00a3y rem: sf ;<s.2,{.)o0j– in the year 1984.<\/p>\n
' ' '"'Subseque:1tiy, the rant was enhanced to K3.2_.90(}\/–~ per<\/p>\n
menth. Qomplaini\ufb02g that on 21.4.3998, taking
\nadvantage of the piaintiffs absence, the defengients
\ncame with the eupperters tn the suit scheduie
\nopened the muck to the suit seheduie
\nthrown out the entire a\ufb01iicles Zr.-:1""'i:i'1e.   K 'V
\nsuit: property. On cemi\ufb01g to keen?\n<\/p>\n
giaimiff rushed back
\nThereafter, on 24.4.. e:1efm\u00ab\u00a71ec;~ee of
\npermanent injunetio\ufb01’  from<\/p>\n
interfering wit3′:\u00abT:. f2eaeefi1l”\u00abp6*$se$_$\u00a3=3n and enjoyment<\/p>\n
of the__$1i._it-\n<\/p>\n
__-4. Thev .d,ei’e1’1d\u00e9:dits entered appearance and<\/p>\n
 V’  –. eeeeijeixdeed  has voluntarily surrendered<\/p>\n
    of the property {:11 38.4.1998 as he was<\/p>\n
iiI3_e\u00a7\u00a3e~  gi-ay the arrears 0f rents of &<e.S2,i30{)\/-.<\/p>\n
 _"i*her.efei'e, they have contended that the plaintiff is net<\/p>\n
  E; peesessien ef the promrty and therefere they<\/p>\n
 u ….i3rayed for dismieeai of the suit. in fact by an.<\/p>\n
application filed for intarim erders, an order ofstatus<\/p>\n
que was passed. However, the defenda3*1is'V\u00a7Jjg<:ii;::\u00a7ia%:d<\/p>\n
defendants No.4 irl possession of  _uSi:;it:VA.\/.:$<\u00a7he\u20ac1Vt:i\u00a7:\u00bb <\/p>\n
preperty as a tenant, and th\u20ac}5;_8}T'\u20ac_C'21%,\u00a7ifi g"  .i31;$si;1_e: 9.s. 7.<\/p>\n
on coming 110 knew 33301.3: tfie_ v."i:1duc*:;i7<},f\u00a7,V':4'<$f V i\ufb01e '4*\u00bbh'
\ndefendant, the piaintiff    f\ufb01r
\namanciment of thc\u00e9  E18 has baen
\niiiegail\ufb01r' dispQsse$$e\u20ac:i}:~.  to be<\/p>\n
amended .  g\u00e9fsiteihsnt was filed.\n<\/p>\n
 5.: 1 I;’:\u00ab_}  –.*3f0f\u00a7$ai\u00a7iVVVV’j)ieadings, tha Trial Court<\/p>\n
f”ra_n:;’c:d’ me ~.Vf{:x%}eW’i;1:’g”.f0ur issues and twe additionai<\/p>\n
isstt\u00e9s: \u00ab V<\/p>\n
  1. %3}i\u00e9f.her the plaintiff graves that he is
\n‘ V  the tenant; under defendant on the date
\nof suit?\n<\/p>\n
2. Whether the plaintiff pmves that
\ndefandant is trying to evict the plairzti\ufb01’
\nfrom the suit scheduda property<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
Without acioptirxg the due process of<\/p>\n
law?\n<\/p>\n
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled f{1!I’:<\/p>\n
reiicaf as sought 12):’?\n<\/p>\n
4. What order or de<:rw':'_,  <\/p>\n
Additional Issues:\n<\/p>\n
1. Whether the  ‘-..;\u00a7rovee;’V:’ ‘
\npassing the order
\nthe defendazt Nrjki   defeiidaiits
\n1333?  L    <\/p>\n
 2. ‘W:t \u00a7c:ftfi%\u00a7%::’  pxaigitiff is entitled far<\/p>\n
” 4n2ar16i\u00e9ti;<:if\u00a7i\u00a73f1j1:ii:{3tioz1 as sought fer?<\/p>\n
  \ufb01x'). ___t:he gjiaintiff, he examineci fzimsell;<\/p>\n
;PWV1..,_fi\u20ac4.\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7aJz1\u00a711ed two wimesses Pwsjz and 3 anti<\/p>\n
p1'ori\u00abiiCedV  "\u00a7V1c::<:1m:;eI1ts as per i:':x.\u00a7'1 to \u00a318. 03:1<\/p>\n
 .  i;}ei"1a.iu)"f"-::f"'t\u00a71\u00a7ixdei'Endants, third defendant: was examineci<\/p>\n
  iI.,3\\\u00a3v'..3.. 'Tiiey also examined three Witnesses as LEW 3.2<\/p>\n
9.<\/p>\n
xx\/i<\/p>\n
to 4′ ‘1’i”1-5:3; produced 19 decuments,
\nas EXBI to D3}. A 2 ”\n<\/p>\n
7*’. THE Trial Court on ap;}\u00a7f\u00e9C\u00a7a\u00a3iG\u00a7; ”  9 7
\nera} and Cumenta1’y \u20acVi\u00bb(if.3I}{)\u20ac:;'(}\u00a7%”\u00a3T\u00a3\u00a7COI’giV.’k”i\u20ac;\u00a7(f
\nplaintiff has proved that    su11d\u20ac#VrV
\nthe dsfe\ufb02dants in :’\u00e9 Spe(:’i_:”  Sc\ufb01\u00e9d\ufb01i\u00e9 property
\nas on the date’ of    threw out the<\/p>\n
snare aI”c1′(:_i6’\u00e9\u00a7’;;j[\u00a3\u00a7%.i’ i:h??:  the suit property.<\/p>\n
\u00a3+’11rtt1rcT,;  ‘  has proved that, after
\npassi\ufb02g’  \u00a7.’.1’%$.N0\u00ab3, defandant No.4 was
\ni\ufb02c\u00a3”a3ct${:i”~\u00abi:i:\u00a2*d\u00e9ih\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01iii\u00e9 1 to T3 in the suit propemy and<\/p>\n
   is entitied to mandatory<\/p>\n
‘  i$1_}!1r1{:;\u20aci0f3;’ gr restaration of the passession of the<\/p>\n
.’ :=*.y;?:?7:%:{er:i1_A1,{\u00e9; ‘ipfapertys Thus, it deem:-,::i the suit as prayed<\/p>\n
far. ~~  \ufb01;.geved :by the said judgment am} decrees, 1318<\/p>\n
A ”  ,$i \u00e9’1i7eI”:da11\u00a3s preferred the regular appeai, The appeiiate<\/p>\n
(\u00a734:mI1:, an appreciation of the entire: evidence on I’\u20aciC(}I”‘C\u00a7<\/p>\n
and after farmuiatiilg the points for Cansideration, held<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
that the findings mcorded by the Trial are<\/p>\n
}1J.S\ufb01ifi\u20acd and therefore it ciisn\ufb01ssed the ap~\u00a7\u00e9:ai;AT..: <\/p>\n
hel\u00e9 that the agpeaj itself is   >
\nsuit is filed under Sec\ufb01on  i.zeii\u00e9%
\nagainst which 110 appeal   t:h{\u00a7
\nsaid gudment of mag %AdLe1’e:1\u00a7a1;:s are
\nin second appeai  <\/p>\n
8.   .\u20ac;..}_:4″‘  ‘a}g3pel\u00a3an\u00a3s, assaibng<\/p>\n
the  a:_1″ff%;x”t'”1gi’\u00a3u”1.~\u00e9;t’1ts  ciecree: of the: Courts
\nbe\u00a3oxa%V;’.\u00e9C{)nt\ufb01n:\u00e9it\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7L\u00ab.%Vti1.g\u00a7\u00a7t*~-\ufb01zfaen ihe piaintiff was not in<\/p>\n
possession \ufb01n _i’hc\u00e9’-._  of the suit and when he<\/p>\n
 $1ii\u00a7*e:;t\ufb01\u20acrr;& tl\u00a7e”‘;Jo$session on 18.4.1998, the suit for<\/p>\n
  fi;1ji1n\u00a7:t\u00a7;31:”3:I_1{i. the suit for recavery 91″ peasession under<\/p>\n
  0f the Speci\ufb01c Reiief Act was not<\/p>\n
 mai\u00a3iT\u00a3,2\ufb01j:1able. He canterzdeci that the ijourts below have<\/p>\n
 ?3″Gpsriy apgreciateci the material on recor\u00e9 and<\/p>\n
%  ..  __’\u00a7;\u00a31us have committed serioua error in decreeing 13:16 suit<\/p>\n
of the piainti\ufb01’.\n<\/p>\n
\n
..}{_\u00a7..\n<\/p>\n
seeking for possession and convemtmg the _a
\nsuit under Sectien er of the Speci\ufb01c
\namerzdment was permitted.   ‘\ufb02ue  V4.\/.1\u00b0\u00a7.ie’d. u
\nimmediately after the plainti\ufb01
\ndefemdarzt was inducted  \u00e9\u00e9ite . of
\ntherefore it is a ciee_r…easeV.e-ti1e:{\u00a7’-the bee\ufb02
\niliega\ufb02y disposseesew   of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
The yerson    ijiepossessed, can
\nmaintain  of Section e of the<\/p>\n
Sgeei\ufb01se   instant case, the tenant was
\nenti{\u00a3ed tQ4’get’hae\ufb01 pee~seeSioI1 by the defendants. In<\/p>\n
fac%:_;1a”gejI}s\u20ac:  .;\u00a7 i1e\u00a5.m..en’\u00a3 and decree in a suit under<\/p>\n
  the Specific Reiief Act, 1963, 1’10 appea}<\/p>\n
 before the appellate Court was not<\/p>\n
 _  and therefere the iower agpeilate Cami”:<\/p>\n
H H K   ju\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01ed in dismissing the appeal of the defendants.<\/p>\n
_\u00a7\u00a7_,<\/p>\n
in that View of tha matter, i dc: nq\u00a3._”i’1t\u00a7\u00a3i f’~ai:y<\/p>\n
substantiai question of law far CQI1si(\u00a3er\u00e9it.ioz: ‘_T’iri t;hi s V’ <\/p>\n
appeai which merits admission.) A\u00e9 Ce:’C\u00a3ingiy, ‘  is<\/p>\n
dismissed ai; the stage 31’ Va;:i_1411i$\u00e910:\u00e9;’itse1i”,    ”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 Author: N.Kumar IN $92 HIGH coum as KARNATAKA AT BAN\u00a7Ai_ORE % i mares mxs we 24″‘ my OF JULY, 2999 % T BEFGRE “me HONBLE muuswica N.w}agRk% \u00a7,s$ANo.1362\/2007 (Iik:;1:; L %;%\u00a7i}’l’Wi\u00a7E}N: 1. {j\u00e9rekandi Vishwanathappa ‘ v S\/o.Basa\u00a7;:pa . Agad 278 years: 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nOrekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1210,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009"},"wordCount":1210,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009","name":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-13T01:38:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/orekondi-vishwanathappa-vs-m-prasanna-kumar-on-24-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Orekondi Vishwanathappa vs M Prasanna Kumar on 24 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260349"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260349\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}