{"id":260441,"date":"2010-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-02-20T15:25:43","modified_gmt":"2017-02-20T09:55:43","slug":"sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRCRev..No. 306 of 2010()\n\n\n1. SASIDHARAN,S\/O.KARUNAKARAN,RESIDING AT\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. RAVEENDRAN,S\/O.KARUNAKARAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. NARAYANA PILLAI(DIED),S\/O.GOVINDA PILLAI\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THANKAMMA,D\/O.KOCHUKUNJAMMA,\n\n3. SUDARSANA PILLAI,DO.\n\n4. BABU PILLAI,DO.\n\n5. SURESH,DO.\n\n6. RAJESH NARAYANAN,DO.\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :14\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.\n                     ------------------------\n                     R.C.R.No. 306 OF 2010\n                     ------------------------\n\n           Dated this the 14th   day of October, 2010\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.\n<\/p>\n
\n
      Under challenge in this revision filed by the tenant and the<\/p>\n
alleged sub tenant, who are brothers, is the judgment of the Rent<\/p>\n
Control Appellate Authority, Kollam, confirming the order of<\/p>\n
eviction, which was passed against them, on grounds under sub<\/p>\n
section (3) of Section 11 and also clause (i) of sub section (4) of<\/p>\n
Section 11.    The need projected by the original landlord under<\/p>\n
section 11(3) is that the building is needed bona fide for the<\/p>\n
occupation of one Sudharsanan Pillai, his son, for the purpose of<\/p>\n
conducting glass and    ply wood business. The allegation of the<\/p>\n
landlord in the context of the ground of sub letting was that the<\/p>\n
first respondent is the tenant having taken the building on the<\/p>\n
basis of the rent chit executed by him in favour of the landlord<\/p>\n
and the 2nd respondent is an unauthroised transferee\/sub lessee.<\/p>\n
      2. The tenant’s defence to the ground under Section 11(3)<\/p>\n
was that the need is not bona fide, that the landlord has five<\/p>\n
RCR.No.306\/2010                  2<\/span><\/p>\n
other rooms, which are identical, and that if the need is bonafide,<\/p>\n
the landlord could have accommodated his son in any of the<\/p>\n
other rooms.    The tenant also claimed protection of the second<\/p>\n
proviso to sub section (3) of Section 11. The tenant’s defence to<\/p>\n
the ground of sub lease was that the original tenant was their<\/p>\n
father and that upon demise of the father, both the respondents<\/p>\n
have become tenants and hence there is no sub lease or transfer.<\/p>\n
      2.   The Rent Control Court enquired into the matter and at<\/p>\n
trial evidence consisted of Exts.A1 to A5, B1 to B11, Exts.C1 to<\/p>\n
C3, PW1 an RW1 and 2. PW1 was              Sudharsanan Pillai, the<\/p>\n
defacto claimant for the building. His evidence inspired the Rent<\/p>\n
Control Court. In fact, the tenants also admitted in their evidence<\/p>\n
that Sudharsanan Pillai is presently without any job or avocation<\/p>\n
though     their contention in the statement of objection is<\/p>\n
otherwise. The court held that the need is bona fide. The court<\/p>\n
further held that the landlord did not have vacant possession of<\/p>\n
any other building at the time of commencement of the Rent<\/p>\n
Control Petition.    The Court also held that the tenant was<\/p>\n
unsuccessful in showing that he satisfies either of the ingredients<\/p>\n
of the second proviso.    Accordingly, the order of eviction under<\/p>\n
RCR.No.306\/2010                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
Section (3) was passed. As regards the ground of sub lease, the<\/p>\n
first respondent admitted that the lease is governed by rent chit<\/p>\n
executed by the first respondent in favour of the landlord. The<\/p>\n
court found that there was nothing in evidence to support the<\/p>\n
contention     that the original tenant was the father of the<\/p>\n
respondent. In fact, it was admitted by RW2 in his evidence that<\/p>\n
the building has been sub let by RW1 in favour of RW2. The<\/p>\n
learned Rent Control Court accepted      the above evidence and<\/p>\n
ordered eviction on the ground of sub letting also.<\/p>\n
      3. The Appellate Authority considering the appeal preferred<\/p>\n
by the revision petitioner reappraised the evidence and concurred<\/p>\n
with all the conclusions of the Rent Control Court. Accordingly,<\/p>\n
the appeal was dismissed confirming the order of eviction.<\/p>\n
      4. In this revision under Section 20, various grounds are<\/p>\n
raised and Sri. B.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the revision<\/p>\n
petitioners addressed strenuous arguments before us on the<\/p>\n
basis of all the grounds.   Mr.Suresh Kumar highlighted that the<\/p>\n
landlord was having     five other rooms which were identical to<\/p>\n
the petition schedule rooms. There was no justification for the<\/p>\n
landlord to have picked and        chosen the petition schedule<\/p>\n
RCR.No.306\/2010                   4<\/span><\/p>\n
building itself for the alleged need of Sri.Sudarshana Pillai, his<\/p>\n
son. The action of the landlord is actuated by oblique motives.<\/p>\n
The learned counsel submitted that the finding of the statutory<\/p>\n
authorities regarding the identity of the building is wrong. At<\/p>\n
any rate, according to the learned counsel, considering the social<\/p>\n
relationship between RW1 an RW2, the court should have<\/p>\n
concluded that the arrangement between them is not one of sub<\/p>\n
lease or transfer, but it is one of permission only. The learned<\/p>\n
counsel argued that the judgment of the Appellate Authority is<\/p>\n
vitiated by illegalities, irregularities or improprieties justifying<\/p>\n
interference under Section 20.        As a last plea, the learned<\/p>\n
counsel requested that at least one year’s time be granted to the<\/p>\n
revision petitioners for surrendering the premises.<\/p>\n
      5. We have very anxiously considered the submissions of<\/p>\n
Mr.Suresh Kumar. We have gone through the judgment of the<\/p>\n
Appellate Authority    as well as the order of the Rent Control<\/p>\n
Court.     We do not find any warrant for invocation of the<\/p>\n
revisional jurisdiction under Section 20. Under this jurisdiction,<\/p>\n
we are not expected       ordinarily   to make reappraisal of the<\/p>\n
evidence or substitute our conclusions of facts for conclusions<\/p>\n
RCR.No.306\/2010                     5<\/span><\/p>\n
arrived at by the final fact finding Authority, the Rent Control<\/p>\n
Appellate Authority, when such conclusions are founded on<\/p>\n
evidence actually available on record. As already stated, in the<\/p>\n
instant case, it was admitted by the tenant that Sri.Sudharsana<\/p>\n
Pillai, the son of the landlord, is without any job or avocation. In<\/p>\n
the light of such      admission,     the conclusion that the need<\/p>\n
projected by the landlord is bona fide is sustainable.     Then the<\/p>\n
question is whether the tenant is entitled for the protection of the<\/p>\n
second proviso to sub section (3) of Section 11. We are of the<\/p>\n
view that the finding of the statutory authorities that, RW1 in<\/p>\n
the RCP the first revision petitioner is the tenant, is based on<\/p>\n
quality evidence including the admissions of the tenant himself.<\/p>\n
It is admitted     that  RW1, the first revision petitioner, is not<\/p>\n
conducting any business in the petition schedule building and that<\/p>\n
he is employed with KSEB. When that is the situation, there is<\/p>\n
no question of      Court   upholding the contention that the first<\/p>\n
revision petitioner is seeking out his livelihood by carrying out<\/p>\n
business. This means that the first ingredient of the second<\/p>\n
proviso will have to be found against the first revision petitioner.<\/p>\n
When the first ingredient is decided against the first revision<\/p>\n
RCR.No.306\/2010                     6<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioner, it will follow that the first revision petitioner will not be<\/p>\n
entitled for protection of the second proviso to sub section (3) of<\/p>\n
Section 11.     We do not find any infirmity about the finding<\/p>\n
regarding the liability of the tenant to suffer order of eviction<\/p>\n
under Section 11(4)(i).         Evidently and admittedly the first<\/p>\n
revision petitioner is not in possession at all. He is employed in<\/p>\n
KSEB.     The question is whether the second revision petitioner<\/p>\n
has acquired the status of the tenant.        It is in evidence that the<\/p>\n
original lease is in favour of the first revision petitioner . When<\/p>\n
that is the situation, there cannot be any infirmity about the<\/p>\n
order of eviction under Section 11(4)(i).\n<\/p>\n
      The RCR fails and accordingly will stand dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                       PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                       P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE
\ndpk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RCRev..No. 306 of 2010() 1. SASIDHARAN,S\/O.KARUNAKARAN,RESIDING AT … Petitioner 2. RAVEENDRAN,S\/O.KARUNAKARAN, Vs 1. NARAYANA PILLAI(DIED),S\/O.GOVINDA PILLAI … Respondent 2. THANKAMMA,D\/O.KOCHUKUNJAMMA, 3. SUDARSANA PILLAI,DO. 4. BABU PILLAI,DO. 5. SURESH,DO. 6. RAJESH NARAYANAN,DO. For Petitioner :SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR For […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1149,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010"},"wordCount":1149,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010","name":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-20T09:55:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sasidharan-vs-narayana-pillaidied-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sasidharan vs Narayana Pillai(Died) on 14 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}