{"id":26054,"date":"2008-04-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-19T04:30:26","modified_gmt":"2019-02-18T23:00:26","slug":"the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda<\/div>\n
THE I-l0N'BLE MR. JLISTKJE 'S.1\u00a7.'  V\nTHE HON'BLE MR. Gowm\n\n \n\n1 THE AS3IST'ANI'?; GEHERAL MANAGER\n(ADM.N)'*BE{ARA\"i'i-I. SRNCHAR menu L'l'D..\n.om=*.:cE:.' oF'!z\u00a7\u00a7aE\"c\u00a7E;NmI2A\"m.:ANAGER\n TELEcaa;naMu.n1c.m.oNs _--\n\n   _ \n\n2 THE TELECQM DESTRICT MANAGER\n_ GUR'uw'ARPET  \n4;j \"I'.I_L1m.A'm_\n E]3E1,_QAuM'_5.. _____ \n\n --v.(B\u00a3YPI}i\"ARE REPRESENTED BY\n* . GENERAL !t.l..A.!~!.l\\.f.3.|\u00a3R {.A...n.1.:~.I;.\n\n0\/1:, (3:.M.T.. BELGAUM-1) '\n\nL... 'SF'? '.7 FLAP! V3.5.-.'.L\".D, AD. .3\n\nauto\u00bb. 5 n 1 n I\n\nT SMT BHARATHI S!-IIVANAND BADIGER\n\n'.'.','0 LATE 8.? BE\". {GER\n\nR\/O CHULARE SAVADATTI TALUK\n\n\n\nBELGAUM DlS'I'RIC'I'\nSINCE DECEASED BY THEIR LRS\n\n1 SUSHMITHA ;\nDIO SHIVANANDA BADIER\n\n2 SAMBAV!  \nD10 SI-HVANANDA BADiC_1_E'R_\n\nBUTHARE mmoges _    \nREPRESENTED .B'f~..CHANNAPP\u00a3. BADIGER \" \"\n3,10 ggpzgga, R;IQ'Q!-!E_Jl_.\ufb01j\u00a7E   % = \nSAVADATTI mwx    \u00b0 '   _\nBELG_AUM_D!SrR!C<T=_ ' "\n\nE E   RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
TH!E’s.jiiii\u00a7i*:ijAF5FEAi)”‘iES .:ii’:”|’i’.’l”i’J\ufb01’flE}’VV'[‘ 4 OF’ THE KARIWFAKA
\nutgyjg\ufb01i :Apr|3j-nnri\\::1’tai:\u00a2Airz5i”- -:\u00bb~1’g:’.m~” A3199. T35 gggnn nnsanng<\/p>\n
Ill \\-I\\Jl\\-.l -!~’$\\-II ‘4 I-V-III) l\\-I lull-WI II I-‘ll\\ Ill!-Z-lla-<\/p>\n
IN THE wan’. PE\u20acif:T10N’m\u00a7.EEs2459\/03 DATED 05\/0912007.<\/p>\n
Tzlzss “=.*::=.?rr.  coming on ma PR3
\nHlggmzue. *r1s~:1sj”Dm,’ vmuueomux oowm J.. DELIVERED<\/p>\n
 1’HE r:oLuQw1NG:”‘ EEEEE <\/p>\n
J’I’I’l’I\ufb02n’H”I|’.I’l’<\/p>\n
v.1{Jn;\u00a2?S.P. Eaciigcr, was a casual maztioor under the<\/p>\n
 .. app\u00e9ilaints. He along with others, had appmachod the
\nE’   Court – CGIT for relief. An award was passed in<\/p>\n
their \ufb02avour by the corr on 21.6.1996 dimcung<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\\’\/
\nK<\/p>\n
lulu I.u.u:1uuut  Iuvu nxuu<\/p>\n
service but with only  of uackwages. it    <\/p>\n
2. “”- ” –‘ “A4″”:fv”:”‘ _  <\/p>\n
1 116 L.’ “xim\ufb02s\ufb01u qw\ufb01su<\/p>\n
appellants by \ufb01ling” writ  \ufb011e2_’_*Ia’t-‘1’_IZ”!’,=  filed’<\/p>\n
against 8.1′. Badigeij’\u00ab~waa\u00abii\ufb01{;1$.’1\u00a7;\u00a7;p3oo49\/1’999. Said
\nwrit petition along   matters were
\n11:13.-   learned Single
\n   vlawamds were modi\ufb01ed,
\n   the appellants was set aside<\/p>\n
.9 it vlrhasv Z  the workmen are entitled to<\/p>\n
 ”   Llerieiit at continuity of service and<\/p>\n
 _  ‘aenefu u ‘t wiuluut ‘aacliwages. Inn<\/p>\n
4.. ‘I… ……1:A.I….. 4.34.]<\/p>\n
drdcrjiwasz’ lquestiuned by the appellants in Writ Appeal<\/p>\n
 as .Nue.’.7V5l4\/ 1999 which was allowed. Challenging the said<\/p>\n
9  Order, SLPs were \ufb01led. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil<\/p>\n
;-l.pp-=-..a.l. lllosilz-.9-124412001, by its deciaioti dated<\/p>\n
\\\\
\n\\\/
\n\/T’<\/p>\n
   nllnnrnd ‘I’ 9 id nnvvnnin ‘I’hn
\nO I ‘-1 m”‘”\u20ac’l <\/p>\n
the Division Bench was set asideusnd   = . <\/p>\n
single Judge was restored.  ” V;\u00a7;-13,<\/p>\n
2.7.2001, Sri S.P.\n<\/p>\n
implementation of the   Hon’ble<\/p>\n
111:-niluaruvu-1.’: (“1-use-vii’     _
\nLII-ll GI-LIG \\.AJI.I.l lug Q-.I-I-Ill-Ill’-i.I.l ‘ V. p<\/p>\n
learned Single’ Judge   wirc of’ said SP.
\nBadiger.    2003 for issue of
\ndnecuonte lduie  mmnams  the writ petition i.e.,<\/p>\n
appellants,’  __ case for appointment on<\/p>\n
  is-1 in-3-_-II at A-‘agnnl-In cs” ‘:90: sin’-us-I-u-I
\nI1′)-I.I.IlJH.BUai’5ufI\u00abIGBI:\\.I El ‘3-gll-I~.’~li’-P I-II VIIJUV \\ll. \\l\\J\u00a7.I-II IJI. lI.\\.t.I. LIDIJGIIII<\/p>\n
  Vifior reliefs. The said writ
\n   passed away during the pendeney of
\n” writ  her two minor children have come on<\/p>\n
 have  the writ petition, through<\/p>\n
 A.i.”.\u00ab..:.._ ………….a_ .1 ..
\n. n 5<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
.5.\n<\/p>\n
3. Learned Singie Judge notiehgthed <\/p>\n
s.1=>. Badiger had worked for 4 19 days whneiie   he   <\/p>\n
and that he had succeeded  <\/p>\n
Judge in W.P.No.30049_\/    e.fc’a1ld*’; have’: a<\/p>\n
get the bene\ufb01t  re1neL\u00e9tet.:;en.,  the
\nallowed me    has ordered
\npayment; of  Challenging
\nthe said  has  \ufb01led.\n<\/p>\n
4.:   learned Advocate appearing for
\nthe appellanteand  the records.<\/p>\n
    counsel for the appellants<\/p>\n
dd   the learned Single Judge has issued the<\/p>\n
“wit of am rule er law; that the<\/p>\n
 . pene\ufb01t of the order passed by the Horfble Supreme<\/p>\n
‘   Court on 31.3.2003 cannot be extended to the me of<\/p>\n
the deceased casual mazdoor; that the claim in the writ<\/p>\n
XV\u00bb
\n\/.c<\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
petition was only for appointment on  <\/p>\n
ground and when the   <\/p>\n
because of the writ  <\/p>\n
91-do-r-Inn nnvmenf nf Pa 0:   I- 3 an  it!”
\n‘ N am  I-ll’-MIC’! V’ J W. -‘I.  ‘ > ‘  2’  at CT<\/p>\n
unjustified.\n<\/p>\n
R  uni -In-p.. A-In’4ru|Vl5’n fhnf<\/p>\n
u. 3.1′. Ba-“net W-3<\/p>\n
“- llkllo    IIGI.\n<\/p>\n
a casual   2     V’  ts; that he had
\nworked__for’.  was found to
\nbe iiacgal  Court and that an<\/p>\n
awaxd \u00abwas   xlfavour directing reinstatement<\/p>\n
 AA Sin5g’let’Judge passed the order i.e., 16.9.1999, ‘SJ’.<\/p>\n
 was alive. Since the matter was carried in wrlt<\/p>\n
 appeal and ultimately went up to the Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
Gout,  Honble Supreme Court while setting aside<\/p>\n
e.\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
.7.\n<\/p>\n
1……\n<\/p>\n
the order passed in w\ufb01t appeai nus <\/p>\n
passed by the learned Single Judge, ‘clearly!  ” <\/p>\n
S.P. Badiger for reinstatement mom.-otor<\/p>\n
of service. In View of his  bofo;-oo1o o:oLt~.or oooo o<\/p>\n
 ….e..!it.y,  moooe the go
\nperson. ‘”1″‘noug’n   ifor
\nappointment.   and she also
\nhaving   oondoncy of the writ
\n  minor daughters aged<\/p>\n
auuut 9″ -mare’  *<\/p>\n
.   m’e , e<..w1ei.de.ri.r-.g %<\/p>\n
2.5<\/p>\n
pecuI1ar_ " "fsn%ct-so cie' Fumatnnom of the case, ieam <\/p>\n
   a sympathetic view, has ordered<\/p>\n
d  of oomponoouon of Rs.20.000\/- by the<\/p>\n
do   Considering the peculiar facts and<\/p>\n
d   of the case and that two minor children<\/p>\n
"' mrents, we do not \ufb01nd it appmprlate m<\/p>\n
\\
\n\\\/
\n\/_.\n<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
interfere with the disete\ufb01on exe\ufb01'”‘ ‘” “‘””‘””V”‘[j””‘*”*”<\/p>\n
Single Judge in ordering eompensatio\ufb01of   <\/p>\n
only. Had Sri. S.P. Badi\ufb02\ufb01r  vn” ‘*3 <\/p>\n
got the benefit of    of: i’<\/p>\n
ser-.-ice, en. in ‘.’l!.’..”.’.’ ef his   .h.”e~  .1′ the<\/p>\n
order ‘by the ‘ ping the order’ of
\nthe Labour_     not get the
\nbene\ufb01t  matter was taken<\/p>\n
up in   not come by an end prior<\/p>\n
 n\ufb02inn<\/p>\n
I-has ‘ as
\n\\.-‘ IE-.4\\-v.ll. \ufb02.l.lI’Iu, I19 I’l’\\II.I.l\\a| .I.lw.I\\.: bun.<\/p>\n
‘Il-\n<\/p>\n
“‘ 31%;: death.\n<\/p>\n
bene\ufb01tV’i”of’v1e\u00a7nstateinent, etc., or re-tren’ chment<\/p>\n
    claim made in the writ petition by<\/p>\n
   S.P. Badiger was ibr compassionate<\/p>\n
it  in view of the penur_v_. having hat the<\/p>\n
ml’-I-I-In C5-ucu|”Ir  1-1l:C’.\u00a21’l! QIFIQ hll\ufb02 nlan<\/p>\n
usufi\ufb01  |..uv.”:’- Juluuy. nlunuoay, eusu unu nun-u<\/p>\n
  away during” the pendency of the writ petition.<\/p>\n
 Under these circumstances, learned Single Judge was<\/p>\n
justified in directing payment’ of oompensation of
\n\\<\/p>\n
*4<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
Rs.20,000\/’ – by the appciianta to the   <\/p>\n
ofS.P. Badigcr\/Exv-mazdocr.   <\/p>\n
9. For the fomgoing ncccc\ufb01a  L?<\/p>\n
\n\nwe do not \ufb01nd any merit  \n\nby the learned fcr \nwrit appeal    It is made\n as precedent, since\nthe    and circumstances of\n\nthe  -\n\n:3-\n:7\n'-4\nS-'\nQ...\nIQ\n(D;\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda THE I-l0N’BLE MR. JLISTKJE ‘S.1\u00a7.’ V THE HON’BLE MR. Gowm 1 THE AS3IST’ANI’?; GEHERAL MANAGER (ADM.N)’*BE{ARA”i’i-I. SRNCHAR menu L’l’D.. .om=*.:cE:.’ oF’!z\u00a7\u00a7aE”c\u00a7E;NmI2A”m.:ANAGER TELEcaa;naMu.n1c.m.oNs _– _ 2 THE TELECQM DESTRICT MANAGER _ GUR’uw’ARPET 4;j “I’.I_L1m.A’m_ E]3E1,_QAuM’_5.. _____ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":932,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\",\"name\":\"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008"},"wordCount":932,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008","name":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T23:00:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-general-manager-vs-smt-bharathi-shivanand-badiger-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Assistant General Manager vs Smt Bharathi Shivanand Badiger on 4 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}