{"id":260635,"date":"2010-08-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-10-07T09:26:44","modified_gmt":"2018-10-07T03:56:44","slug":"k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 9107 of 2008(H)\n\n\n1. K.THANKAMMA, AGED 68,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :30\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                  W.P.(C). No.9107\/2008-H\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n           Dated this the 30th day of August, 2010\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    The petitioner is the widow of late Shri.N.A.Sudhakaran<\/p>\n<p>who was a freedom fighter.     It is averred in the writ<\/p>\n<p>petition  that   the  petitioner&#8217;s   husband  had   actively<\/p>\n<p>participated   in   the   Punnapra-Vayalar   Struggle   and,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, he was arrayed as an accused by the police in<\/p>\n<p>Case  No.P.E.10\/1122  of   the  Special  Magistrate   Court,<\/p>\n<p>Alappuzha.  Since non-bailable warrant was issued against<\/p>\n<p>him, he absconded from 30\/10\/1946 to 08\/09\/1948 and at last<\/p>\n<p>he was   declared  as  an  absconder  by  the  court.    The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s late husband was granted pension under the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Freedom Fighters&#8217; Pension Rules as evident from<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1.  Ext.P2 is a copy of the application for grant of<\/p>\n<p>Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension.  Ext.P3 is a certificate<\/p>\n<p>issued by the Sub Inspector of Police after conducting<\/p>\n<p>local  enquiry  wherein   it  is  certified   that  he   has<\/p>\n<p>participated in the Punnapra-Vayalar Struggle and a warrant<\/p>\n<p>had been issued under P.E.10\/46.  It is also mentioned that<\/p>\n<p>the relevant records are not available now.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    2.   Initially, the application was rejected by Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>stating that the State Government has not recommended the<\/p>\n<p>application.      Thereafter,   the   petitioner&#8217;s   husband<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.9107\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                               -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>approached this Court by filing O.P.No.23991\/2002.          By<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5, the Central Government rejected the application<\/p>\n<p>which was under challenge in W.P.(C).No.26813\/2003.          At<\/p>\n<p>that point of time the petitioner&#8217;s husband had produced<\/p>\n<p>the Personal Knowledge Certificates from Shri C.G.Sadasivan<\/p>\n<p>and Shri V.K.Viswanathan.      The petitioner&#8217;s husband again<\/p>\n<p>produced the Personal Knowledge Certificate issued by Shri<\/p>\n<p>H.K.Chakrapani another freedom fighter a copy of which is<\/p>\n<p>produced as Ext.P6 and, Ext.P7 is the copy of the convict<\/p>\n<p>register relating to the certifier.      Ext.P8 is the copy of<\/p>\n<p>the order granting S.S.S Pension to Shri H.K.Chakrapani.<\/p>\n<p>It   appears      that the  State   Government again   did  not<\/p>\n<p>recommend the application for S.S.S Pension and by relying<\/p>\n<p>upon     Government   letter  No.65269\/FFP   A2\/2005\/GAD  dated<\/p>\n<p>02\/09\/2005, Ext.P10 order has been passed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     3.      The main reason for rejection of the application<\/p>\n<p>is that the District Collector in his report has stated<\/p>\n<p>that &#8220;as per the available copy of the Judgment, kept in<\/p>\n<p>the Collectorate, regarding case No.PE.10\/1122(1946), the<\/p>\n<p>name of the petitioner&#8217;s husband is not seen included&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, it is pointed out that the certificate of Shri<\/p>\n<p>H.K.Chakrapani is not acceptable.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">     4.      The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n<p>that the report made by the District Collector cannot be<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.9107\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>supported since what was available and referred to therein<\/p>\n<p>was not a copy of the Judgment in Case No.PE.10\/1122(1946).<\/p>\n<p>It is pointed out that in other connected cases [W.P.(C).<\/p>\n<p>Nos.31178\/2004       and 12456\/2007],   wherein  the  very  same<\/p>\n<p>reason    was     shown, this   Court   considered  the   matter<\/p>\n<p>elaborately by Ext.P13 Judgment.       My attention was invited<\/p>\n<p>to the relevant findings therein to show that what was<\/p>\n<p>available and referred to by the District Collector is not<\/p>\n<p>the Judgment in Case No.PE.10\/1122(1946) but only an order<\/p>\n<p>transferring the case from Sessions Court to Additional<\/p>\n<p>Temp.Sessions Judge Thiruvananthapuram.       It is pointed out<\/p>\n<p>that the list of accused therein is not exhaustive as only<\/p>\n<p>those who faced trial alone are listed in that document.<\/p>\n<p>In the cause title of the document, the names of 25 accused<\/p>\n<p>have been shown.        This is considered in paragraph (5)<\/p>\n<p>onwards in Ext.P13 Judgment.         It was held by this Court<\/p>\n<p>that the said document cannot be treated as the copy of the<\/p>\n<p>Judgment.      In fact, in the above writ petitions, the State<\/p>\n<p>Government had filed counter affidavit with reference to<\/p>\n<p>the said document and on an appreciation of all aspects,<\/p>\n<p>this Court had held that the approach made by the State<\/p>\n<p>Government is not correct.       It was held that the document<\/p>\n<p>relied upon by the Statement as a copy of the Judgment was<\/p>\n<p>not a true copy of a Judgment.        The petitioner is entitled<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.9107\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                              -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for the benefit of the said finding.      It is also pointed<\/p>\n<p>out that the State Government, later on recommended the<\/p>\n<p>case of the applicant in W.P.(C).No.12456\/2007, namely, one<\/p>\n<p>Smt.Elizabath Varghese and Ext.P14 is the copy of the<\/p>\n<p>recommendation forwarded by the State Government to the<\/p>\n<p>Central Government.      It is pointed out that the said<\/p>\n<p>applicant is now a recipient of S.S.S Pension.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">     5.      Herein also the petitioner is relying upon, two<\/p>\n<p>other documents namely, Ext.P3 certificate issued by the<\/p>\n<p>Sub Inspector of Police stating that there was a warrant in<\/p>\n<p>Case No.PE.10\/1122(1946) against the late husband of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner as well as Ext.P12 a copy of the report, in the<\/p>\n<p>form prescribed, submitted by the Tahsildar to the District<\/p>\n<p>Collector, when the application of the late husband of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was processed for granting pension under the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Freedom Fighters&#8217; Pension Rules.     In Column (1) it<\/p>\n<p>is clearly certified that &#8220;he has participated in Punnapra-<\/p>\n<p>Vayalar Struggle and he has gone underground for a period<\/p>\n<p>of two years on consequent of the arrest was issued against<\/p>\n<p>him&#8221;.     Evidently, that was accepted and by Ext.P1 pension<\/p>\n<p>was sanctioned to him.     Apart from these two documents, he<\/p>\n<p>had produced the Personal Knowledge Certificate issued by<\/p>\n<p>Shri H.K.Chakrapani and, therefore, these three have to be<\/p>\n<p>independently assessed along with the N.A.R.C from the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.9107\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">                                -:5:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>C.J.M Court.       It is also submitted that Ext.P9 is the copy<\/p>\n<p>of the N.A.R.C of the C.J.M. Court, Alappuzha.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">     6.      In that view of the matter, Ext.P10 order of the<\/p>\n<p>Government is quashed.       The matter will be reconsidered by<\/p>\n<p>the State Government and a proper recommendation will be<\/p>\n<p>forwarded afresh, after considering Exts.P3, P6, P9 and<\/p>\n<p>P12, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt<\/p>\n<p>of a copy of this Judgment and, on receipt of the fresh<\/p>\n<p>communication of the State Government, the application for<\/p>\n<p>S.S.S Pension will be considered afresh and order will be<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Central Government within a further period of<\/p>\n<p>three months.        The State Government will bestow attention<\/p>\n<p>to the relevant findings in Ext.P13 Judgment as well as the<\/p>\n<p>findings     rendered   above  and   there  will  be  a  proper<\/p>\n<p>assessment      of   the  eligibility  of  the   deceased  Shri<\/p>\n<p>Sudhakaran and the petitioner for the grant of pension and,<\/p>\n<p>thereafter,      forward   appropriate  recommendation  to  the<\/p>\n<p>Central Government as directed above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">     The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">                             (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)<\/p>\n<p>ms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 9107 of 2008(H) 1. K.THANKAMMA, AGED 68, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1119,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\",\"name\":\"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010"},"wordCount":1119,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010","name":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-07T03:56:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-thankamma-vs-the-union-of-india-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Thankamma vs The Union Of India on 30 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260635\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}