{"id":260639,"date":"2008-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-03T01:40:15","modified_gmt":"2015-08-02T20:10:15","slug":"vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n\n                             CHANDIGARH.\n\n\n\n\n                                           Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008\n\n                            DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 10, 2008\n\n\n\n\nVIKAS KUMAR                                          ....... PETITIONER(S)\n\n                                 VERSUS\n\nSTATE OF HARYANA                                     .... RESPONDENT(S)\n\n\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA\n\n\n\nPRESENT: Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).\n         Mr. Sidarath Sarup, AAG, Haryana.\n         Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate, for the complainant.\n\n\nAJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">            This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure,<\/p>\n<p>seeks bail in FIR No.10 dated 12.1.2008 under Sections 498-A, 406, 304-B,<\/p>\n<p>302, 34,<a href=\"\/doc\/1569253\/\" id=\"a_1\"> Indian Penal Code<\/a>, Police Station, Barwala, District Hisar.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">            The facts, in brief, as have been brought out by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner, are that the petitioner was married with Poonam<\/p>\n<p>on 30.1.2005. There was an issue &#8211; a son; namely, Modak. Modak was<\/p>\n<p>suffering from a serious eye ailment requiring cornea transplantation of<\/p>\n<p>which the success rate is 60%. It has been contended that Poonam was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\"> Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>under tremendous mental tension on account of ailment of her son.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">      `     On 10.1.2008, Poonam left the matrimonial home with the<\/p>\n<p>child during early hours. Intimation was given in regard to this to Rajesh<\/p>\n<p>Chugh, cousin of Poonam.         It seems that Rajesh Chugh gave an<\/p>\n<p>application, which was entered as DDR No.17 in Police Station, Barwala,<\/p>\n<p>and has been placed on record as Annexure P-2.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">            It is the specific case set up on behalf of the petitioner that<\/p>\n<p>Poonam left a suicide note. The suicide note was brought to the notice of<\/p>\n<p>Rajesh Chugh, however, no reference was made in his statement. Be that<\/p>\n<p>as it may, the document (Annexure P-2) indicates that there was no<\/p>\n<p>allegation as against the petitioner or his other family members in regard<\/p>\n<p>to demand of dowry.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">            It has also been brought out that the dead body was recovered<\/p>\n<p>on 12.1.2008 from Rajli Canal. The FIR was lodged on the same day with<\/p>\n<p>allegations not only against the petitioner and his mother but also against<\/p>\n<p>his maternal uncle, sister and her husband-Rajesh.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">            Guided by the contents of the suicide note, a search was made<\/p>\n<p>around the canal. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that<\/p>\n<p>no proper investigation was conducted and the suicide note was not<\/p>\n<p>investigated. Be that as it may, the suicide note was taken into account for<\/p>\n<p>grant of bail to Ishwar Devi alias Ishwari Devi, mother in law of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased. In this regard, reference has been made to order (Annexure P-<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5).\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">            Supplementary statement of Munish, brother of the deceased,<\/p>\n<p>was recorded on 18.1.2008, wherein again, a reference to the suicide note<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\"> Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>has been made. Munish has admitted the suicide note, however, has tried<\/p>\n<p>to explain it by saying that the accused might have connived and forced<\/p>\n<p>his deceased-sister to write the note to defend themselves.               The<\/p>\n<p>investigation file reveals that on 19.1.2008, the suicide note was handed<\/p>\n<p>over by Ishwar Devi alias Ishwari Devi at the time of her arrest.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">             Learned counsel for the petitioner has also stated that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has been in custody since 18.1.2008. An application has been<\/p>\n<p>filed under <a href=\"\/doc\/1138947\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 319<\/a>, Code of Criminal Procedure, for summoning the<\/p>\n<p>three relatives, referred to above as additional accused. Even a criminal<\/p>\n<p>complaint has been filed in which the petitioner and other family members<\/p>\n<p>are being prosecuted.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">             The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, is that a doubt has been created on account of ignorance of the<\/p>\n<p>suicide note by the Investigating Agency. When the defence is brought<\/p>\n<p>out, the suicide note would be established. The suicide note establishes<\/p>\n<p>innocence of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">             Learned counsel for the respondent-State, to whom assistance<\/p>\n<p>has been given by the learned counsel for the complainant, states that<\/p>\n<p>there have been as many as three deaths in so much as Poonam was<\/p>\n<p>pregnant at the time when she died. The body of Modak is yet to be<\/p>\n<p>recovered and Modak might be alive and in the custody of the accused<\/p>\n<p>side.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">             I have considered the issue. The material placed before the<\/p>\n<p>court is required to be considered only in the context of the prayer for bail.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">             A perusal of the document (Annexure P-1) that has been<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\"> Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>termed as a suicide note\/dying declaration, indicates that the deceased<\/p>\n<p>declared that she was in depression due to eye problem of her child. The<\/p>\n<p>success rate of cornea transplantation is 60%. If the operation is not<\/p>\n<p>successful, more damage could be caused to the eyes of the child. Under<\/p>\n<p>these circumstances, a decision had been taken by the deceased to jump in<\/p>\n<p>a river and commit suicide. The note further states that there is no fault of<\/p>\n<p>any one in the matter. The action of suicide is in relation to the child and<\/p>\n<p>the deceased only. The parents or the in-laws are not at fault. Be that as it<\/p>\n<p>may, for reasons best known to the Investigating Agency, the suicide note<\/p>\n<p>has not been brought on the record of the investigation file although,<\/p>\n<p>admittedly, it has been referred to in the statement of the witness. No<\/p>\n<p>investigation in regard to the note, however, has been conducted.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">               It seems that an application for further investigation was<\/p>\n<p>made from the side of the accused which, however, was declined. A<\/p>\n<p>petition was carried to this court also in the same context, which was<\/p>\n<p>withdrawn.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">               I have also referred to order (Annexure P-5) passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Judge, Hisar, wherein, in para-8, it has been recorded &#8220;The<\/p>\n<p>police has not investigated the matter in the light of the suicidal note of<\/p>\n<p>the victim&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">               I have also taken note of the fact that although on 18.1.2008,<\/p>\n<p>Munish, brother of the deceased, had referred to the suicide note,<\/p>\n<p>however, the suicide note had been taken possession of on 19.1.2008,<\/p>\n<p>purportedly at the time of effecting the arrest of Ishwar Devi alias Ishwari<\/p>\n<p>Devi, mother of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\"> Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008                                       5<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">\n<p id=\"p_17\">              Consideration of the facts show that, indeed, son of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and the deceased; namely, Modak, suffered from a serious eye<\/p>\n<p>ailment. The suicide note was brought to the notice of the Investigating<\/p>\n<p>Agency, however, no investigation in that regard has been conducted.<\/p>\n<p>Contents of the suicide note absolve the petitioner as the same indicate<\/p>\n<p>depressive mental state of the deceased on account of her son&#8217;s eye<\/p>\n<p>ailment. The note has been mentioned even in the statements of witnesses<\/p>\n<p>i.e. relatives of the deceased. While allowing bail to Ishwar Devi alias<\/p>\n<p>Ishwari Devi, the suicide note was taken into account. Allegations in the<\/p>\n<p>FIR against     Ishwar Devi alias Ishwari Devi and the petitioner are<\/p>\n<p>somewhat similar. Three of the persons implicated by the complainant<\/p>\n<p>have been found innocent by the Investigating Agency as no incriminating<\/p>\n<p>material could be collected       against them during investigation.    The<\/p>\n<p>investigation has been concluded and the petitioner is in custody since<\/p>\n<p>18.1.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">              I have also considered that the trial is likely to take<\/p>\n<p>considerable time as an application under <a href=\"\/doc\/1138947\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 319<\/a>, Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure, is pending adjudication and if the same is allowed, de-novo<\/p>\n<p>trial would follow.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">              Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this<\/p>\n<p>petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">              Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court, Hisar.<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">December 10, 2008                                            ( AJAI LAMBA )\nKang                                                                 JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.15998-M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 10, 2008 VIKAS KUMAR &#8230;&#8230;. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA &#8230;. RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Hemant Bassi, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1141,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008"},"wordCount":1141,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008","name":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-02T20:10:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vikas-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}