{"id":260704,"date":"2008-03-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008"},"modified":"2015-07-09T22:28:43","modified_gmt":"2015-07-09T16:58:43","slug":"subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\"> \n\nTI-IE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEMNIK.' _\"'f'ii;~:'iii\"'   \n\n \n\nBETW EEN:\n\nSUBRAMANYA KALAKURA \u00bb I *\nSIC) LAXMINARAYANAKALKURA ''\nAGED ABOUT 49 YEAR3. , = I\" \nRIAT TI-IENKANIDIYUR \\.(II;I-.AG-IE\n\n--.. nnnu\n\nIt-IOTTAIVI POST, UOUPI' T1'='u.-i.:r\\- _ 1;. }\n\n   V.  V\ufb01m\u00e9nrnnnc\n. \u00bb. ' \u00bb_ n-f In 1|-r 1|-nu\n\nI...-,= are : K suauaaaa' \u00a7:+;\"3_1:\u00a7:;AvI-:uz\u00ab.4;2x:::':a5 .=\u00bbI;N.\u00bb-~p\u00bb..\u00abEr.x--_.~.\u00bb\u00bb.arI=;g )\n\n1 THEASLIEERIINTEH-DING'EMT'-INEEQIEITECTRICITY)\nMeescom; .'.*iA,NAGI.0RE \nD\"!r$DI8TRICT~-.'j-._ ,  \n\n2 THEIASSISTANTIENEGIUEFIIIEENGINEER\n\n\ufb01\ufb02ER.A?I0T\u20ac.AN\ufb02 I'.'IAII'ITE.IIIA\"I\"'-3\n\nMascom. UDUPIISUB. DIVISION\n um?! nssrmcgr\n\n\u00e9 V     RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> .(_By_s&#8221;ri : \u00a7I::i{.:(3UI5TAV [ADVOCATE )<\/p>\n<p>I TI-IIS  PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF<br \/>\n.&#8221;&#8216;I-5&#8243;&#8216; &#8216;\\.7\u00bb&#8217;\\.&#8217;.&#8217;:&#8217;I&#8221;s&#8217;u$T~ITIJ ON OF INOIA PRAVIIIG TO QIJASI-I  DETAILED BILL<br \/>\nDATED NIL ISSUED BY R2 VIDE ANNEX.A. AND GONSEQUENTLY THE<br \/>\n\ufb02I.L$*.!-$&#8217;.~$&#8217;.!ED BY THE R  OT: 213.200? VIDE ANNEXB. TO<br \/>\nTHIS WRIT PETITION. &#8216; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">T THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN<br \/>\n&#8216;3&#8217; GROUP, THIS DAY. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>IN THE 1-IIGH COURT 0?&#8217;  A&#8221; wmaazoaa w.::- Na 3 I-&#8216;.&#8221;&#8216;.2&#8243;&#8216;.&#8221;.\ufb01&#8217;.}&#8217;7<\/p>\n<p>INTHEH 0 TO K T TB .. 0. 72\/007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>0 DE<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner, assaiiing the conectnese. 7 <\/p>\n<p>impugned bck billing demand notioe..date_d   K V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>second respondent vide    <\/p>\n<p>2007 vide Annexure B~,.__ has*&#8221;riresented the &#8220;instant <\/p>\n<p>petition.  H V i V<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2. The     it petitioner is a<br \/>\nconsumer    the eiectricity<br \/>\n his residential premises<br \/>\nbearingiM_lg.:F&#8217;   has been paying the said<\/p>\n<p>bilIs_;regLiiariy ascend when they are received;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A  _ :5; vi\u00ab.ii,i&#8217;s~\u00ab.the case of petitioner that, petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>been  electricity bills in the range of Rs.90l- to<\/p>\n<p> 1461-  rnonth from June 2005 to October 2006 and<\/p>\n<p>A fhtihie this nnnaurnnrl-inn nu nrn nf nlu-.+rini-I-u nninu Inn<br \/>\n&#8221; as &#8211;.-u. 0&#8242;!-I so no 1.-mun-n.ar&#8211;rau.u.u u I: can I I u lulu.&#8217; 51 1.; 0.:<\/p>\n<p>fl&#8217; II III III I-IE!<\/p>\n<p>  pe\ufb01tioner. When things stood thus, to the shock and<\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>A<br \/>\n\/<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALDRE W.P.&#8217;No.l l727I20D7<\/p>\n<p>HLEHE HIGH COURT OF KARNATALCA AT ?AN _ALQ-_E W..P-.N\u20ac,!=! 172312007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>surprise of petitioner, on 16&#8243;&#8216; November 2.996 th<\/p>\n<p>a squad<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">-f respondent &#8211; Company&#8217; raided the house of petitio&#8217;ner..u<\/p>\n<p>and when petitioner was on duty at Udupi, as i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>at Udupi Post Of\ufb01ce, the respondents; \u00ab_ it<\/p>\n<p>uniiatereiiy, have issued the  billing..deniian&#8217;d\u00a7inotice<br \/>\nvide Annexure A and :1i:i&#8217;-!_e  eleotrioity bill<br \/>\nVida Annexure B._  of the back<br \/>\npetitioner&#8221; has&#8217;?  itbefore the Appellate<br \/>\nAuthority on  * 5 But, the said appeal was<\/p>\n<p>returned itopppppetitioner  ground that, there is rte<\/p>\n<p> provisi\u00a7ion&#8217;~f*r \ufb01tning-:tn_\u00abepp*ei under Reguiation 4;?.L&#8217;J6 in<\/p>\n<p> reepecti\u00e9of  The same has been intimated to<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00ab .tse&#8217;tt&#8217;:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">petitioner  of communication dated 29&#8243;&#8216; June<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;;&#8217;jhiliing notice and the consequential bill, petitioner<\/p>\n<p>  rushed to this Court and presented the instant writ<\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>\/ -.-.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p>[N     K_A_&#8211;  A- 9 -T B- -&#8216;C-?!&#8217;_u,-&#8216;g-\u00ab_-&#8216;&#8212;;_-;-_1&#8242; &#8220;3 in v _ 5 3 3V1<\/p>\n<p>petition on the around of threat of disconnection of<\/p>\n<p>eiectrici'&#8221;y supply to the instaiiation of petitioner. f i&#8217; =  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">4. l have heard learned counsel  H<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and learned standing :c:ounsa_| 7.appea&#8217;iinVp_: for<\/p>\n<p>.responden&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">5. When this matter tor<br \/>\nfor preliminary hearing   _thisV&#8217;Court has<br \/>\ngranted the interim ordAer,v:l&#8217;_ ijgpondents to<br \/>\nrestore the  _   instaiiation of<br \/>\npetitioner__vsu&#8217;bjeet.;_:.:toV&#8221;  50% of the<br \/>\namount&#8211;i_as._  A and B within two<\/p>\n<p>weeks fromi__4ti1atV&#8217;::!e.teg =  counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p> petu&#8217;t.iz;:{ner&#8217;~ subrnitteci______that. the said&#8217; conditional interim<\/p>\n<p>order Vgranteci,\u00abt:y_this Court has been complied with and<\/p>\n<p>tl1e&#8217;;t.,p&#8221;ti1ev.san\u00a7ie1&#8217;vhas also not been disputed by learned<\/p>\n<p>Sr!!!<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;counsel for res-V&#8217;-nden*..s = Company.<\/p>\n<p> .  After careful evaluation of the entire material<\/p>\n<p>V. jilavailable on record, with speci\ufb01c reference to Annexure<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">7<\/span><br \/>\n__,..\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\n<p>CO 0 T T A .. . 727 7<\/p>\n<p>Qffieer of rape. den. &#8212; Cempeny, i sin of the view.j&#8217;ii&#8217;e_at,<\/p>\n<p>the same is issued behind the back of petiijtinet  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>much as the concerned Of\ufb01cerV.:has..isstiedd&#8217;it<\/p>\n<p>without issuing show cause notioevppasivienviseped <\/p>\n<p>the rete-tent &#8220;revision of the  Conditions  as<br \/>\nthe Eieotrioity Act. Therefore; iiiipof not taking an<br \/>\nappropriate decision and-T-&#8216;by the decision<\/p>\n<p>on the basis: ofethe iialiegired  by the<\/p>\n<p>Of\ufb01eer,  to petitioner, the<br \/>\nimpugned oactbuiing snmt be sustained.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">7. &#8216; Keeping \u00abiittiie\u00a7v&#8212;:ei&#8217;i&#8221;ti1ese factors , without going<\/p>\n<p>into&#8221;   of the case,  would suft\ufb01ce for this<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab_ _ _._1.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\"> Court, .v.\\:Aiiie.8~ppropriate direction is issued, to safeguard<\/p>\n<p>tne&#8217;interesti&#8217;Lof&#8217;A&#8217;i5oth parties.<\/p>\n<p>A {ftheii&#8221;eese, as stated above, the  p&#8217;ti&#8217;tion \ufb01&#8217;eo&#8217; y<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\"> 8. ti:-_-letting regard to the facts and circumsmnoes of<\/p>\n<p>  petitioner is disposed of with the following directions:<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;_____.._.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l 172712007<\/p>\n<p>E [GHCO TOP T A P. .17 7\/ 007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>l] The impugned back billing demand<br \/>\nnotice vide Annexure A issued by   it<\/p>\n<p>respondent is directed to be Heated  &#8211;<br \/>\ncause notice issued to petitioner  .. T? 4&#8242; _<br \/>\nll] Petitioner is permitted to. me deteilfed.  <\/p>\n<p>objections to the show  we notice \u00ab T. <\/p>\n<p>show ceu$ej:&#8217;n_otic\u00a7f3&#8217;\u00a7V&#8217;  from<\/p>\n<p>the\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\"> &#8211;\u00ab   respondent is direci\ufb02<br \/>\nti&#8217;-&#8216;I  to be \ufb01ied by<br \/>\nFletitioner &#8220;iappropriate order, after<br \/>\n &#8221;  ._ &#8216; &#8216;-&#8216;:is}i&#8217;fcrding.&#8217;reesoh\u00a7ble opportunity of hearing to<br \/>\n    ccmpiience<br \/>\nA iegrs\ufb01vprovisicns of the <a href=\"\/doc\/132967048\/\" id=\"a_1\">Electricity Act<\/a> read<br \/>\n&#8221;  .. vi  relevant provision of the Conditions of<br \/>\nA   &#8220;*\u20ac&#8217;;i:pply of Electricity of the Distribution<\/p>\n<p>|._ice.n.-ee-es in t..e State of K-rrr&#8217;t&#8217;i-is and<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>\/________,__..\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l l727f20D&#8217;7<\/p>\n<p>IN THE  COJRT OF KARNATAKA AT T1353&#8242; &#8216; &#8220;&#8221;5 &#8216;Q&#8217;3E;\u00a7&#8217; &#8216;\ufb02.F.Ng.1l7g7i3QOZ<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>diepeee of the same as ex\ufb01editiriusiy as <\/p>\n<p>possibie, at any rate, within a period of el_giit:VV&#8217;:*&lt;<\/p>\n<p>weeks from the date of receipt of objee\ufb01eiee ted it <\/p>\n<p>be \ufb01led by petitioner te   <\/p>\n<p>vide Anneuur A, w&#039;niVch_ is directed mi   it<\/p>\n<p>treated as show cause&quot;&#039;=e?\u00a2tic;e<br \/>\npetitioner.  V A 2<\/p>\n<p>IV] Ftirther, the..eecendt,_ree&#039;_&quot;f\ufb01de*t err<\/p>\n<p>L5:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\"> .. ef i&#8217;eeperide&#8217;ht 1?? Company<\/p>\n<p>the Loc:4-$10<br \/>\nare V &#8221; direct_ed\u00ab:.; :_:neti._   electricity<br \/>\nsu;iaply._ &#8212;  instaliatien of<\/p>\n<p>petitieiieeg&#8221; t,i!!&#8221;tt1e*.see&#8217;.:;i&#8217;ind r&#8221;-pendent takes a<\/p>\n<p> as &#8216;directed bove.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">Sd,\/-E<\/p>\n<p>   H  Iudq\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">IN THE I-HG&#8221; COURT GE&#8217; KA&#8217;n\u20acI\\iA'&#8221;:&#8217;\\KA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.1 172719007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil TI-IE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICEMNIK.&#8217; _&#8221;&#8216;f&#8217;ii;~:&#8217;iii&#8221;&#8216; BETW EEN: SUBRAMANYA KALAKURA \u00bb I * SIC) LAXMINARAYANAKALKURA &#8221; AGED ABOUT 49 YEAR3. , = I&#8221; RIAT TI-IENKANIDIYUR \\.(II;I-.AG-IE &#8211;.. nnnu It-IOTTAIVI POST, UOUPI&#8217; T1&#8217;=&#8217;u.-i.:r\\- _ 1;. } V. V\ufb01m\u00e9nrnnnc . \u00bb. &#8216; \u00bb_ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":975,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008"},"wordCount":975,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008","name":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-09T16:58:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanya-kalakura-vs-the-superintending-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Subramanya Kalakura vs The Superintending &#8230; on 28 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}