{"id":260916,"date":"2008-09-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-28T23:15:10","modified_gmt":"2016-07-28T17:45:10","slug":"dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.G Sabhahit S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">if Co's re,c.':{eo\u00a7\nVicig,\nCmhambe-5\n0'TC\u00a3Q:6'\n\ndHw\\q.n.u8\n\n '\nQsrvsq)\n\n\u00a7i3DGqE\n\nIN THE HIGH CQER? OF KAR\u00a7A%AKA fj'tf\\\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT 9aARwA\u00a7\ufb01 \"\n\nDATED THIS THE 3?\" \ufb02ay my SEQTEMBER 2G\u00a7$ \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR sjsfzcg v;\u00a2;\u00e9AB3&amp;H:T\n\nig\ufb013; ',_\nTHEA\ufb01ON'BLE_MR,JUS$ICEVS5\u00a7\ufb01TYANARAYANA\n'  1w; Nb :9\u00a7$ C? 2005 {SK}\n\nBETw\ufb013N.ff \"\"\n\nDHAN\u00a5AKUMAR,G~KZVA@E'-\n\nAGED.51 YEARS \".'\ns\/o;sULAB'cHANu.\"V\nR\/Q.DR,a;B.3AJJAMNAvAR BUILDING\n\n4\u00a7PRABAT cQLoNY,'HUBL:\n\n.. _____  . . . APPELLANT\n\niay\ufb01a\u00e9zxyw\ufb01s G.R.AN\u00a7AN:MATa, S.S.NERANJAN AND\n\n'Mz$;sU3aAkA0 &amp; CO. ~ ADVS.}\n\n', ANn.\u00a7\n\nK.5,RN35:TAK\u00a7X S?}\u00a7'E'EZ. ROAD TRANSPORT CORPCBREKTEQN\n\n\"RcENTRaL GFFICES, K H ROAD\n\u00b0BANGALGRE~27\n\nREP BY ITS MEJAGING BIRECTOR\n. . . RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">(By Sr: J.M.i\u00a7MEZSi\u00b0\u00a7 MURTHY 5: L.GGVINBR}3xJ- }7&amp;\u00a73V8.E<\/p>\n<p>WRIT RPPEAL FILED U\/S 4 OF THE Kf&#8211;&#8220;-;RNATAKA<br \/>\nHIGH COURT ACT PRAEENG TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER<\/p>\n<p>PASSED :nJ THE WRIT PETITION No.23:4?%i\u00a7\u00a79 D egp<br \/>\n24\/5\/2005. .i &#8216;win &#8216; L<\/p>\n<p>THIS WRIT Appz\ufb01i, coMIme~@\ufb01e&#8217;\u00a3i\ufb01: aeaeime<\/p>\n<p>THIS DAY, sABHAHIeW&#8211;J., ,BELIVER\u00a3DH reg;<\/p>\n<p>FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">VeLJQDGMHT&#8217;.if5Rv%<\/p>\n<p>This ap\ufb01eai iemfiiee by the \u00e9etitioner in<br \/>\nw.P.NO.23247\/Q\ufb01ieeie\ufb01 \u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a2\u00a7ed by the order<br \/>\ndated *2\u00a7j5.\u00e9Q0\u00a7* w\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7ein~ \ufb01ne writ petitien<br \/>\nfilee ef {\ufb01e g\u00e9\ufb01i\ufb01ieneyg challenging the order<br \/>\n\u00a2f&#8221;&#8221;hige%\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7m\u00a7$g\u00a7; _ef\u00a3er helding&#8217; disciplinary<\/p>\n<p>e\ufb01quiry}_iieQnfifmed in appeal, has been<\/p>\n<p>_eonfi:med-an\ufb02-whit petition is rejected.<\/p>\n<p>u&#8221;ie?;_\u00a7he writ petitioner was working as a<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;,iDiVisiQnal Controller ef Bi&#8217;a a: division of<br \/>\n. , 3<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">-J-u<\/p>\n<p>reSpondent&#8211;CQrporation frem 23.6.1992 go<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;, ?.1.i\u00a794. A notification was issued for<\/p>\n<p>eelection \ufb01e the post of drivere on 4.1.1\u00a792<br \/>\nand subsequent1y'&lt;directions were issued fer<\/p>\n<p>appointment of drivers an temporary basis an<\/p>\n<p>\\9Q$<\/p>\n<p>the wzit petitiomeg is befere thiee\ufb01eurt in<\/p>\n<p>this intra Court appeal. J .u._ ,\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3. We have heard the $eerned&#8217;%e0unee1<\/p>\n<p>agpeerinq fer the Va\ufb01pelient. and fiearmeda<\/p>\n<p>couneel appearing fore&#8217; the_*.\u00a3ee\u00a7e\u00a7Qent&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Corporation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">e. The leafeed_eQunsei fer the appellant<\/p>\n<p>s\ufb01bmi\ufb01\ufb01et\ufb01 the: the appeilant was not afferde\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>Smff;eiehtW,&#8217;ope;temit\u00a7r during the enquiry<\/p>\n<p>proeeediegs.} &#8216;The dieeipiinary authority bee<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; net _ceneide\u00a7ed the contentions raised in<\/p>\n<p> Ve:eepenee t0 the shew cause notice ieeued and<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;theeepeeii:e cententioes raised to the effect<\/p>\n<p>t\ufb01etv the selection list made by the writ<\/p>\n<p>A:\u00b0g\u00a7etitioner has been accepted and appointment<\/p>\n<p>erders have been issued to all the caedidaies<br \/>\nas recommended by the petitioner as the<br \/>\nChairman ef the Selection Committee and<br \/>\nwherefere, the irregularity, if any, has been<\/p>\n<p>yaw?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p>.,%\/<\/p>\n<p>condoned by&#8217; the Cerperatien and the lquantum<\/p>\n<p>of punishment is disproportienetei\u00a5ten*the<\/p>\n<p>irregularities found tewhavefbeesfprevedpandx<\/p>\n<p>ordering dismissal ef the writ&lt;\u00a7etit1ener_is.<\/p>\n<p>liable te be seth aside &quot;an\u00e9i the &quot;Ap\u00a7ellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority has also eom\ufb01ited the same mistake.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">4. On the \u00a7th\u00e9\u00a775g\ufb01a; tie learned counsel<br \/>\nfor the ressoneenteberseratien, sumbitted that<br \/>\nsuffieieneie\ufb01\u00e9gg\ufb01ehity has been given te the<br \/>\nagpellane a\u00a7;;ag the eisciplinary enquiry and<br \/>\nall. \u00abthe  E\u00a7\u00aent\u00a7htions raised have been<\/p>\n<p>eQesi\ufb01er&amp;i_hy the Sisciplinary Authority and<\/p>\n<p>lih;.appeal &#8220;ales, all the Contentions raised<br \/>\nl&#8217;u:he\u00a7eLWabeen considered by the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>r_\ufb01utherit\u00a7n and the mere fact that the<\/p>\n<p>res\ufb01endent~Cor\u00a7oration has issued appointment<\/p>\n<p>l ,_e:ders to all the candidates including the<\/p>\n<p>persess who were wrongly selected. According<br \/>\nto the resposdest&#8211;Corperatios, as per the<\/p>\n<p>charge frame\u00e9 against the petitiener would not<\/p>\n<p>K9,)?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>in any way affect the irregularity eemmitted<\/p>\n<p>by the writ petitioner as irre\ufb01elaritiee were<\/p>\n<p>found after the appeintment Verde\ufb01ee;were;<\/p>\n<p>issued.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">5. We have given anxious eeneideretion to<br \/>\nthe cententieng of the ieerned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>pazties,<\/p>\n<p>N6L_Et is eleaf item the perusal ef the<\/p>\n<p>Zmat\u00e9figi c\ufb011.recoej-including tins proceedings<\/p>\n<p>before the diecieiinar eneuirt that there is<br \/>\n2 M  ,  z: 1 )7<\/p>\n<p>_ne \ufb01E\u00a3it~5in7 the contention of the learned<\/p>\n<p>taeeueeel fee&#8221; the appellant that he was not<\/p>\n<p>t-attordee. sufficient epperutnity in the<\/p>\n<p>disciplinary enquiry. The materiai en recerd<\/p>\n<p>weeld clearly&#8217; show; as rightly&#8221; \ufb01eld by&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02flearned Single Judge, that sufficient<\/p>\n<p>opportunity has been afferded to the appellant<br \/>\nand the enquiry held by the authority is just<br \/>\nand fair. However, it ie ciear from the order<\/p>\n<p>passed by&#8217; the disciplinary&#8221; auteorityt dated<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1V\u00a7\\,\\j\u00a7 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">8.l\u20ac.&#8221;}.Ii\u00a798 as aiscs \ufb01he order  the<\/p>\n<p>Appeilata Authority dated 3.5}:993 \u00e9EabH the<\/p>\n<p>sgecific contention z\u00e9iged\ufb02in:th\u00e9&lt;;\u00a7\u00a7iy&quot;giue\ufb01*<\/p>\n<p>to the Disciplinargg  auth@\u00a73\ufb01y* &#039;3\ufb01dV* the<\/p>\n<p>contention raised i\ufb01,the*app\u20acal H\ufb01mo befcre<\/p>\n<p>the Appellatg ,A\ufb01th\u00a2r\u00a3:y t\ufb01ai all the<br \/>\ncandidates seleciwi by f\ufb01\ufb01 appellant as the<\/p>\n<p>Chairman ef \ufb01ha Sale\u00e9\ufb01ig\ufb01 Committee have bae\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>appz\u00e9V\u00e9d &quot;a3d&quot;gappgi\ufb01iment orders have bean<\/p>\n<p>;issu\u00e9d\u00a7_ oh&#039; ,26,3,l993 and wherefoze, tge<\/p>\n<p>ig\ufb01egulaxiiyy ugf &quot;any, has not affected Ehe<\/p>\n<p>_ validity ~Gf  a\ufb01pointmentT of candidates since<\/p>\n<p> \u20ac\ufb01ey&quot; have W$een du1yT appointed a3 per the<\/p>\n<p>V K\u00e9CQm\ufb01\u20acR\ufb01ati0\ufb01 made by the appellant, has not<\/p>\n<p>been \u00a2Gmsidered by the Discipiinary autharity<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9g\ufb02 the Appellate Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">?. The above said cantention is material<br \/>\nin this case as, all the charges said to have<br \/>\nbeam preved pertain. ta irregularity in the<\/p>\n<p>selectimn of candidates. if thare wa\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>as\/&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">\n<p>I2<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">8. There is emrit in the ebe\ufb01e referred<\/p>\n<p>contentien of the learned coensei* fd:~ the<\/p>\n<p>appellant and te that extent the e\u00a7@ef_\u00a7esee\u00a7ut<\/p>\n<p>by the learned _SingIe ,Ju\u00e9ge thee? to aee<\/p>\n<p>modified.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">9. There ie-ee \u00a2\u00e9:1:;:e the contention of<br \/>\nthe 1eereee.ceeneei fet tee eppeilant that the<br \/>\nordeitieE{?3ie@iSeel,jie2 liable to be quashed<br \/>\nwithge\ufb01ite\ufb01itti\ufb01e t5e&#8221;emtte\u00a7 in View of the<\/p>\n<p>decision ef the Hen&#8217;ble Supreme Court in Civil<\/p>\n<p>Appeel we 586?\/reg? (KSRTC W xx;-~ sneee RAMA<\/p>\n<p>g&#8217;R5e\u00a3y} d\u00e9teew21.3.2oe3 and the decision of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;u31y:s\u00a2\u00a7h.eench cf this Court in WA NG.8G88f\u00a76<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;eate\u00e9f15.?.i997. It is Clear frem the order<\/p>\n<p>upaeeed by the Hoe&#8217;bie Supreme Court in KSRTC &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>AA&#8221;=ys W SHREE RAMa. REDDY&#8217;S case that the said<\/p>\n<p>decision is not helpful to the appellant in<\/p>\n<p>the present caee having&#8217; regard to the fact<br \/>\nthat ie the said case, the Hen&#8217;bie Supreme<\/p>\n<p>Court found that the delinquent employee did<\/p>\n<p>\\;;\/3<\/p>\n<p>thazeaft&amp;r,<\/p>\n<p>with law.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">pas$<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>fresh. ord%rs,min w<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008 Author: V.G Sabhahit S.N.Satyanarayana if Co&#8217;s re,c.&#8217;:{eo\u00a7 Vicig, Cmhambe-5 0&#8217;TC\u00a3Q:6&#8242; dHw\\q.n.u8 &#8216; Qsrvsq) \u00a7i3DGqE IN THE HIGH CQER? OF KAR\u00a7A%AKA fj&#8217;tf\\ CIRCUIT BENCH AT 9aARwA\u00a7\ufb01 &#8221; DATED THIS THE 3?&#8221; \ufb02ay my SEQTEMBER 2G\u00a7$ THE HON&#8217;BLE MR sjsfzcg v;\u00a2;\u00e9AB3&amp;H:T [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":965,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008"},"wordCount":965,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008","name":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport ... on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-28T17:45:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanyakumar-g-kivade-vs-karnataka-state-road-transport-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dhanyakumar G Kivade vs Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; on 17 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260916\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}