{"id":26146,"date":"1998-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1998-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998"},"modified":"2018-10-01T09:51:18","modified_gmt":"2018-10-01T04:21:18","slug":"bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","title":{"rendered":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K A Gafoor<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: K A Gafoor<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.<\/p>\n<p>1. The petitioner is admittedly a temporary appointee under Rule<br \/>\n9(a)(i) of the General Rules in the K.S. and S.S.R. against the post of Opthalmic Assistant<br \/>\nin Primary Health Centre, Cherukunnu. Ext. P1 is the appointment order. Ext. P1 shows that<br \/>\nthe appointment is for a period of one year. Temporary appointment can only be for a period<br \/>\nof one year in terms of the said rule, as the post is one existing in paramedical wing in Health<br \/>\nService Department. The petitioner has approached this Court contending that under the<br \/>\nproviso to Rule 9(a)(iii) of the said rules, replacement of temporary appointees shall be in the<br \/>\norder of seniority based on length of temporary service. In other words, as and when<br \/>\ntemporary hand are ousted, persons with longer tenure shall be ousted first in preference to<br \/>\nthose having lesser. The petitioner, therefore, contends that before her temporary service is<br \/>\nterminated, those who are having lengthier service shall be terminated first. The petitioner<br \/>\nalso submits that there is no rank list prepared by the Public Service Commission for regular<br \/>\nappointment to the said post and she is in poor financial condition. The termination of service<br \/>\nwill result in misery to her and her family. Therefore, she shall be continued in service and<br \/>\nshall not be terminated from service otherwise than to accommodate the candidates advised<br \/>\nby P.S.C. If she is terminated otherwise, it would be arbitrary, the petitioner contends. It is<br \/>\nin the above circumstances, the petitioner, has approached this Court seeking a direction<br \/>\nto retain her in service and not to terminate her service except for accommodating P.S.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>hands.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. None of the contentions of the petition can be accepted. As per Rule 9(a)(i) of the General Rules in K.S. &amp; S.S.R., temporary appointments are effected in the exigencies of situation when there is no list prepared by the P.S.C. for regular appointment. According to the said rule, the said appointment can be only for 179 days, except the teaching posts and posts in paramedical wing. In the case of such posts, the period of appointment is limited as one year. It is also provided in Rule 9(a)(i) itself that persons who had one year of appointment cannot be continued or re-appointed in the office under the same appointing authority. That provides a prohibition against continuance of persons more than one year. Moreover, as per Ext. P1 also, the appointment is for a maximum period of one year. In such circumstances, the petitioner cannot, on any count seek continuance beyond the period of one year mentioned in Rule 9(a)(i) or in Ext. P1 appointment order.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Even if there is no list prepared by the P.S.C. for regular appointment, it cannot improve the case of the Petitioner for continuance in service beyond the period of one year. So, the petitioner cannot get a direction for continuance in service or not to tcrmiaate her service except for accommodating P.S.C., hands.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. It is true that proviso to Rule 9(a)(iii) provides that temporary hands having lengthier service shall be ousted first from service in preference to those having lesser length of service. But the lengthier service or lesser length of service shall be counted only within the maximum period of appointment as permissible under Rule 9(a)(i), namely, one year in the case of the post which the petitioner occupies. In other words, the impact of the proviso to Rule 9(a)(iii) is that when there are more incumbents holding temporary appointment and if anyone has to be terminated, it shall be the person which lengthier service among them and such lengthier service has to be taken only within the maximum period of temporary appointment in terms of Rule 9(a)(i), namely, one year. When persons cannot be continued as per the said rule beyond one year, merely because one or two persons arc continuing illegally for more than one year, it cannot be contended that such illegality shall he perpetuated by continuing all the persons like the petitioners. The arbitrariness or discri-mination can be contended only within reference to the permissible limits as per the rules. So, the contention with reference to the proviso to Rule 9(a)(iii) also does not improve the case of the petitioner for continuance in service. It is also submitted that there are no quali-fied hands registered with the Employment Exchange for being appointed against the said post. In such circumstances, the rule also provides that such hands can be re-advised by the employment exchange. So, if there are not sufficient qualified hands for being advised for temporary appointment necessarily, the petitioner will get a re-advise from the exchange.\n<\/p>\n<p>In such circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to any of the reliefs prayed for in the original petition. The original petition fails. Dismissed. No costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 Author: K A Gafoor Bench: K A Gafoor JUDGMENT K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J. 1. The petitioner is admittedly a temporary appointee under Rule 9(a)(i) of the General Rules in the K.S. and S.S.R. against the post of Opthalmic [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998\",\"datePublished\":\"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\"},\"wordCount\":857,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\",\"name\":\"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998","datePublished":"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998"},"wordCount":857,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998","name":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1998-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-01T04:21:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bindhi-b-opthalmic-assistant-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-25-november-1998#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bindhi B. Opthalmic Assistant vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 25 November, 1998"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26146\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}