{"id":261581,"date":"2011-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011"},"modified":"2016-11-15T22:47:29","modified_gmt":"2016-11-15T17:17:29","slug":"g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
no\n\nAND:\n\n \n\n1. M\/s Lakshmi Mallables\n\nPrivate Limited;\n\nA comoarzy registered under the\nCompanies Act<\/a> 1956;\n\nRptd by its Managing Director,\nM.R.Rajath,   \nAged about 35 years, \n\nS\/o late M.Rama<:handra,\n\nNo.144, Nyandahalli, , \nMysore Road, Bangalore ~ 5600'3__9'.~~._p\n\n2. The Commissioner, .  '  \nBangalore Development ADtho--flty,,.  " '\nSankey Road,  " *  ' _  -.\nBangalore ~ 560020. ' Respondents<\/pre>\n
A’ ‘ ‘ ‘ (common)<\/p>\n
(By sri. H.T.Nata4r;a.fg;\u00a7.,.rr.;\u00a7xd.\\?; ‘f<;\u00bb;f"l'\u00a71   " <\/p>\n
MFA 469s::__o,r 2Ut1._V"i's,ffil'ed' uljder section 1<\/a>:34, r\/w
\norder 43..r.ru_l’e’~._1(rj::::..of’-CPC, aga.irlst the order dated
\n23.05.2011 passed on I-.\/3;:~l.\\io 2 in OgS.l\\lo.25383\/2011 on
\nthe file :or ‘-the I\\r’ff\/lsgdldl.”*Qi’ty Civil and Sessions Judge,
\nMayohall ‘unit, ‘B.ang’aiore__,”‘\u00abrestraining the defendants
\ntherein frorhr.i_4nterferEng._xmth the possession of the plaintiff
\nover the. suft sc.hedo’le property and directing the plaintiff<\/p>\n
_._to ma\u00e9rgtam status’—gg__o__Aa,s on order dated in respect of suit\n<\/p>\n
-. s:-:hedrul’e?–.’site’._until such orders that may be passed in
\n‘=_W.A;3522’\/G9’\u00ab.orvp’ending disposal of the suit, whichever is<\/p>\n
eariner, * <\/p>\n
 of 2011 is filed under section 10<\/a>% r\/w<\/p>\n
 -order “43”_ru’le 10″) of CPC, against the order dated\n<\/p>\n
–\u00ab..fg\u00ab._23.05.2C}3,\u00a7* passed on I.A.No.2 in Cl.S.i\\lo.2S384\/2011 on
\n thee” file of the IV’ Addi. City Civil and Sessions Judge;
\n l\u00a5ia3rr0gha1.\u00a7% unit; Barzgaioref restraining the defendants
\n ._jt.here\u00a7r% from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff
\n“‘~,o:.rer the soil: sehedule prooerty aed directing the pfa\u00e9rltiff<\/p>\n
 is earhier.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
therein to maintain status quo as on order dated in respect
\nof suit schedule site until such orders that may be passed<\/p>\n
in W.A.1522\/O9 or pending disposai of the suit, wh,i;ioi.eve_r<\/p>\n
is earlier.\n<\/p>\n
MFA 4702 of 2011 is filed under sec:tio’.’i:i:” M<\/p>\n
order 43 ruie 1(r) of CPC, against: the~V–o.rder”\u00bb.da.ted<\/p>\n
23.05.2911 passed on I.A.i\\io.2 inV-0;’S;-Ngo.;Z53,8S\/’~23ii\ufb02onvng V
\nthe file of the Iv Addl. City Civil an.dAf:3e-ss’ion’s 3v~s;i”d__ge,;-
\nMayohall unit, Bangalore, restrairmug ‘the”.,defend’ant.s’*<\/p>\n
therein from interfering with the\ufb02 possession of\u00bb’thue._plain;tift
\nover the suit schedule properL3{‘a.nd di’re\u00a7:ting “the, plaintiff
\ntherein to maintain status quo ason order’da_ted in’grespect
\nof suit schedule site until suchglo-rders”‘that maiy-.beV passed
\nin W.A.1S22\/O9 or pending: di:f3pos.a”i~Qf,t’he suit, whichever
\nis earlier.   7.  s   <\/p>\n
MFA 4703_oi.__201:i is”fAiie.d”\u00ab.i;’n_de’r”section 1o4<\/a>, i”\/W
\norder 43 rule 13:)’ of”: CPC’, agiai’n’st—-the order dated
\n23.05.2011 _.pas’s.ed-._..ofn “I..A_s_i\\’lo,2′–“in’-\u00abV0.5.i\\io.25386\/2011 on
\nthe file of the.:j_I\\\u00a3 Addi,”‘C,ity”‘\u20ac’ivilg and Sessions Judge,
\nMayohail,i.u,nit;._ ‘Ba:ng_ai–ore,_’ re-straining the defendants
\ntherein from ‘i’nte_rfer’:.ng with the possession of the plaintiff
\nover the.._su:it s.ched”e,.lge.ipropie–rty’and directing the plaintiff
\ntherein tornaintain ‘stjawtuis..g”u’o””as on order dated in respect
\nof suit s<:he'dlulie.Vsit'e_ u'nti'i.i$pch orders that may be passed
\nin WA.1522\/O9._\u00bboi'-pending disposal of the suit, whichever<\/p>\n
.A _lV'lFr7A\\'A\u00ab474:C.i4.__Of 2011 is filed under section 104<\/a>, r\/w<\/p>\n
\u00b0o.rd’er.V’\u00ab*i~3″‘\u00bb..iroiei~s._1j.{r) of CPC; against the order dated<\/p>\n
23;.os..,2o:;:i\u00a7r_p_ass’ea on :.A.No.2 in OISeN@u2S387!f20l1 on
\ntheifiie of.th;e IV Addi. City Civii and Sessions Judge,<\/p>\n
 –Mayoh’aii ‘gunit, Bangaiore, restraining the defendants
\n therein irorn interfering with the possession of the piaintiff
\n “at\/erwoitghe suit schedule property and directing the piaintiff’<\/p>\n
‘  “t-h_eVrein’g.’to maintain status due as on order dated in respect
\n._j_of7:suit”schedtiie site entii such orders that may be passed<\/p>\n
in W.A.1S22\/09 or pending disposal of the suit, whichever
\nis earlier.\n<\/p>\n
MFA 4705 of 2011 is flied under section 1<\/a>‘{34′;—fr;{wv..
\norder 43 rule 1(r) of CPC, against the order’-\u00ab..tl–a__t_edV___”\u00ab_
\n23.05.2011 passed on I.A.No.2 in C).S.No.2S3’\u00e93_8″\/20.1″: org’
\nthe file of the Iv Addl. City Civil and S_e~ssi–<:{ns ";}ud.ge,.__
\nMayohall unit, Bangalore, restrahiing. tije_..dAefe_nda-n.ts
\ntherein from interfering with the possesisioln 'of't.he- p'i'ra'ir-n_tii?\u20ac~
\nover the suit schedule property and,dirfeCting"thepiabintiff "<\/p>\n
therein to maintain status quofas on o'rde'r dated' jinrespiect
\nof suit schedule site untii such-.or'd..ers that 'may be passed
\nin W.A.1522\/09 or pending disposal of the"-suit," whichever
\nis earlier.   –.\n<\/p>\n
MFA 4706 m:2o11″e-\ufb01mdvpndersecnon 104,i7w
\norder 43 rule 1(r) of__CPC., ragairist “th;e” order dated
\n23.05.2011 passed on f_’.A.N’o.;2_iii..jO._.S.’N’n.25389\/2011 on
\nthe file of the” I\\%;.iAddl3; City? Civ._il”a”rtid~=’ Sessions Judge.
\nMayohall ur_>it,” ..__B1an’ga’lo.re_.’ ~.._re’s”tra_ini_ng the defendants
\ntherein from: i_Vnt:%;_rijerin”gwVi’thf_’theposgsession of the plaintiff
\nover the_.s.u.it_ sC_hed:gle prorpeirty’—–\u00bba.nd: directing the plaintiff
\ntherein to mail’r’it’a,in stiatuisttuo as on order dated in respect
\nof suit seheduie s’ite-\u00bb.,ur;\u00bbtil’s.u’i:h orders that may be passed
\nin W.A.15’22\/’O9 or peii.dir;g_”d\u00ab\u00a7sposal of the suit, whichever
\nis earlier. 0′ ” ‘ I  <\/p>\n
..\u00ab’fijhese app”eels_ having been reserved, the Court<\/p>\n
‘idenvereathetpnomnngi<\/p>\n
1″WyiE\ufb01\u20ac0MM0NJUDGMENT<\/p>\n
“‘<App_el'ie.n'ts are the defendants 1 to 4 in the suit\/s<\/p>\n
"":?".:"–..i:n::titute.d'~~-"by the 19' respondent\/piaintiff. The 2""<\/p>\n
..re's_penrdent is the 5" defendant in the stzitfs. For<\/p>\n
E
\n'2<\/p>\n
'V.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb02y\u00bb<\/p>\n
Convenience, the parties woutd be referred te with<\/p>\n
reference to their rank: in the suit\/s.\n<\/p>\n
2. Brief facts of the case are:\n<\/p>\n
(i) The plaintiff is an aiI:dtAEe’e’.ef’..\u00ab sf:}:’eAsV:v[_bVea-Emgv–.’<\/p>\n
Nes.169, 179, 171, 189, 190, 1:9e:L’~~sg’%J:9Je’<\/p>\n
Nagarabhavi 11 Stage lay0ut~,ve.g:.V”ferme’dn.\u00a7h~..S\u00a5:1.Ne’;’i’O\u00a7 of h’ ‘<\/p>\n
Nagarabhavi Vmage, VBa.hgaE\u00aber’e’Noffh_2TaIg\u00abk;–..be the 5″‘<\/p>\n
defendant\/Bangalore DeQeIehr’neh’t  (BDA). The<\/p>\n
possession ofg.st:’zegVVghsa;dIs;t\u00a7\u00a7s]fwefeV\u00a7Teve}:\u00a7re;e?d by the em to
\nthe plaintiff  the sake deeds were
\nexecuf.’ed”{‘   has been registered in
\nthe na:h*.e”e_f ti~.\u00e9::”::’  %<\/p>\n
_ _(ii) The ‘tang Sy.N0g1O3, measuring 2 acres;<\/p>\n
sit-{;je’te\u00bbe,: at NaAge:*e~b\u00abhavi Viiiage, which beionged to the<\/p>\n
 4 was acquired by the Government,<\/p>\n
eu_;%suah:”V4:\u20ac;y3;a Pret\u00e9minary Notification dated 15\u00a7O7.1982<\/p>\n
 and ef\u00e9hai deciaratien dated 16.05.1985. An award was<\/p>\n
 \u00a7:=es’s.ed en 2e.e5.2ee2.\n<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
X,<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
in disoute, wit? be maintained by the appeiiants, invievfg of<\/p>\n
the pehdency of WA Nos. 1490\/2009 and 1522\/zoos;jf;..i_’—_<\/p>\n
6. Sri H.T.Netaraj, iearoed courise! eooejer\u00e9irrg  <\/p>\n
the 1″ resoohdeht, on the other ha:fio>Veo’r’st.e’:3ded~that,_thej_ <\/p>\n
property of the appeiiarits was dVLi~!.,\\,g:”.,\/:1’tquijre.:fi1″\u00a7_;y <\/p>\n
Government for impiementation'”eri{V:’the  theui\u00e9iiliuilx,
\npossession was taken a.nid,oeii_xie’r’eo:’j4toi”B_f\u00a7>A,ithoohyvv\u00e9which,
\nthe BDA formed the  to the
\npfaintiff and  sites was
\ndelivered anci’ the aiiotted sites
\nwas atscf””eXeeog;:.eo’:;:::fi~iV”T the properties was
\nregisterettih piaintiff. Learned counset<\/p>\n
submitted thot..,% in rife h’-\ufb01hi-gr befated we 13028\/2oo7 filed<\/p>\n
 th.e’3″de_fered_antsV”I~to–~4, an exoarte order of statusquo<\/p>\n
.VweerVoasose–o_”o:r:’i~ ::S;.10.2007. However, by an order passed<\/p>\n
on  the piaintiff} which was the 4″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
‘iron the w~rit’\u00abpetition, was permitted to out up Construction,<\/p>\n
  s:\u00e9r\u00a7’.\u00a7ehi”ef.eerfy shows that the oiairit\u00e9ffs is in possession and<\/p>\n
‘V””i.___”‘en;io;ymeht of the suit oroperty, $%r1r:e; the writ petition<\/p>\n
a
\nti:\n<\/p>\n
 Ar
\n”\u00bb,.(x”
\nV” _<\/p>\n
it)
\nwas erroneously allowed, WA 1522\/2009 was filed and the<\/p>\n
order passed by the Learned Single Judge on 2O.i33;2_(jQi\u00a7}’;~.vV<\/p>\n
allowing we 13028\/2007′ was stayed. Learned. <\/p>\n
submitted that, despite the said orde_r,,.the defenda_’hts”ii”‘to  <\/p>\n
4, who are residing in the locality wh’ereii;’nithe’;.ui’t <\/p>\n
is situated, made concerted”l_eif_orts to displossiesvstnthe<\/p>\n
plaintiff from the suit sehedule__:4_t5’rope.rty tj\\,i.lge\\soVrt\u00a7ing to
\nillegal methods and by and muscle
\npower and also their the political
\ninfluence.  the plaintiff,
\nwhich is the high handed and
\niliegal acts of: –4fand their henchmen and<\/p>\n
hence the lstiitfis  to protect the possession<\/p>\n
of the’p’ro,oert;.r, eras lawfully allotted and conveyed<\/p>\n
 thvaea”  \ufb02tezarned counsel submits that; in View of the<\/p>\n
pi’e\u00a7n’ti_i?fllAsa4t’i*sfyinVVgs””the mandatory conditions required for<\/p>\n
 _passir’ig art ‘order of temporary injunction, the Trial Court<\/p>\n
it””7e”tiVoo.nVcc_e>\u00ab:a’rnining the case of the parties, oassed the<\/p>\n
‘” tr2?i’;i:_i;i*\u00abghed order, which in the facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n
.:’_4’thve~–i:ase hetne a just and an eoeitaeie order; does riot sail<\/p>\n
, 55%’
\n‘Q ,7<\/p>\n
ea,
\nJ,
\n\/”\n<\/p>\n
\n
1″}<\/p>\n
5.<\/p>\n
quash the award and the acquisition notifications. Cm<\/p>\n
25.10.2002. an interim order was passed <\/p>\n
13828\/2007 to maintain status–quo. By a <\/p>\n
dated 09.04.2008, the piaintiff; ‘which ;wa\u00bbsf”\u00a7:j~:h’ef 4%”<\/p>\n
respondent in the writ petition, was perm:ittAe\u00bb.ci’ ‘t:o’put]-:;’p=:i;_*i<\/p>\n
Construction, subject to result of the wnt_ petVitio’n’.’ A..;T.heWw:ritVA<\/p>\n
Detition was aiiowed on  Tne aim ruesvponvdent in
\nthe writ petition ques\u20aci\u00e9’;ied’.V:L  “”vs’\u00a7z.ii\u00a7i’~_’\u00bborder in WA
\n152:2.\/zoos. By anVinterimi._orde-t\u00e9\u00e9oait\u00e9\u00e9giVA\u00e93j.”.’i37.20O9, the
\noperation of.4t;i}ie'<   aiiowing WP
\n13028\/zoo?EtugggiV:\u00bbg;\u00a7;\u00a7}:e'g,\ufb027TerpgifBig" questioned in WA
\n1490\/20'i,)x9  the said writ: petition, The<\/p>\n
pendency'o.f4"che  and passing of the said<\/p>\n
V Enteriijriortier i\/vaSV_Vp1'eaded and also brought to the notice<\/p>\n
   Trlioi {:o\u00ab:i_rt. Noticing the said undisputed position,<\/p>\n
 the impugned order\/s has heici as<\/p>\n
V _foiiox%%i'\u00abs:\n<\/p>\n
 .. VoL_”I:1V’e–v’\u00a7exv of fiiing oi’ Writ Appeal 1522\/O9 by the
\nV x  \u00a7.\u00a7\u20actE’\u00a7\ufb01,iff against the order allowing WP ESQESKG? ano
\nstay of operation of the order passed in WP E3928\/QT?<\/p>\n
in ‘EEJF1 EEEZETJEI, it is neeessarv to maintain the stains<\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
injunction against: the appe\ufb01fants\/defendants 1 to 4, from<\/p>\n
interfering with the possession and enjoyment V<_31Vr'.._:t'En1._Ve<\/p>\n
amtted sites by the EDA.\n<\/p>\n
The statement made by Sri C;MyNa.ga’\u00a7;ng:Vs%i*\u00a7\u00a73naVV’itngatt,’,A 2<\/p>\n
the status-qua of the property <\/p>\n
maintained by his clients Le. apvn:\u00e9’i.!nants; :3_t.a2’~.;i:s”v_:r\u00ab\u00e9\u00e9’c:\u00a7i$F\u20acieE:ji.<\/p>\n
No costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda no AND: 1. M\/s Lakshmi Mallables Private Limited; A comoarzy registered under the Companies Act 1956; Rptd by its Managing Director, M.R.Rajath, Aged about 35 years, S\/o late M.Rama<:handra, No.144, Nyandahalli, , Mysore Road, Bangalore ~ 5600'3__9'.~~._p […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-261581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G Channarayappa vs M\\\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1785,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\",\"name\":\"G Channarayappa vs M\\\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G Channarayappa vs M\\\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011"},"wordCount":1785,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011","name":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private ... on 7 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-15T17:17:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-channarayappa-vs-ms-lakshmi-mallables-private-on-7-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G Channarayappa vs M\/S Lakshmi Mallables Private … on 7 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}